Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yeni Kapitalizmin Mekânsal Örgütlenme Biçimi Olarak Yaratıcı Kentler: Singapur Örneği

Yıl 2024, , 1703 - 1730, 30.10.2024
https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1373200

Öz

Bu çalışmada 20. yüzyılın son çeyreğinde sosyo-ekonomik yapıda meydana gelen dönüşümlerin kentsel mekânda yansımaları incelenmiştir. Yeni kapitalizmin yüksek teknoloji ve bilgi merkezli yeni ilişkileri, küresel çapta sermaye ve finans akışları, Kuzey Amerika ve Batı Avrupa kentlerinin sanayi üretimini güney ülkelere kaydırması sonucu dünyanın önde gelen kentleri yönetim, denetim, finans ve bankacılık merkezleri haline gelmiştir. Küresel kent veya dünya kenti olarak analiz edilen bu süreçlerin yanında, yeni kapitalizmin kültürel-yaratıcı sektörler aracılığıyla kültürle kurduğu yeni ilişki yaratıcı kent modelini meydana getirmiştir. Yaratıcılık ve inovasyon tarafından şekillendirilen yeni küresel ekonomi, kentsel mekânı yaratıcı bir sosyal çevre ve yaratıcı süreçler inşa etmek üzere yeniden tasarlamaktadır. Yaratıcı kent tartışmaları bu noktada kentin çok aktörlü, çok katmanlı ve disiplinler arası yöntemlerle inşa edilmesine ve toplumların soft altyapılarının kentte görünür kılınmasına odaklanmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, son yıllarda gelişen Singapur gibi Güney Asya kentleri incelemeye değer örnekler sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada yeni kapitalizmin kent mekânı ile kurduğu ilişki yaratıcı kentler üzerinden Singapur kent devleti örneğinde değerlendirilmiştir. Singapur İstatistik Kurumu tarafından sağlanan nicel verilerle Singapur’da tam bağımsızlık sonrası yaşanan kentsel dönüşüm ve yaratıcı kentleşme süreci betimleyici bir dille ele alınmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Abshire, J.E. (2011). The History of Singapore. California: Greenwood.
  • Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Theory, Culture & Society,7, 295-310.
  • Baum, S. (1999). Social Transformations in the Global City: Singapore. Urban Studies, 36 (7), 1095-1117.
  • Bell, D., de-Shalit, A. (2011). The Spirit of Cities, Why the Identity of a City Matters in a Global Age. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Burgess, E.W. (2018). Şehrin Büyümesi: Araştırmaya Giriş. (Pnar Karababa Kayalıgil, Çev). Park, R. E. ve Burgess, E. W (Der.), Şehir, Kent Ortamındaki İnsan Davranışlarının Araştırılması Üzerine Öneriler içinde, (ss. 89-106). Ankara: Heretik.
  • Chang, T. C. (2000). Renaissance Revisited: Singapore as a Global City for the Arts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24 (4), 818-831.
  • Chang, T.C., Lee, W. K. (2003). Renaissance City Singapore: a Study of Art Spaces. Area, 35 (2), 128-141.
  • Chong, H.K. (2017). Era of Globalization: Singapore’s New Urban Economy and the Rise of a World Asian City. Kiang, H.C. (Der). 50 Years of Urban Planning in Singapore içinde. (ss. 273-286). Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Chye, K.T., Guo, R. (2017). Making Singapore a Livable and Sustainable City: Our Urban Systems Approach. Kiang, H.C. (Der). 50 Years of Urban Planning in Singapore içinde, (ss. 81-100). Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Clark, T.N. (2004). The City as an Entertainment Machine, Urban Policy, 9, 1-17.
  • Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of Innovation Approaches, Their Emergence and Characteristics. Edquist, C (Der.). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations içinde (ss. 1-35). London: Printer.
  • Evans, G. (2001). Cultural Planning: an Urban Renaissance?. London: Routledge.
  • Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the Creative Class. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Florida, R. (2017). The New Urban Crisis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Giddens, A. (2020) Modernliğin Sonuçları, Çev. Ersin Kuşdil, İstanbul, Ayrıntı.
  • Hall, P. (1998). Cities in Civilization. New York, NY: Pantheon.
  • Hall, S. (1988). Brave New World. Marxism Today, October, 24-29.
  • Hannigan, J. (1998). Fantasy City. London: Routledge.
  • Hiroshi, S., Hitoshi, H. (1999). Japan and Singapore in the World Economy. London: Routledge.
  • Huat, C.B. (2011). Singapore as Model: Planning Innovations, Knowledge Experts”, Worlding Cities, Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global, Ed. Roy, A. ve Ong, A., w.place, s. 29-54.
