TEKNOLOJİYLE BAĞLANTILI YENİ DAVRANIŞSAL BOZUKLUKLAR / RECENT BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS DUE TO TECHNOLOGY

Öz

Hayatın kolaylaştırılmasını sağlayan teknoloji her geçen gün hayatımızda daha fazla yer edinmektedir. Örneğin akıllı telefonlarla birçok işlem kolayca gerçekleştirilebilmektedir. Ancak akıllı telefonların olumlu yönlerinin yanında olumsuz etkilerinin de olabileceği düşünülmektedir. İnternet kullanımının da yaygınlaşmasıyla cep telefonlarının kötüye kullanımının bağımlılığa yol açabileceği endişesi doğmuştur. Burada söz edilen bağımlılık madde bağımlılığının aksine davranışsal bağımlılıkla ilgilidir. Madde bağımlılığında günlük yaşamda değişikliklerin gözlenebileceği açık bir an varken davranışsal bağımlılıkta sorunların problemli davranışlardan mı, kişilik özelliklerinden mi yoksa diğer psikiyatrik hastalıklardan mı kaynaklandığını belirlemek zordur. Sorunun cep telefonu ya da internet olmadığı; bunların kontrolsüz kullanımının yoksunluk sendromu, depresyon, çevreyle uyumsuzluk, duygu-durum bozukluklarına yol açabileceği son zamanlardaki araştırmaların konusudur. Sosyal medyanın günümüzde yaygın kullanımı sonucu bu gibi sorunlarla ilişkili olan nomofobi, fomo, netlessfobi gibi kavramlar ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu kavramların DSM-5 kriterlerinde davranışsal bozukluk olarak sınıflanması için öneriler sunulmuştur. Özellikle psikoloji, psikiyatri, çocuk ruh sağlığı ve halk sağlığı alanlarını ilgilendiren bu tür sorunların etkilerinin daha iyi anlaşılabilmesi için yeni araştırmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tenkoloji,bağımlılık,nomofobi,sosyal ağlar,davranışsal bozukluklar

RECENT BEHAVIORAL DIORDERS DUE TO TECHNOLOGY

Öz

Technology that eases the life is gaining more and more place in our lives with each day. For example; many activities can be performed easily with smartphones. However, smartphones may have negative effects as well as positive sides. With the widespread use of the Internet, there has been a concern that mobile phone misuse can lead to addiction. This situation is related to behavioral addiction. While there is a clear moment in substance addiction that changes in daily life can be observed, it is difficult to determine whether the problems in behavioral addiction are caused by problematic behaviors, personality traits, or other psychiatric disorders. The issue is not mobile phone or the Internet; it is the subject of recent research that their misuse may lead to withdrawal syndrome, depression, environmental incompatibility, and mood disorders. As a result of the widespread use of social media, concepts such as nomophobia, fomo and netlessphobia have emerged. Suggestions are presented for classifying these concepts as behavioral disorders according to DSM-5 criteria. New researches are needed to better understand the effects of such problems, especially in the fields of psychology, psychiatry, mental health care for children. In our study,
technology related behavioral dependencies have been studied and behavioral disorders that occur in recent years was reviewed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Technology,addiction,nomophobia,social network,behavioral disorders

Kaynakça

1. 1. Bowirrat A, Oscar-Berman M. Relationship between dopaminergic neurotransmission, alcoholism, and reward deficiency syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics - Neuropsychiatric Genetics. 2005;132 B(1):29–37.
2. 2. Bozkurt H, Şahin S, Zoroğlu S. İnternet Bağımlılığı: Güncel Bir Gözden Geçirme. Journal of Contemporary Medicine [Internet]. 2016;6(3). Available from: http://dergipark.gov.tr/doi/10.16899/ctd.66303
3. 3. Blum K, Cull J, Comings E. Biogenetics of reward deficiency syndrome. Sci Am. 1996;84:132–45.
