Dijital Medya, Fikri Mülkiyet Rejimi ve Özgür Açık Kaynak Yazılıma Eleştirel Bir Bakış

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 813 - 827, 30.07.2024

Yılmaz Alışkan

https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.1434384

Öz

Bu makale, fikri mülkiyet rejiminin dijital ortamda nasıl çalıştığını ve özgür açık kaynak yazılımların dijital alanda rejimin sınırlarını nasıl zorladığını incelemektedir. Bilgi üretim modellerinin katılımcı bir toplum inşa etme sürecinde yaratacağı farkları ortaya koymak bu makalenin temel amacını oluşturmaktadır. Bu makalede, yöntem olarak Michael Gibbons'ın Mode 1 ve Mode 2 teorileri kullanılıyor. Bu teori ışığında bilginin üretimi ve dağıtımındaki güç ilişkileri tartışılıyor. Özgür açık kaynak kodlu yazılımlardaki bilgi üretim modeli, Mod 2 için çarpıcı bir örnektir. Mod 2 modeli, bilgi üretiminde demokratik bir potansiyele sahip olan müştereklere dayalı üretim modeline işaret eder. Dijital medya bilginin serbest akışında kilit bir rol oynadığından, fikri mülkiyet rejimi bilginin internet üzerindeki dolaşımını kontrol etmede zorlanmaktadır. Özgür açık kaynak kodlu yazılım dijital alanda bilginin özgür akışını destekleyenler için etkili bir modeldir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dijital Medya, Fikri Mülkiyet, Dijital Müşterek, Özgür Açık Kaynak Yazılım, Bittorent.

A Critical Look at Digital Media, the Intellectual Property Regime and Free Open Source Software

Öz

This article examines how the intellectual property regime works in digital media and how free open source software is pushing the boundaries of the regime on the digital realm. The main purpose of this article is to highlight the differences that models of knowledge production can make in the process of building a participatory society. This article uses Michael Gibbons' Mode 1 and Mode 2 theories as a method. In the light of this theory, power relations in the production and distribution of knowledge are discussed. The Mode 2 model points to a commons-based model of knowledge production that has a democratic potential. The intellectual property regime is struggling to control the flow of information on the internet. It is quite difficult for the intellectual property rights regime to control the circulation of knowledge on the Internet, as digital media play a key role in the free flow of knowledge. Free open source software is an effective model for those who support the free flow of information in the digital space.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital Media, Intellectual Property, Digital Commons, Free Open Source Software, Bittorent.

Kaynakça

• Aliskan, Y. (2021). Free and open hardware: A critical and thematic analysis of free and open hardware communities RepRap and Arduino. [PhD Thesis, University of Sussex, Falmer, East Sussex, UK]. https://sussex.figshare.com/articles/thesis/Free_and_open_hardware_a_critical_and_thematic_analysis_of_free_and_open_hardware_communities_RepRap_and_Arduino/23482328/1/files/41191265.pdf
• Alışkan, Y. (2023). Hyper-Exploitation in the Hacker Movement. Lexington.
• Bauwens, M. (2005). The Political Economy of Peer Production. https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14464
• Beanty, L. and Sherman, B. (2001). Intellectual Property Law. Oxford University Press.
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1084713807301373
• Berry, D. M. (2008). Copy, rip, burn: The politics of copyleft and open source. Pluto Press.
• Bischoff, P. (2023, Temmuz 19). What is Torrenting? Is it Safe? Is it illegal? Are you likely to be caught? - https://www.comparitech.com/blog/vpn-privacy/is-torrenting-safe-illegal-will-you-be-caught/
• Boyle, J. (2008). The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. Boyle.Yupnet. http://boyle.yupnet.org/
• Castells, M. (2009). The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell
• Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford University Press (UK).
• De Rosnay, M. D. and Musiani, F. (2018). Towards a (de) Centralisation-Based Typology of Peer Production. Triple-C, 16 (2), 835-852.
• Dean, J. (2005). Communicative capitalism: Circulation and the foreclosure of politics. Cultural Politics, 1(1), 51-74.
• Dean, J. (2012). The Communist Horizon. Verso Books.
• Drahos, P., and Braithwaite, J. (2002). Information feudalism: Who owns the knowledge economy. Routledge.
• Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. Routledge.
• Fuchs, C. (2021). Social media: A critical introduction.Sage.
• Gibbons, M. (2013). Mode 1, Mode 2, and Innovation. İçinde Carayannis, Elias (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer.Gibbons, Michael., Limoges, Camille., Nowotny, Helga., Schwartzman, Simon. and
• Trow, Martin. (2010). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage Publication.
• Himanen, P. (2010). The hacker ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age. Random House.
• Internet Stats & Facts (2021).WebsiteSetup - How to Make a Website. Geliş tarihi 03 Mart 2024, gönderen https://websitesetup.org/news/internet-facts-stats/
• Kar, E. (2021). Aristoteles ve Platon’un Bilim Sınıflaması Üzerine. Siirt Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Fikriyat Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1 (2), s.183-192.
• Kostakis, V. (2011). Commons-based peer production and the neo-Weberian state: Synergies and interdependencies. Halduskultuur, 12(2), 146-161.
• Levy, S. (2010). Hackers: Heroes of the computer revolution. O’Reilly Media.
• Marx, K. (1990). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. A Critique of Political Economy. Penguin Books.
• McDonnald, N. (2018). Digital in 2018: World’s internet users pass the 4 billion mark. Wearesocial. https://wearesocial.com/us/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018/
• O’reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & strategies, 1, 17.
• Raymond, E. (2001). The Cathedral And The Bazaar Musings On Linux And Open Source By An Accidental Revolutionary. O’Reilly.
• Rifkin, J. (2014). The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The İnternet Of Things, The Collaborative Commons, And The Eclipse Of Capitalism. St. Martin’s Press.
• Scholz, R. T. (2009). The Internet as Playground and Factory. Routledge. http://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/2094
• Scholz, T. (2016). How platform cooperativism can unleash the network. İçinde T.
• Scholz, & N. Schneider, (Ed.), Ours To Hack And To Own: The Rise Of Platform Cooperativism, A New Vision For The Future Of Work And A Fairer Internet (ss. 19-26). Anthology Selection New York.
• Sekalala, S., Forman, L., Hodgson, T., Mulumba, M., Namyalo-Gafala, H. and Meier, B. M. (2021). Decolonising human rights: how intellectual property laws result in unequal access to the COVID-19 vaccine. BMJ Global Health, 6 (006169), 1-9.
• Stallman, R. (2002). Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays Of Richard M. Stallman. GNU Press.
• Stallman, R. (2004). What is Free Software? - GNU Project—Free Software Foundation. GNU. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html
• Stallman, R. (2018). FLOSS and FOSS - GNU Project—Free Software Foundation. GNU. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/floss-and-foss.en.html
• Stoll, P-T., Busche, J. and Arend, K. (2009). WTO – Trade-Related Aspects ofIntellectual Property Rights. Martınus Nıjhoff Publıshers.The impact of intellectual property regimes on the enjoyment of right to science and culture. (2023). OHCHR. Geliş tarihi 03 Mart 2024, gönderen https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-cultural-rights/impact-intellectual-property-regimes-enjoyment-right-science-and-culture
• Wark, M. (2004). A Hacker Manifesto. Harvard Press.
• Wenbo, Y., Quanyu, W., and Zhenwei, G. (2015). Smart home implementation based on Internet and WiFi technology. 2015 34th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), 9072-9077. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7261075/
• World Internet Users Statistics and 2023 World Population Stats. (t.y.). Geliş tarihi 03 Mart 2024, gönderen https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm