Türkiye’de Eğitim Alanında Örgütsel Sessizlik: Sistematik Literatür Taraması (2015-2023)

Öz

Bu çalışma Türkiye’de 2015-2023 yılları arasında Yök Tez, Dergipark ve Tr Dizin veri tabanlarında eğitim alanında örgütsel sessizlik üzerine yapılan makale ve tezleri sistematik literatür taraması yöntemi ile analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma amacı doğrultusunda elde edilen tez ve makalelerin yıllara göre sayıları, araştırma yöntemleri, değişkenleri, örneklemleri, anahtar kelimeleri ve içerikleri incelenmiştir. Araştırma bulguları arasında örgütsel sessizlik çalışmalarının sayıları göz önüne alındığında Türkiye’de eğitim sektöründe oldukça önemi artan bir alan olduğunu göstermektedir. Araştırma yöntemi olarak büyük kısmı nicel araştırma yöntemi ile araştırmaların gerçekleştirdiği görülmektedir. Özellikle nicel yöntemlerin yoğun olarak kullanıldığı belirlenirken, nitel ve karma yöntemlerin daha sınırlı kaldığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, ilkokul ve ortaokul düzeyindeki öğretmenler üzerine odaklanılırken, lise ve anaokulu öğretmenlerinin daha az araştırmaya dahil edildiği görülmüştür. Bu durum, eğitim kademelerine yönelik araştırmalarda örneklemin dengeli bir dağılım olmadığını göstermektedir. Araştırmanın diğer önemli bulguları ise; örgütsel sessizlik eğitim alanındaki çalışmalarda hangi değişkenler ile birlikte incelendiği, bu değişkenler ile nasıl bir korelasyon olduğu, nitel araştırmaların içeriklerinin nasıl olduğu ve hangi anahtar kelimelerin öne çıktığı tespit edilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Örgütsel Sessizlik
• Eğitim
• Sistematik Literatür Taraması

Organizational Silence in the Field of Education in Turkey: Systematic Literature Review (2015-2023)

Öz

This study aims to analyze the articles and theses written on organizational silence in the field of education in the Yök Tez, Dergipark and Tr Index databases between the years 2015-2023 in Turkey using the systematic literature review method. In line with the research purpose, the numbers of theses and articles obtained by year, research methods, variables, samples, keywords and contents were examined. Considering the number of studies on organizational silence among the research findings, it shows that it is an area of increasing importance in the education sector in Turkey. It is seen that the majority of the research is conducted with the quantitative research method as the research method. It was determined that quantitative methods were used intensively in particular, while qualitative and mixed methods were more limited. In addition, it was observed that while the focus was on primary and secondary school teachers, high school and kindergarten teachers were included in the research less. This situation shows that the sample is not a balanced distribution in studies on educational levels. Other important findings of the research are; It has been determined which variables organizational silence is examined with in studies in the field of education, what kind of correlation there is with these variables, what the content of qualitative studies is like and which keywords are prominent

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Organizational Silence
• Education
• Systematic Literature Review

Kaynakça

1. Alparslan, E., & Kayalar, H. (2012). Silence Behaviors and Their Organizational and Individual Effects. M.A.E.Ü. Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 137-147.
2. Bowen, F. E., & Blackmon, K. (2003). Spirals of Silence. Organizational Voice, Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1393-1417.
3. Chou, S. Y., & Chang, T. (2020). Employee Silence and Silence Antecedents: A Theoretical Classification. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(3), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417703301
4. Çakıcı, A., (2007). Örgütlerde Sessizlik: Sessizliğin Teorik Temelleri ve Dinamikleri, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16 (1),145-162.
5. Çetindere, E. D. (2019). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel sessizlik algıları ile motivasyonları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
6. Dallı, H. T., & Sezgin, F. (2022). Predicting Teacher Organizational Silence: The Predictive Effects of Locus of Control, Self-confidence and Perceived Organizational Support. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 7(1).
7. Dehkharghani, L. L., Paul, J., Maharati, Y., & Menzies, J. (2023). Employee silence in an organizational context: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 41(6), 1072-1085.
8. Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.

9. Hulland, J., & Houston, M. B. (2020). Why systematic review papers and meta-analyses matter: An introduction to the special issue on generalizations in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(3), 351–359.
10. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering (EBSE Technical Report, Version 2.3). Software Engineering Group, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University.
11. İnandi, Y., Gün, M. E., & Gılıç, F. (2017). The study of relationship between women teachers’ career barriers and organizational silence: Viewpoint of women and men teachers. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(3), 542–556.
12. Kurt, E. S. (2023). Integrated Reporting Studies in Turkey: A Systematic Literature Review (2012-2022). Accounting Institute Journal, 68, 15-42. https://doi.org/10.26650/MED.1224266 Lainidi, O., Jendeby, M. K., Montgomery, A., Mouratidis, C., Paitaridou, K., Cook, C., Johnson, J., & Karakasidou,
13. E. (2023). An integrative systematic review of employee silence and voice in healthcare: What are we really measuring? Front Psychiatry, 14, 111579. M acit, F., & Erdem, G. (2020). A Conceptual Review of Organizational Silence. M.C.B.Ü. Journal of Social Sciences, 18(2), 93-114.
14. Morrison EW, Milliken FJ (2000). Morrison EW, Milliken FJ (2000). Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change 213 and Developmentin a Pluralistic, Academy of Management. Rev. 25(4):706-725.
15. Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717.
16. Pinder, C.C. & Harlos, K. P. (2001), Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 331-369.
17. Saeed, A., & Karim, H. (2016). Mediating role of organizational silence on the effect of trust on organizational commitment: Case study of Tehran Municipality. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 6, 1748–1760.
18. Seyedi, S. S., & Darroudi, A. (2023). Personality as a Key Determinant of the Organizational Silence in Iranian Startups. Ekonomie a Management, 26(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.15240/TUL/001/2023-1-004
19. Sipahi, H., & Kartal, Y. (2018). The Effect of Nepotism on Organizational Silence and Turnover Intention. İş’te Hareket Dergisi, 3(2), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.25203/idd.467686
20. Tavşancıl Tarkun, E. (2000). Nitel araştırmalar. Öneri Dergisi, 3(14), 29–34.
21. Yalçınsoy, A. (2017). Örgütsel sessizlik ve sonuçları.The Journal of Social Science, 1(1), 1-15.
22. Yeşilaydin, G., & Bayın, G. (2015). Literature Review of Studies on Organizational Silence in Turkey. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 15(4), 103-120.
23. Yao, J.-H., Xiang, X.-T., & Shen, L. (2022). The impact of teachers’ organizational silence on job performance: A serial mediation effect of psychological empowerment and organizational affective commitment. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2031869.
24. Yu, S., Liu, S., & Xu, C. (2023). The effect of job insecurity on employee silence: Test an interactive model. Chinese Management Studies, 17(3), 488–509.
25. Zhang, Y., Xu, S., Zhang, L., & Liu, S. (2019). How Family Support Influences Work Cynicism and Employee Silence: The Moderating Role of Gender. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 60(3), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965518788526