Invisible Barriers in Academia: A Systematic Review on Glass Ceiling Syndrome

Öz

This study aims to systematically review the articles that address the issue of the glass ceiling syndrome in higher education institutions. The research was conducted using a systematic review method, guided by the PRISMA 2020 and Weight of Evidence (WoE) frameworks. A total of 31 articles, published between 2000 and 2025 and accessed through Web of Science, Scopus, and TRDizin databases, were evaluated and included based on their content relevance. These studies were analyzed in terms of publication year, country of study, research and data collection methods, disciplinary fields, and theoretical frameworks. Additionally, the career barriers faced by women academics, as identified in the studies, were thematically analyzed, and categorized under three main themes: societal, organizational, and individual obstacles. The findings reveal that research on the glass ceiling syndrome has increased significantly in recent years. The studies reviewed were conducted using data from higher education institutions in diverse regions, indicating that the glass ceiling is a global issue. Quantitative studies were found to be more common; however, qualitative, and mixed-method studies contributed significantly to a deeper understanding of the phenomenon. One of the most prominent findings of this study is that the glass ceiling syndrome is a multidimensional issue arising not only from individual factors but also from social and organizational dynamics This systematic review study contributes to the literature by making a comprehensive evaluation in order to better understand the invisible barriers faced by and limiting women in higher education and to increase awareness in the field. Future studies are recommended to adopt stronger theoretical foundations, utilize longitudinal data, and conduct cross-cultural comparative analyses. In addition, institutional improvements by policymakers and university administrations are needed to reduce the barriers faced by women academics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Glass ceiling syndrome
• Women academics
• Career barriers
• Gender inequality
• Higher Education
• Systematic review

AKADEMİDE GÖRÜNMEZ BARİYERLER: CAM TAVAN SENDROMU ÜZERİNE SİSTEMATİK BİR İNCELEME

Öz

Bu çalışmada, yükseköğretim kurumlarında yaşanan cam tavan sendromunu ele alan makalelerin sistematik olarak incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Sistematik derleme yöntemiyle yürütülen araştırmada, PRISMA 2020 ve Weight of Evidence (WoE) çerçeveleri kullanılmıştır. Web of Science, Scopus ve TRDizin veri tabanlarında 2000–2025 yılları arasında yayımlanan çalışmalar taranmış ve içerik uygunluğu açısından değerlendirilerek belirlenen 31 makale incelemeye alınmıştır. Makaleler; yayın yılı, yürütüldüğü ülke, araştırma ve veri toplama yöntemleri, çalışma alanı ve araştırmaların kuramsal çerçeveleri açısından analiz edilmiştir. Ayrıca makalelerdeki kadın akademisyenlerin karşılaştığı kariyer engelleri tematik olarak analiz edilmiş ve bu engeller toplumsal, örgütsel ve bireysel olmak üzere üç ana tema altında sınıflandırılmıştır. Araştırmada elde edilen bulgular, cam tavan sendromunu konu alan çalışmaların özellikle son yıllarda artış gösterdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca incelenen makalelerin dünyanın farklı coğrafyalarındaki yükseköğretim kurumlarından elde edilen verilerle yürütüldüğü ve cam tavan sendromunun küresel ölçekte ortak bir sorun alanı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Yöntem açısından bakıldığında ise nicel araştırmaların sayıca daha fazla olduğu, ancak nitel ve karma yöntemle yürütülen çalışmaların da konunun derinlemesine anlaşılmasına önemli katkılar sunduğu görülmektedir. Öne çıkan bir bulgu olarak, cam tavan sendromunun sadece bireysel değil, aynı zamanda toplumsal ve örgütsel faktörlerden kaynaklanan çok boyutlu bir sorun alanı olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Yapılan sistematik derleme çalışması, yükseköğretimde kadınların karşılaştığı ve onları sınırlayan görünmez bariyerlerin daha iyi anlaşılması ve alandaki farkındalığın artırılması açısından bütüncül bir değerlendirme yaparak alanyazına katkı sunmaktadır. Gelecek çalışmalarda kuramsal temelli araştırmaların artırılması, boylamsal veri kullanımı ve farklı kültürlerde karşılaştırmalı analizlerin yapılması önerilmektedir. Kadın akademisyenlerin yaşadıkları engellerin azaltılabilmesi için politika yapıcılar ve üniversite yönetimlerinin yapacağı iyileştirmelere ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cam tavan sendromu
• Kadın akademisyenler
• Kariyer engelleri
• Cinsiyet eşitsizliği
• Yükseköğretim
• Sistematik derleme

