Anterior Cross-Bite’ın Hareketli Apareylerle Tedavisi: Bir Vaka Serisi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 3, 575 - 579, 30.12.2025

Hatice Aydoğdu , Pinar Demir , Beril Demircan , Merve Bilmez Selen

https://doi.org/10.34108/eujhs.1793829

Öz

Ön çapraz kapanış çocuklarda en sık görülen maloklüzyonlardan biridir. Karma dişlenme döneminden daimi dişlenmeye geçişte ark uzunluğu azaldığı için bu problemin çözümü zor olabilir. Ön dişlerinde çapraşıklık şikayetiyle kliniğe başvuran 7-11 yaş aralığındaki (8.6±1.6) 24 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalara hareketli aktif akrilik aparey uygulandı, ayrı cam aksiller darlığı olan 10 hastaya yavaş genişletme uygulandı. Tedaviler ortalama 32±14.6 günde tamamlandı. Çalışmada kullanılan aparey düşük maliyeti, kısa laboratuvar işlemleri ve hasta eğitimine gerek olmaması gibi avantajları nedeniyle tercih edilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı tedavi zamanlamasının önemini vurgulamak ve literature katkıda bulunmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Crossbite , malokluzyon , hareketli aparey , tedavi

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma için etik kurul onayı İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Girişimsel Olmayan Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu'ndan alınmıştır (Tarih: 2021, Sayı: 2733).

Anterior Cross-Bite Treatment with Removable Appliances: A Case Series

Öz

Anterior crossbite is one of the most common malocclusions in children. This problem can be difficult to solve as the arch length decreases during the transition from the mixed dentition to the permanent dentition. 24 patients aged between 7 and 11 (8.6±1.6) who were referred to the clinic with the complaint of crowding in their anterior teeth were included in the study. The removable active acrylic appliance was applied to the patients, additionally, slow expansion was performed in 10 patients with maxillary stenosis. Treatments were completed in an average of 32±14.6 days. The appliance used in the study had been preferred because of its advantages such as low cost, short laboratory procedures, and no need for patient education. The aim of the present study is to underline the importance of treatment timing and to contribute to the literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Crossbite , malocclusion , removable appliance , treatment

Etik Beyan

Ethics committee approval was received for this study from the Health Sciences Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Inonu University (Date: 2021, Number: 2733).

Kaynakça

• Miamoto CB, Marques LS, Abreu LG, Paiva SM. Impact of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite on children’s quality of life. Dent Press J Orthod. 2018;23(1):71-78. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.071-078.oar
• Wiedel AP, Bondemark L. Fixed versus removable orthodontic appliances to correct anterior crossbite in the mixed dentition—a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(2):123-127. doi:10.1093/ejo/cju005
• İlisulu C, Güleç A, Göymen M, Kılıç E. Early interceptive orthodontic treatments: case series. Int J Med Investig. 2019;8(3):104-111.
• Koaban A, Al-Harbi SK, Al-Shehri AZ, et al. Current trends in pediatric orthodontics: a comprehensive review. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e68537. doi:10.7759/cureus.68537
• Jorge JO, Corradi-Dias L, Flores-Mir C, Pordeus IA, Paiva SM, Abreu LG. Comparison between removable and fixed devices for nonskeletal anterior crossbite correction in children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020;20(3):101423. doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101423
• Almarhoumi A, Alwafi MM. Early interceptive correction for anterior crossbite using a removable appliance: a pediatric case study. Cureus. 2024;16(3):e56072. doi:10.7759/cureus.56072
• Prakash P, Durgesh B. Anterior crossbite correction in early mixed dentition period using Catlan’s appliance: a case report. Int Sch Res Notices. 2011;2011:298931. doi:10.5402/2011/298931
• Sunil MM, Zareena MA, Ratheesh MS, Anjana G. Early orthodontic interception of anterior crossbite in mixed dentition. J Int Oral Health. 2017;9(2):88-90. doi:10.4103/jioh.jioh_9_17
• Khalaf K, Mando M. Removable appliances to correct anterior crossbites in the mixed dentition: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2020;78(2):118-125. doi:10.1080/00016357.2019.1657178
• Borrie F, Bearn D. Early correction of anterior crossbites: a systematic review. J Orthod. 2011;38(3):175-184. doi:10.1179/14653121141443
• Sockalingam S, Khan KAM, Kuppusamy E. Interceptive correction of anterior crossbite using short-span wire-fixed orthodontic appliance: a report of three cases. Case Rep Dent. 2018;2018:4323945. doi:10.1155/2018/4323945
• Baskaradoss JK, Geevarghese A, Alsaadi W, et al. The impact of malocclusion on the oral health-related quality of life of 11–14-year-old children. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22:91. doi:10.1186/s12887-022-03127-2
• Taibah SM, Al-Hummayani FM. Effect of malocclusion on the self-esteem of adolescents. J Orthod Sci. 2017;6(4):123. doi:10.4103/jos.JOS_16_17
• Vedovello SA, Zucoloto ML, Deglise KC, et al. Impact of anterior occlusal conditions in the mixed dentition on oral health–related quality of life item levels: a multivariate analysis. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(4):564-570. doi:10.2319/090219-571.1
• Miamoto CB, Marques LS, Abreu LG, Paiva SM. Comparison of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite in the mixed dentition: a randomized trial. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(2):144-150. doi:10.2319/052117-344.1
• Vishnu G, RR. Comparative clinical outcomes in the treatment of anterior crossbite using three different appliances: a case series. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e68703. doi:10.7759/cureus.68703
• Kotadiya J, Fernandes S, Bafna Y, Soni S, Patel J. Anterior crossbite correction with three different approaches: a series of three cases. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2019;7(1):179-184. doi:10.18535/jmscr/v7i1.31
• Sinha A, Mohanty S, Acharya S. Single anterior crossbite correction in mixed dentition using Z-spring along with posterior bite plane: a case report. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020;14(4):8637-8640.
• Lira ALDS, Fonseca GHA. Anterior crossbite malocclusion: prevalence and treatment with a fixed inclined plane orthodontic appliance. Braz J Oral Sci. 2019;18:e191502.
• Ceyhan D, Akdik C. Taking a glance at anterior crossbite in children: case series. ContempClin Dent. 2017;8(4):679-682. doi:10.4103/ccd.ccd_633_17
• Ulusoy AT, Bodrumlu EH. Management of anterior dental crossbite with removable appliances. ContempClin Dent. 2013;4(2):223-226. doi:10.4103/0976-237X.114855
• Miamoto CB, Marques LS, Abreu LG, Paiva SM. Comparison of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite in the mixed dentition: A randomized trial. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(2):144-150. doi:10.2319/052117-344.1
• Neelkanthan S, Vaiude A, Dhonde S, Jawdekar AM, Mistry LN, Pokale S. Correction of single-tooth crossbite in children: a report of three cases. Cureus. 2025;17(7):e88086. doi:10.7759/cureus.88086
• Frankel HW. Treatment of nonskeletal problems in preadolescent children. In: Proffit WR, ed. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2007:433-494.
• Bindayel NA. Simple removable appliances to correct anterior and posterior crossbite in mixed dentition: case report. Saudi Dent J. 2012;24(2):105-113. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2011.12.005
• Dipalma G, Marinelli G, Casamassima L, et al. Effectiveness and Clinical Indications of 2 × 4 Fixed Orthodontic Therapy in Regard to Mixed Dentition: A Systematic Review. Children. 2025;12(7):897. doi:10.3390/children12070897