Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Bilgiler Odaklı Epistemolojik İnançları, Öğrenme Yaklaşımları, Akademik Risk Alma Davranışları ve Ders Başarıları Arasındaki İlişkiler: Bir Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 1, 179 - 199, 31.01.2020

Servet Üztemur , Erkan Dinç , İsmail Acun

Öz

Bu araştırmada ortaokul öğrencilerinin sosyal bilgiler odaklı epistemolojik inançları, öğrenme yaklaşımları, akademik risk alma davranışları ve akademik başarıları arasındaki yordayıcı ve açıklayıcı ilişkileri, öne sürülen model üzerinde ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Çok faktörlü karmaşık yordayıcı korelasyonel desenin kullanıldığı araştırmanın örneklemini 2017-2018 eğitim-öğretim yılında Manisa ili Yunusemre ilçesindeki devlet ortaokullarından basit seçkisiz örnekleme yoluyla seçilmiş 494 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Öğrencilerin epistemolojik inançlarının belirlenmesinde “Ortaokul Öğrencileri Epistemolojik İnanç Ölçeği”, öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesinde “Sosyal Bilgiler Öğrenme Yaklaşımları Ölçeği”, akademik risk alma davranışlarının belirlenmesinde “Sosyal Bilgiler Odaklı Akademik Risk Alma Ölçeği” ve sosyal bilgiler ders başarılarının belirlenmesinde ise yazılı sınav notları kullanılmıştır. Öne sürülen modelin test edilmesinde yapısal eşitlik modellemesinden yararlanılmıştır. Bulgular; ortaokul öğrencilerinin sosyal bilgiler odaklı epistemolojik inançlarının öğrenme yaklaşımlarını, akademik risk alma davranışlarını ve akademik başarılarını anlamlı bir şekilde yordadığını ortaya koymuştur. Sosyal bilgiler öğrenme yaklaşımları akademik risk alma davranışlarını anlamlı bir şekilde yordamıştır. Öğrenme yaklaşımları ve akademik risk alma davranışları sosyal bilgiler akademik başarılarını anlamlı bir şekilde kısmen yordamıştır. Araştırma sonuçları ilgili değişkenlerin sosyal bilgiler ders başarısı üzerinde doğrudan ve dolaylı bir etkiye sahip olduklarını göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal bilgiler, ortaokul öğrencileri, epistemolojik inançlar, öğrenme yaklaşımları, akademik risk alma davranışları, yapısal eşitlik modellemesi, yordayıcı korelasyonel desen

The Relationships amongst Middle School Students’ Social Studies-Oriented Epistemological Beliefs, Learning Approaches, Academic Risk-Taking Behaviors and Their Course Success: A Structural Equation Modeling

Öz

Within this research, it is aimed to reveal the predictive and explanatory relationships among the middle school students’ social studies–focused epistemological beliefs, learning approaches, academic-risk taking behaviors and their course success on the suggested model. 494 students chosen from the public middle schools in Yunusemre district of the city of Manisa in 2017-2018 academic year through simple random sampling constitute the sampling of the research in which the multi-factor complex predictive correlational pattern has been used. While determining, the students’ epistemological beliefs “Middle School Students’ Epistemological Belief Inventory”; determining the learning approaches, “Social Studies Learning Conceptions Scale”, determining the academic risk taking behaviors, “Social Studies-Oriented Academic Risk-Taking Scale’’ and while determining the social studies course, success written exam marks were used. The structural equation modeling was used to test the suggested model. The findings have indicated that middle school students’ social studies-focused epistemological beliefs meaningfully predict the learning approaches, academic risk-taking behaviors and their academic success. Social studies learning approaches have meaningfully predicted their academic risk-taking behaviors. Learning approaches and academic risk-taking behaviors have meaningfully but partially predicted social studies academic success. The results of the research shows that the relevant variables have a direct and indirect influence on social studies course success.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social studies, middle school students, epistemological beliefs, learning approaches, academic risk taking, structural equation modeling, predictor correlation model

Kaynakça

• Aypay, A. (2011). Öğretme ve öğrenme anlayışları ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlaması ve epistemolojik inançlar ile öğretme ve öğrenme anlayışları arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(1), 7-29.
