“HER” FİLMİ ÜZERİNDEN ROGERS'IN YENİLİKLERİN YAYILMASI TEORİSİNE FARKLI BİR BAKIŞ

Öz

Bu makale, yapay zekâ (YZ) teknolojisinin hızlı bir şekilde geliştiği ve yaygınlaştığı bir dönemde, YZ felsefesi ile yeniliklerin kabulü teorisi arasındaki ilişkiye odaklanmaktadır. YZ'nin küresel yatırımlardaki artışı ve toplumsal etkisi, bu teknolojinin felsefi boyutlarını ve toplum tarafından nasıl kabul edildiğini anlama gerekliliğini ortaya koymaktadır. John Searle'ın "Güçlü Yapay Zeka" eleştirisini, düşünme ve hesaplamanın ilişkisini, duygusal zekâ ve yaratıcılık gibi temel YZ felsefesi konularını ayrıntılı bir şekilde ele alarak başlamaktadır. Bu, YZ'nin insan zihnini nasıl anlamaya çalıştığını ve bilinçle ilişkisini nasıl kurduğunu değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Rogers'ın Yeniliklerin Yayılması Teorisi'nin YZ teknolojisinin toplum tarafından kabul edilme süreçlerini nasıl açıklayabileceği incelenmektedir. YZ'nin sinema içeriklerindeki artan kullanımı, sadece teknolojik bir ilerlemenin yansıması olmanın ötesinde, aynı zamanda derin felsefi tartışmalara da kapı aralamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, makale, YZ felsefesi, zihin felsefesi, bilişsel bilimler, etik, epistemoloji, semiyotik, estetik ve sinema teorisi gibi farklı disiplinlerle sıkı bir ilişki içinde olduğunu göstermektedir. YZ'nin sinema içeriklerindeki etkisini ve bu etkinin toplumsal kabul süreçlerine nasıl katkıda bulunduğunu derinlemesine analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, Rogers'ın Yeniliklerin Yayılması Teorisi, YZ teknolojisinin nasıl toplumsal bir fenomen haline geldiğini ve toplumun bu teknolojiyi nasıl benimsediğini daha iyi anlama konusunda bir araç sunmaktadır. Makale, teknolojik ve toplumsal değişimin daha etkili bir şekilde yönetilmesine katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır ve bu alandaki araştırmalara yol göstermeyi hedeflemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yeniliklerin Yayılması Teorisi
• Yapay Zekâ Felsefesi
• “Her” Filmi

A UNIQUE PERSPECTIVE ON ROGERS' DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS THEORY THROUGH THE LENS OF THE “HER” MOVIE

Öz

This article explores the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) philosophy and the theory of innovation adoption in the context of rapidly advancing AI technology. The increasing global investments and societal impact of AI underscore the need to understand its philosophical dimensions and societal acceptance. The article begins by examining John Searle's critique of "Strong AI" and fundamental AI philosophy topics, including the relationship between thinking and computation, emotional intelligence, and creativity. It evaluates AI's pursuit of understanding the human mind and consciousness. Rogers' Theory of Innovation Adoption is used to explain societal acceptance of AI technology. The use of AI in cinema not only reflects technological advancement but also encourages philosophical debates. The article shows the interaction of AI philosophy with other disciplines such as philosophy of mind, cognitive sciences, ethics, epistemology, semiotics, aesthetics, and cinema theory. The paper inspects the influence of AI on cinema, its role in societal acceptance, and uses Rogers' theory for framing. The work intends to contribute to the effective management of technological and social change, and also to direct further research in this domain.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Theory of Diffusion of Innovations
• Everett Rogers
• Artificial Intelligence Philosophy
• Movie “Her”

Kaynakça

1. Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052
2. Anadolu, B. (2019). Dijital Hikaye Anlatıcılığı Bağlamında Yapay Zekanın Sinemaya Etkisi: Sunspring ve It’s No Game Filmlerinin Analizi, Erciyes Üniversitesi Iletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi, 1, 39–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.483510
3. Bringsjord, S., & Govindarajulu, N. S. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in E N Zalta, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2018 Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. From: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/artificial-intelligence/
4. Chapuis, S. & de Bovis-Vlahovic, C. (2016). VII. Everett Mitchell Rogers Cultiver la diffusion des innovations, Les Grands Auteurs en Management de l'innovation et de la créativité, 133-155. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3917/ems.burge.2016.01.0133
5. Chayka, K. (2023). Your A.I. companion will support you no matter what. The New Yorker. From: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/your-ai-companion-will-support-you-no-matter-what
6. Couros, A. (2003). Innovation, change theory and the acceptance of new technologies: A literature review, Education Technology. From: http://www.educationaltechnology.ca/couros/publication_files/unpublishedpapers/change_theory.pdf
7. Downs, G., & Mohr, L. (1976). Conceptual issues in the study of innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21:700-714. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2391725
8. Fèvres, J. (2012). Everett M. Rogers, Diffusion of innovations, Essais, 1(2012): 135-137. Doi: https://journals.openedition.org/essais/11135

