Öğretmen Failliği Üzerine Yapılan Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışma, bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi kullanılarak öğretmen failliği araştırmalarının güncel durumunu ortaya koymayı amaçlamıştır. Araştırma kapsamında nitelikli ve güvenilir makalelere erişim imkânı sunan Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanı kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada RStudio'daki "biblioshiny-bibliometrix" paketi kullanılarak 827 çalışmadan oluşan veri seti anahtar kelime eğilimleri, araştırmaların yıllara göre dağılımı, en çok atıf alan makaleler, akademik üretkenliği en yüksek olan ülkeler, en çok makale yayınlayan dergiler, tekrar eden kelime grupları ve araştırmaların kavramsal, sosyal ve entelektüel yapıları şeklinde bibliyometrik göstergeler ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları öğretmen failliği üzerine yapılan araştırmaların sayısında son yıllarda önemli bir artış olduğunu göstermektedir. Öğretmen failliği ile ilgili en fazla çalışmanın “Teaching and “Teacher Education" dergisinde yayınlandığı tespit edilmiştir. Bu dergiyi sırasıyla "System", "Curriculum Journal", "English Teaching-Practice and Critique" ve "Teachers and Teaching" dergileri takip etmiştir. Öğretmen failliği araştırmalarının büyük çoğunluğunun Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'ndeki akademisyenler tarafından yayınlandığı belirlenmiştir. ABD, Birleşik Krallık ve Çin gibi büyük ve etkili ülkelerin kendi bölgelerindeki diğer ülkelerle daha yoğun iş birlikleri kurdukları tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öğretmen failliği
• bibliyometrik analiz
• faillik
• araştırma eğilimleri

Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Teacher Agency

Abstract

This study aimed to reveal the current status of teacher agency research using bibliometric analysis. The study was conducted using the Web of Science (WoS) database, which provides access to qualified and reliable articles. The data set, consisting of 827 studies, was analyzed using the "biblioshiny-bibliometrix" package in RStudio to examine keyword trends, the distribution of studies by year, the most cited articles, the most academically productive countries, the journals with the most published articles, recurring word groups, and the conceptual, social, and intellectual structures of the studies using bibliometric indicators. The research results showed that there has been a significant increase in the number of studies conducted on teacher agency in recent years. It was determined that the most studies on teacher agency were published in the journal of "Teaching and Teacher Education". This journal was followed by "System", "Curriculum Journal", "English Teaching-Practice and Critique" and "Teachers and Teaching". It was determined that the majority of teacher agency research was published by academics in the United States. It was revealed that large and influential countries such as the USA, UK and China establish more intensive collaborations with other countries in their regions.

Keywords

• Teacher agency
• bibliometric analysis
• agency
• research trends

Kaynakça

1. Acar, S. (2021). Öğretmen failliğinin incelenmesi. Akademik Platform Eğitim ve Değişim Dergisi, 4(2), 195-218.
2. Aşçı, M., & Yıldırım, R. (2020). Öğretmen failliği ile öğretim programına bağlılık arasındaki ilişki: yunus emre ilçesi örneği. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 16(Eğitim ve Toplum Özel sayısı), 6126-6149.
3. Ball, R. (2017). An introduction to bibliometrics: New development and trends. Candos Publishing.
4. Bandura, A. (2001). Social-cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
5. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Karadağ, N., & Gümüş, S. (2021). Kolektif öğretmen yeterliği ile öğretmen failliği arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: Hiyerarşik lineer modelleme (HLM) analizi. Başkent University Journal of Education, 8(1), 160-168.
6. Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545.
7. Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and teaching, 21(6), 624-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
8. Börner, K., Chen, C., ve Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179-255.