4. 4. Hou H, Jia S, Hu S, Fan R, Sun W, Sun T, et al. Reduced Striatal Dopamine Transporters in People with Internet Addiction Disorder. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology [Internet]. 2012;2012:1–5. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2012/854524/
5. 5. Ko C-H, Liu G-C, Hsiao S, Yen J-Y, Yang M-J, Lin W-C, et al. Brain activities associated with gaming urge of online gaming addiction. Journal of Psychiatric Research [Internet]. 2009 Apr;43(7):739–47. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002239560800229X
6. 6. Han DH, Kim YS, Lee YS, Min KJ, Renshaw PF. Changes in Cue-Induced, Prefrontal Cortex Activity with Video-Game Play. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking [Internet]. 2010 Dec;13(6):655–61. Available from: http://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/cyber.2009.0327
7. 7. Karatay S. Hyperconnectıvıty Kavramı Bağlamında Mobil Sosyal Medya Uygulamaları: Nomofobi Ve Fomo Rahatsızlıklarına Yönelik Bir Araştırma, Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. İstanbul Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü; 2018.
8. 8. Deloitte. Dijitalleşen Hayatımızda Mobil Teknolojilerin Yeri Deloitte Global Mobil Kullanıcı Anketi 2017: Türkiye Yönetici Özeti. İstanbul; 2017.

9. 9. Deloitte. Deloitte Global Mobil Kullanıcı Anketi 2015 Türkiye Yönetici Özeti. 2015.
10. 10. Tavakolizadeh J, Atarodi A, Ahmadpour S, Pourgheisar A. The Prevalence of Excessive Mobile Phone Use and its Relation With Mental Health Status and Demographic Factors Among the Students of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences in 2011 - 2012. Razavi International Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2014 Feb 20;2(1). Available from: http://razavijournal.com/en/articles/57368.html
11. 11. Sánchez-Martínez M, Otero A. Factors Associated with Cell Phone Use in Adolescents in the Community of Madrid (Spain). CyberPsychology & Behavior [Internet]. 2009 Apr;12(2):131–7. Available from: http://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/cpb.2008.0164
12. 12. López-Fernández O, Honrubia-Serrano ML, Freixa-Blanxart M. Adaptación española del “Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale” para población adolescente. Adicciones [Internet]. 2012 Jun 1;24(2):123. Available from: http://www.adicciones.es/index.php/adicciones/article/view/104
13. 13. Leung L. Leisure Boredom, Sensation Seeking, Self-esteem, Addiction Symptoms and Patterns of Mobile Phone Use. Mediated Interpersonal Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from http://www. com …; 2007.
14. 14. Billieux J, Van der Linden M, Rochat L. The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology [Internet]. 2008 Dec;22(9):1195–210. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/acp.1429
15. 15. Igarashi T, Takai J, Yoshida T. Gender differences in social network development via mobile phone text messages: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships [Internet]. 2005 Oct 30;22(5):691–713. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0265407505056492
16. 16. Piqueras JA, Mateu-Martínez O, Carballo JL, Orgilés M, Espada JP. Gender, personality and coping characteristics in the use of internet, mobile and videogames in adolescence/Diferencias de sexo, característica de personalidad y afrontamiento en el uso de internet, el móvil y los videojuegos en la adolescencia. Health and Addictions/Salud y Drogas. 2012;12(1).
17. 17. Demirci K, Akgönül M, Akpinar A. Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions [Internet]. 2015 Jun;4(2):85–92. Available from: http://www.akademiai.com/doi/abs/10.1556/2006.4.2015.010
18. 18. Tekin Ç. Cep Telefonu Problemli Kullanım (Pu) Ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. İnönü Üniversitesi; 2012.
19. 19. Lopez-Fernandez O, Honrubia-Serrano L, Freixa-Blanxart M, Gibson W. Prevalence of Problematic Mobile Phone Use in British Adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking [Internet]. 2014;17(2):91–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0260
20. 20. Haug S, Castro RP, Kwon M, Filler A, Kowatsch T, Schaub MP. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. Journal of Behavioral Addictions [Internet]. 2015 Dec;4(4):299–307. Available from: http://www.akademiai.com/doi/abs/10.1556/2006.4.2015.037
21. 21. Nikhita CS. Prevalence of Mobile Phone Dependence in Secondary School Adolescents. Journal of Clınıcal and Dıagnostıc Research [Internet]. 2015; Available from: http://jcdr.net/article_fulltext.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2015&volume=9&issue=11&page=VC06&issn=0973-709x&id=6803
22. 22. Koo HY. Development of a Cell Phone Addiction Scale for Korean Adolescents. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing [Internet]. 2009;39(6):818. Available from: http://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.4040/jkan.2009.39.6.818
23. 23. Fargues MB, Lusar AC, Jordania CG, Sánchez y XC. Validación de dos escalas breves para evaluar la adicción a Internet y el abuso de móvil. Psicothema. 2009;21(3):480–5.
