Analysis of Geographically Indicated Food and Beverage Products in Turkey

Yıl 2022, , 604 - 634, 29.09.2022

Sevim Usta , Serkan Şengül

https://doi.org/10.32572/guntad.1102302

Cited By: 6

Öz

Geographical indications are the signs that ascribe the quality, recognition and other characteristics of a product to the geographical region to which it belongs, revealing the relationship and standards of the product with the region of origin. In other words, it is a registration system that protects local foods. The aim of this study is to determine and examine the local gastronomy products with geographical indications registered in Turkey. For this purpose, gastronomic products registered on the website of the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office were examined by content analysis. It has been determined that there are 823 gastronomy products with geographical indication registration in Turkey. Products were classified and 15 different food categories were determined. In line with the findings, it is seen that Gaziantep province ranks first with 69 products in the list of geographically indicated products in Turkey. Konya province ranks second with 43 products, and Şanlıurfa province ranks third with 32 products. It is thought that the research will contribute to the literature in terms of presenting the geographically indicated food categories concentrated in the field of gastronomy in Turkey and evaluating the geographically indicated gastronomy products in Turkey from a holistic perspective.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Local Dishes, Geographical Indication, Turkey

Türkiye’deki Coğrafi İşaretli Yiyecek-İçecek Ürünlerinin Analizi

Öz

Coğrafi işaretler, bir ürünün benzerlerinden farklı olarak sahip olduğu kalite, tanınırlık ve diğer karakteristik özelliklerini ait olduğu coğrafi bölgeye atfeden, ürünün menşei bölge ile ilişkisini ve standartlarını ortaya koyan işaretlerdir. Başka bir ifadeyle yöreye özgü yiyecekleri koruyan bir tescil sistemidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’nin coğrafi işaret tescilline sahip yöresel gastronomi ürünlerinin tespit edilerek incelenmesidir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Türk Patent ve Marka Kurumunun web sitesinde kayıtlı gastronomi ürünleri, içerik analizi ile incelenmiştir. Türkiye’de coğrafi işaret tesciline sahip 823 gastronomi ürününün bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ürünler sınıflandırılarak 15 farklı yemek kategorisi belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda Gaziantep ilinin Türkiye’de coğrafi işaretli ürünler sıralamasında 69 ürün ile ilk sırada yer aldığı görülmektedir. Konya ili 43 ürün ile ikinci sırada, Şanlıurfa ili ise 32 ürün ile üçüncü sırada yer almaktadır. Araştırmanın Türkiye’de gastronomi alanında yoğunlaşılan coğrafi işaretli yemek kategorilerini sunması ve Türkiye’deki coğrafi işaretli gastronomi ürünlerini bütüncül bir bakış açısıyla değerlendirmesi bakımından literatüre katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yöresel Yemekler, Coğrafi İşaret, Türkiye