  • Huat, C.B. (2011). Singapore as Model: Planning Innovations, Knowledge Experts. Roy, A. ve Ong, A., (Der). Worlding Cities, Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global içinde, (ss. 29-54).West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Kawasaki, K. (2010). Singapore: A Creative City, Global Cultural Policies and New Cosmopolitanism. The Annals of Japan Association for Urban Sociology, 28, 75-89.
  • Kawasaki, K. (2013). Singapore as a Creative City in Globalisation: Cultural Policies and New Cosmopolitanism. Journal of Global Media Studies, 12, 31-40.
  • Kong, L. (2012). Ambitions of a Global City: Arts, Culture and Creative Economy in ‘Post-Crisis’ Singapore. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 18 (3), 279-294.
  • Landry, C. (2000). The Creative City, A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London: Earthscan.
  • Landry, C. (2006). The Art of City-Making. London: Earthscan.
  • Landry, C. (2008). The Intercultural City, Planning for Diversity Advantage. London: Earthscan
  • Landry, C., Bianchini, F. (1995). The Creative City. London: Demos.
  • Lash, S., Urry, J. (1994). Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage.
  • Lundvall, B. A., Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industrial Studies, IV, 23-42.
  • Mahbubani, K. (2017). Singapore: The Smartest city on Our Planet. Kiang, H.C. (Der.) 50 Years of Urban Planning in Singapore içinde, (ss. 311-313). Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Mumford, L. (2019). Tarih Boyunca Kent: Kökenleri, Geçirdiği Değişimler ve Geleceği. (Gürol Koca ve Tamer Tosun, Çev). İstanbul: Ayrıntı. (Orijinal Eserin Yayın Tarihi 1961)
  • Parker, G. (2004). Sovereign City, The City-State Through History. London: Reaktion Books.
  • Pratt, A. C. (2008). Creative Cities: The Cultural Industries and the Creative Class. Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography, 90 (2), 107-117.
  • Pratt, A.C. (2008). Creative Cities: The Cultural Industries and the Creative Class. Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography, 90 (2), 107-117.
  • Pratt, A.C., Jeffcutt, P. (2009). Creativity, Innovation and the Cultural Economy: Snake Oil fort he Twenty-first Century?. A.C. Pratt., P. Jeffcutt (Der.), Creativity, Innovation and the Cultural Economy içinde (ss. 1-19). London: Routledge.
  • Raban, J. (1974). Soft City. London: Picador Classsic.
  • Russo, M. (1985). Technical Change and the Industrial District: The Role of Interfirm Relations in the Growth and Transformation of Ceramic Tile Production in Italy. Research Policy, 14, 329-343.
  • Sassen, S. (1991). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Scott, A. J. (2008). Social Economy of the Metropolis: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of Cities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Scott, A. J. (2014). Beyond the Creative City: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the New Urbanism. Regional Studies, 48 (4), 565-578.
  • Scott, A.J. (2006). Creative Cities: Conceptual Issues and Policy Questions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28 (1), 1-17.
  • Scott, A.J. (2008). Social Economy of the Metropolis: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of Cities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Scott, A.J. (2012). A World in Emergence, Cities and Regions in the 21st Century. Cheltenham: Edgar.
  • Sönmez, A. (2001). Doğu Asya ‘Mucizesi’ ve Bunalımı. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Suner, A. (2018). Hong-Kong-İstanbul: Şehri Şahsileştirmek. İstanbul: Metis. Weber, A.F. (1965). The Growth of Cities in Nineteenth Century: A Study in Statistics. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Yeoh, B.S. (2005). The Global Cultural City? Self-Imagineering and Politics in the (Multi)Cultural Marketplaces of South-east Asia. Urban Studies, 42 (5-6), 945-958.
  • Yok, T.P. (2017). Greening Singapore: Past Achievements, Emerging Chanllenges. Kiang, H.C. (Der.) 50 Years of Urban Planning in Singapore içinde, (ss. 177-195). Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Yuen, B. (1996). Creating the Garden City: Singapore Experience. Urban Studies, 33 (6), 955-970.
  • Yusuf, S., Nabeshima, K. (2005). Creative Industries in East Asia. Cities, 22 (2), 109-122.
  • Zukin, S. (1989). Loft Living, Culture and Capital in Urban Change. New Jersey, Rutgers University Press.

