Adapting the General Self-Efficacy Scale to Kyrgyz Culture and Examining its Psychometric Properties

Öz

Aim: The aim of this study was to adapt the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) to Kyrgyz culture and examine its psychometric properties. Self-efficacy is the belief in one's ability to influence various aspects of one's life and to cope with difficulties that arise in various areas. Method: The study was designed according to survey design, one of the quantitative research designs. Data were collected from four different samples. Simple random sampling technique was used to determine the samples. SPSS and AMOS programs were used to analyze the data. Results: The study included the stages of testing the validity and reliability of the scale in the context of Kyrgyz culture as well as examining the general self-efficacy levels of university students according to various variables. The validity and reliability of the scale were tested using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and Crombach's Alpha value, and the values obtained were found to provide sufficient evidence. Conclusion: As a result of the analysis, the original German general self-efficacy scale was adapted to the Kyrgyz culture in a valid and reliable way.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Self-Efficacy
• Kyrgyz Culture
• University Students
• Scale Adaptation
• Validity and Reliability

Адаптация Шкалы Общей Самоэффективности К Условиям Кыргызской Культуры И Исследование Психометрических Свойств

Öz

Цель: Целью данного исследования была адаптация шкалы общей самоэффективности (ШОС) к кыргызской культуре и изучение ее психометрических свойств. Самоэффективность - это вера в то, что человек может влиять на различные аспекты своей жизни и справляться с трудностями, возникающими в различных сферах. Методы: Исследование было разработано в соответствии с дизайном опроса, одним из количественных исследовательских дизайнов. Данные были собраны на четырех различных выборках. для определения выборок использовался метод простой случайной выборки. Для анализа данных использовались программы SPSS и AMOS. Выводы: Исследование включает в себя этапы проверки валидности и надежности шкалы в контексте кыргызской культуры, а также изучение уровня общей самоэффективности студентов университета в зависимости от различных переменных. Валидность и надежность шкалы проверялись с помощью эксплораторного и конфирматорного факторного анализа, значения альфа Кромбаха, и полученные значения были признаны достаточными для подтверждения. Результаты: В результате проведенного анализа оригинальная немецкая шкала общей самоэффективности была адаптирована к кыргызской культуре валидным и надежным образом.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Самоэффективность
• Кыргызская Культура
• Студенты Университета
• Адаптация Шкалы
• Валидность И Надежность

Genel Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği’nin Kırgız Kültürüne Uyarlanması ve Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Genel Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği'ni (GSE) Kırgız kültürüne uyarlayıp psikometrik özelliklerini incelemektir. Öz-yeterlik, kişinin yaşamının çeşitli yönlerini etkileyebileceğine ve çeşitli alanlarda ortaya çıkan zorluklarla baş edebileceğine olan inancıdır. Yöntem: Çalışma nicel araştırma desenlerinden survey desenine göre tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmada dört farklı örneklemden veriler toplanmıştır. Örneklemlerin belirlenmesinde basit tesadüfi örnekleme tekniğinden yararlanılmıştır. verilerin analizinde SPSS ve AMOS programları kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırma, ölçeğin Kırgız kültürü bağlamında geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin test edilmesinin yanı sıra üniversite öğrencilerinin genel öz-yeterlik düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi aşamalarını da içermektedir. Ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirliği açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri, Crombach's Alpha değeri kullanılarak test edildi ve elde edilen değerlerin yeterli kanıt oluşturduğu görüldü. Sonuç: Analiz sonucunda orjinali Almanca olan genel öz yeterlik ölçeği Kırgız kültürüne geçerli ve güvenilir bir şekilde uyarlandı.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öz-Yeterlik
• Kırgız Kültürü
• Üniversite Öğrencileri
• Ölçek Uyarlama
• Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik

Kaynakça

1. AGNEW, C., & VANDERDRIT, L. E. (2009). Survey Methods in Relationship Research. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/psychpubs/21
2. AHMED, H., NAWAZ, S., & IMRAN RASHEED, M. (2019). Self-efficacy, Self-Esteem, and Career Success: The Role of Perceived Employability. Journal of Management Sciences, 6(2), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1906202
3. AKAİKE, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294359
4. AKBAŞ, A., & ÇELİKKALELİ, Ö. (2014). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının fen öğretimi özyeterlik inançlarının cinsiyet, öğrenim türü ve üniversitelerine göre incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.53326
5. AYDOĞDU, B., & SABAN, Y. (2018). Öğretmen Adaylarının Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Öz-Yeterlik İnançları ile Öğretmenlik Uygulaması Performansları Arasındaki İlişki. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 120–133.
6. BAHAR, A. (2023). Determining the Relationship between the Level of Self-efficacy and Quality of Life on Coping with Depression. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 255–260. https://doi.org/10.14744/jern.2021.22363
7. BANDURA, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
8. BANDURA, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

