Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE RELATİONSHİP BETWEEN HİGH-PERFORMANCE HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTİCES AND INNOVATİVE BEHAVİOR

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 39 Sayı: 1, 228 - 253, 25.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.48070/erciyesakademi.1530236

Öz

While the impact of high-performance human resource practices on employee performance has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years, there is limited research on the effects of these practices on employees innovative behavior In this study, the relationship between high-performance human resource practices and employees innovative behavior was investigated. Data was collected through a survey technique from 218 employees working in medium and large-scale businesses operating in Kayseri. The hypotheses of the study were tested using multiple linear regression analysis. According to the results of the regression analysis, it was found that the talent development, motivation enhancement, and opportunity-enhancing incentivizing practices that constitute high-performance human resource practices are positively related to employees' innovative behavior. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that high-performance human resource practices have a positive impact on employees innovative behavior. By adopting these practices, organizations can enhance their employees innovative potential and achieve sustainable competitive advantage.

Kaynakça

  • Alayoğlu, N. (2010). Rekabet üstünlüğü sağlamada insan kaynakları ve rekabet stratejileri uyumunun önemi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 9(17), s.27-49.
  • Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
  • Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367-403. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
  • Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, S., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
  • Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102-1119. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0470
  • Blau, P. M. (2017). Exchange and Power in Social Life (1. bs). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203792643
  • Boon, C., Jiang, K., Takeuchi, R., & Gong, Y. (2022). Strategic Human Resource Management and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Bordia, S., Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia S. & Tang, R. L. (2017). Effects of resource availability on social exchange relationships: the case of employee psychological contract obligations. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1447- 1471.
  • Bos-Nehles, A. C., Van Riemsdijk, M. J., & Kees Looise, J. (2013). Employee perceptions of line management performance: Applying the AMO theory to explain the effectiveness of line managers’ HRM implementation: Employee perceptions of line management performance. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 861-877. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21578
  • Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2009). Research and theory on high-performance work systems: Progressing the high- involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748- 8583.2008.00082.x
  • Brown, A., Shipton, H., Sparrow, S., & Budhwar, S. (Eds.). (2016). Human Resource Management, Innovation and Performance. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
  • Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & LePine, J. A. (2018). A meta‐analysis of empowerment and voice as transmitters of high‐performance managerial practices to job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(10), 1296-1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2295
  • Choi, W. S., Kang, S. W., & Choi, S. B. (2021). Innovative behavior in the workplace: An empirical study of moderated mediation model of self-efficacy, perceived organizational support, and leader–member exchange. Behavioral Sciences, 11(12), 182.
  • Cole, M. S., Bruch, H., & Vogel, B. (2006). Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(4), 463-484.
  • Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta- analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 501-528.
  • Cropanzano, R. & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exhange theory: An interdiciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
  • Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479-516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099
  • Çalışkan, A., Akkoç, İ., & Turunç, Ö. (2019). Yenilikçi davraniş: bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 94-111.
  • Eisenbeiss, S. A., Van Knippenberg, D., & Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1438.
  • Escribá-Carda, N., Balbastre-Benavent, F., & Canet-Giner, M. T. (2017). Employees’ perceptions of high- performance work systems and innovative behaviour: The role of exploratory learning. European Management Journal, 35(2), 273-281.
  • Evans, A., & Chun, E. (2012). Creating a tipping point: strategic human resources in higher education: ASHE higher education report. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Farazmand, A. (2023). Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer Nature.
  • Guthrie, J. P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: evidence from new zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 180-190. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069345
  • Gürbüz, S. (2021). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi [Structural equation modeling with AMOS]. Seckin Publishing.
  • Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Seckin Publishing.
  • Gürbüz, S., Schaufeli, W. B., Freese, C., & Brouwers, E. P. M. (2024). Fueling creativity: HR practices, work engagement, personality, and autonomy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(22), 3770-3799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2024.2429125
