Müzik Öğretmeni Adaylarının Uygulanan Lisans Programının Etkililiğine ve İşleyişine İlişkin Görüşleri

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, YÖK (Yüksek Öğretim Kurulu) tarafından hazırlanan ve zorunlu olarak uygulanan 2018 müzik öğretmenliği lisans programlarında öğrenim gören müzik öğretmeni adaylarının, tâbi oldukları lisans programına ve programın işleyişine ilişkin görüşlerini betimlemektir. Araştırma ‘Tarama Modelleri’nden ‘Genel Tarama’ modeli bir araştırmadır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu çeşitli üniversitelerin Eğitim Fakültesi Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi Bölümü Müzik Eğitimi Ana Bilim dallarında öğrenim gören müzik öğretmeni adaylarıdır. 2024-2025 eğitim-öğretim yılında öğrenim gören adaylar, toplam 105 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada çalışma grubuna lisans programına yönelik sorulardan oluşan veri toplama aracı sunulmuştur. İlgili ölçme aracında derslere yönelik nitelik ve nicelik odaklı sorular yer almıştır. Araştırmadan başlıca su sonuçlar çıkmıştır: Müzik öğretmeni adayları; programdaki “Alan Eğitimi Dersleri”, “Öğretmenlik Meslek Bilgisi Dersleri” ve “Genel Kültür Dersleri”nin oran ve içeriklerinin genel olarak yeterli bulmaktadır. Öğrenciler sadece “Genel Kültür” derslerine programda gereğinden fazla önem, zaman ve emek verildiğini düşünmektedirler. Öğretmen adayları derslik sayılarını ve dersliklerin teknik altyapılarını önemli ölçüde eksik bulmakta ve lisans programını yürüten öğretim elemanlarının sayı olarak yeterliği konusunda; nispeten olumlu bir görüş bildirmektedir. Öğrencilerin ders işlenişi ve öğretim elemanlarının yeterlikleri hususunda ise “iyi” ve “orta” düzeyli görüşler belirttiği görülmüştür. Diğer yandan müzik öğretmeni adayları, ağırlıklı olarak müzik alanı ile ilgili dersler ve kısmen de öğretmenlik becerisi derslerinden bazılarının saatlerinin arttırılmasını istemişlerdir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mesleki müzik eğitimi
• Öğretmenlik Lisans programı
• Müzik öğretmeni adayı

Pre-service Music Teachers’ Views on the Effectiveness and Implementation of the Undergraduate Program

Öz

This study aimed to explore the views of pre-service music teachers enrolled in the 2018 undergraduate music teacher education program, which was developed and mandated by the Council of Higher Education (CoHE), regarding the curriculum and its implementation. The research was designed as a descriptive survey, which is one of the survey models. The study group consisted of pre-service music teachers enrolled in the Music Education Programs within the Departments of Fine Arts Education at the Faculties of Education of various universities. For data collection, a questionnaire regarding the undergraduate program was administered to the participants. The instrument included both qualitative and quantitative questions related to the courses. Some findings can be drawn from the study: Pre-service music teachers generally considered the proportion and content of the “Field Education Courses,” “Pedagogical Knowledge Courses,” and “General Culture Courses” in the program to be adequate. However, students believe that the program placed excessive emphasis, time, and effort on “General Culture” courses. Nevertheless, pre-service music teachers predominantly requested an increase in the hours allocated to music-related courses, and to some extent, the hours allocated to certain pedagogical skill courses.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Vocational Music Education
• Teacher Education Program
• Pre-service Music Teacher

Kaynakça

1. Albuz, A. (2004). An overview of program evaluation approaches in education/music education. Uludağ University Journal of Faculty of Education, 17 (1), 13-18.
2. Arslan, E. (2022). Validity and reliability in qualitative research. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Science Institute, 51 (Special Issue1), 395-407.
3. Balcı, A. (1997). Research-Methods, Techniques and Principles in Social Sciences. Personal Publication.
4. Ballantyne, J. and Packer, J. (2010). Effectiveness of preservice music teacher education programs: Perceptions of early-career music teachers. Music Education Research, 6(3), 299-312
5. Blankson, G. (2022). Program evaluatıon of musıc teacher educatıon in Ghana: Implıcatıons for practıce, polıcy, and research, [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Music The University of Mississippi.
6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Handbook of data analysis for social sciences (4th ed.). Pegem Academy.
7. Büyüköztürk, Ş.,Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2022). Scientific research methods in education (32nd Ed.). Pegem Academy.
8. Council of Higher Education. (2018). Teacher Training Undergraduate Programs.