Creative Cities as a Spatial Organization Form of the New Capitalism: The Case of Singapore

Yıl 2024, , 1703 - 1730, 30.10.2024
https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1373200

Öz

This study has discussed the reflections of socio-economic transformations on urban space during the last quarter of the 20th century. The new relationships of high-technology and information-centered new capitalism, global capital and finance flows, and the shift of industrial production from North America and Western Europe to southern countries have transformed the world's leading cities into centers of administration, control, finance, and banking. Alongside the processes analyzed as global cities or world cities, the relationship established by the new capitalism through the cultural-creative sectors with the creative city model also influences the forms of urbanization. The new global economy shaped by creativity and innovation is re-designing urban space to create a creative social environment and construct creative processes. Discussions on the creative city focus on the multi-actor, multi-layered, and interdisciplinary construction of the city and the visibility of societies' soft infrastructures in the city. In this context, developing South Asian cities like Singapore in recent years provide noteworthy examples. In this study, the relationship between the urban space and the new capitalism has been evaluated through the example of the Singaporean city-state using the lens of creative cities. The post-independence urban transformation and creative urbanization process in Singapore have been described in a narrative style using quantitative data provided by the Singapore Department of Statistics.

Kaynakça

  • Abshire, J.E. (2011). The History of Singapore. California: Greenwood.
  • Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Theory, Culture & Society,7, 295-310.
  • Baum, S. (1999). Social Transformations in the Global City: Singapore. Urban Studies, 36 (7), 1095-1117.
  • Bell, D., de-Shalit, A. (2011). The Spirit of Cities, Why the Identity of a City Matters in a Global Age. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Burgess, E.W. (2018). Şehrin Büyümesi: Araştırmaya Giriş. (Pnar Karababa Kayalıgil, Çev). Park, R. E. ve Burgess, E. W (Der.), Şehir, Kent Ortamındaki İnsan Davranışlarının Araştırılması Üzerine Öneriler içinde, (ss. 89-106). Ankara: Heretik.
  • Chang, T. C. (2000). Renaissance Revisited: Singapore as a Global City for the Arts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24 (4), 818-831.
  • Chang, T.C., Lee, W. K. (2003). Renaissance City Singapore: a Study of Art Spaces. Area, 35 (2), 128-141.
  • Chong, H.K. (2017). Era of Globalization: Singapore’s New Urban Economy and the Rise of a World Asian City. Kiang, H.C. (Der). 50 Years of Urban Planning in Singapore içinde. (ss. 273-286). Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Chye, K.T., Guo, R. (2017). Making Singapore a Livable and Sustainable City: Our Urban Systems Approach. Kiang, H.C. (Der). 50 Years of Urban Planning in Singapore içinde, (ss. 81-100). Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Clark, T.N. (2004). The City as an Entertainment Machine, Urban Policy, 9, 1-17.
  • Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of Innovation Approaches, Their Emergence and Characteristics. Edquist, C (Der.). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations içinde (ss. 1-35). London: Printer.
  • Evans, G. (2001). Cultural Planning: an Urban Renaissance?. London: Routledge.
  • Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the Creative Class. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Florida, R. (2017). The New Urban Crisis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Giddens, A. (2020) Modernliğin Sonuçları, Çev. Ersin Kuşdil, İstanbul, Ayrıntı.
  • Hall, P. (1998). Cities in Civilization. New York, NY: Pantheon.
  • Hall, S. (1988). Brave New World. Marxism Today, October, 24-29.
  • Hannigan, J. (1998). Fantasy City. London: Routledge.
  • Hiroshi, S., Hitoshi, H. (1999). Japan and Singapore in the World Economy. London: Routledge.
  • Huat, C.B. (2011). Singapore as Model: Planning Innovations, Knowledge Experts”, Worlding Cities, Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global, Ed. Roy, A. ve Ong, A., w.place, s. 29-54.
  • Huat, C.B. (2011). Singapore as Model: Planning Innovations, Knowledge Experts. Roy, A. ve Ong, A., (Der). Worlding Cities, Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global içinde, (ss. 29-54).West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Kawasaki, K. (2010). Singapore: A Creative City, Global Cultural Policies and New Cosmopolitanism. The Annals of Japan Association for Urban Sociology, 28, 75-89.
