Investigation Of Relationship Between Basic Concept And Mean Length Of Utterances In Children With Autism

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 129 - 150, 15.07.2015

Ayfer Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.20489/intjecse.69125

Öz

The study was conducted to investigate the development of children with autism in terms of basic concepts and mean length of utterances (MLU). The sample of this study was consisted of 36-72 months of 30 children with autism living in Ankara City . While determining chronological ages of samples, it was important that autism and Down syndrome diagnosis in the health board report and special education evaluation report. The basic concepts scores were obtained through one-on-one application of the Boehm-3 Basic Concepts Test (36-71 months) for children in the groups of autism. Participants’ MLUs were determined by taking natural language samples.

It was determined that which concepts in the Boehm Basic Concepts Test can be primarily learned as the mean utterance level of the groups increases. While the top and the biggest concepts in the Boehm Basic Concepts Test were the most known concepts; around and some but not too much concepts were the most challenging concepts for children. When we investigated the relationship between the MLU and total basic concept score of the children with autism (r=0.60; p<0.01) were significant. It is thought that the obtained shed light for the researchers and educators in this field. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Basic concepts; mean length of utterances; language development of children with autism

Kaynakça

• Acarlar, F. ve Johnston, J. R. (2011). Acquisition of Turkish Grammatical Morphology by Children with Developmental Disorders. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders,46 (6), 728-38.
• Adams, A. M. ve Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Phonological Memory and Speech Production in Pre-school Children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 38, 403– 414.
• Adams, A. M. ve Gathercole, S. E. (2000). Limitations in Working Memory: Implications for Language Development. International Journal of Language and Communication,35, 95–116.
• Akçakın, M.,Polat.S. ve Kerimoğlu, E. (1993). Otistik ve Zeka Özürlü Çocukların Demografik ve Doğumla İlgili Özellikler Yönünden Karşılaştırılması.Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 4(1).
• Akoğlu, G. (2011). Gelişimsel Dil Bozukluğu Olan Ve Normal Gelişim Gösteren Çocuklarda Sözdizimini Anlama Becerileri İle Sözel Çalışma Belleği İlişkisinin İncelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ankara.
• Aksu-Koç, A. (2005). Dil Edinimi Araştırmalarının Dil Bozuklukları Açısından Önemi. 2. Ulusal Dil ve KonuşmaBozuklukları Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, Kök Yayıncılık, 39–56.
• Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği (APA), (2014). Ruhsal Bozuklukların Tanısal ve Sayımsal El Kitabı. Beşinci Baskı (DSM-5), (Çeviri E.Köroğlu), Ankara, Hekimler Yayın Birliği.
• Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği (APA), (2001). Ruhsal Bozuklukların Tanısal ve Sayısal El Kitabı.Yeniden Gözden Geçirilmiş Dördüncü Baskı (DSM-IV-TR), (Çeviri Ed.E.Köroğlu), Ankara, Hekimler Yayın Birliği.
• Bailey Jr, D.B. ve Wolery, M. (1992). Facilitating the Acquisition and Use of Communication Skills. Teaching Infants and Preschoolers with Disabilities. Merill, Prentice Hall, Ohio, USA.
• Bartolucci, G., Pierce, S. J. ve Streiner, D. (1980). Crosssectional Studies of Grammatical Morphemes in Autistic and Mentally Retarded Children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10 (1), 39–50.
• Beech, M., C. (1981). Concurrent Validity of the "Boehm Test of Basic Concepts". Learning Disability Quarterly, 4 (1), 53-60.
• Bloom, L. ve Lahey, M., (1978). Language Development and Language Disorders. John Wiley & Sons, Newyork. USA.
• Boehm, A., E. (1971). Boehm Test of Basic Concepts. Journal of Educational Measurement. 7 ( 2), 139-140.
• Boehm, A. E. (2000). Assessment of Basic Relational Concepts. B. A. Bracken (Ed.), The Psychoeducational Assessment of Preschool Children. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Boehm, A., E. (2001). Technical Report. Boehm 3. Preschool. Boehm Test of Basic Concepts. Third Edition. Web: http://psychcorp. pearsonassessments.com/ hai/images/Products/Boehm3/BoehmIII_TechRPT.pdf. 11 Aralık 2012’de alınmıştır.
• Boucher, J. (2003). Language Development in Autism. International Congress Series, 1254, 247-253.
• Bracken, B., A. ve Panter, J., E. ( 2011). Using The Bracken Basic Concept Scale and Bracken Concept Development Program in The Assessment and Remediation of Young Children’s Concept Development. Psychology in the Schools, 48 (5), 464-475.
• Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Carrow-Woolfolk, E. ve Lynch, J.,I. (1982). An Integrative Approach to Language Disorders in Children. Grune &Stratton. Florida. USA.
