Sözcüğü Sözcüğüne Olmak ya da Olmamak: Nazım Hikmet’in Saman Sarısı Şiirinin İngilizce Çevirileri Üzerine

Öz

Bu çalışma, Nazım Hikmet’in Saman Sarısı şiirinin iki farklı çevirisini sözcüğü sözcüğüne çeviri ve serbest çeviri kavramları çerçevesinde incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmanın çıkış noktasını, şiirin iki farklı çevirisinin çevirmenleri arasında, sözcüğü sözcüğüne çeviri ekseninde ortaya çıkan çeviri anlayışına yönelik eleştiri ve tartışmalar oluşturmaktadır. Bu bağlamda makale, iki çeviriyi betimleyici ve karşılaştırmalı bir yaklaşımla ele almakta; çevirileri sözcüğü sözcüğüne ve serbest çeviri yaklaşımları ile çeviri eleştirisi ekseninde tartışmaktadır. Çalışma, hem çevirilere hem de bu çeviriler üzerine yapılan eleştirilere odaklanarak, farklı çeviri stratejilerinin Nazım Hikmet’in Saman Sarısı şiirinin iki farklı çevirisinde nasıl uygulandığına ışık tutmayı ve sözcüğü sözcüğüne ve serbest çeviri yaklaşımlarının uygulamadaki işleyişine dair bir anlayış sunmayı hedeflemektedir. Söz konusu iki çeviri stratejisinin göreli yararları ve sınırlılıkları da karşılaştırmalı bir bakış açısıyla değerlendirilmektedir. Bununla birlikte, çalışma, görünüşte zıt stratejilerin aynı metin içinde bir arada bulunabileceğini ortaya koymakta; şiir bağlamında sözcüğü sözcüğüne ve serbest çeviri ikileminin sınırlarını sorgulayarak, çevirmenlerin kaynağa sadakat ve yaratıcı yorumlama arasında nasıl bir denge kurduklarını da gözlemlemektedir. Tartışmanın amacı, mevcut eleştirilerde öne çıkan noktalar doğrultusunda çevirilerin hangi stratejiye yakın durduğunu belirlemeye çalışmak ve bulguların, Nazım Hikmet’in şiirlerinin çevirisinde kullanılan yöntem ve yaklaşımlar hakkında yeni çıkarımlar sunmasına katkı sağlamaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• şiir çevirisi
• alımlama
• Nazım Hikmet
• çeviri eleştirisi
• çeviri stratejileri

To Be Literal or Not: On English Translations of Hikmet’s Saman Sarısı

Öz

This study examines two distinct English translations of Nazım Hikmet’s poem “Saman Sarısı” within the frame of literal and free translation. The framework for this analysis emerges from critical debates among translators, who have evaluated one another’s renditions for being either excessively literal or insufficiently faithful to the source text. Based on this discourse, the article adopts a descriptive comparative approach to examine the translations, situating the discussion within the broader theoretical concepts of literal and free translation as well as translation criticism. By analyzing the strategies employed in each version, the study seeks to determine the extent to which the translations align with either approach, as suggested by prior critiques. This focus enables an understanding of how translators strike a balance between fidelity to the source text and interpretive freedom. Ultimately, the study aims to shed light on the methods and decisions underlying the translation of Hikmet’s poetry and to synthesize these findings into a coherent assessment of the practical applications and relative merits of literal and free translation strategies. In doing so, it also contributes to ongoing debates in translation studies by showing how even seemingly opposed strategies can coexist within the same text, complicating strict binaries of “literal” versus “free.”

Anahtar Kelimeler

• translating poetry
• reception
• Nazım Hikmet
• translation criticism
• translation strategies

Kaynakça

1. Adil, Alev. “Review: Nazım Hikmet, Beyond the Walls: Selected Poems.” Review of Beyond the Walls: Selected Poems, by Nazım Hikmet. Accessed November 9, 2015, https://www.scribd.com/document/22306152/Nazim-Hikmet-Beyond-the-Walls-Selected-Poems-Chosen-by-Ruth. google scholar
2. Babayev, Ekber. Yaşamı ve Yapıtları ile Nazım Hikmet. Translated by Ataol Behramoğlu. Cem Yayınları, 1976. google scholar
3. Bassnett, Susan. Translation. Routledge, 2014. google scholar
4. Bailey, Paul. “Review.” Independent. November 23, 2002. google scholar
5. Benjamin, Walter. “The Task of the Translator.” In Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt. Schocken, 1969. google scholar
6. Berman, Antoine. Toward a translation criticism: John Donne, edited and translated by Françoise Massadier-Kenny. Kent State University Press, 2009. google scholar
7. Boase-Beier, Jean. “Poetry.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, edited by Mona Baker and Gabriela Saldanha. Routledge, 2019. google scholar
8. Christie, Ruth. Personal Communication. 2003. google scholar