24. 24. Martinotti G, Villella C, Di Thiene D, Di Nicola M, Bria P, Conte G, et al. Problematic mobile phone use in adolescence: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Public Health [Internet]. 2011;19(6):545–51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-011-0422-6
25. 25. Gutiérrez JDS, de Fonseca FR, Rubio G. Cell-phone addiction: A review. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2016;7(OCT).
26. 26. Young KS. Internet Addiction. American Behavioral Scientist [Internet]. 2004 Dec 27;48(4):402–15. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002764204270278
27. 27. Zhou Y, Zhang X, Liang JC, Tsai CC. The relationship between parents addicted to mobile phone and adolescent addicted to Internet. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computers in Education Japan: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. 2014. p. 484–8.
28. 28. Yen J-Y, Ko C-H, Yen C-F, Wu H-Y, Yang M-J. The comorbid psychiatric symptoms of Internet addiction: attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, social phobia, and hostility. Journal of adolescent health. 2007;41(1):93–8.
29. 29. Hardie E, Tee MY. Excessive Internet use: The role of personality, loneliness and social support networks in Internet Addiction. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society. 2007;5(1).
30. 30. Shapira NA, Goldsmith TD, Keck Jr PE, Khosla UM, McElroy SL. Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use. Journal of affective disorders. 2000;57(1–3):267–72.
31. 31. Polderman TJC, Benyamin B, de Leeuw CA, Sullivan PF, van Bochoven A, Visscher PM, et al. Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics [Internet]. 2015 Jul 18;47(7):702–9. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/ng.3285
32. 32. Li M, Chen J, Li N, Li X. A Twin Study of Problematic Internet Use: Its Heritability and Genetic Association With Effortful Control. Twin Research and Human Genetics [Internet]. 2014 Aug 16;17(4):279–87. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1832427414000322/type/journal_article
33. 33. Hahn E, Reuter M, Spinath FM, Montag C. Internet addiction and its facets: The role of genetics and the relation to self-directedness. Addictive Behaviors [Internet]. 2017 Feb;65:137–46. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306460316303756
34. 34. Young KS. Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the Signs of Internet Addiction--and a Winning Strategy for Recovery. 1st ed. New York: Wiley; 1998.
35. 35. Nichols LA, Nicki R. Development of a Psychometrically Sound Internet Addiction Scale: A Preliminary Step. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors [Internet]. 2004;18(4):381–4. Available from: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0893-164X.18.4.381
36. 36. Lemmens JS, Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Development and Validation of a Game Addiction Scale for Adolescents. Media Psychology [Internet]. 2009 Feb 26;12(1):77–95. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15213260802669458
37. 37. Kutlu M, Savci M, Demir Y, Aysan F. Young internet bağımlılığı testi kısa formunun türkçe uyarlaması: Universite öğrencileri ve ergenlerde geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2016;17:69–76.
38. 38. Günüç S, Kayri M. Türkiye’de İnternet Bağımlılık Profili ve İnternet Bağımlılık Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik-Güvenirlik Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010;39:220–32.
39. 39. Baysak E, Kaya FD, Dalgar I, Candansayar S. Online Game Addiction in a Sample from Turkey: Development and Validation of the Turkish Version of Game Addiction Scale. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni-Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology [Internet]. 2016 Mar 8;26(1):21–31. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.5455/bcp.20150502073016
40. 40. Çaynak BY, Çöl M. internet addiction, depression and other factor in the 1-2-3 year students of a school of medicine. In: 20 Ulusal ve uluslarası halk sağlığı kongresi. Antalya; 2019. p. 1183.