• Balkıs, M., Duru, E., Buluş, M. & Duru, S. (2006). Üniversite öğrencilerinde akademik erteleme eğiliminin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 2 (7), 57-73.
• Başbay, M. (2013). Analysing the relationship of critical thinking and metacognition with epistemological beliefs through structural equation modeling. Education and Science. 38(169), 249-262.
• Batı, A.H., Tetik, C., & Gürpınar, E. (2010). Öğrenme yaklaşımları ölçeği yeni şeklini Türkçeye uyarlama ve geçerlilik güvenirlilik çalışması. Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, 30(5), 1639-1646.
• Baxter-Magolda, M. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college. Gender-related patterns in students intellectual development. Jossey-Bass.
• Beckwith, J. B. (1991). Approaches to learning, their context and relationship to assessment performance. Higher Education, 22, 17–30.
• Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 210-223.
• Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R. & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Womens' ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. USA: Basic Books.
• Beverley, J. (2005) Perceptions of the learning context and learning approaches: Implications for quality learning outcomes in accounting. Accounting Education, 14(3), 271-291. Bıyıklı, C. (2016). Öğrencilerin öğrenme yaklaşımları ile ders çalışma süreleri arasındaki ilişki. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 98-119. DOI: 10.17679/iuefd.17345407 Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. London: Open University Press.
• Biggs, J. B. (2001). Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach? In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Biggs, J.B., Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y.P. (2001) The revised two factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.
• Brownlee, J., Purdie, N. & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2001) Changing epistemological beliefs in pre-service teacher education students. Teaching in Higher Education 6(2). 247-268.
• Buehl, M. M. (2003). At the crossroads of epistemology and motivation: Modeling the relations between students’ domain-specific epistemological beliefs, achievement motivation, and task performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
• Burr, J. E. & Hofer, B. K. (2002). Personal epistemology and theory of mind: Deciphering young children’s beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 199-224.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. (17. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Canıdemir, A. (2013). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımları ve başarı amaç yönelimlerinin akademik başarı ile ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 203–221.
• Cavallo, A.M.L., & Schafer, L.E. (1994). Relationships between students’ meaningful learning orientation and their understanding of genetic topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(4), 393-418.
• Chan, K. W. (2002). Students' epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning. Paper presented at the AARE2002 Conference held at Brisbane, Australia from 1-5 December.
• Chan, K. W. (2003). Hong Kong teacher education students' epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning. Research in Education, 69, 36-50.
• Chan, K. W. (2011). Preservice teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs and conceptions about learning. Instructional Science, 39(1), 87-108.
• Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. G. (2002). Exploratory study of Hong Kong teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs: Cultural perspectives and implications on beliefs research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 392-414.
• Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 817-831.
• Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 75-87.
• Chinn, C. (2009). Epistemological Beliefs. 15/01/2018 tarihinde http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_56b24c020101geo3.html adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Clifford, M. M. (1988). Failure tolerance and academic risk taking in ten to twelve year old students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 15-27.
• Clifford, M. M. (1991). Risk taking: Theoretical, empirical and educa-tional considerations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 263-297.
• Clifford, M.M. & Chou, F.C. (1991). Effects of payoff and task context on academic risk-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 499-507.
• Clifford, M. M., Chou, F. C., Mao, K. N., Yun Lan, W., & Kuo, S. Y. (1990). Academic risk taking, development, and external constraint. The Journal of Experimental Education, 59(1), 45-64.
• Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I. & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary educational psychology, 29(2), 186-204.
• Cuthbert, P. F. (2005). The student learning process: learning styles or learning approaches. Teaching in Higher education, 10(2), 235-249.
• Çakır, E., & Yaman, S. (2015). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin zihinsel risk alma becerileri ve üst bilişsel farkındalıkları ile akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişki. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2), 163-178.
