TÜRKİYE’DE İŞ İNSANLARININ ÖRGÜTLER ARASI SOSYAL AĞLARI VE AĞLARA KATILIM GEREKÇELERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Öz

Bu çalışmada örgütsel ağ düzeneklerine dair oluşan geniş yazına dayanarak, Türkiye’deki girişimci aktörlerin hangi formel ve informel ağlara sahip oldukları ve bu ağlar içinde bulunma nedenlerinin tespiti amaçlanmıştır. İş insanları arasındaki ilişkisel süreçler incelenmiş, gözlem ve anket gibi niceliksel araştırma yöntemleri benimsenmiştir. Araştırmanın evrenini, İSO Türkiye’nin ilk 500 sanayi kuruluşu 2019 yılı listesinde yer alan büyük sanayi kuruluşlarından kasti örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen 156 büyük sanayi kuruluşu ve bu sanayi kuruluşlarının 257 iş insanı oluşturmaktadır. İş insanlarının sosyal ağ verilerinin analizi için Ucinet 6 ve bu iş insanlarının ağlara katılım nedenlerine ilişkin verilerin analizinde ise SPSS 13 yazılım programları kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın amacı doğrultusunda yapılan analizler sonucunda Türk girişimcilerin sahip oldukları ağ ilişkileri ve ağlara katılım nedenlerinin ülke bağlamına özgü özellikler taşıyabildiği tespit edilmiştir. Türkiye bağlamında işletme organizasyonlarını temsil eden iş insanlarının katıldıkları sosyal ağların niteliğinin ve bu ağlara dahil olma amaçlarının sosyal ağ kuramının geliştirildiği ve ağırlıkla araştırıldığı Anglo Sakson kültürüne dahil ülkelerden farklı sonuçlar ürettiği tespit edilmiştir. İş insanlarının sosyal ağlara katılma gerekçelerinde gözlemlenen ve beklenen değişkenlikler, sosyal yerleşiklik kuramı çerçevesinde paralellik arz ettiği tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ağ
• Örgütler Arası Ağlar
• Sosyal Ağlar
• Stratejik Ağlar

A RESEARCH ON THE INTER ORGANIZATIONAL SOCIAL NETWORKS OF BUSINESS PEOPLE IN TURKEY AND THE REASONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN NETWORKS

Öz

In this study, based on the extensive literature on organizational network mechanisms, it is aimed to determine which formal and informal networks the entrepreneurial actors in Turkey have and the reasons for being in these networks. Relational processes among business people were examined, and quantitative research methods such as observation and survey were adopted. The universe of the research consists of 156 large industrial enterprises and 257 business people of these industrial enterprises, selected by deliberate sampling method from the large industrial enterprises included in the list of ISO Turkey's top 500 industrial enterprises in 2019. Ucinet 6 software programs were used for the analysis of the social network data of business people and SPSS 13 software programs were used for the analysis of the data on the reasons for the participation of these business people in the networks. As a result of the analyzes made in line with the purpose of the research, it has been determined that the network relations of Turkish entrepreneurs and the reasons for their participation in networks may have characteristics specific to the country context. It has been determined that the nature of the social networks that business people representing business organizations participate in and the purposes of being included in these networks in the context of Turkey produce different results from countries included in the Anglo Saxon culture, where social network theory has been developed and heavily researched. It has been determined that the observed and expected variability in the reasons for joining social networks of business people are parallel to the framework of social embeddedness theory.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Network
• Inter-Organizational Networks
• Social networks
• Strategic Networks