41. 41. Ergin A, Uzun SU, Bozkurt Aİ. Tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinde internet bağımlılığı sıklığı ve etkileyen etmenler. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi. 2013;6(3):134–42.
42. 42. Whang LS-M, Lee S, Chang G. Internet Over-Users’ Psychological Profiles: A Behavior Sampling Analysis on Internet Addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior [Internet]. 2003 Apr;6(2):143–50. Available from: http://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/109493103321640338
43. 43. Adiele I, Olatokun W. Prevalence and determinants of Internet addiction among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior [Internet]. 2014 Feb;31:100–10. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563213003786
44. 44. Lin Y-J, Hsiao RC, Liu T-L, Yen C-F. Bidirectional relationships of psychiatric symptoms with internet addiction in college students: A prospective study. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association [Internet]. 2019 Oct; Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0929664619300075
45. 45. Zhang R, Bai B, Jiang S, Yang S, Zhou Q. Parenting styles and internet addiction in Chinese adolescents: Conscientiousness as a mediator and teacher support as a moderator. Computers in Human Behavior [Internet]. 2019 Dec;101:144–50. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563219302626
46. 46. Alimoradi Z, Lin C-Y, Broström A, Bülow PH, Bajalan Z, Griffiths MD, et al. Internet addiction and sleep problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews [Internet]. 2019 Oct;47:51–61. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1087079219300267
47. 47. Du Y, Jiang W, Vance A. Longer Term Effect of Randomized, Controlled Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Internet Addiction in Adolescent Students in Shanghai. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry [Internet]. 2010 Feb;44(2):129–34. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3109/00048670903282725
48. 48. Sansone RA, Sansone LA. Cell phones: the psychosocial risks. Innovations in clinical neuroscience. 2013;10(1):33.
49. 49. Andreassen CS, Torsheim T, Brunborg GS, Pallesen S. Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale. Psychological Reports [Internet]. 2012 Apr;110(2):501–17. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501-517
50. 50. Toda M, Monden K, Kubo K, Morimoto K. Mobile Phone Dependence and Health-Related Lifestyle of University Students. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal [Internet]. 2006 Jan 1;34(10):1277–84. Available from: http://openurl.ingenta.com/content/xref?genre=article&issn=0301-2212&volume=34&issue=10&spage=1277
51. 51. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Online Social Networking and Addiction—A Review of the Psychological Literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [Internet]. 2011 Aug 29;8(9):3528–52. Available from: http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/8/9/3528
52. 52. Giota KG, Kleftaras G. The role of personality and depression in problematic use of social networking sites in Greece. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace [Internet]. 2013;7(3). Available from: https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4293/3338
53. 53. Augner C, Hacker GW. Associations between problematic mobile phone use and psychological parameters in young adults. International Journal of Public Health [Internet]. 2012 Apr 3;57(2):437–41. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00038-011-0234-z
54. 54. Wu JY-W, Ko H-C, Tung Y-Y, Li C-C. Internet use expectancy for tension reduction and disinhibition mediates the relationship between borderline personality disorder features and Internet addiction among college students – One-year follow-up. Computers in Human Behavior [Internet]. 2016 Feb;55:851–5. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563215301771
55. 55. Talan T, Korkmaz A, Gezer M. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Mobil Telefon Bağımlılık Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi Üzerine. In: Uluslararası Çağdaş Eğitim Araştırmaları Kongresi [Internet]. Muğla: Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi; 2016. p. 424–34. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/31053556/Uluslararası_Çağdaş_Eğitim_Araştırmaları_Tam_Metin_Kitap_Proceedings_of_International_Contemporary_Educational_Research_Congress_2016_Muğla.pdf
56. 56. Nazlıgül MD, Baş S, Akyüz Z, Yorulmaz O. İnternette Oyun Oynama Bozukluğu ve Tedavi Yaklaşımları: Sistematik Bir Gözden Geçirme. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions. 2018;5(1):13–35.
