The Relationship between Secondary School Teachers’ Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Their Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 1, 120 - 135, 31.01.2020

Osman Tayyar Çelik , Mehmet Üstüner

Öz

In this research, it is aimed to reveal the relationships among, secondary school teachers’ perceptions of organizational politics, organizational dependence and organizational citizenship behaviours. 2972 teachers teaching in Malatya’s central districts (Battalgazi and Yeşilyurt) during 2017-2018 academic year constitute the universe of the research. 856 of whom were defined through stratified sampling method as the sample of the research. In this relational screening model based research, a model was suggested by researchers for the relationship between variables and this model was tested by SEM analyse. At the end of the research; its understood that the perceptions of organizational politics of secondary school teachers’ predict their “organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behaviours significantly in a negative way”, estimate “organizational commitment’ and organizational citizenship behaviours significantly in a positive way” and have a partial procuration role between organizational commitment perceptions of organizational politics associated with organizational citizenship behaviour. Besides, it is comfirmed that the research explains nearly the %59 of the variance of secondary school teachers’ perception of organizational politics perception and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behaviours.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Perception of organizational politics, political behavior, organizational citizenship behavior, organizational commitment, teacher

Ortaokul Öğretmenlerinin Örgütsel Politika Algıları ile Örgütsel Bağlılıkları ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışları Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Bu araştırmada, ortaokul öğretmenlerinin örgütsel politika algılarıyla, örgütsel bağlılıkları ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini, 2016-2017 eğitim-öğretim yılında Malatya ili merkez ilçelerinde (Battalgazi ve Yeşilyurt) görev yapan 2.972 ortaokul öğretmeni oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemini ise tabakalı örnekleme yöntemi ile belirlenen 856 öğretmen oluşturmaktadır. İlişkisel tarama modelindeki bu araştırmada değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiye yönelik araştırmacılar tarafından bir model önerilmiş ve yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (YEM) ile test edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda ortaokul öğretmenlerinin örgütsel politika algılarının örgütsel bağlılıklarını ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarını negatif yönde anlamlı bir şekilde yordadığı, ortaokul öğretmenlerinin örgütsel bağlılıklarının örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarını pozitif yönde anlamlı bir şekilde yordadığı ve örgütsel bağlılığın örgütsel politika algısı ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasında kısmi aracılık rolüne sahip olduğu sonuçlarına ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca ortaokul öğretmenlerinin örgütsel politika algısı ile örgütsel bağlılıklarının örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarındaki varyansın yaklaşık %59’unu açıkladığı tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel politika algısı, politik davranış, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı, örgütsel bağlılık, öğretmen

Kaynakça

• Alkan, S.E. (2015). A research about the relationship of psychological safety and organizational politics perception wıth compulsory citizenship behavior. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
• Allen, R. W., Madison, D. L., Porter, L. W., Renwick, P. A., & Mayes, B. T. (1979). Organizational politics: Tactics and characteristics of its actors. California Management Review, 22(1), 77-83.
• Afshardoust, M., Feizabadi, M. S., Zakizadeh, B., & Abdolhoseyni, M. (2013). Relationship between organizational citizenship behaviour and organizational perceived politic among the sport organization experts of tehran municipality. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences,4 (4), 870-873.
• Asiedu, M., Sarfo, J. O., & Adjei, D. (2014). Organisational commitment and citizenship behaviour: Tools to improve employee performance; An internal marketing approach. European Scientific Journal, 10(4), 288-305.
• Ayhan, Ö., ve Gürbüz, S. (2014). Algılanan örgütsel politikanın örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ile ilişkisinde adaletin rolü. "Is, Guc" Industrıal Relatıons and Human Resources Journal, 16(3), 76-93.
• Bacharach, S. B., & Mundell, B. L. (1993). Organizational politics in schools: Micro, macro, and logics of action. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(4), 423-452.
• Balay, R. (2000). Örgütsel bağlılık. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of theexecutive. Cambridge, Massachussetts: Harvard University.