• Çelik, H. E., & Yılmaz, V. (2013). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi temel kavramlar uygulamalar programlama. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. (Üçüncü baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
• Çolak, E. (2006). İşbirliğine dayalı öğretim tasarımının öğrencilerin öğrenme yaklaşımlarına, akademik başarılarına ve öğrenmenin kalıcılığına etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Davidson, R.A. (2002). Relationship of study approach and exam performance. Journal of Accounting Education, 20(1), 29-44.
• Deryakulu, D. (2004). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme ve ders çalısma stratejileri ile epistemolojik inançları arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve uygulamada eğitim yönetimi, 38, 230-249.
• Deryakulu, D. (2014). Epistemolojik İnançlar. Y. Kuzgun ve D. Deryakulu (Edt.), Eğitimde Bireysel Farklılıklar (s. 261-289). Üçüncü Basım. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
• Deryakulu, D. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Epistemolojik inanç ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 2(8), 111-125.
• Deryakulu, D., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Epistemolojik inanç ölçeğinin faktör yapısının yeniden incelenmesi: Cinsiyet ve öğrenim görülen program türüne göre epistemolojik inançların karşılaştırılması. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 5(18), 57-70.
• Dinç, E., İnel, Y., & Üztemur, S. (2016). Epistemolojik inanç ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 767-783.
• Diseth, Å., & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational psychology, 23(2), 195-207.
• Donovan, M. S. & Bransford, J. D. (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom.Washington: National Academies Press.
• Drew, P. Y., & Watkins, D. (1998). Affective variables, learning approaches, and academic achievement: A causal modeling investigation with Hong Kong Chinese tertiary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 173-188.
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological review, 95(2), 256-273.
• Ekinci, N. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34(151), 74-88.
• Ekinci, N. (2017). Examining the relationships between epistemological beliefs and teaching and learning conceptions of lower-secondary education teachers, Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 18(1), 344-358. DOI: 10.17679/inuefd.307065
• Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325-345.
• Entwistle, N.J., & Smith, C.A. (2002). Personal understanding and target understanding: mapping influences on the outcomes of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 321-342.
• Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57-72.
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. (8th edt). New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
• Gezer, M., İlhan, M., & Şahin, İ. F. (2014). Sosyal bilgiler odaklı akademik risk alma ölçeğinin (SOARAÖ) geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kalem Uluslararası Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 125-164.
• Gezer, M., & Şahin, İ. F. (2017). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğrenme Yaklaşımları Ölçeği (SÖYÖ): Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. İlköğretim Online, 16(1), 228-244.
• Harteis, C., Gruber, H., & Hertramph, H. (2010). How epistemological beliefs influence e-learning in daily work-life. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 201.
• Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378-405.
• Hofer, B. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353–383.
• Hofer, B. K. (2004). Exploring the dimensions of personal epistemology in differing classroom contexts: Student interpretations during the first year of college. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 129-163.
• Hofer, B. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-144.
• Holschuh, J. L. (1998). Epistemological beliefs in ıntroductory biology: addressing measurement concerns and exploring the relationships with strategy use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Georgia, Athens. Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 9908606).
• Houghton, W. (2004). Engineering subject centre guide: Learning and teaching theory for engineering academics. Loughborough: Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre, Loughborough University.
• House, D. J. (2002). An investigation of the effects of gender and academic self-efficacy on academic risk-taking for adolescent students. UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations. Umi Number: 3066174.
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
• İlhan, M. & Çetin, B. (2013). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin matematik odaklı akademik risk alma davranışları: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. E-uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 1-28.
• İlhan, M., Çetin, B., Öner Sünkür, M., & Yılmaz, F. (2013). Ders çalışma becerileri ile akademik risk alma arasındaki ilişkinin kanonik korelasyon ile incelenmesi. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 123-146.
• Kanadlı, S., & Akbaş, A. (2015). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının epistemolojik inançları, öğrenme yaklaşımları ve LYS puanları arasındaki ilişkiler. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1) 16-131.
• Khalid, A., & Azeem, M. (2012). Constructivist vs traditional: effective instructional approach in teacher education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 170-177.