9. Connolly, David. “Poetry Translation.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, edited by Mona Baker. Routledge, 1998. google scholar
10. Eagleton, Terry. How to Read a Poem. Blackwell, 2007. google scholar
11. Ergil, Başak. The Image of Nazım Hikmet and His Poetry in Anglo-American Literary Systems. Nazım Hikmet Culture and Art Foundation, 2008. google scholar
12. Freely, Maureen. “A Passion for Politics.” Review of Beyond the Walls: Selected Poems, by Nazım Hikmet. Cornucopia 5, no. 28 (2003): 15-16. google scholar
13. Furniss, Tom. and Michael Bath. Reading Poetry: An Introduction. Prentice Hall, 1996. google scholar
14. Göbenli, Mediha. “Nazım Hikmet’s Reception as a World Poet.” In Turkish Literature as World Literature, edited by Burcu Alkan and Çimen Günay-Erkol. Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. google scholar
15. Göksu, Saime and Edward Timms. Romantik Komünist: Nazım Hikmet'in Yaşamı ve Eseri. Translated by Barış Gümüşbaş. Doğan Kitap, 2001. google scholar
16. Göksu, Saime and Edward Timms. Romantic Communist: The Life and Work of Nazım Hikmet. Hurst & Company, 1999. ¬ google scholar
17. Hermans, Theo. Translation in Systems: Descriptive and Systemic Approaches Explained. St. Jerome, 1999. google scholar
18. Hermans, Theo. “Translation Studies and a New Paradigm.” In The Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literal Translation, edited by Theo Hermans. Croom Helm, 1985. google scholar
19. Hikmet, Nazım. Beyond the Walls: Selected Poems. Anvil Press and YKY, 2002. google scholar
20. Hikmet, Nazım. Seçme Şiirler. Adam Yayınları, 1998. google scholar
21. Hikmet, Nazım. Poems of Nazım Hikmet. Persea Books, 1994. google scholar
22. Holmes, James. S. “Forms of Verse Translation and the Translation of Verse Form.” In Translated! Papers on Literary Translation and Translation Studies, Editions Rodopi, 1988. google scholar
23. Holmes, James. “The Name and the Nature of Translation Studies.” In Translated! Papers on Literary Translation and Translation Studies. Editions Rodopi, 1988. google scholar
24. House, Juliane. Translation Quality Assessment: Past and Present. Routledge, 2015. google scholar
25. Konuk Blasing, Mutlu. Nazım Hikmet: The Life and Times of Turkey’s World Poet. Persea Books, 2013. google scholar
26. Konuk Blasing, Mutlu. “Seduction and Betrayal.” Review of Beyond the Walls: Selected Poems, by Nazım Hikmet. Poetry Review 92, no. 3 (2002a): 100-102. google scholar
27. Konuk Blasing, Mutlu. “Introduction.” In Poems of Nazım Hikmet, translated by Randy Blasing and Mutlu Konuk. Persea Books, 2002b. google scholar
28. Leech, Geoffrey N. A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. Longman Inc., 1969. google scholar
29. Lewes, George H. The Life of Goethe. F. A. Brockhaus, 1864. google scholar
30. Maier, Carol. “Reviewing and Criticism.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, edited by Mona Baker. Routledge, 1998. google scholar
31. Messo, George. “Beyond the Walls – Selected Poems by Nazım Hikmet, trs. Ruth Christie, Richard McKane, and Talat Sait Halman.” Review of Beyond the Walls: Selected Poems, by Nazım Hikmet. Translation Review 86, no. 1 (2002): 86-88. google scholar
32. Nabokov, Vladimir. “Problems of Translation: ‘Onegin’ in English.” In The Translation Studies Reader, edited by Lawrence Venuti. Routledge, 2000. google scholar
33. Newmark, Peter. A Textbook of Translation. Prentice-Hall International, 1988. google scholar
34. Paterson, Dom. Orpheus: A Version of Rilke’s ‘Die Sonette an Orpheus’. Faber & Faber, 2006. google scholar
35. Popovič, Anton. “The Concept ‘Shift of Expression’ in Translation Analysis.” In The Nature of Translation: Essays on the Theory and Practice of Literary Translation, edited by James S. Holmes. Slovak Academy of Sciences, 1970. google scholar
36. Reiss, Katharina. Translation Criticism. The Potentials and Limitations. Translated by Erroll F. Rhodes. St. Jerome, 2000. google scholar
37. Robinson, Douglas. “Literal Translation.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, edited by Mona Baker. Routledge, 1998. google scholar
38. Robinson, Douglas. “Free Translation.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, edited by Mona Baker. Routledge, 1998. google scholar
39. Toury, Gideon. In Search of a Theory of Translation. The Porter Institute of Poetics and Semiotics, 1980. google scholar
40. Uysal, Zeynep. “Saman sarısı şiirinin katmanları.” B.Ü. Nazım Hikmet Kültür ve Sanat Araştırma Merkezi, Posted November 9, 2020, by Boğaziçi University. YouTube, 29:39. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= btAGn4QTlDA. google scholar
41. van den Broeck, Raymond. “Second Thoughts on Translation Criticism: A Model of its Analytic Function.” In The Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literal Translation, edited by Theo Hermans. Croom Helm, 1985. google scholar