• Başol, G. ve Yalçın, B. (2009). Eğitim örgütlerinde Meyer ve Allen’in Üç Boyutlu Örgütsel Bağlılık Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Full Text]. The 5th International Balkan Educational and Science Congress, 5th International Balkan Educational and Science Congress Full Text Book, 2, 497-507, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey.Dağıtım.
• Bayram, N. (2016). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Amos uygulamaları. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
• Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32-40.
• Brown, T. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.
• Bedi, A., & Schat, A. C. (2013). Perceptions of organizational politics: A meta-analysis of its attitudinal, health, and behavioural consequences. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 54(4), 246.
• Billingsley, B. S., & Cross, L. H. (1992). Predictors of commitment, job satisfaction, and intent to stay in teaching: A comparison of general and special educators. The Journal of Special Education, 25(4), 453-471.
• Blase, J. (1989). The micropolitics of the school: The everyday political orientation of teachers toward open school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 24(4), 377-407.
• Blase, J. J. (1990). Some negative effects of principals’ control-oriented and protective political behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 727-753.
• Blase, J., & Anderson, G. (1995). The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment. (ERIC No:391252).
• Blase, J. & Blase, J. (2002). The micropolitics of instructional supervision: A call for research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 6-44.
• Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277-289.
• Bozkurt Bostancı, A., Akçadağ, T., Kahraman, Ü., & Tosun, A. (2016). Okulların DNA profili ile okul içi politik davranışlar arasındaki ilişki. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(3), 5693-5705.
• Burns, T. (1961). Micropolitics: Mechanisms of institutional change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6(3), 257-281.
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
• Chang, C. H., Rosen, C. C., & Levy, P. E. (2009). The relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and employee attitudes, strain, and behavior: A meta-analytic examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 779-801.
• Chang, C. H., Rosen, C. C., Siemieniec, G. M., & Johnson, R. E. (2012). Perceptions of organizational politics and employee citizenship behaviors: Conscientiousness and self-monitoring as moderators. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), 395-406.
• Choi, P. L., & Tang, S. Y. F. (2009). Teacher commitment trends: Cases of Hong Kong teachers from 1997 to 2007. Teaching and teacher Education, 25(5), 767-777.
• Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 159–180.
• Çelik, K., ve Erdem, A. R. (2012). Üniversitede çalışan idari personele göre “Kayırmacılık”. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11, 23-30.
• Çokluk, O., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B., & Singleton, C. A. (2006). Organizational commitment of teachers in urban schools: Examining the effects of team structures. Urban Education, 41(6), 603-627.
• Ekinci, C.E. (2017). The relationships between organizational ethical climate and political behavior perceptions of the faculty members. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education), 32(1), 1-17.
• Ersözlü, A. (2012). Okul yöneticilerinin yönetsel güçlülük düzeylerinin öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılık, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları ve iş doyumuna etkisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ.
• Etzioni, A. (1961). Complex organizations: A sociological reader. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Faye, K., & Long, Y. (2014). The impact of job satisfaction in the relationships between workplace politics and work related outcomes and attitudes: evidence from organizations in senegal. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(5), 160-168.
• Ferris, G. R., Frink, D. D., Bhawuk, D. P., Zhou, J., &Gilmore, D. C. (1996). Reactions of diverse groups to politics in the workplace. Journal of Management, 22(1), 23-44.
• Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management, 18(1), 93-116.
• Ferris, G. R., Fedor, D. B., Chachere, J. G., & Pondy, L. R. (1989). Myths and politics in organizational contexts. Group ve Organization Management, 14(1), 83-103.
• Ferris, G.R., Russ, G.S. & Fandt, P.M. (1989). Politics in organizations (Ed. Giacalone, R.A., Rosenfeld, P.). Impression management in the organization. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Firestone, W. A., & Rosenblum, S. (1988). Building commitment in urban high schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(4), 285-299.