9. Council of Higher Education. (n.d.). Transfer of Authority to Education Faculties. Retrieved January 24, 2023 from https://eski.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/2020/egitim-fak%C3%BCltelerine-yetki-devri.aspx.
10. Davidova, J. (2019). Music teacher’s competences in the 21st century. Pedagogika/Pedagogy, 134(2), 99-108.
11. Eldemir, C. (2011). Opinions of undergraduate students in the department of music and arts education about pedagogy courses: Gazi University example. Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences, 30(1), 47-59.
12. Erden, M. (1998). Programme evaluation in education., Anı Yayıncılık.
13. Gökçe, N. N. (2019). Opinions of lecturers, music teachers and students regarding music teaching undergraduate program [Unpublished Master's Thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
14. Gün, E. & Özkasnaklı, U. (2020). Elective course orientations and needs of music teacher candidates within the scope of the undergraduate program effective in 2018, In Fine Arts Research, pp. 1-14, Akademisyen Publications.
15. Horowits, R. (2024). From dissonance to consonance: Bringing clarity to music assessment and program evaluation. Visions of Research in Music Education, 45, 82-98. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/vrme/vol45/iss1/8
16. Huh, S. Y. and Kim, M.S. (2020). A Study on the evaluation of music education program for the low-income juveniles. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(4), 293-316.
17. Karasar, N. (2022). Scientific Research Methods Concepts-Principles-Techniques (37th Ed.), Nobel Publications.
18. Kılıç, S. (2016). Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. Journal of Mood Disorders, 6(1), 47-48.
19. Marianti, S., Rufaida, A., Hasanah, N., & Nuryanti, S. (2023). Comparing item-total correlation and item-theta correlation in test item selection: A simulation and empirical study. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 27(2), 133-145.
20. Ministry of National Education. (2017). General competencies for teaching profession. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_12/11115355_YYRETMENLYK_MESLEYY_GENEL_YETERLYKLERY.pdf.
21. Öztürk, G. (2022). A brief critical evaluation of the 2018 music teaching undergraduate program. In S. Karabatak (Ed.), Education-Science II, 81-103. Efe Academy.
22. Provus, M. (1971-1972). Curriculum theory network, monograph supplement: curriculum evaluation: potentiality and reality, Wiley on behalf of the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto. http://www.jstore.org/stable/1179190.
23. Saldańa J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. (4th ed.). SAGE
24. Sönmez, V. & Alacapınar, F. G. (2015). Programme evaluation in education with examples. Anı Publishing.
25. Sönmezöz, F. (2016). The evaluation of realization levels of “scale-training” included in piano lesson at undergraduate level of music education through the opinions of music preservice teachers. İnesjornal, 3(6), 150-179.
26. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1999). Foundational models for 21st century program evaluation. The Evaluation Center Occasional Papers Series.
27. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.
28. Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Attitude measurement and data analysis with SPSS. Nobel Publishing.
29. Tutar, H. (2022). Validity and reliability in qualitative research: A model proposal. Anadolu University Journal of Social Science, 22, 117-140.
30. Uçan, A. (2005). Music Education - Basic Concepts, Principles, Approaches and the Situation in Turkey. Evrensel Müzikevi.
31. Uçaner, B. (2015). Evaluation of Technological Infrastructure Status of Music Education Departments in Turkey. Atatürk Culture, Language and History Supreme Council Publication. https://www.ayk.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/U%C3%87ANER-Bur%C3%A7in-T%C3%9CRK%C4%B0YE%E2%80%99DEK%C4%B0-M%C3%9CZ%C4%B0K-E%C4%9E%C4%B0T%C4%B0M%C4%B0-ANAB%C4%B0L%C4%B0M-DALLARININ-TEKNOLOJ%C4%B0K-ALTYAPI-DURUMLARININ-DE%C4%9EERLEND%C4%B0R%C4%B0LMES%C4%B0.pdf.
32. Yüksel, S. (2007). Effect of hidden curriculum on prospective teachers’ thoughts about teacher training courses. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 50, 321-345.