Job Insecurity and Organizational Citizenship Behavior Among Migrant Employees: Organizational Identification as Mediator and Intention to Stay as Moderator
Öz
This research examines the effect of job insecurity on organizational citizenship behavior among migrant employees, drawing on social exchange theory and the psychological contract framework. It also investigates the mediating role of organizational identification, grounded in social identity theory. In addition, the study explores the moderating role of intention to stay in the host country within the conservation of resources framework. Data were collected through an online questionnaire from 275 migrant employees. The results show that job insecurity negatively affects organizational identification and citizenship behaviors. Furthermore, organizational identification fully mediates the relationship between job insecurity and organizational citizenship behavior. The findings also reveal that intention to stay in the host country does not significantly moderate the negative indirect effect of job insecurity on organizational citizenship behavior. This study contributes to organizational behavior and migration research by extending knowledge on the job stressor–outcome relationship and identifying conditional boundaries of this relationship, with a particular focus on migrant employees.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Aguiar-Quintana, T., Nguyen, T. H. H., Araujo-Cabrera, Y., & Sanabria-Díaz, J. M. (2021). Do job insecurity, anxiety and depression caused by COVID-19 influence hotel employees’ self-rated task performance? The moderating role of employee resilience. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102868
- Ashford, S. J., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1989). Content, cause, and consequences of job insecurity: A theory-based measure and substantive test. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 803-829.
- Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
- Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33, 1–4. https://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU33.html
- Bagozzi, R.P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
- Bartram, T., Karimi, L., Leggat, S.G., & Stanton, P. (2014). Social identification: linking high performance work systems, psychological empowerment and patient care. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(17), 2401-2419.
- Baruch, Y., & Cohen, A. (2007). The dynamics between organizational commitment and professional identity formation at work. A. Brown, S. Kirpal & F. Rauner (Eds.), Identities at work (241–260). Germany: Springer.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
İşletme
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
18 Mart 2026
Gönderilme Tarihi
12 Kasım 2025
Kabul Tarihi
15 Ocak 2026
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2026 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1