• Gandz, J., & Murray, V. V. (1980). The experience of workplace politics. Academy Of Management Journal, 23(2), 237-251.
• Getzels, J. W., & Guba, E. G. (1957). Social behavior and the administrative process. The School Review, 65(4), 423-441.
• Goess, D.E. (2015). Organizational citizenship behavior and student bullying: An analysis of Texas elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tthe Unıversıty of Texas, San Antonıo (UMI Number: 3702282).
• Gürbüz, S. (2006). A research on identifying the relationships between organizational citizenship behavior and affective commitment. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(1), 48-75.
• Harrell-Cook, G., Ferris, G. R., & Dulebohn, J. H. (1999). Political behaviors as moderators of the perceptions of organizational politics--work outcomes relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(7), 1093-1105.
• Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
• Hartel, C., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Zerbe, W. (2005). Emotions in organizational behavior. Psychology Press.
• Holliman, S. L. (2012). Explorıng the effects of empowerment, ınnovatıon, professıonalısm, conflıct, and partıcıpatıon on teacher organızatıonal commıtment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa.
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
• Hrebiniak, L. G., & Alutto, J. A. (1972). Personal and role-related factors in the development of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(4), 555-573.
• İnnes, P.M. (2004). The ınfluence of leadershıp on perceptıons of organızatıonal polıtıcs, job ınvolvement, and organızatıonal commıtment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Regent University, Virginia. UMI Number: 3138653.
• Indartono, S., & Chen, C.H.V. (2011). Moderating effects of tenure and gender on the relationship between perception of organizational politics and commitment and trust. South Asian Journal of Management, 18(1), 7-36.
• Kacmar, K. M., Bozeman, D. P., Carlson, D. S., & Anthony, W. P. (1999). An examination of the perceptions of organizational politics model: Replication and extension. Human Relations, 52(3), 383-416.
• Kacmar, K. M., & Baron, R. A. (1999). Organizational politics: The state of the field, links to related processes, and an agenda for future research.(Ferris, G. R. (Ed). Research in human resources management. US: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
• Kanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 33(4), 499-517.
• Karakuş, M. (2008). İlköğretim okul yöneticilerinin ve öğretmenlerin duygusal zekâ yeterliklerinin, öğretmenlerin duygusal adanmışlık, örgütsel vatandaşlık ve iş doyumu düzeylerine etkisi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
• Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The psychology of organizations. New York: HR Folks International.
• Kelchtermans, G. (2005). Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 995-1006.
• Khalid, S., & Ishaq, S. (2015). Job related outcomes ın relatıon to perceıved organızatıonal polıtıcs. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 53(1), 133.
• Khan, S. K., & Rashid, M. Z. A. (2012). The mediating effect of organizational commitment in the organizational culture, leadership and organizational justice relationship with organizational citizenship behavior: A study of academicians in private higher learning ınstitutions in malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(8), 83-91.
• Kline, R. B. (2013). Assessing statistical aspects of test fairness with structural equation modelling. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(2-3), 204-222.
• LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: a critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52-65.
• Lewin, K. (1936). A dynamic theory of personality: selected papers. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 84(5), 612-613.
• MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Ahearne, M. (1998). Some possible antecedents and consequences of in-role and extra-role salesperson performance. The Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 87-98.
• Maslyn, J. M., & Fedor, D. B. (1998). Perceptions of politics: Does measuring different foci matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 645-653.
• Mayo, E. (1945). The social problems of an industrial society. Boston, MA. Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
• Mehtap, Ö. (2011). Örgüt içi politik davranışların örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Meydan, C.H. ve Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi Amos uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 1(1), 61-89.
• Miller, B. K., & Nicols, K. G. (2008). Politics and justice: A mediated moderation model. Journal of Management Issues, 20(2), 214-237.
• Mintzberg, H. (1985). The organization as political arena. Journal of Management Studies, 22(2), 133-154.
• Morgan, G. (1998). Yönetim ve örgüt teorilerinde metafor (Çev: G.Bulut). İstanbul: MESS.