57. 57. Bhattacharya S, Bashar M, Srivastava A, Singh A. NOMOPHOBIA: NO MObile PHone PhoBIA. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care [Internet]. 2019;8(4):1297. Available from: http://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2019/8/4/1297/257106
58. 58. Yıldırım S, Kişioğlu ahmet nesimi. Teknolojinin Getirdiği yeni hastalıklar: Nomofobi, netlessfobi, fomo. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi [Internet]. 2018 Jun 30;25(4):473–80. Available from: http://dergipark.gov.tr/doi/10.17343/sdutfd.380640
59. 59. Kaplan Akıllı G, Gezgin DM. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Nomofobi Düzeyleri ile Farklı Davranış Örüntülerinin Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi Examination of the Relationship Between Nomophobia Levels and Different Behavior Patterns of University Students. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Internet]. 2016 Dec 28;1(40). Available from: http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/maeuefd/article/view/5000200446
60. 60. Dikeç G, Yalnız T, Bektaş B, Turhan A, Çevik S. Ergenlerde Akıllı Telefon Bağımlılığı ve Yalnızlık Arasındaki İlişki. Bağımlılık Dergisi [Internet]. 2017;18(4):103–11. Available from: http://dergipark.gov.tr/bagimli/issue/35459/378915
61. 61. Cheever NA, Rosen LD, Carrier LM, Chavez A. Out of sight is not out of mind: The impact of restricting wireless mobile device use on anxiety levels among low, moderate and high users. Computers in Human Behavior [Internet]. 2014 Aug;37:290–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563214002805
62. 62. Levitas D. Always Connected How Smartphones And Social Keep Us Engaged An IDC Research Report, Sponsored By Facebook [Internet]. Framingham; 2013. Available from: https://www.nu.nl/files/IDC-Facebook Always Connected %281%29.pdf
63. 63. Erdem H, Türen U, Kalkın G, Kalkin G. Mobil Telefon Yoksunluğu Korkusu (Nomofobi) Yayılımı : Türkiye’den Üniversite Öğrencileri ve Kamu Çalışanları Örneklemi. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi. 2017;10(1):1–12.
64. 64. Arpaci I, Baloğlu M, Özteke Kozan Hİ, Kesici Ş. Individual Differences in the Relationship Between Attachment and Nomophobia Among College Students: The Mediating Role of Mindfulness. Journal of Medical Internet Research [Internet]. 2017 Dec 14;19(12):e404. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2017/12/e404/
65. 65. Kim J-H. Smartphone-mediated communication vs. face-to-face interaction: Two routes to social support and problematic use of smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior [Internet]. 2017 Feb;67:282–91. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563216307452
66. 66. King ALS, Valença AM, Silva ACO, Baczynski T, Carvalho MR, Nardi AE. Nomophobia: Dependency on virtual environments or social phobia? Computers in Human Behavior [Internet]. 2013 Jan;29(1):140–4. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563212002282
67. 67. Yildirim C, Sumuer E, Adnan M, Yildirim S. A growing fear: Prevalence of nomophobia among Turkish college students. Information Development. 2016;32(5):1322–31.
68. 68. Franchina V, Vanden Abeele M, van Rooij A, Lo Coco G, De Marez L. Fear of Missing Out as a Predictor of Problematic Social Media Use and Phubbing Behavior among Flemish Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [Internet]. 2018 Oct 22;15(10):2319. Available from: http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2319
69. 69. Przybylski AK, Murayama K, DeHaan CR, Gladwell V. Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior [Internet]. 2013 Jul;29(4):1841–8. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563213000800
70. 70. Dossey L. FOMO, Digital Dementia, and Our Dangerous Experiment. EXPLORE [Internet]. 2014 Mar;10(2):69–73. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1550830713003479
71. 71. Milyavskaya M, Saffran M, Hope N, Koestner R. Fear of missing out: prevalence, dynamics, and consequences of experiencing FOMO. Motivation and Emotion [Internet]. 2018 Oct 17;42(5):725–37. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11031-018-9683-5
72. 72. Beyens I, Frison E, Eggermont S. “I don’t want to miss a thing”: Adolescents’ fear of missing out and its relationship to adolescents’ social needs, Facebook use, and Facebook related stress. Computers in Human Behavior [Internet]. 2016 Nov;64:1–8. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563216304198
73. 73. Gökler ME, Aydin R, Ünal E, Metİntaş S, Çalışmada A, Kaçırma G, et al. Sosyal Ortamlarda Gelişmeleri Kaçırma Korkusu Ölçeğinin Türkçe sürümünün geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg. 2016;17:53–9.