• Kılıç, D. (2009). Öğrencilerin genetik kavramları anlama düzeyleri ile mantıksal düşünme yetenekleri ve öğrenme yaklaşımları arasındaki ilişki. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Kizilgunes, B., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2009). Modeling the relations among students' epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. The Journal of educational research, 102(4), 243-256.
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3. edition). New York/London: The Guilford Press. Koç-Erdamar, G., & Bangir-Alpan, G. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının epistemolojik inançları. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 6(4), 2689-2698.
• Korkmaz, H. (2002). Fen eğitiminde proje tabanlı öğrenmenin yaratıcı düşünme, problem çözme ve akademik risk alma düzeylerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Kuhn, D., Cheney, R. & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328.
• Lietz, P. (2011). The impact of values and learning approaches on student achievement: Gender and academic discipline ınfluences. Issues in Educational Research, 21(2), 201-231.
• Lublin, J. (2013). Deep, surface and strategic approaches to learning. Centre for Teaching and Learning Good Practice in Teaching and Learning.
• Mohamed, M. T., & El-Habbal, M. (2013). The relationship between epistemological beliefs and academic performance: are better students always more mature? Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 158.
• Mansour, N. (2009). Science teachers' beliefs and practices: Issues, implications and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(1), 25-48.
• Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning: I-Outcome and process. British Journal of Psychology, 46(4), 4-11.
• Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning: II-Outcome as a function of the learners conception of the task. British Journal of Psychology, 46, 115-127.
• McManus, I.C., Richards, P. & Winder, B.C. (1999). Intercalated degrees, learning styles, and career preferences: Prospective longitudinal study of UK medical students. British Medical Journal. International edition, 319, 542-546.
• Meyer, D.K., Turner, J.C., & Spencer, C.A. (1997). Challenge in a mathematics classroom: Students’ motivation and strategies in project-based learning. Elementary School Journal, 97, 501–521.
• Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemological beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42, 173–190.
• Neihart, M. (2010). Systematic risk-taking. Roeper Review, 21(4), 289-292.
• Otting, H., Zwall, W., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2010). The structural relationship between students’ epistemological beliefs and conceptions of teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 741-760.
• Ozkal, K., Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Sungur, S. (2009). A conceptual model of relationships among constructivist learning environment perceptions, epistemological beliefs, and learning approaches. Learning and individual differences, 19(1), 71-79.
• Öner Sünkür, M. (2013). Fen ve Teknoloji dersinde tahmin et-gözle-açıkla yöntemi ile desteklenmiş yansıtıcı düşünmeye dayalı etkinlik uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Malatya.
• Öner Sünkür, M., İlhan, M., Kinay, İ. & Kılınç, M. (2013). An examinatıon of the relation between 8th grade students’ level of academic risk taking and their positive and negative perfectionism traits. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 42(2), 01-10.
• Özbay, H. E. (2016). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin akademik başarılarının bilimsel epistemolojik inançlar ve zihinsel risk alma davranışları ile ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Malatya.
• Özkan, Ş. (2008). Modelling elementary students’ science achievement: the interrelationships among epistemological beliefs, learning approaches and self-regulated learning strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University Ankara, Turkey.
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and education research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Education Research, 62, 307-332.
• Peled, I. (1997). Forms of passiveness encoding and risk taking of poor math learners, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 28(4), 581-589.
• Peng, H., & Fitzgerald, G. (2006). Relationships between teacher education students' epistemological beliefs and their learning outcomes in a case-based hypermedia learning environment. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 255-285.
• Phan, H. P. (2006). Examination of student learning approaches, reflective thinking, and epistemological believes: A latent variables approach. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, No. 10, Vol 4(3), 577-610.
• Phan, H. P. (2008). Predicting change in epistemological beliefs, reflective thinking and learning styles: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75-93.
• Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K., (1999). Relational perspectives on higher education teaching and learning in the sciences. Studies in Science Education, 33(1), 31-60.
• Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge Farmer.
• Ricco, R., Pierce, S. S., & Medinilla, C. (2010). Epistemological beliefs and achievement motivation in early adolescence. The journal of early adolescence, 30(2), 305-340.
• Rodríguez, L., & Cano, F. (2006). The epistemological beliefs, learning approaches and study orchestrations of university students. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 617-636.