Kaynakça

1. Abelson, J. S., Chartrand, G., Moo, T. A., Moore, M., & Yeo, H. (2016). The climb to break the glass ceiling in surgery: trends in women progressing from medical school to surgical training and academic leadership from 1994 to 2015. American Journal of Surgery, 212(4), 566–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.06.012
2. Abulbaqi Al-Azzawi, A., Upadhyay, M., & Tyagi, N. (2019). Impact of glass ceiling on stress, well-being, self-esteem, effective organizational commitment and job satisfaction among working women. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(4), 11158–11165.
3. Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management science, 58(2), 219–235.
4. Adamu, A. Y. (2023). Barriers to women’s participation in and contribution to leadership in Ethiopian higher education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.7884
5. Ainslie, K. M. (2023). 9 to 5 in academia: addressing barriers for women. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2023 20(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00899
6. Akpinar-Sposito, C. (2013). Career barriers for women executives and the glass ceiling syndrome: The case study comparison between French and Turkish women executives. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.053
7. Ali, R., & Rasheed, A. (2021). Women leaders in Pakistani academia: Challenges and opportunities. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 27(2), 208–231.
8. Altamimi, N. N., Alali, R. A., Eid, H. F., Alhkbani, F. A., & Al-Haqbani, A. A. (2022). Breaking through the glass ceiling: The three-dimensional model (Macro, Meso and Micro) towards promoting women participation in an academic context: Insights from a mixed-methods approach. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 9(2), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2022.02.005