74. 74. GÜNEY B. Dijital Bağımlılığın Dijital Kültüre Dönüşmesi: Netlessfobi. Electronic Journal of New Media [Internet]. 2017 May 1;1(2):207–13. Available from: http://yenimedya.aydin.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ejnm_v01i2108.pdf
75. 75. Avrupa Birliği Eğitim ve Gençlik Programları Merkezi Başkanlığı. Gençlik Programı Şubat 2013 (R1) Başvuru Dönemi Proje Başvuruları Değerlendirme Sonuçları [Internet]. [cited 2019 May 10]. Available from: http://ua.gov.tr/docs/gençlik-programı-haber/genclikprogrami_subat_2013_proje_basvurulari_degerlendirme_sonuclari.xls?sfvrsn=0
76. 76. Öztürk UC. Bağlantıda Kalmak Ya da Kalmamak İşte Tüm Korku Bu: İnternetsiz Kalma Korkusu ve Örgütsel Yansımaları. Journal of International Social Research [Internet]. 2015 Apr 20;8(37):629–629. Available from: http://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/cilt8/sayi37_pdf/4sosyoloji_psikoloji_felsefe/ozturk_umutcan.pdf
77. 77. Fritz L. How Much Digitalization Can a Human Tolerate? In: Conference Proceedings Trends in Business Communication 2016 [Internet]. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2017. p. 107–13. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-658-17254-1_10
78. 78. AKMAN E, IŞIK M. Kamu Çalışanlarında İnternetsiz Kalma Korkusu (Netlessfobi): Isparta İlinde Bir Araştırma. Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi [Internet]. 2018 Oct 15;6(14):20–37. Available from: http://dergipark.gov.tr/doi/10.33692/avrasyad.510600
79. 79. Gökçearslan Ş, Uluyol Ç, Şahin S. Smartphone addiction, cyberloafing, stress and social support among university students: A path analysis. Children and Youth Services Review [Internet]. 2018 Aug;91:47–54. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0190740918301166
80. 80. J-Ho SC, Gan PL, Ramayah T. A Review of the Theories in Cyberloafing Studies. Advanced Science Letters [Internet]. 2017 Sep 1;23(9):9174–6. Available from: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/10.1166/asl.2017.10049
81. 81. Lim VKG, Teo TSH. Prevalence, perceived seriousness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore. Information & Management [Internet]. 2005 Dec;42(8):1081–93. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378720604001600
82. 82. The Council on Surgical and Perioperative Safety. Noise and Distraction [Internet]. [cited 2020 Apr 26]. Available from: http://www.cspsteam.org/21-noise-and-distraction/
83. 83. Wu J, Mei W, Ugrin JC. Student Cyberloafing In and Out of the Classroom in China and the Relationship with Student Performance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking [Internet]. 2018 Mar;21(3):199–204. Available from: http://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/cyber.2017.0397
84. 84. Coker BLS. Workplace Internet Leisure Browsing. Human Performance [Internet]. 2013 Apr;26(2):114–25. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08959285.2013.765878
85. 85. Akbulut Y, Dursun ÖÖ, Dönmez O, Şahin YL. In search of a measure to investigate cyberloafing in educational settings. Computers in Human Behavior [Internet]. 2016 Feb;55:616–25. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S074756321530217X
86. 86. Malarvani T, Ganesh E, Nirmala P, Kumar A, Singh MK. WhatsAppitis : Recent Study on SMS Syndrome. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences. 2014;2(6B):2026–33.