  • Gürlek, M. (2020). Yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları uygulamaları hizmet odaklı örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışını nasıl etkiler? İş tutumlarının aracılık rolü. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 7(1), 59-76.
  • Huang, X., Iun, J., Liu, A., & Gong, Y. (2010). Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non-managerial subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 122-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.636
  • Imran, R., & Al-Ansi, K. S. H. (2019, March). High performance work system, job engagement and innovative work behavior: An exploration in Omani context. In Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Computers in Management and Business (pp. 24-28).
  • İspir, İ., & Yeşil, S. (2020). İnsan kaynakları yönetimi uygulamalarının çalışanların iş tatminine, yenilikçiliğine ve performansına etkisi. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 15(58), 190-209.
  • Jaiswal, D., & Dhar, R. L. (2017). Impact of human resources practices on employee creativity in the hotel industry: The impact of job autonomy. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 16(1), 1-21.
  • Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of management Journal, 55(6), 1264-1294.
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
  • Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of Creativity. İçinde J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (ss. 20-47). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.004
  • Lawler, E. E. (1986). High-involvement management (1st ed). Jossey-Bass.
  • Miao, R., Lu, L., Cao, Y., & Du, Q. (2020). The high-performance work system, employee voice, and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological safety. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1150.
  • Mitchell, R., Obeidat, S., & Bray, M. (2013). The effect of strategic human resource management on organizational performance: The mediating role of high‐performance human resource practices. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 899-921.
  • Mostafa, A. M. S. (2017). High-performance HR practices, positive affect and employee outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(2), 163-176.
  • OECD. (2020). Getting skills right: Workforce innovation to foster positive learning environments in Canada. OECD Publishing.
  • Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2-3), 463-479. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.678
  • Paré, G., & Tremblay, M. (2007). The influence of high-involvement human resources practices, procedural justice, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors on information technology professionals’ turnover intentions. Group & Organization Management, 32(3), 326-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106286875
  • Pelenk, S. E. (2020). İş güvencesizliğinin görev performansına etkisi: yenilikçi davranışın düzenleyici rolü. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(1), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.33905/bseusbed.730234
  • Posthuma, R. A., Campion, M. C., Masimova, M., & Campion, M. A. (2013). A high performance work practices taxonomy: integrating the literature and directing future research. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1184-1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478184
  • Prieto, I. M., & Santana, P. P. M. (2012). Building ambidexterity: The role of human resource practices in the performance of firms from Spain. Human Resource Management, 51(2), 189-211.
  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determınants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy Of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
  • Sezgin, O. B., Uçar, Z., & Duygulu, E. (2015). Güven, yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisinde bilgi paylaşımının aracılık rolü. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 1-1. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.268156
  • Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 558-577.
  • Takeuchi, R., Chen, G., & Lepak, D. S. (2009). Through the looking glass of a social system: Cross-level effects of high-performance work systems on employees’ attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 62, 1–29.
  • Tsai, C. Y., Horng, J. S., Liu, C. H., & Hu, D. C. (2015). Work environment and atmosphere: The role of organizational support in the creativity performance of tourism and hospitality organizations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 46, 26-35.
  • Türkoğlu, İ. (2020). ASEAD 5. uluslararası sosyal bilimler sempozyumu bildiriler kitabı. Astana Yayınları.
  • Wei, Y.-C., Han, T.-S., & Hsu, I.-C. (2010). High-performance HR practices and OCB: A cross-level investigation of a causal path. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 1631–1648.
  • Werner, J. M. (2021). Human resource development: Talent development. Cengage Learning.
  • Whitener, E. M. (2001). Do “high commitment” human resource practices affect employee commitment?: A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of management, 27(5), 515-535.
  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293. https://doi.org/10.2307/258761
  • Yılmaz, H., & Karahan, A. (2015). Yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları yönetimi uygulamaları, psikolojik güçlendirme ve duygusal bağlılık arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi: Tekstil sektöründe bir araştırma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(4), 607.
  • Zhang, Y., Long, L., Wu, T.-Y., & Huang, X. (2015). When is pay for performance related to employee creativity in the Chinese context? The role of guanxi HRM practice, trust in management, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 698–719.
  • Zhong, L. (2013). Effects of high performance human resource practices on employee job performance. Chinese Journal of Management, 10, 993–1033.