Kaynakça

• Aichner, T. (2014). Country-of-origin marketing: A list of typical strategies with examples. Journal of Brand Management, 21, 81-93.
• Albayrak, M. ve Güneş, E. (2010). Traditional foods: Interaction between local and global foods in Turkey. African Journal Business Management, 4(4), 555-561.
• Aparecida Castro, V., Lourençao, M., ve Engracia Giraldi, J. M. (2021). Geographıcal Indıcatıon as a Strategıc Brand Resource in The Wıne Sector in Rıo Grande do Sul/BrazI, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 14 (2), 276-296.
• Barham, E. (2003). Translating terroir: the global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of Rural Studies, 19 (1), 127-138. Bathmanathan, V., Rajadurai, J. ve Sadiq Sohail, M. (2018): Generational Consumer Patterns : A document Analysis Method. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 10 (4), 1-13.
• Bilge, B., Demirbaş, N. ve Artukoğlu, M. (2019). Türkye'de Coğrafi İşaretl Gıda Ürünlernn Gurme Turzm Açısından Önemi. Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 25(1), 127-132.
• Bonadonna, A., Macar, L., Peira, G. ve Giachino, C. (2017). The Dark Side of the European Quality Schemes: The Ambiguous Life of the Traditional Specialities Guaranteed. Food Safety Management, 18 (156), 102-108.
• Cei, L., Defrancesco, E. ve Stefani, G. (2018). From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy. 10, 3745, 1-21.
• Divya, N. D. ve Anoop, K.K. (2018). Rural Development Through Geographıcal Indıcatıon. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 119 (16), 1385-1391.
• Duvaleix, S., Emlinger, C., Gaigne, C. ve Latouche, K. (2021). Geographical indications and trade: Firm-level evidence from the French cheese industry. Food Policy, 102, 1-12.
• Fernandez-Ferrin, P., Bande, B., Galan-Ladero, M. M., Martin-Consuegra, D., Diaz, E. ve Gastro-Gonzalez, S. (2019). Geographical indication food products and ethnocentric tendencies: The importance of proximity, tradition, and ethnicity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 1-9.
• Fracarolli, G. S. (2021). The Effects of Institutional Measures: Geographical Indication in Mercosur and the EU. Sustainability, 13(6), 3476.Frac.
• Hadelan, L., Jez Rogelj, M., Mikus, O., Prisenk, J. ve Zrakic Susac, M. (2021). Food Geographıcal Indıcatıon In Enhancıng Agrıcultural And Tourısm Performance. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 21 (1), 361-368.
• Kan, M. ve Kan, A. (2020). Qualıtatıve And Quantıtatıve Analysıs Of The Geographıcal Indıcatıon System In Turkey. Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences, 8(2), 114-123.
• Kantaroğlu, M. ve Demirbaş, N. (2018). Türkiye’de Coğrafi İşaretli Gıda Ürünleri Üretim Potansiyelinin Değerlendirilmesi. VIII. IBANESS Congress Series- Plovdiv, 21-22 Nisan, Bulgaristan, 514-520.
• Likoudis, Z., Sdrali, D., Costarelli, V., and Apostolopoulos, C. (2016). Consumers’ intention to buy protected designation of originand protected geographical indication foodstuffs: the caseof Greece. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40, 283-289.
• Likudis, Z. (2016). Olive oils with protected designation of origin (PDO) and protected geographical indication (PGI). Products from Olive Tree, 175-190.
• Lukose, L. P. (2007). Rationale and Prospects of the Protection of Geographical Indication: An Inquiry. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12, 212-223.
• Mitchell, J. T. ve Terry, C. T. (2011). Contesting Pisco: Chile, Peru and Politics of Trade. Geographical Review, 101(4), 518-535.
• Nizam, D. ve Tatari, M. F. (2020). Rural revitalization through territorial distinctiveness: The use of geographical indications in Turkey. Journal of Rural Studies , 1-11.
• Papageorgiou, D. (2014). The International Protection of Geographical Indications. Ph.D. Thesis, Hellenic Republic National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Law, Department of International Studies.
• Rahmah, M. (2017). The Protection Agricultural Products Under Geographical Indication: An Alternative Tool for Agricultural Development in Indonesia. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22, 90-103.
• Sgroi, F. (2021). Territorial development models: A new strategic vision to analyze the relationship between the environment, public goods and geographical indications. Science of the Total Environment, 787, 1-7.
• Tashiro, A., Uchiyama, Y. ve Kohsaka, R. (2018). Internal processes of Geographical Indication and their effects: an evaluation framework for geographical indication applicants in Japan. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 5, 202-210.
• Tosato, A. (2013). The Protection of Traditional Foods in theEU: Traditional Specialities Guaranteed. European Law Journal, 19 (4), 545-576.
• Trubek, A., Guy, K. M. ve Bowen, S. (2010). Terroır: A French Conversatıon Wıth A Transnatıonal Future. Contemporary French and Francophone Studies, 14 (2), 139-148.
• Ucuncuoglu, D. (2020). Geographical Indications and Designations of Origin linked Agricultural Products: Current Statistics from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 8 (4), 957-959.
• Yazıcıoğlu, İ., Işın, E. ve Yalçın, E. (2019). Coğrafi İşaretli Ürünlerin Gastronomi Turizmi Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi: Akdeniz Bölgesi Örneği. Gastroia: Journal of Gastronomy and Travel Research, 3(4), 861-871.