• Mosheti, P. A. (2013). Teacher participation in school decision-making and job satisfaction as correlates of organizational commitment in senior schools in Botswana. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Andrews University, Michigan.
• Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Dubin, R. (1974). Unit performance, situational factors, and employee attitudes in spatially separated work units. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12(2), 231-248.
• Özyer, K. ve Alıcı, İ. (2015). An Empirical Research on Relationship Between Emotional intelligence, Organizational Commitment and Organizational Cıtızenshıp Behavıor. Journal of World of Turks, 7(1), 69-85.
• Parsons, T. (1967). Some ingredients of a general theory of formal organizations. In A. W. Halpin (ed.). Administrative theory in education (pp. 40-72). New York: The MacMillan Company.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of management, 26(3), 513-563.
• Polat, S. (2007). Ortaögretim ögretmenlerinin örgütsel adalet algıları, örgütsel güven düzeyleri ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kocaeli.
• Porter, M. E. (1976). Interbrand choice, strategy, and bilateral market power. Harvard University Press.
• Preffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
• Puri, P., & Saxena, N. (2013). Job ınvolvement in relation to organizational climate: A study on government employees. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR).4(9), 1199-1203.
• Ram, P., & Prabhakar, G.V. (2010). Leadership styles and perceived organizational politics as predictors of work related outcomes. European Journal of Social Sciences, 15(1), 40-55.
• Randall, M. L., Cropanzano, R., Bormann, C. A. & Birjulin, A. (1999). Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(2), 159-174.
• Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). On multilevel model reliability estimation from the perspective of structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(1), 130-141.
• Riaz, A., & Akbar, A. (2013). Antecedents of organızatıonal polıtıcs (evıdence from pakıstanı publıc sector). Actual Problems of Economıcs, 5(143), 442-451.
• Rosenholtz, S. J., and Simpson, C. (1990). Workplace conditions and the rise and fall of teachers' commitment. Sociology of Education, 63(4), 241-257.
• Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal Of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
• Schappe, S. P. (1998). The influence of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and fairness perceptions on organizational citizenship behavior. The journal of Psychology, 132(3), 277-290.
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology Press.
• Sides, S.M. (2013). The effect of perceıved organızatıonal support and perceıved organızatıonal polıtıcs on teacher commıtment: an analysıs of publıc and non-publıc secondary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Arkansas, Arkansas (UMI Number: 3615899).
• Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118.
• Smethem, L. (2007). Retention and intention in teaching careers: will the new generation stay?. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(5), 465-480.
• Somech, A., & Roon, I. (2007). Promoting organizational citizenship behavior in schools: The impact of individual and organizational characteristics. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 38-66.
• Taylor, F. W. (1947). Scientific management. NetnI York: Harper & Brothers.
• Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1987). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives. New York, NY: Praeger.
• Vigoda, E. (2000). Organizational politics, job attitudes, and work outcomes: exploration and implications for the public sector. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 326–347.
• Ware, H., & Kitsantas, A. (2007). Teacher and collective efficacy beliefs as predictors of professional commitment. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 303-310.
• Weber, M. (2009). The theory of social and economic organization. Simon and Schuster.
• Weick, K. E. (1977). Organization design: Organizations as self-designing systems. Organizational Dynamics, 6(2), 31-46.
• Willson, J.W. (2000). The relatıon of ındıvıdual polıtıcal behavıor, perceptıons of organızatıonal polıtıcs, and organızatıonal cıtızenshıp behavıor: ıntegratıng organızatıonal justıce. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, Teksas.
• Witt, L. A., Hilton, T. F., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2001). Addressing politics in matrix teams. Group and Organization Management, 26(2), 230-247.
• Yuan, K. H., Bentler, P. M., & Zhang, W. (2005). The effect of skewness and kurtosis on mean and covariance structure analysis: The univariate case and its multivariate implication. Sociological Methods & Research, 34(2), 240-258.