9. BANDURA, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University.
10. BANDURA, A. (2000). Self-efficacy: the foundation of agency. In W. J. Perring (Ed.), Control of human behavior mental processes and consciousness (pp. 17–37). Erlbaum.
11. BANDURA, A. (2018). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280
12. BARUT, E. (2011). İlköğretim II. kademe sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin öz yeterliliklerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi (Ankara İli Örneği) [Master Thesis]. Niğde University.
13. BERGMAN, D., & MORPHEW, J. (2015). Research and Teaching: Effects of a Science Content Course on Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy of Teaching Science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 044(03). https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst15_044_03_73
14. BOUİH, A., NADİF, B., & BENATTABOU, D. (2021). Assessing the Effect of General Self-efficacy on Academic Achievement Using Path Analysis: A Preliminary Study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 3(4), 18–24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351112669_Assessing_the_Effect_of_General_Self-efficacy_on_Academic_Achievement_Using_Path_Analysis_A_Preliminary_Study
15. BOZBAŞ, Y. (2015). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin öz yeterlilik inançları ve sınıf yönetimi beceri algıları arasındaki ilişki [Master Thesis]. İstanbul Aydın University.
16. CHA, E., KİM, K. H., & ERLEN, J. A. (2007). Translation of scales in cross‐cultural research: issues and techniques. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58(4), 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x
17. CHRİSTİANSEN, M., VİK, P., & JARCHOW A. (2002). Addictive behaviors cognitive behavioral outreach program. Journal of Community Psychology, 25(6), 519–533.
18. DENİZ, Z. (2007). The adaptation of psychological scales. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, 1(16), 40–41. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000160
19. DEVELLİS, R. F. (2003). Scale Development: Theory and Applications . Sage.
20. DOLAPÇI, S. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının öz-yeterlilik algıları ve kaynaştırma eğitime bakış açıları. Dokuz Eylül University.
21. EKİNCİ, H. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının öz yeterlik algıları: müzik, resim ve beden eğitimi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(3), 189–196.
22. ERDEN, E. (2007). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin fen öğretimi öz yeterlilik inançlarının öğrencilerin fen tutumları ve akademik başarıları üzerindeki etkisi [Master Thesis]. Ege University.
23. EYMUR, G., & ÇETİN, P. S. (2017). Argümantasyon Tabanlı Sorgulayıcı Araştırma Yönteminin Öğretmen Adaylarının Fen Öğretimi Öz Yeterlik İnancına Etkisi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.315852
24. FABRİGAR, L. R., WEGENER, D. T., MACCALLUM, R. C., & STRAHAN, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
25. FARLEY, H. (2020). Promoting self‐efficacy in patients with chronic disease beyond traditional education: A literature review. Nursing Open, 7(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.382
26. FLORES, I. M. (2015). Developing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy through field-based science teaching practice with elementary students. Research in Higher Education, 27(1), 1–16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1056173.pdf
27. FORNELL, C., & LARCKER, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
28. FORSYTH, A. D., & CAREY, M. P. (1998). Measuring self-efficacy in the context of HIV risk reduction: Research challenges and recommendations. Health Psychology, 17(6), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.17.6.559
29. FREUND, T., GENSİCHEN, J., GOETZ, K., SZECSENYİ, J., & MAHLER, C. (2013). Evaluating self‐efficacy for managing chronic disease: psychometric properties of the six‐item Self‐Efficacy Scale in Germany. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 19(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01764.x
30. GEİSİNGER, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.304
31. GİBSON, S., & DEMBO, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569
32. GUDMUNDSSON, E. (2009). Guidelines for translating and adapting psychological instruments. Nordic Psychology, 61(2), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276.61.2.29
33. GUL, Y. E. (2023b). A theoretical perspective on survey method from quantitative research methods. Universum:Psychology & Education, 106(4), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.32743/UniPsy.2023.106.4.15254