  • Kawasaki, K. (2013). Singapore as a Creative City in Globalisation: Cultural Policies and New Cosmopolitanism. Journal of Global Media Studies, 12, 31-40.
  • Kong, L. (2012). Ambitions of a Global City: Arts, Culture and Creative Economy in ‘Post-Crisis’ Singapore. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 18 (3), 279-294.
  • Landry, C. (2000). The Creative City, A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London: Earthscan.
  • Landry, C. (2006). The Art of City-Making. London: Earthscan.
  • Landry, C. (2008). The Intercultural City, Planning for Diversity Advantage. London: Earthscan
  • Landry, C., Bianchini, F. (1995). The Creative City. London: Demos.
  • Lash, S., Urry, J. (1994). Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage.
  • Lundvall, B. A., Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industrial Studies, IV, 23-42.
  • Mahbubani, K. (2017). Singapore: The Smartest city on Our Planet. Kiang, H.C. (Der.) 50 Years of Urban Planning in Singapore içinde, (ss. 311-313). Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Mumford, L. (2019). Tarih Boyunca Kent: Kökenleri, Geçirdiği Değişimler ve Geleceği. (Gürol Koca ve Tamer Tosun, Çev). İstanbul: Ayrıntı. (Orijinal Eserin Yayın Tarihi 1961)
  • Parker, G. (2004). Sovereign City, The City-State Through History. London: Reaktion Books.
  • Pratt, A. C. (2008). Creative Cities: The Cultural Industries and the Creative Class. Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography, 90 (2), 107-117.
  • Pratt, A.C. (2008). Creative Cities: The Cultural Industries and the Creative Class. Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography, 90 (2), 107-117.
  • Pratt, A.C., Jeffcutt, P. (2009). Creativity, Innovation and the Cultural Economy: Snake Oil fort he Twenty-first Century?. A.C. Pratt., P. Jeffcutt (Der.), Creativity, Innovation and the Cultural Economy içinde (ss. 1-19). London: Routledge.
  • Raban, J. (1974). Soft City. London: Picador Classsic.
  • Russo, M. (1985). Technical Change and the Industrial District: The Role of Interfirm Relations in the Growth and Transformation of Ceramic Tile Production in Italy. Research Policy, 14, 329-343.
  • Sassen, S. (1991). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Scott, A. J. (2008). Social Economy of the Metropolis: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of Cities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Scott, A. J. (2014). Beyond the Creative City: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the New Urbanism. Regional Studies, 48 (4), 565-578.
  • Scott, A.J. (2006). Creative Cities: Conceptual Issues and Policy Questions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28 (1), 1-17.
  • Scott, A.J. (2008). Social Economy of the Metropolis: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of Cities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Scott, A.J. (2012). A World in Emergence, Cities and Regions in the 21st Century. Cheltenham: Edgar.
  • Sönmez, A. (2001). Doğu Asya ‘Mucizesi’ ve Bunalımı. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Suner, A. (2018). Hong-Kong-İstanbul: Şehri Şahsileştirmek. İstanbul: Metis. Weber, A.F. (1965). The Growth of Cities in Nineteenth Century: A Study in Statistics. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Yeoh, B.S. (2005). The Global Cultural City? Self-Imagineering and Politics in the (Multi)Cultural Marketplaces of South-east Asia. Urban Studies, 42 (5-6), 945-958.
  • Yok, T.P. (2017). Greening Singapore: Past Achievements, Emerging Chanllenges. Kiang, H.C. (Der.) 50 Years of Urban Planning in Singapore içinde, (ss. 177-195). Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Yuen, B. (1996). Creating the Garden City: Singapore Experience. Urban Studies, 33 (6), 955-970.
  • Yusuf, S., Nabeshima, K. (2005). Creative Industries in East Asia. Cities, 22 (2), 109-122.
  • Zukin, S. (1989). Loft Living, Culture and Capital in Urban Change. New Jersey, Rutgers University Press.
Toplam 52 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Kent Sosyolojisi ve Toplum Çalışmaları
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Serkan Çelik 0000-0002-6012-8298

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 25 Ekim 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Ekim 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024

Kaynak Göster

APA Çelik, S. (2024). Yeni Kapitalizmin Mekânsal Örgütlenme Biçimi Olarak Yaratıcı Kentler: Singapur Örneği. İDEALKENT, 16(45), 1703-1730. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1373200