YÜKSEK PERFORMANSLI İNSAN KAYNAKLARI UYGULAMALARININ YENİLİKÇİ DAVRANIŞ İLE İLİŞKİSİ

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 39 Sayı: 1, 228 - 253, 25.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.48070/erciyesakademi.1530236

Öz

Yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları uygulamalarının çalışanların performansları üzerindeki etkisi son yıllarda ilgi çeken konulardan birisi olmasına rağmen bu uygulamaların işgörenlerin yenilikçi davranışları üzerindeki etkisine yönelik kısıtlı sayıda araştırma olduğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları uygulamalarının işgörenlerin yenilikçi davranışlarıyla ilişkisi araştırılmıştır. Araştırman hipotezlerini test etmek amacıyla Kayseri’de faaliyet gösteren orta ve büyük ölçekli işletmelerde çalışan 218 işgörenden anket tekniği kullanılarak veri toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın hipotezleri çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre, yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları uygulamalarını oluşturan yetenek geliştirici, motivasyon artırıcı ve olanak artırıcı teşvik edici uygulamalarının işgörenlerin yenilikçi davranışlarıyla olumlu yönde ilişkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları uygulamalarının işgörenlerin yenilikçi davranışları üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi olduğu bu çalışma ile gösterilmiştir. İşletmeler bu uygulamaları benimseyerek işgörenlerin yenilikçilik potansiyelini artırabilir ve sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajı elde edebilirler.