34. GÜL, Y. E. (2023a). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemlerinde Yaklaşımlar ve Felsefi İkilemler: Paradigma Savaşları. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, 13:3(13:3), 296–315. https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.68781
35. GUNNİNG, A. M., & MENSAH, F. M. (2011). Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Development of Self-Efficacy and Confidence to Teach Science: A Case Study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9198-8
36. HAİR, J. F., BLACK, W. C., BABİN, B. J., & ANDERSON, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
37. HAMBLETON, R. K., MERENDA, P. F., & SPEİLBERGER, C. D. (2009). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
38. HENSON, R. K. (2001). Teacher self-efficacy: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas. In Annual Meeting of the Educational Research Exchange. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED452208.pdf
39. HOOPER, D. (2012). Exploratory Factor Analysis. In H. Chen (Ed.), Approaches to Quantitative Research – Theory and its Practical Application: A Guide to Dissertation Students. Oak Tree Press.
40. IRVİANA, L., & AZLİYANTİ, E. (2023). The Effect of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), Organization-Based Self-Esteem and The Broad Role of Self-Efficacy on Predictors of Perception Employability. Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Bung Hatta, 18(2), 197–2009.
41. JESUS, L. M. T., & VALENTE, A. R. (2016). Cross-cultural adaptation of health assessment instruments. SLH LAB Speech, Language and Hearing Laboratory. https://sweet.ua.pt/lmtj/lmtj/JesusValente2016.pdf
42. JOVANOVİĆ, L., KUDLÁČEK, M., BLOCK, M. E., & DJORDJEVİĆ, I. (2014). Self-efficacy of pre-service physical education teacher toward teaching students with disabilities in general physical education classes in Serbia. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 7(2), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.5507/euj.2014.009
43. KARAKOÇ, F. Y., & DÖNMEZ, L. (2014). Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışmalarında Temel İlkeler. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 13(40), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.228738
44. KLEİNMAN, B. P., MİLLERY, M., SCİMECA, M., & POLİSSAR, N. L. (2002). Predicting Long-term Treatment Utilization among Addicts Entering Detoxification: The Contribution of Help-seeking Models. Journal of Drug Issues, 32(1), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260203200109
45. KUTLUCA, A. Y., & AYDIN, A. (2016). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Öz-Yeterlik İnançlarının Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi: Oluşturmacı Öğretimin Etkisi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2016.16.1-5000182919
46. LUSZCZYNSKA, A., GUTİÉRREZ‐DOÑA, B., & SCHWARZER, R. (2005). General self‐efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000041
47. MARKS, R., ALLEGRANTE, J. P., & LORİG, K. (2005). A Review and Synthesis of Research Evidence for Self-Efficacy-Enhancing Interventions for Reducing Chronic Disability: Implications for Health Education Practice (Part I). Health Promotion Practice, 6(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839904266790
48. MCCROSKY, J. C., & YOUNG, T. J. (1979). The use and abuse of factor analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research, 5(4), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00651.x
49. MUTLU-BOZKURT, T. (2013). Beden eğitimi öğretmeni adaylarının öz yeterliliklerinin incelenmesi [Master Thesis]. Gazi Üniversitesi.
50. NUNNALLY, J. C., & BERNSTEİN, I. H. (1994). The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248–292.
51. O’LEARY, A. (1992). Self-efficacy and health: Behavioral and stress-physiological mediation. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16(2), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173490
52. O’LEARY, A., SHOOR, S., LORİG, K., & HOLMAN, H. R. (1988). A cognitive-behavioral treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Health Psychology, 7(6), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.7.6.527
53. SCHWARZER, R., & JERUSALEM, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, NFER-NELSON.
54. WANG, A. Y., & RİCHARDE, R. S. (1988). Global versus task-specific measures of self-efficacy. The Psychological Record, 38, 533–541. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-21053-001
55. WEST, S. G., FİNCH, J. F., & CURRAN, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Sage.
56. WORTHİNGTON, R. L., & WHİTTAKER, T. A. (2006). Scale Development Research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
57. ZAJACOVA, A., LYNCH, S. M., & ESPENSHADE, T. J. (2005). Self-Efficacy, Stress, and Academic Success in College. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 677–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-4139-z