Kaynakça

1. ADLER Paul, Seok Woo KWON, “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, January 2002, pp. 17-40.
2. AHUJA Gautam, “Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 3, September 2000, pp. 425-455.
3. ALTER Catherine, Jerald HAGE, Organizations Working Together, London: Sage, 1993.
4. ANDERSON Ali Stair, Sarah JACK, “The Articulation of Social Capital in Enterpreneurial Networks; A Glue or a Lubricant?”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 14, No. 3, July 2002, pp. 193-210.
5. BAUM Joel A. C., Christine OLIVER, “Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 2, June 1991, pp. 187-218.
6. BIRLEY Sue, Stan CROMIE, Andrew MYERS, “Entrepreneurial Networks: Their Creation and Development in Different Countries”, International Small Business Journal, 1990, pp. 1-36.
7. BOURDIL Maryline, Mickael GERAUDEL, “What are the interpersonal antecedents of women’s network satisfaction?”, Gender in Management: An International Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2016, pp. 266-280.
8. BRASS Daniel J., “Being in the Right Place: A Structural Analysis of Individual Influence in an Organization”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 4, December 1984, pp. 518-539.

9. BURT Ronald S., Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Harvard University Press, 1992.
10. BURT Ronald S., ”A Note on Social Capital and Network Content”, Social Networks, Vol. 19, 1997, pp. 355-374.
11. BURT Ronald S., “The Network Structure of Social Capital”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 22, 2000, pp. 345-423.
12. CANBOLAT Ela Ö., “Örgütlerin İçinde Bulunduğu Ağ Şebekelerindeki Konumlarının Örgütsel Alandaki Eşbiçimliliğe Etkisi”, Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, C. 2, S. 1, 2010, ss. 1-9.
13. CANBOLAT Ela Ö., “Organizational Network Effect On Diversification Strategies”, Strategic Management Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 2, June 2014, pp. 27-48.
14. COLEMAN James S., "Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital", American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, 1988, pp. 95-120.
15. COLEMAN James S., Foundations of Social Theory, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1990.
16. DEMİRKAN İrem, David L. DEEDS, “Research Collaboration Networks And Innovation Output”, Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 1, August 2007, pp. 1-6.
17. DONG Di, Xiangyun GAO, Xiaoqi SUN, Xueyong LIU, “Factors Affecting the Formation of Copper International Trade Community: Based on Resource Dependence and Network Theory”, Resources Policy, Vol. 57, August 2018, pp. 167-185.
18. DOWLİNG John, Jeffrey PFEFFER, “Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior”, The Pacific Sociological Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1975, pp. 122-136.
19. EISENHARDT Kathleen M., Claudia B. SCHOONHOVEN, “Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms”, Organization Science, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1996, pp. 136-150.
20. EISENSTADT, Samuel N., Modernleşme: Başkaldırı ve Değişim, Çev: U. Çoşkun, İstanbul: Doğu Batı Yayınları, 2007.
21. FUKUYAMA, Francis, Büyük Çözülme: İnsan Doğası ve Toplumsal Düzenin Yeniden Oluşturulması, Çev: H. Kaya, İstanbul: Profil Kitap, 2009.
22. GARGIULO Martin, Mario BENASSI, “Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes and the Adaptation of Social Capital”, Organizaiton Sicence, Vol 11, No. 2, March-April 2000, pp. 183-196.
23. GRANDORI Anna, Giuseppe SODA, “Inter-Firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms”, Organization Studies, Vol. 16, No. 2, March 1995, pp. 183-214.
24. GRANOVETTER Mark S., “The Strenght of Weak Ties”, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, No. 6, May 1973, pp. 1360-1380.
25. GRANOVETTER Mark, “The Strenght of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited”, Sociological Theory, Vol. 1, 1983, pp. 201-233.
26. GRANOVETTER Mark, “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, 1985, pp. 481-510.
27. GULATI Ranjay, “Alliances and Networks”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 4, April 1998, pp. 293-317.
28. GULATI Ranjay, “Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 5, 1999, pp. 397-420.
29. GULATI Ranjay, Martin GARGIULO, “Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 104, No. 5, March 1999, pp. 1439-1493.
30. GULATI Ranjay, Nitin NOHRIA, Akbar ZAHEER, “Strategic Networks”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, March 2000, pp. 203-215.