9. Calvert, L. (2016). Moving from compliance to agency: What teachers need to make professional learning work. Oxford, OH: Learning Forward and NCTAF.
10. Cobo, M. J., López‐Herrera, A. G., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402.
11. Cong-Lem, N. (2021). Teacher agency: A systematic review of international literature. Issues in Educational Research, 31(3), 718-738. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879231224744
12. Cretu, D.M., & Morandau, F. (2022). Bullying and cyberbullying: a bibliometric analysis of three decades of research in education. Educational Review, 76(2), 371-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2034749
13. Danielewicz, J. (2001). Teaching selves: Identity, pedagogy and teacher education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
14. Deschênes, M., & Parent, S. (2022). Methodology to study teacher agency: A systematic review of the literature. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 2459-2474
15. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
16. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962-1023.
17. Fellnhofer, K. (2019). Toward a taxonomy of entrepreneurship education research literature: A bib- liometric mapping and visualization. Educational Research Review, 27, 28–55. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.edurev.2018.10.002
18. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122, 108–111.
19. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Oxford: Polity Press.
20. Gingras, Y. (2014). Bibliometrics and research evaluation: Uses and abuses. The MIT Press.
21. Hawthorne-Kocak, C. (2021). Investigating the relationship between teacher agency, student engagement, and student achievement (Publication No. 28418460) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Rhode Island]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
22. Heikonen, L., Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., & Soini, T. (2017). Early career teachers’ sense of professional agency in the classroom: Associations with turnover intentions and perceived inadequacy in teacher–student interaction. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2016.1169505
23. Huang, J., & Yip, J. W. (2021). Understanding ESL teachers’ agency in their early years of professional development: A three-layered triadic reciprocity framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 739271. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739271
24. Inden, R. (1990). Imagining India. Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Juutilainen, M., Metsäpelto, R. L., & Poikkeus, A. M. (2018). Becoming agentic teachers: Experiences of the home group approach as a resource for supporting teacher students' agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 116-125.
26. Kandeel, M., Morsy, M. A., Abd El-Lateef, H. M., Marzok, M., El-Beltagi, H. S., Al Khodair, K. M., Soliman, W. E., Albokhadaim, I., & Venugopala, K. N. (2023). A century of “camel research”: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, 1157667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1157667
27. Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and teacher education, 21(8), 899-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.003
28. Li, J., Antonenko, P. D., & Wang, J. (2019). Trends and issues in multimedia learning research in 1996-2016: A bibliometric analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100282
29. Li, L., & Ruppar, A. (2021). Conceptualizing teacher agency for inclusive education: A systematic and international review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(1), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406420926976
30. Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional of Teacher Education, 33, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406420926976
31. Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research 79, 327–365. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325583
32. Oakeshott, M. (1975). On human conduct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2017). Teacher agency and Professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us? Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 318-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1180316
34. Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Soini, T. (2016). Teacher’s Professional agency – a relational approach to teacher learning. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(18), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2016.1181196
35. Poulton, P. (2020). Teacher agency in curriculum reform: The role of assessment in enabling and constraining primary teachers’ agency. Curriculum Perspectives, 40(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-020-00100-w
36. Pranckute, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
37. Priestley, M, Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum (pp.187-206). London: Bloomsbury.
38. Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: What is it and why does it matter? R. Kneyber ve J. Evers (Eds.), Flip the system: Changing education from the bottom up (pp. 134-148). London: Routledge.
39. Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum inquiry, 42(2), 191-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x
40. Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2013). Comprehensive school teachers’ professional agency in large-scale educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 15(3), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-013-9215-8
41. Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2015). Teachers’ Professional agency and learning-from adaption to active modification in the teacher community. Teachers and Teaching, 21(7), 811-830. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.995483
42. Sachs, J. (2000). The activist professional. Journal of Educational Change, 1, 77–94.
43. Sang, G. (2020). Teacher agency. Encyclopedia of Teacher Education, 1–5. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_271-1.
44. Small, H. (1997). Update on science mapping: Creating large document spaces. Scientometrics, 38(2), 275–293.
45. Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2016) What if teachers learn in the classroom? Teacher Development, 20(3), 380-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1149511
46. Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., Toom, A., & Pyhältö, K. (2015) What contributes to first-year student teachers’ sense of professional agency in the classroom? Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 641-659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044326
47. Toom, A., Pietarinen, J., Soini, T., & Pyhältö, K. (2017). How does the learning environment in teacher education cultivate first year student teachers' sense of professional agency in the professional community? Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.013
48. Turnbull, M. (2005). Student teacher professional agency in the practicum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 3, 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660500122116
49. Vaughn, M., & Faircloth, B. (2011). Understanding teacher visioning and agency during literacy instruction. In J. V. Hoffman, D. Shallert, C. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, & B. Maloch (Eds.), 60th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 309–323). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
50. Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629