Understandings of Atmosphere-related Environmental Issues of Pre- and In-Service Teachers in Turkey: The Effects of Major and Gender

Öz

This study aimed to investigate pre- and in-service teachers’ understandings of greenhouse effect, global warming, ozone layer depletion and acid rain in terms of gender and major using a three-tier diagnostic test which has the potential to differentiate respondents with lack of knowledge from those with misconceptions. The data of the research in which survey method was used were collected using “The Atmosphere-related Environmental Problems Diagnostic Test (AREPDiT)”. The sample of the study consisted of 987 respondents (634 pre-service and 353 in-service teachers). The data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA. The results revealed that although males’ AREPDiT mean score was higher than that of their female counterparts, the difference between them was not statistically significant. Also, science and social studies in-service teachers’ understandings of atmospheric environmental issues were significantly higher than that of pre-service teachers with the same majors while there was no a significant difference between pre- and in-service primary teachers’ understandings of atmosphere-related environmental issues. It was found that the participants had some common misconceptions about atmosphere-related environmental issues. Moreover, both pre- and in-service teachers more commonly use informal sources such as the Internet and TV to access environmental knowledge than formal ones such as seminar and book.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Atmosphere-related environmental problems,teacher,gender,major

Proje Numarası

SBA-2015-562

Pre- and In-Service Teachers’ Understandings of Atmosphere-related Environmental Issues: The Effects of Major and Gender

Öz

This study aimed to investigate pre- and in-service teachers’ understandings of the greenhouse effect, global warming, ozone layer depletion, and acid rain in terms of gender and major using a three-tier diagnostic test which has the potential to differentiate respondents with lack of knowledge from those with misconceptions. The data of the research in which the survey method was used were collected using “The Atmosphere-related Environmental Problems Diagnostic Test (AREPDiT).” The sample of the study consisted of 987 respondents (634 pre-service and 353 in-service teachers). The data were analyzed using a three-way ANOVA. The results revealed that although males’ AREPDiT mean score was higher than that of their female counterparts, the difference between them was not statistically significant. Also, science and social studies in-service teachers’ understandings of atmospheric environmental issues were significantly higher than that of pre-service teachers with the same majors, while there was no significant difference between pre- and in-service primary teachers’ understandings of atmosphere-related environmental issues. It was found that the participants had some common misconceptions about atmosphere-related environmental issues. Moreover, both pre- and in-service teachers more commonly use informal sources such as the Internet and TV to access environmental knowledge than formal ones such as seminars and books.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Atmosphere-related environmental problems,Teacher,Gender,Major

Destekleyen Kurum

Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Scientific Research Coordination Unit

Proje Numarası

SBA-2015-562

Teşekkür

I would like to thank the Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Scientific Research Coordination Unit for supporting the research financially.

Kaynakça

1. Acar Sesen, B., & Ince, E. (2010). Internet as a source of misconception. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 94-100.
2. Alp, E., Ertepinar, H., Tekkaya, C., & Yilmaz, A. (2006). A statistical analysis of children’s environmental knowledge and attitudes in Turkey. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(3), 210-223.
3. Arsal, Z. (2010). İlköğretim öğretmen adaylarının sera etkisi i¬le i¬lgili kavram yanılgıları [The greenhouse effect misconceptions of the elementary school teacher candidates]. Elementary Education Online, 9(1), 229-240.
4. Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu, C. & Moseley, C. (2012). A Three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about global warming, greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion, and acid rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667-1686.
5. Becker, L. A. (2000). Effect size. Retrieved from https://www.uv.es/~friasnav/EffectSizeBecker.pdf
6. Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1997). The Environmental impact of cars: children's ideas and reasoning. Environmental Education Research, 3(3), 269-282.
7. Boyes, E., Stanisstreet, M., & Papantoniou, V. S. (1999). The ideas of Greek high school students about the “ozone layer”. Science Education, 83(6), 724-737.
8. Cataloglu, E. (2002). Development and validation of an achievement test in introductory quantum mechanics: the quantum mechanics visualization instrument. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) The Pennsylvania State University