• Rodriguez, L., & Cano, F. (2007). The learning approaches and epistemological beliefs of university students: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 647-667.
• Ryan, M. P. (1984). Monitoring text comprehension: Individual differences in epistemological standards. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 248-258.
• Saunders, G.L. (1998). Relationships among epistemological beliefs, gender, approaches to learning, and implementation of instruction in chemistry laboratory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma.
• Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498-504.
• Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 406–411.
• Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesising epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293-319.
• Schommer, M. (1998). The role of adults’ beliefs about knowledge in school, work, and everyday life. In, M. C. Smith & T. Pourchot (Eds.). Adult learning and development: Perspectives from educational psychology. (pp. 127-143). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological belief system. In B. Hofer, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.). Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing (pp. 103-119). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational psychologist, 39(1), 19-29.
• Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 435–443.
• Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, P. K., & Barker, S. (2003). Epistemological beliefs across domains using biglan’s classification of academic disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 44, 347-366.
• Schommer, M. & Dunnell, P. A. (1994). A comparison of epistemological beliefs between gifted and non-gifted high school students. Roeper Review, 16(3), 207-210.
• Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, O. K. & Hutter, R. (2005). Epistemological beliefs, mathematical problem-solving beliefs, and academic performance of middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 105(3), 289-304.
• Schraw, G. (2013). Conceptual integration and measurement of epistemological and ontological beliefs in educational research. ISRN Education, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/327680
• Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemological Belief Inventory (EBI). B. Hofer, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.). Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing. (pp. 261-277). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New York: Routledge.
• Senemoğlu, N. (2004). Gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim: Kuramdan uygulamaya. (4. baskı). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
• Sipahi, B., Yurtkoru, S. & Çinko, M. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS’le veri analizi. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
• Skaar, N. R. (2009). Development of the adolescent exploratory and risk behavior rating scale. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, Minnesota University.
• Strum, I. S. (1971). The relationship of creativity and academic risk-taking among fifth graders: Final report. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED046212.
• Şahin-Taşkın, Ç. (2012). Epistemolojik inançlar: öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme yaklaşımlarını yordayıcı bir değişken. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(19), 273-285.
• Şeker, H. & Gençdoğan, B. (2006). Psikolojide ve eğitimde ölçme aracı geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
• Tanriverdi, B. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2635-2642.
• Tarabashkina, L., & Lietz, P. (2011). The impact of values and learning approaches on student achievement: Gender and academic discipline influences. Issues in Educational Research, 21(2), 210-231.
• Tay, B., Özkan, D. & Akyürek Tay, B. (2009). The effect of academic risk taking levels on the problem solving ability of gifted students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1099-1104.
• Trautwein, U. & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Epistemological beliefs, school achievement and college major: A large-scale longitudinal study on the impact of certainty beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 348–366.
• Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22(3), 251-66.
• Tsai, C. -C. (1998). An analysis of scientific epistemological beliefs and learning orientations of Taiwanese eighth graders. Science Education, 82, 473−489.
• Uysal, E. (2010). A modeling study: the ınterrelatıonshıps among elementary students’ epistemological belıefs, learnıng envıroment perceptıons, learnıng approaches and scıence achıevement. Unpublished master thesis. Middle East Technical University Social Sciences Institute, Ankara.
• Üztemur, S., Dinç, E. ve İnel, Y. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin epistemolojik inançlarının ölçülmesi: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 1459-1489. doi: 10.23891/efdyyu.2018.112
• Qian, G., & Elvermann, D. (2000). Relationship between epistemological beliefs and conceptual change. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16(1), 59-74.
• Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of approaches to learning: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 165–195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Wong, N., & Watkins, D. (1998). A longitudinal study of the psychosocial environment and learning approaches in the Hong Kong classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 247–254.
• Zeegers, P. (2001). Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 115–132.
• Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Are learning approaches and thinking styles related? A study in two Chinese populations. The Journal of psychology, 134(5), 469-489.
• Zhu, C., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2008). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, learning conceptions, and approaches to study: a cross-cultural structural model?. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(4), 411-423.