9. Aslan, S., Yeşiltepe, A. ve Öztürk, A. (2024). Prejudice determination of glass ceiling barriers in academicians. Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(1), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1209515
10. Atay, Ö., Gürgen, N. E. ve İmamoğlu, E. (2022). Türkiye'de kadın akademisyenlerde algılanan cam tavan sendromu araştırması. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 170–182.
11. Banker, D. V. (2023). Status of women leadership in the Indian higher education sector. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(3), 662–680. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2022-0216
12. Beyoda-Dorado, C., Garcia-Solarte, M., Pena-Zuniga, J. S., & Buritica, S. A. P. (2019). Entry barriers and “glass roof” in university management in Colombia. Journal of Management, 35(65), 18–35.
13. Bruckmüller, S., Ryan, M. K., Rink, F., & Haslam, S. A. (2014). Beyond the glass ceiling: The glass cliff and its lessons for organizational policy. Social issues and policy review, 8(1), 202–232.
14. Burkinshaw, P., & White, K. (2017). Fixing the women or fixing universities: Women in the leadership. Administrative Sciences, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7030030
15. Bülbül, S. (2021). Glass ceiling in academia revisited: evidence from the higher education system of Turkey. International Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2021.1881872
16. Campbell, S., & LaCost, B. Y. (2010). CLS to higher education administrator: the price they paid. Clinical laboratory science: Journal of the American Society for Medical Technology, 23(3), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.23.3.157
17. Cannito, M., Naldini, M., & Santero, A. (2023). Investigating the glass ceiling in Italian academia. women’s strategies and barriers to career advancement. Sociologica, 17(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/17592
18. Corsi, M., D’Ippoliti, C., & Zacchia, G. (2019). On the evolution of the glass ceiling in Italian academia: The case of economics. Science in Context, 32(4), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889720000046
19. Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect, Social Forces, 80(2), 655–681, https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0091
20. De Paola, M., Ponzo, M., & Scoppa, V. (2018). Are men given priority for top jobs? Investigating the glass ceiling in Italian academia. Journal of Human Capital, 12, 475–503.
21. Diezmann, C., & Grieshaber, S. (2019). Women professors: who makes it and how? Springer.
22. Dominguez, A., & Diez, R. (2022). Gender barriers in academia: Perceptions of inequality in professional development among female academics in the faculty of education, University of Alicante, Spain. Societies, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12060175
23. Eagly, A. H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1380–1383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1380.b
24. Elacqua, T. C., Beehr, T. A., Hansen, C. P., & Webster, J. (2009). Managers’ beliefs about the glass ceiling: Interpersonal and organizational factors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/036168430903300304
25. Eslen-Ziya, H., & Yildirim, T. M. (2022). Perceptions of gendered-challenges in academia: How women academics see gender hierarchies as barriers to achievement. Gender Work Organ, 29, 301–308.
26. Esnard, C., & Grangeiro, R. da R. (2025). Cultural barriers to women’s progression in academic careers: A France-Brazil comparison through the lens of the queen bee phenomena. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,66, 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.13078
27. European Commission. (2019), She figures 2019 – Gender in research and innovation – Statistics and indicators, Publications Office. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9540ffa1-4478-11e9-a8ed01aa75ed71a1/language-en
28. European Commission. (2021). She figures 2021 – Gender in research and innovation – Statistics and indicators, Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/06090
29. Fox Tree, J. E., & Vaid, J. (2022). Why so few, still? Challenges to attracting, advancing, and keeping women faculty of color in academia. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 1–14.
30. Gaudet, S., Marchand, I., Bujaki, M., & Bourgeault, I. L. (2022). Women and gender equity in academia through the conceptual lens of care. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1944848
31. Gough, D. (2007). Weight of evidence: A framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Research Papers in Education, 22(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296189
32. Hocaoğlu, M., Tükenmez, A. ve Donuk, B. (2022). Akademisyenlerde cam tavan sendromu üzerine bir araştırma: Spor bilimleri fakülteleri örneği. Uluslararasi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(25).
33. Howe-Walsh, L., & Turnbull, S. (2014). Barriers to women leaders in academia: tales from science and technology. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.929102
34. Kafes, M. (2019). Türkiye’de kadınların maruz kaldığı cam tavan davranışı üzerine sağlık kurumlarında yapılmış çalışmaların bir incelemesi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 25–30.
35. Karaözkök, İ. N. (2024). Kadın akademisyenler üzerindeki “cam tavan” sendromu: Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi örneği. Enderun, 8(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.59274/enderun.1451330