9. Chisnall, P. (1997). Marketing Research, 5th edition. McGraw-Hill, Berkshire, UK.
10. Cordero, E. (2000). Misconceptions in Australian students' understanding of ozone depletion. Critical Studies in Education, 41(2), 85-97.
11. Daskolia, M., Flogaitis, E., & Papageorgiou, E. (2006). Kindergarten teachers’ conceptual framework on the ozone layer depletion. Exploring the associative meanings of a global environmental issue. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 168-178.
12. Dijkstra, E. M., & Goedhart, M. J. (2012). Development and validation of the ACSI: measuring students’ science attitudes, pro-environmental behaviour, climate change attitudes and knowledge. Environmental Education Research, 18(6), 733-749.
13. Dove, J. (1996). Student teacher understanding of the greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion and acid rain. Environmental Education Research, 2(1), 89-100.
14. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas and the learning of science. In: Driver R, Guesne E, Tiberghien A (eds) Children’s ideas in science. Open University Press, Buckingham, pp 1-9
15. Groves, F. H., & Pugh, A. F. (1999). Elementary pre-service teacher perceptions of the greenhouse effect. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 75-81.
16. Gungordu, N., Yalcin-Celik, A., & Kilic, Z. (2017). Students' misconceptions about the ozone layer and the effect of Internet-based media on it. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 7(1), 1-16.
17. Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory. Physics Teacher, 33, 502–506.
18. Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, ınterests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84(2), 180-192.
19. Kaltakci, D. (2012). Development and application of a four-tier misconception test to assess pre-service students’ misconceptions about geometric optics. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
20. Khalid, T. (2001). Pre-service teachers’ misconceptions regarding three environmental issues. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1), 102-120.
21. Khalid, T. (2003). Pre-service high school teachers' perceptions of three environmental phenomena. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 35-50.
22. Kisoglu, M., Gurbuz, H., Erkol, M., Akar, M. S., & Akilli, M. (2010). Prospective Turkish elementary science teachers' knowledge level about the greenhouse effect and their views on environmental education in university. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(2), 217-236.
23. Kolomuc, A., & Tekin, S. (2011). Chemistry teachers’ misconceptions concerning concept of chemical reaction rate. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(2), 84-101.
24. Korkut-Owen, F., Mutlu, T. (2016). Türkiye’de fen bilimleri, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik alanlarının seçiminde cinsiyetler arası farklılıklar [Gender differences on selecting STEM Areas in Turkey]. Education for Life, 30(2), 53-72.
25. Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C. & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for Intermediate Statistics, Use and Interpretation. (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah.
26. Lin, S.-W. (2004). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test for high school students’ understanding of flowering plant growth and development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 175-199.
27. McCright, A. M. (2010). The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment, 32, 66-87.
28. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence based inquiry (6th ed.). New York, Pearson Education. MEB (Ministry of National Education) (2018). Programmes of instruction. Retrieved from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Programlar.aspx
29. Michail, S., Stamou, A. G., & Stamou, G. P. (2007). Greek primary school teachers' understanding of current environmental issues: An exploration of their environmental knowledge and images of nature. Science Education, 91(2), 244-259.
30. Mitra, N. K., Nagaraja, H. S., Ponnudurai, G., & Judson, J. P. (2009). The levels of difficulty and discrimination indices in type a multiple choice questions of pre-clinical semester 1, multidisciplinary summative tests. IeJSME, 3(1), 2-7.
31. Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196.
32. NEETF (2005). Environmental literacy in America: What ten years of NEETF/roper research studies say about environmental literacy in the US. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED522820.pdf
33. Ocal, A., Kisoglu, M., Alas, A., & Gurbuz, H. (2011). Turkish prospective teachers’ understanding and misunderstanding on global warming. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 20(3), 215-226.
34. Papadimitriou, V. (2004). Prospective primary teachers' understanding of climate change, greenhouse effect, and ozone layer depletion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 299-307.
35. Pekel F. O. (2005). High school students' and trainee science teachers' perceptions of ozone layer depletion. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 1(7), 12-21.
36. Pekel, F. O., & Ozay, E. (2005). Turkish high school students' perceptions of ozone layer depletion. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 4(2), 115-123.
37. Perneger, T. V. (1998). What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal, 316, 1236-1238.
38. Ratinen, I. J. (2013). Primary student-teachers' conceptual understanding of the greenhouse effect: a mixed method study. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 929-955.
39. Rye, J. A., & Rubba, P. A. (1998). An exploration of the concept map as an interview tool to facilitate the externalization of students' understandings about global atmospheric change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 521-546.
40. Salehi, S., Nejad, Z. P., Mahmoudi, H., & Burkart, S. (2016). Knowledge of global climate change: view of Iranian university students. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25(3), 226-243.
41. Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (1997). Students' misconceptions in electrochemistry: Current flow in electrolyte solutions and the salt bridge. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(7), 819.
42. Sivek, D. J. (2002). Environmental sensitivity among Wisconsin high school students. Environmental Education Research, 8(2), 155-170.
43. Summers, M., Kruger, C., Childs, A., & Mant, J. (2000). Primary school teachers' understanding of environmental issues: An interview study. Environmental Education Research, 6(4), 293-312.
44. Tsui, C. Y., & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating secondary students’ scientific reasoning in genetics using a two‐tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1073-1098.
45. Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169.
46. Walz, K. A., & Kerr, S. C. (2007). "Holes" in student understanding: addressing prevalent misconceptions regarding atmospheric environmental chemistry. J. Chem. Educ., 84(10), 1693-1696.
47. Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387-398.
48. Xiao, C., & Hong, D. (2017). Gender differences in concerns for the environment among the Chinese public: An update. Society & Natural Resources, 30(6), 782-788.
49. Yalcin, F. A. (2012). Pre-service primary science teachers' understandings of the effect of temperature and pressure on solid–liquid phase transition of water. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 369-377.
50. Yalcin, F. A., & Yalcin, M. (2017). Turkish primary science teacher candidates’ understandings of global warming and ozone layer depletion. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(10), 218-230.
51. Yip, D. Y. (1998). Teachers' misconceptions of the circulatory system. Journal of Biological Education, 32(3), 207-215.