31. HOANG Ha, Bostjan ANTONCİC, “Network-Based Research in Entrepreneurship: A Critical Review”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 18, No. 2, February 2003, pp. 165-187.
32. HUGGINS Robert, “The Success and Failure of Policy-implanted Inter-firm Network Initiatives: Motivations, Processes and Structure”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2000, pp.11-135.
33. JACK Sarah, R. Alistair ANDERSON, “The Effect of Embeddednes on the Entrepreneurial Process”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 17, 2002, pp. 467-487.
34. JARILLO Carlos J., “On Strategic Networks”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1988, pp. 31-41.
35. KRISTIANSEN Stein, “Social Networks and Business Success: The Role of Subcultures in an African Context”, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 63, No. 5, November 2004, pp. 1149-1171.
36. LIN Nan, “Building a Network Theory of Social Capital”, Connections, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1999, pp. 28-51.
37. LIN Nan, Karen S. COOK, Ronald S. BURT, Social Capital: Theory and Research, New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 2001.
38. MIERSCH Yvonne T., “Beyond Trust: Towards a Practice-Based Understanding of Governing Network Organizations”, Journal of Management & Governance, Vol. 21, No. 2, June 2017, pp. 473-498.
39. MIZRUCHI Mark S., Mina YOO, “Interorganizational Power and Dependence,” in Joel A.C. Baum (ed.), Companion to Organizations, New York: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 599-620.
40. MOLLER Kristian, Arto RAJALA, “Rise of Strategic Nets — New Modes of Value Creation”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 36, No. 7, October 2007, pp. 895-908.
41. ÖBERG Christina, Tommy Tsung-Ying SHIH, Hsin-Hui CHOU, “Network Strategies and Effects in an Interactive Context”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 52, January 2016, pp. 117-127.
42. PARK Seung Ho, “Managing Interorganizational Network: A Framework of the Institutional Mechanism for Network Control”, Organization Studies, Vol. 17, No. 5, 1996, pp. 795-824.
43. PARKHE Arvind, Stanley WASSERMAN, David A. RALSTON, “New Frontiers in Network Development”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2006, pp. 560-568.
44. PARTANEN Jukka, Kristian MÖLLER, “How to Build a Strategic Network: A Practitioner-Oriented Process Model for the ICT Sector”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 41, No. 3, April 2012, pp. 481-494.
45. PFEFFER Jeffrey, Gerald R. SALANCIK, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
46. PODOLNY Joel M., “Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market”, American Journal os Sociology, Vol. 107, No. 1, July 2001, pp. 33-60.
47. POWELL Walter W, Paul J. DIMAGGIO, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
48. PROVAN Keith G., Patrick KENIS, “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management and Effectiveness”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 18, No. 2, August 2007, pp. 229-252.
49. PUTNAM Robert D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000.
50. RAO Hayagreeva, Gerald F. DAVIS, Andrew WARD, “Embeddedness, Social Identity and Mobility; Why Firms Leave the NASDAQ and Join the New York Stock Exchange”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 45, No. 2, June 2000, pp. 268-292.
51. SINGH Anurag, Rahul KUMAR, Yatındra Nath SINGH, “Impact of Structural Centrality Based Attacks in Complex Networks”, Acta Physica Polonica B, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2015, pp. 305-325.
52. SULLIVAN Diane M., Ford M. CAMERON, “How Entrepreneurs Use Networks to Address Changing Resource Requirements During Early Venture Development”, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2014: pp. 551-574.
53. SYDOW Jörg, Arnold WINDELER, “Organizing and Evaluating Interfirm Networks: A Structurationist Perspective on Network Processes and Effectiveness”, Organization Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, May/June 1998, pp. 265-284.
54. UZZI Brian, “The Source and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, No. 4, 1996, pp. 674-698.
55. UZZI Brian, “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1997, pp.35-67.
56. WILLIAMSON Oliver E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: The Free Press, 1983.
57. XIE Xuemei, Yanru GAO, “Strategic Networks and New Product Performance: The Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Innovation”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 30, No. 7, 2018, pp. 811-824.