87. 87. Hidalgo Cajo BG, Mayacela Alulema Á, Hidalgo Cajo DP, Hidalgo Cajo IM. El uso de dispositivos electrónicos móviles y su impacto en el incremento de afecciones en los estudiantes universitarios. SATHIRI [Internet]. 2019 Dec 27;14(2):257. Available from: http://revistasdigitales.upec.edu.ec/index.php/sathiri/article/view/906
88. 88. Agten CA, Rosskopf AB, Jonczy M, Brunner F, Pfirrmann CWA, Buck FM. Frequency of inflammatory-like MR imaging findings in asymptomatic fingers of healthy volunteers. Skeletal Radiology [Internet]. 2018 Feb 6;47(2):279–87. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00256-017-2808-1
89. 89. Fernandez-Guerrero IM. “WhatsAppitis.” The Lancet [Internet]. 2014 Mar;383(9922):1040. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673614605195
90. 90. Fong Yong RK, Kaneko Y. Hikikomori, a Phenomenon of Social Withdrawal and Isolation in Young Adults Marked by an Anomic Response to Coping Difficulties: A Qualitative Study Exploring Individual Experiences from First- and Second-Person Perspectives. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine [Internet]. 2016;06(01):1–20. Available from: http://www.scirp.org/journal/doi.aspx?DOI=10.4236/ojpm.2016.61001
91. 91. Wong JCM, Wan MJS, Kroneman L, Kato TA, Lo TW, Wong PW-C, et al. Hikikomori Phenomenon in East Asia: Regional Perspectives, Challenges, and Opportunities for Social Health Agencies. Frontiers in Psychiatry [Internet]. 2019 Jul 23;10. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00512/full
92. 92. Hayakawa K, Kato TA, Watabe M, Teo AR, Horikawa H, Kuwano N, et al. Blood biomarkers of Hikikomori, a severe social withdrawal syndrome. Scientific Reports [Internet]. 2018 Dec 13;8(1):2884. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-21260-w
93. 93. Malagón-Amor Á, Martín-López LM, Córcoles D, González A, Bellsolà M, Teo AR, et al. A 12-month study of the hikikomori syndrome of social withdrawal: Clinical characterization and different subtypes proposal. Psychiatry Research [Internet]. 2018 Dec;270:1039–46. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165178117317341
94. 94. Tanabe N, Hiraoka E, Kataoka J, Naito T, Matsumoto K, Arai J, et al. Wet Beriberi Associated with Hikikomori Syndrome. Journal of General Internal Medicine [Internet]. 2018 Mar 29;33(3):384–7. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11606-017-4208-6
95. 95. Teo AR, Chen JI, Kubo H, Katsuki R, Sato‐Kasai M, Shimokawa N, et al. Development and validation of the 25‐item Hikikomori Questionnaire (HQ‐25). Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences [Internet]. 2018 Oct 27;72(10):780–8. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/pcn.12691
96. 96. Nicolai T, Kirchhof L, Bruns A, Wilson J, Saunders B. The self-Googling phenomenon: Investigating the performance of personalized information resources. First Monday [Internet]. 2009 Dec 7;14(12). Available from: http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2683
97. 97. Paw. Majority of online Americans ‘Google themselves [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2019 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/09/27/majority-of-online-americans-google-themselves/
98. 98. Lee YJ, Hwang J, Lee SI, Woo S-I, Hahn SW, Koh S. Impact of experience of psychiatrists and psychiatry residents regarding electronic communication and social networking on internet use patterns: a questionnaire survey for developing e-professionalism in South Korea. BMC Medical Education [Internet]. 2019 Dec 8;19(1):411. Available from: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-019-1771-z
99. 99. LaPorta LD. Twitter and YouTube: Unexpected Consequences of the Self-Esteem Movement? [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2019 Nov 1]. Available from: https://pro.psychcentral.com/twitter-and-youtube-unexpected-consequences-of-the-self-esteem-movement/
100. 100. Hewitt PL, Flett GL, Turnbull-Donovan W. Perfectionism and suicide potential. British Journal of Clinical Psychology [Internet]. 1992 May;31(2):181–90. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00982.x
101. 101. Kaur S, Maheshwari DSK, Preksha D. Narcissistic Personality and Selfie Taking Behavior among College Students. International Journal of medical and health research. 2018 May 28;3:56–60.
102. 102. Yonetani R, Kitani KM, Sato Y. Ego-Surfing: Person Localization in First-Person Videos Using Ego-Motion Signatures. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [Internet]. 2018 Nov 1;40(11):2749–61. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8103030/
103. 103. SPITZBERG BH. The Tactical Topography of Stalking Victimization and Management. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse [Internet]. 2002 Oct 29;3(4):261–88. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1524838002237330
104. 104. Woodlock D. The Abuse of Technology in Domestic Violence and Stalking. Violence Against Women [Internet]. 2017 Apr 9;23(5):584–602. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077801216646277
105. 105. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of suicide research. 2010;14(3):206–21.