Kaynakça

  • Alayoğlu, N. (2010). Rekabet üstünlüğü sağlamada insan kaynakları ve rekabet stratejileri uyumunun önemi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 9(17), s.27-49.
  • Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
  • Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367-403. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
  • Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, S., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
  • Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102-1119. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0470
  • Blau, P. M. (2017). Exchange and Power in Social Life (1. bs). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203792643
  • Boon, C., Jiang, K., Takeuchi, R., & Gong, Y. (2022). Strategic Human Resource Management and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Bordia, S., Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia S. & Tang, R. L. (2017). Effects of resource availability on social exchange relationships: the case of employee psychological contract obligations. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1447- 1471.
  • Bos-Nehles, A. C., Van Riemsdijk, M. J., & Kees Looise, J. (2013). Employee perceptions of line management performance: Applying the AMO theory to explain the effectiveness of line managers’ HRM implementation: Employee perceptions of line management performance. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 861-877. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21578
  • Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2009). Research and theory on high-performance work systems: Progressing the high- involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748- 8583.2008.00082.x
  • Brown, A., Shipton, H., Sparrow, S., & Budhwar, S. (Eds.). (2016). Human Resource Management, Innovation and Performance. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
  • Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & LePine, J. A. (2018). A meta‐analysis of empowerment and voice as transmitters of high‐performance managerial practices to job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(10), 1296-1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2295
  • Choi, W. S., Kang, S. W., & Choi, S. B. (2021). Innovative behavior in the workplace: An empirical study of moderated mediation model of self-efficacy, perceived organizational support, and leader–member exchange. Behavioral Sciences, 11(12), 182.
  • Cole, M. S., Bruch, H., & Vogel, B. (2006). Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(4), 463-484.
  • Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta- analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 501-528.
  • Cropanzano, R. & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exhange theory: An interdiciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
  • Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479-516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099
  • Çalışkan, A., Akkoç, İ., & Turunç, Ö. (2019). Yenilikçi davraniş: bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 94-111.
  • Eisenbeiss, S. A., Van Knippenberg, D., & Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1438.
  • Escribá-Carda, N., Balbastre-Benavent, F., & Canet-Giner, M. T. (2017). Employees’ perceptions of high- performance work systems and innovative behaviour: The role of exploratory learning. European Management Journal, 35(2), 273-281.
  • Evans, A., & Chun, E. (2012). Creating a tipping point: strategic human resources in higher education: ASHE higher education report. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Farazmand, A. (2023). Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer Nature.
  • Guthrie, J. P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: evidence from new zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 180-190. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069345
  • Gürbüz, S. (2021). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi [Structural equation modeling with AMOS]. Seckin Publishing.
  • Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Seckin Publishing.
  • Gürbüz, S., Schaufeli, W. B., Freese, C., & Brouwers, E. P. M. (2024). Fueling creativity: HR practices, work engagement, personality, and autonomy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(22), 3770-3799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2024.2429125
  • Gürlek, M. (2020). Yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları uygulamaları hizmet odaklı örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışını nasıl etkiler? İş tutumlarının aracılık rolü. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 7(1), 59-76.
  • Huang, X., Iun, J., Liu, A., & Gong, Y. (2010). Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non-managerial subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 122-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.636
  • Imran, R., & Al-Ansi, K. S. H. (2019, March). High performance work system, job engagement and innovative work behavior: An exploration in Omani context. In Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Computers in Management and Business (pp. 24-28).
  • İspir, İ., & Yeşil, S. (2020). İnsan kaynakları yönetimi uygulamalarının çalışanların iş tatminine, yenilikçiliğine ve performansına etkisi. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 15(58), 190-209.
  • Jaiswal, D., & Dhar, R. L. (2017). Impact of human resources practices on employee creativity in the hotel industry: The impact of job autonomy. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 16(1), 1-21.
  • Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of management Journal, 55(6), 1264-1294.
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
  • Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of Creativity. İçinde J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (ss. 20-47). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.004
  • Lawler, E. E. (1986). High-involvement management (1st ed). Jossey-Bass.
  • Miao, R., Lu, L., Cao, Y., & Du, Q. (2020). The high-performance work system, employee voice, and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological safety. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1150.
  • Mitchell, R., Obeidat, S., & Bray, M. (2013). The effect of strategic human resource management on organizational performance: The mediating role of high‐performance human resource practices. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 899-921.
  • Mostafa, A. M. S. (2017). High-performance HR practices, positive affect and employee outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(2), 163-176.
  • OECD. (2020). Getting skills right: Workforce innovation to foster positive learning environments in Canada. OECD Publishing.
  • Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2-3), 463-479. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.678
  • Paré, G., & Tremblay, M. (2007). The influence of high-involvement human resources practices, procedural justice, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors on information technology professionals’ turnover intentions. Group & Organization Management, 32(3), 326-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106286875
  • Pelenk, S. E. (2020). İş güvencesizliğinin görev performansına etkisi: yenilikçi davranışın düzenleyici rolü. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(1), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.33905/bseusbed.730234
  • Posthuma, R. A., Campion, M. C., Masimova, M., & Campion, M. A. (2013). A high performance work practices taxonomy: integrating the literature and directing future research. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1184-1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478184
  • Prieto, I. M., & Santana, P. P. M. (2012). Building ambidexterity: The role of human resource practices in the performance of firms from Spain. Human Resource Management, 51(2), 189-211.
  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determınants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy Of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
  • Sezgin, O. B., Uçar, Z., & Duygulu, E. (2015). Güven, yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisinde bilgi paylaşımının aracılık rolü. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 1-1. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.268156
  • Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 558-577.
  • Takeuchi, R., Chen, G., & Lepak, D. S. (2009). Through the looking glass of a social system: Cross-level effects of high-performance work systems on employees’ attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 62, 1–29.
  • Tsai, C. Y., Horng, J. S., Liu, C. H., & Hu, D. C. (2015). Work environment and atmosphere: The role of organizational support in the creativity performance of tourism and hospitality organizations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 46, 26-35.
  • Türkoğlu, İ. (2020). ASEAD 5. uluslararası sosyal bilimler sempozyumu bildiriler kitabı. Astana Yayınları.
  • Wei, Y.-C., Han, T.-S., & Hsu, I.-C. (2010). High-performance HR practices and OCB: A cross-level investigation of a causal path. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 1631–1648.
  • Werner, J. M. (2021). Human resource development: Talent development. Cengage Learning.
  • Whitener, E. M. (2001). Do “high commitment” human resource practices affect employee commitment?: A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of management, 27(5), 515-535.
  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293. https://doi.org/10.2307/258761
  • Yılmaz, H., & Karahan, A. (2015). Yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları yönetimi uygulamaları, psikolojik güçlendirme ve duygusal bağlılık arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi: Tekstil sektöründe bir araştırma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(4), 607.
  • Zhang, Y., Long, L., Wu, T.-Y., & Huang, X. (2015). When is pay for performance related to employee creativity in the Chinese context? The role of guanxi HRM practice, trust in management, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 698–719.
  • Zhong, L. (2013). Effects of high performance human resource practices on employee job performance. Chinese Journal of Management, 10, 993–1033.
Toplam 58 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Örgütsel Davranış
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Damla Doğan 0009-0005-1408-9266

Ebru Aykan 0000-0003-3537-5235

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Mart 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 18 Eylül 2024
Kabul Tarihi 12 Şubat 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 39 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Doğan, D., & Aykan, E. (2025). YÜKSEK PERFORMANSLI İNSAN KAYNAKLARI UYGULAMALARININ YENİLİKÇİ DAVRANIŞ İLE İLİŞKİSİ. Erciyes Akademi, 39(1), 228-253. https://doi.org/10.48070/erciyesakademi.1530236

ERCİYES AKADEMİ | 2021 | erciyesakademi@erciyes.edu.tr Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-Gayri Ticari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.