9. Frankenfield, J. (2023). The Turing Test: What is it, what can pass it, and limitations, Investopedia. From https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/turing-test.asp
10. Gartner (2017). Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2018, Gartner. From https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/gartner-top-10-strategic-technology-trends-for-2018
11. Ghoshal, D.S. & Bartlett, C. (1988). Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations, The Journal of International Business Studies. 19 (3): 372. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490388. S2CID 167588113.
12. Goss, K. F. (1979). Consequences of diffusion of innovations to rural population, Rural Sociology, 44:754-772. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547095016003002
13. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Bate, P., Macfarlane, F., & Kyriakidou, O. (2005). Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations: a systematic literature review, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISBN-13: 978-0-7279-1869-7
14. IMDB (2013). Her, IMDB. From: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1798709/?ref_=ttawd_ov
15. International Data Corporation- IDC (2018). Worldwide Semiannual Cognitive Artificial Intelligence Systems Spending, IDC. From: https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp? containerId=prUS43662418
16. Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein, M. (2020). The Age of Artificial Intelligence: An Exploration, Gouveia, S. (ed.), Spain: Vernon Press. ISBN: 1648892183
17. Larousse, É. (n.d.). intelligence artificielle - LAROUSSE. From: https://www.larousse.fr/encyclopedie/divers/intelligence_artificielle/187257
18. Li, L. (2023). Diegetic Prototypes in the Design Fiction Film Her: A Posthumanist Interpretation. Journal of Futures Studies, 27(3).
19. Lyytinen, K & Damsgaard, J, (2001). What’s Wrong with the Diffusion of Innovation Theory? , International federation for information processing publications- ifip. 173-190
20. MacVaugh, J., & Schiavone, F. (2010). Limits to the diffusion of innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 197–221. doi:10.1108/14601061011040
21. McCarthy, J. (2006). The Philosophy of AI and the AI of Philosophy. Computer Science Department, Stanford University. From: http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/
22. McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (1955). A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. From: http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dartmouth/dartmouth.html
23. McElheran, K., Li, J. F., Brynjolfsson, E., Kroff, Z., Dinlersoz, E., Foster, L. S., & Zolas, N. (2023). AI Adoption in America: Who, What, and Where (No. w31788), National Bureau of Economic Research. From: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w31788/w31788.pdf
24. Meade, N., & Islam, T. (2006). Modelling and forecasting the diffusion of innovation–A 25-year review, International Journal of Forecasting, 22(3), 519-545. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.01.005
25. Meyer, G. (2004). "Diffusion Methodology: Time to Innovate?", Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 9(1), 59- 69. doi:10.1080/10810730490271539
26. Moore, G. C. & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research, 2(1991), 192-222.
27. Moravec, H. (1998). Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind. UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195116304
28. Reed, R. (2018). A New Patheon: Artificial intelligence and" Her", Journal of Religion & Film, 22(2), 5. From: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol22/iss2/5
29. Rescorla, M. (2015). The computational theory of mind. From https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/computational-mind/?ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwuko.aizh-CN%2F8d51bc5b-42b7-449c-809f-88b261ee6c2b
30. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovation, New York: Free Press.
31. Rotten Tomatoes. (2014). Her. From: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/her
32. Ryan, B., & Gross, N. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8(1), 15-24. From: https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/13f7bd1e514b12ad420bd3a35d35defb7/cameron
33. Searle, J. R. (2010). Minds, brains, and programs, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417-424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756
34. Simon, H. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2011). Allen Newell (1927- 1992) (Behavioral and Brain Sciences), Cambridge University Press, 15(3), 1-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00069466
35. Singer, L. (2020). On the Diffusion of Innovations: How New Ideas Spread, Dr. Leif Singer. From https://leif.me/on-the-diffusion-of-innovations-how-new-ideas-spread/
36. Singer, L. (n.d.) Diffusion of innovation theory, Behavior Change Models, Boston University. From https://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-modules/sb/behavioralchangetheories/behavioralchangetheories4.html
37. Spike Jonze, “Her”. (2013). Spike Jonze, “Her”.
38. Statista. (2018). Revenues From the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Market Worldwide From 2016 to 2025. From https://www.statista.com/statistics/607716/worldwide-artificialintelligence-market-revenues/
39. Strang, D. & Soule, S. (1998). "Diffusion in Organizations and Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills", Annual Review of Sociology. 24: 265–290. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.265.
40. Tarde, G. (1890). Les lois de l'imitation: étude sociologique, Paris Ancienne Librarie Germer Bailliere. From https://books.google.ch/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=u38vAAAAYAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Tarde+g&ots=PuuIKDEg7f&sig=LCy6keR_FyyBOFHDYPhc4IUqxOg#v=onepage&q=Tarde%20g&f=false
41. Taube, D. (2015). Film: HER. David Taube - Philosophy Now, Philosophy Documentation Center. From https://www.pdcnet.org/philnow/content/philnow_2015_0110_0000_0044_0045
42. Turing, A.M. (2009). Computing Machinery and Intelligence, Epstein, R., Roberts, G., & Beber, G. (ed.), Parsing the Turing Test. Springer, Dordrecht. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5_3
43. Turner, R & Eden, AH (2008) Philosophy of Computer Science. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University. From https://repository.essex.ac.uk/3486/
44. WarnerBros.com (n.d.). Her. From: https://www.warnerbros.com/movies/her
45. Wikipedia. (n.d.). Diffusion of Innovations. Wikipedia. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffusion_of_innovations
46. Zaltman G., Duncan R. & Holbeck J. (1973). Innovation and Organizations, New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 9780471981299
47. Zaretsky, E. (2015). From psychoanalysis to cybernetics: The case of Her. American Imago, 72(2), 197-210. doi:10.1353/aim.2015.0011.