106. 106. Juvonen J, Gross EF. Extending the School Grounds?-Bullying Experiences in Cyberspace. Journal of School Health [Internet]. 2008 Sep;78(9):496–505. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x
107. 107. Allen KP. Off the radar and ubiquitous: Text messaging and its relationship to ‘drama’and cyberbullying in an affluent, academically rigorous US high school. Journal of Youth Studies. 2012;15(1):99–117.
108. 108. Wells M, Mitchell KJ. How do high-risk youth use the Internet? Characteristics and implications for prevention. Child maltreatment. 2008;13(3):227–34.
109. 109. Eterovic-Soric B, Choo K-KR, Ashman H, Mubarak S. Stalking the stalkers – detecting and deterring stalking behaviours using technology: A review. Computers & Security [Internet]. 2017 Sep;70:278–89. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016740481730127X
110. 110. Durak Batigun A, Gor N, Komurcu B, Senkal Erturk I. Cyberchondria Scale (CS): Development, validity and reliability study. Dusunen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences [Internet]. 2018 Jun 29;31:148–62. Available from: http://dusunenadamdergisi.org/ing/Articledetails.aspx?MkID=1250
111. 111. Uzun SU, Zencir M. Reliability and validity study of the Turkish version of cyberchondria severity scale. Current Psychology [Internet]. 2018 Sep 18;20(4):241–6. Available from: http://www.sleepandhypnosis.org/ing/abstract.aspx?MkID=258
112. 112. Barke A, Bleichhardt G, Rief W, Doering BK. The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): German Validation and Development of a Short Form. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine [Internet]. 2016 Oct 1;23(5):595–605. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12529-016-9549-8
113. 113. Altındiş S, İnci MB, Aslan FG, Altındiş M. Üniversite Çalışanlarında Siberkondria Düzeyleri ve İlişkili Faktörlerin İncelenmesi. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi. 2018;8(2):359–70.
114. 114. Olcay S. Dıgıtalızatıon of Socıalızatıon as Socıal Medıa and Gettıng Lost Dısorder ın Photos: Photolurkıng. Electronic Journal of New Media [Internet]. 2018 Jan 5;2(2):90–104. Available from: http://yenimedya.aydin.edu.tr/index.php/ejnm_v02i2104/
115. 115. Khalid H, Dix A. From selective indulgence to engagement: exploratory studies on photolurking. 2010.
116. 116. Team C co. The CrackBerry Story [Internet]. 2007. Available from: https://crackberry.com/crack-team
117. 117. Tekayak HV, Akpınar E. Tıp Alanında Yeni Bir Dönem: Dijital Çağda Doğan Yeni Hastalıklar. Euras J Fam Med. 2017;6(3):93–100.
118. 118. wikimedia. Edit counting [Internet]. [cited 2020 Apr 28]. Available from: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Edit_counting
119. 119. Kumar Goyal A. Studies on Phantom Vibration and Ringing Syndrome among Postgraduate Students. Indian Journal of Community Health. 2015;27(April):35–40.
120. 120. Mohammadbeigi A, Mohammadsalehi N, Moshiri E, Anbari Z, Ahmadi A, Ansari H. The prevalence of phantom vibration/ringing syndromes and their related factors in Iranian’ students of medical sciences. Asian Journal of Psychiatry [Internet]. 2017 Jun;27:76–80. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1876201816302817
121. 121. Lin Y-H, Lin S-H, Li P, Huang W-L, Chen C-Y. Prevalent hallucinations during medical internships: phantom vibration and ringing syndromes. PloS one. 2013;8(6).
122. 122. Rosenberger R. An experiential account of phantom vibration syndrome. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;52:124–31.
123. 123. Rothberg MB, Arora A, Hermann J, Kleppel R, Marie PS, Visintainer P. Phantom vibration syndrome among medical staff: a cross sectional survey. BMJ [Internet]. 2010 Dec 20;341(dec15 2):c6914–c6914. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.c6914