BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Investigation of Self-Reported Teaching Style Preferences and Perceptions of Physical Education and Sport Teacher Candidates

Yıl 2015, Cilt 3 (Özel Sayı 1), 116 - 124, 27.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.14486/IJSCS267

Öz

The purpose of this study was to investigate self-reported teaching style preferences and perceptions of physical education and sport teacher candidates which studying Physical education and Sport Teacher department and teaching formation certificate programme
Randomly selected two-hundred and thirty physical education teacher candidates studying in 3 different universities participated in the study. In order to collect data Turkish version of “Physical Education Teachers’ Perceptions of Teaching Styles-(PETPTS)” was used.
Data were analyzed by using IBM SPSS (version 20.0). Descriptive statistics were presented. For statistical analysis, repeated measures anova was performed. According to analysis, while command style was the most preferred teaching styles of both physical education and sport teacher candidates, at the least was self-teaching styles. In addition to, Physical education teacher candidates were the highest command style perceptions while teaching formation certificate programme were the highest practice style in teaching style perception value. As a result of repeated measure of analysis, statistically significant interaction was found each sub-dimensions of using teaching style levels and teaching style perceptions
As a result of this study, difference was not found at prefered teaching style and perception values of sport teacher candidates which studying Physical education and Sport Teacher department and teaching formation certificate programme.
In cause of this situation, we can say that regardless of department of physical education and sport fundemantels, show similiar teaching styles. Also, teaching a new skill in physical education and sport result from, multiple teaching styles can be used interbedded. So that, teaching formation certificate programme does not change teaching styles of physical education and sport teacher candidates

Kaynakça

  • Byra M (2000) A Review of Spectrum Research. The Contributions of Two eras Quest 52 (3), 229-245.
  • Çelikten M, Şanal M, Yeni Y (2005). Teaching Profession and its Characteristics. Erciyes University, Institute of Social Sciences Journal , 19(2): 207–237
  • Demirhan G, Bulca Y, Altay F, Şirin R, Güvenç A, Aslan A, Güven B, Kangalgil M, Hünük D, Koca C, Açıkada C (2008) Comparison of the View of Partners Regarding the Physical Education Curriculum and its Delivery. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Science. 19 (3), 157-180
  • Ertan H, Çiçek Ş (2003) Student achievement evaluation approaches in Elementary Physical Education Courses in Turkey, Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 25, 76-83.
  • Hein V. Ries F, Pires F, Caune A, Emeljanovas A, Ekler JH, Valantiniene I (2012). The relationship between teaching styles and motivation to teach among physical education teachers. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 11, 123-130.
  • İnce ML, Hünük D (2010). Experienced Physical Education Teachers’ Use and Perceptions of Teaching Styles during the Educational Reform Period, Education and Science Vol 5, No 157: pp 128-139
  • Jaakkola T, Watt A (2011). Finnish physical education teachers' self-reported use and perceptions of Mosston and Ashworth's teaching styles. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30(3), 248-262.
  • Kirk D (2010) Physical Education Futures, New York: Routledge.
  • Kulinna PH, Cothran DJ (2003) Physical education teachers’ self-reported use and perceptions of various teaching styles, Learning and Instruction 13; 597–609.
  • Mosston M & Ashworth S, 2008, Teaching Physical Education, First Online Edition: pp:1-291.
  • Petray CK (1989). Organizing physical assessment (grades K-2): Strategies for the elementary physical education specialist JOPERD, 60(6), 57-60.
  • Saracaloğlu, AS, ve Kumral O, Kanmaz A (2009). Anxieties, Academic Motivation Levels and Competencies at Teaching Profession of Students at Secondary Education Fields Teaching Nonthesis Master Programme. Yüzüncü yıl University Faculty of Education Journal, 4: 38–54.
  • Saraç E, Muştu E (2013) Teacher Candidates’ usage of Physical Training Education Styles’ Levels and examination of Value Perceptions in relation to their Styles Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, Vol.4, No.2, Pg:112-124.
  • Yetim AA (1998). Social Missions of Teaching Profession and Physical Education Teachers, Atatürk University, 1st Sports Congress, Erzurum.
Yıl 2015, Cilt 3 (Özel Sayı 1), 116 - 124, 27.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.14486/IJSCS267

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Byra M (2000) A Review of Spectrum Research. The Contributions of Two eras Quest 52 (3), 229-245.
  • Çelikten M, Şanal M, Yeni Y (2005). Teaching Profession and its Characteristics. Erciyes University, Institute of Social Sciences Journal , 19(2): 207–237
  • Demirhan G, Bulca Y, Altay F, Şirin R, Güvenç A, Aslan A, Güven B, Kangalgil M, Hünük D, Koca C, Açıkada C (2008) Comparison of the View of Partners Regarding the Physical Education Curriculum and its Delivery. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Science. 19 (3), 157-180
  • Ertan H, Çiçek Ş (2003) Student achievement evaluation approaches in Elementary Physical Education Courses in Turkey, Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 25, 76-83.
  • Hein V. Ries F, Pires F, Caune A, Emeljanovas A, Ekler JH, Valantiniene I (2012). The relationship between teaching styles and motivation to teach among physical education teachers. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 11, 123-130.
  • İnce ML, Hünük D (2010). Experienced Physical Education Teachers’ Use and Perceptions of Teaching Styles during the Educational Reform Period, Education and Science Vol 5, No 157: pp 128-139
  • Jaakkola T, Watt A (2011). Finnish physical education teachers' self-reported use and perceptions of Mosston and Ashworth's teaching styles. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30(3), 248-262.
  • Kirk D (2010) Physical Education Futures, New York: Routledge.
  • Kulinna PH, Cothran DJ (2003) Physical education teachers’ self-reported use and perceptions of various teaching styles, Learning and Instruction 13; 597–609.
  • Mosston M & Ashworth S, 2008, Teaching Physical Education, First Online Edition: pp:1-291.
  • Petray CK (1989). Organizing physical assessment (grades K-2): Strategies for the elementary physical education specialist JOPERD, 60(6), 57-60.
  • Saracaloğlu, AS, ve Kumral O, Kanmaz A (2009). Anxieties, Academic Motivation Levels and Competencies at Teaching Profession of Students at Secondary Education Fields Teaching Nonthesis Master Programme. Yüzüncü yıl University Faculty of Education Journal, 4: 38–54.
  • Saraç E, Muştu E (2013) Teacher Candidates’ usage of Physical Training Education Styles’ Levels and examination of Value Perceptions in relation to their Styles Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, Vol.4, No.2, Pg:112-124.
  • Yetim AA (1998). Social Missions of Teaching Profession and Physical Education Teachers, Atatürk University, 1st Sports Congress, Erzurum.
Toplam 14 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Osman Pepe

Mehmet Turan Bu kişi benim

Aydın Pekel Bu kişi benim

Ziya Bahadır Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 27 Temmuz 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt 3 (Özel Sayı 1)

Kaynak Göster

APA Pepe, O., Turan, M., Pekel, A., Bahadır, Z. (2015). Investigation of Self-Reported Teaching Style Preferences and Perceptions of Physical Education and Sport Teacher Candidates. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, 3(Special Issue 3), 116-124. https://doi.org/10.14486/IJSCS267
IntJSCS is published by International Science Culture and Sport Association (ISCSA).