• Casby, M.W. (2011). An Examination of the Relationship of Sample Size and Mean Length of Utterance for Children with Developmental Language Impairment. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 27(3) 286–293.
• Çelebi, C. (2010). Otistik Bozukluğu Olan Çocukların OSU Düzeyine Göre Eşleşmiş Normal Gelişim Gösteren Çocuklarla Sözcük Çeşitliliği Bakımından Karşılaştırılması. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Eskişehir.
• Ege, P. (2005). Sözdizimsel ve Biçimbilgisel Gelişim. S. Topbaş (ed.). Dil ve Kavram Gelişimi, Ankara: Kök Yayıncılık.
• Ege, P. (2006). Farklı Engel Gruplarının İletişim Özellikleri ve Öğretmenlere Öneriler. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi, Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 7 (2), 1-23.
• Ege, P., Acarlar, F. ve Güleryüz, F. (1998). Türkçe kazanımında yaş ve ortalama sözce uzunluğunun ilişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 13, 41, 19-33.
• Eigsti, I.M., Bennetto, L. ve Dadlani, M. B. (2006). Beyond Pragmatics: Morphosyntactic Development in Autism. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 37, 1007–1023.
• Ergül, A. (2007). Boehm Okul Öncesi Temel Kavramlar Testi-3’ün 36-47 Aylık Çocuklar İçin Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Facon, B., Magis, D. ve Courbois, Y. (2012). On the Difficulty of Relational Concepts Among Participants with Down Syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 60–68.
• Frith, U. (1989). A New Look at Language and Communication in Autism. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 24, 123-150.
• Hudry, K., Leadbitter, K., Temple, K., Slonims, V., Mc Conachie, H., Aldred, C. (2010). Preschoolers with Autism Show Greater Impairment in Receptive Compared to Expressive Language Abilities. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45, 681–690.
• Kavale, K. (1982). A Comparison of Learning Disabled and Normal Children on the Boehm Test of Basic Concepts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15 (3), 160-162.
• Kaysılı-Keçeli, B. (2006). Otistik Çocukların Dil Özelliklerinin Kullanım Açısından İncelenmesi.Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Kuder, S. J. (1997). Understanding Language and Communication. Teaching Students with Language and Communication Disabilities. Allyn & Bacon. USA.
• Kulaksızoğlu, A. (2003). Farklı Gelişen Çocuklar. Epsilon Yayıncılık Hizmetleri. İstanbul. Mclean, M., Bailey Jr., D., B. ve Wolery, M. (1996). Assessing Communication Skills.
• Assesing Infants and Preschoolers with Special Needs. Prentice Hall, Ohio, USA. MEB, (2006a). Okul Öncesi Eğitim Programı (36-72 aylık Çocuklar için). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınevi. Ankara.
• MEB, (2006b). Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınevi. Ankara.
• Owens, R. (1984). Preschool Language Development. Language Development, An Introduction. Charles E. Merrill. Columbus, Ohio.USA.
• Owens, R. (1999). Language Disorders. A Functioanal Approach to Assessment and Intervention. Ally&Bacon.Boston.USA.
• Paul, R. (2001). Language Disorders. From Infancy through Adolescence. Assessment & Intervention. Mosby. Missouri. USA.
• Rosenberg, S., ve Abbeduto, L. (1993). Topics in Applied Psycholinguistics. Language and Communication in Mental Retardation, Development, Processes, and Intervention. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. New Jersey. USA.
• Salvia, J. ve Ysseldyke, J., E. (1978). Assessment of Language. Assessment in Special and Remedial Education. Houghton Mifflin Company. Boston. USA.
• Smith, D. D. (2001). Introduction to Special Education: Teaching in an Age of Opportunity, Allyn & Bacon. USA.
• Spector, C. C. (1979). The Boehm Test of Basic Concepts: Exploring the Test Results for Cognitive Deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12 (8), 66-69.
• Sucuoğlu, B. (2005). Otizm ve Otistik Bozukluğu Olan Çocuklar. A. Ataman (ed.). Özel Eğitim Gereksinimli Çocuklar ve Özel Eğitime Giriş. Gündüz Eğitim ve Yayıncılık. Ankara.
• Travis, L.L. ve Sigman, M. (1998). Social Deficits and Interpersonal Relationships in Autism. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 4, 65-72.
• Uyanık-Balat, G. (2009). Examining the Knowledge of Basic Concepts of Children Starting Primary Education. Early Child Development and Care, 179 (7), 911–918.
• Wagner, C. R. ve Nettelbladt, U. (2005). Tor: Case Study of A Boy with Autism Between The Age of Three and Eight. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 21(2), 123–145.
• Yıkgeç, A. (2005). A Validity Study of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M- CHAT) on a Turkish Sample.Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. İstanbul.
• Zhou, Z. ve Boehm, A. (2004). American and Chinese Children’s Understanding of Basic Relational Concepts in Directions. Psychology in the Schools, 41(2), 261-272.