Developing Assessment Instrument to Measure Physics Problem Solving Skills for Mirror Topic

Yıl 2019, , 358 - 366, 01.07.2019

Arum Karima Permatasari Edi Istiyono Heru Kuswanto

https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.573872

Cited By: 6

Öz

The Problem solving skills are needed to students in physics learning. Physic problem can be seen in
daily, such as mirror topic. Student who has problem solving skills can solve question of mirror topic
not only by equation, but also use concepts and principles what he know. This research aimed to
develop a valid physics assessment to measure problem-solving skills for Senior High School
Students grade XI. The development stages include: (1) determination for general purpose, (2)
conceptual definition, (3) operational definition, (4) establishment for indicators, (5) construction for
grid questions, and (6) determination for test form. The development stage includes: (1) the content
validation by experts, (2) revision of the instrument, (3) the prepation for research (4) trial and
empirical validation. The disseminate stage was publication of journal. Subjects of this research was
55 students of Senior High School 2 Yogyakarta. Students as subjects of this research was chosen
who had learned mirror topic. According the result of the content validation and the empiric
validation, assessment instrument was valid to measure physics problem solving skills in mirror
topic. The content validation has 0,96 for all items, while the empirical validation has 0,97 ± 0,18 for
Infit MNSQ, it means all items are in accordance with PCM model. the assessment instrument has
value of goodness of fit un range -0.94 to 1.12 and has level of item difficulty in range -0,94 to 1.12,
those mean all items in the assessment instrumen are good. Futhermore, the assessment instrument
is valid in the content validation and the empirical validation and able to measure physics problem
solving skills. Categories problem-solving skills of subjects obtained of low, medium and high
category

Anahtar Kelimeler

Assessment instrument, mirror topic, physics assessment, physics problem solving skills, reasoned multiple choice

Kaynakça

• Aiken, L. R. (1980). Three coefficient of analyzing of the realibility and validity of ratings. International of Educational and Phsycological Measurement, 45(1), 955-967. Asysyifa,D.S., Jumadi, Wilujeng,I. & Kuswanto,H. (2019). Analysis of students critical thinking skills using partial credit models (Pcm) in physics learning. International Journal of Educational Research Review,4(2), 245-253. Delen, E. (2015). Enhancing a computer-based testing environment with optimum item response time. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1457–1472. Dewi, I.N., Poedjiastoeti, S. & Prahani, B.K. (2017). ELSII learning model based local wisdom to ımprove student’ problem-solving skills and scientific communication. International Journal of Education and Research, 5 (1), 107-118. Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual problem solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2). Dindar, M., Yurdakul, I. K., & Dönmez, F. I. (2013). Multimedia in test items: Animated questions vs. static graphics questions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 1876–1882. Erfianti,L., Istiyono,E. & Kuswanto,H. (2019). Developing lup instrument test to measure higher order thinking skills (Hots) Bloomian for senior high school students. International Journal of Educational Research Review,4(3),320-329. Gok, T. (2010). The General assessment of problem solving processes and metacognition in physics educatin. Eurasia Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 2(2), 110-122. Helaiya, S. (2010). Development and Implementation of Life Skills Programme for Student Teachers. Vadodara: Maharaja Sayaji Rao University of Baroda. Heller, K., & Heller, P. (2012). Cooperative problem solving in physics a user’s manual. Universitas of Minnesota. Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. B., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. B., Mohaffyza, M., & Mohamad, B. (2011). The level of marzano higher order thinking skills among technical education student. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(2), 121–125. Hopson, M. H., Simms, R. L., & Knezek, G. A. (2001). Using a technology-enriched environment to improve higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 109–119. Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno. (2014). Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika (PysTHOTS) Peserta Didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 1–12. Kemendikbud (2016). Permendikbud Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar.. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Kerry, E., & David, G,. (2011). An-other look at assessment: Assessment in learning. New Zaeland Journal of Teacher Work, 8(1), 11-20. Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. D. (2013). Educational testing and measurement: Classroom Application sand practice. Hoboken, NJ: Willey. Mcdonald, F. (2010). An inverstigation of student’ problem solving skills in an introductory physics class (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida. McNeill, M., Gosper, M., & Xu, J. (2012). Assessment choices to target higher order learning outcomes: The power of academic empowerment. Research in Learning Technology, 20(3), 283–296. Miller, P. W. (2008) Measurement and teaching. Indiana: Patrick W. Miller & Associates. Mundilarto. (2002). Kapita Selekta Pendidikan Fisika. Yogyakarta: Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika UNY. Nadapdap, A. T. Y., & Istiyono, E. (2017). Developing physics problem-solving skill test for grade X student of senior high school. Research and Evaluation in Education, 3(2), 114. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Doubloday Garden City. Uno, H, B. (2007). Model Pembelajaran Menciptakan Proses Belajar Mengajar yang Kreatif dan Efektif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Weir, J. (1974). Problem solving in everybody’s problem. The Science Teacher, 4, 16-18.