36. Kulik, C., & Rae, B. (2019). The glass ceiling in organizations. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. https://oxfordre.com/business/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-41
37. Lee, S. M. (2002). Do Asian American faculty face a glass ceiling in higher education? Source: American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 695-724.
38. Leišytė, L., Pekşen, S., & Tönnes, L. (2022). The influence of a university’s HRM practices on women academics’ progression to management positions. Source: Journal of East European Management Studies, 27(4), 662–685. https://doi.org/10.2307/27295035
39. Luke, C. (2002). Globalization and women in southeast Asian higher education management. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 625–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00174
40. Medina, T., Plotnikov, Y., & Zagoruiko, L. (2021). Women academics in Ukrainian tertiary education: Gendered image of occupational segregation. Technology and Society (BRAJETS) 14,(Special Edition), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v14.se1.2021
41. Mizrahi, R. ve Aracı, H. (2010). Kadın yöneticiler ve cam tavan sendromu üzerine bir araştırma. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, III(1), 149–156.
42. Morrison, A. M., White, R. P., & Van Velsor, E. (1987). Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of america's largestcorporations?. Pearson Education.
43. Özyer, K. ve Orhan, U. (2012). Cam tavan sendromunun çalışanların korku düzeylerine etkisi var mıdır? Eğitim sektörü üzerinde bir uygulama. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 5(8), 971–987.
44. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. (N. Çınar ve G. Hür, Çev.) BMJ
45. Palma, S. L. D., & Topper, G. G. (2001). Social work academia: Is the glass ceiling beginning to crack? Affilia Spring, 16(1), 31–45.
46. Pilkina, M. (2024). What are the differences in perception of gender disparities in academia? A survey of academics from Russia. Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, 1(3), 88–109. https://doi.org/10.17323/VO-2024-16871
47. Powell, G. N., & Graves, L. M. (2003). Women and men in management (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. Purcell, D., MacArthur, K. R., & Samblanet, S. (2010). Gender and the glass ceiling at work. Sociology Compass, 4(9), 705–717.
48. Roberto, F., Rey, A., Maglio, R., & Agliata, F. (2020). The academic “glass-ceiling”: investigating the increase of female academicians in Italy. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 28(5), 1031–1054.
49. Schwartz, F. N. (2006). Kadınlar: İş yaşamının kaçınılmaz bir buyruğu. İçinde: iş yaşamında kadınlar. Harvard Business Review (L. Aslan, Çev. pp. 161–185). MESS.
50. Suğur, S., ve Cangöz, İ. (2016). Üniversite yönetiminde kadınların eksik temsili üzerinde toplumsal cinsiyet ilişkilerinin rolü. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 49(3), 89–115.
51. Tahtalıoğlu, H., ve Özgür, H. (2020a). Türkiye’de akademisyenlerin idari görevlerine dair “cam tavan” algısı ölçeği geliştirme. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(4), 809–823. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.735898
52. Tahtalıoğlu, H., ve Özgür, H. (2020b). Türkiye’nin yükseköğretim kurumlarında akademisyenlerin idari görevleri açısından cam tavan algısı üzerine bir araştırma. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 41, 166–190. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.655549
53. Toader, A., & Dahinden, J. (2018). Family configurations and arrangements in the transnational mobility of early–career academics: Does gender make twice the difference? Migration Letters, 15(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v15i1.339
54. United Nations. (2015). Global Sustainable Development Report. UNDESA. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1870GSDR%202015%20Briefs.pdf
55. U.S. Glass Ceiling Commission (1995). Good for business: Making full use of the Nation’s human capital. Government Printing Office.
56. van Veelen, R., & Derks, B. (2022). Equal representation does not mean equal opportunity: Women academics perceive a thicker glass ceiling in social and behavioral fields than in the natural sciences and economics. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.790211
57. Williams, J. C. (2005). The glass ceiling and the maternal wall in academia. New Directions for Higher Education, 130, 91–105.
58. Xiao, Y., Pinkney, E., Li, T., & Yip, P. S. F. (2023). Breaking through the glass ceiling: unveiling women’s representation by gender and race in the higher education hierarchy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599–023-02481-5
59. Yanar, N. ve Akpınar, Ö. (2023). Kadın akademisyenlerin cam tavan sendromundaki metaforik algıları. Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.38021/asbid.1269776
60. Yavuz Eroğlu, S. ve Özoruç, S. (2024). Kadın akademisyenlerin cam tavan sendromuna ilişkin görüşleri. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(58), 1852–1869.
61. Yıldız, S., Alhas, F., Sakal, Ö. ve Yıldız, H. (2016). Cam uçurum: Kadın yöneticiler cam tavanı ne zaman aşar?. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 71(4), 1119–1146. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002425
62. Yükseköğretim Kurulu [YÖK]. (2025). “Eğitim-öğretim istatistikleri”. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Resmi İstatistik Sayfası. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/