Araştırma Makalesi

Akut Toksisite Testi Hassasiyetinin Belirlenmesinde Referans Toksik Madde Olarak Formaldehit Kullanımı

Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3 24 Aralık 2016
PDF İndir
EN TR

Interlaboratory Precision of Acute Toxicity Tests Using Reference Toxicant Formaldehyde

Abstract

Acute toxicity test, which takes place among rapid toxicity tests and is conducted through bioluminescent bacteria, has been included in many countries' standards thanks to its test duration, sample volume, cost-efficiency and result sensitivity. Sensitivity of Microtox® Reagent, being one of the commercial kits of bioluminescent bacteria, can be detected via reference toxicants (control). Various reference toxicants (control) are recommended by the manufacturer company to be used in Microtox® acute toxicity test. This study aims to use formaldehyde as alternative reference toxicant (control) in Microtox® acute toxicity test. Acute toxicity of formaldehyde, according to Vibrio fischeri, was investigated on 5, 15 and 30 minutes of inhibition periods. EC50 values were found as 2,30±0,60 mg/l; 2,14±0,63 mg/l and 2,17±0,70 mg/l by inhibition periods, respectively. Standard deviation of EC50 values found for each sample group differed between 0,01-0,47. According to mean acute toxicity results of all formaldehyde inhibition periods, 0,10 unit deviation was found in 5 minutes of results. For 15 and 30 minutes of inhibition periods, mean value of unit deviation was found as 0,06 and 0,04 which showed closer values to each other and the mean value. The investigated toxicants show the performance of pipetting sensitivity of reagent, analyzer and test operator.

Keywords

Acute toxicity,Vibrio fischeri,Microtox®,reference toxicant,formaldehyde

Kaynakça

  1. Blaise, C. & Férard, J.F., 2005, Small-scale Freshwater Toxicity Investigations, Springer Netherlands.
  2. EPA, 2002, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms, 5. Edition, Washington.
  3. García-Montaño, J., Domenech, X., García-Hortal, J.A., Torrades, F., & Peral, J., 2008, The testing of several biological and chemical coupled treatments for Cibacron Red FN-R azo dye removal, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154(1), 484-490.
  4. Gerhardt, A., 2002, Bioindicator species and their use in biomonitoring, Environmental Monitoring I, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: Eolss Publishers.
  5. Guilhermino, L., Diamantino, T., Silva, M. C., & Soares, A. M. V. M., 2000, Acute toxicity test with Daphnia magna: an alternative to mammals in the prescreening of chemical toxicity?. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 46(3), 357-362.
  6. Harkey, G. A., & Young, T. M., 2000, Effect of soil contaminant extraction method in determining toxicity using the Microtox® assay. Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 19(2), 276-282.
  7. Johnson, B. T., & Long, E. R.,1998, Rapid toxicity assessment of sediments from estuarine ecosystems: A new tandem in vitro testing approach. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 17(6), 1099-1106.
  8. Liu, M. C., Chen, C. M., Cheng, H. Y., Chen, H. Y., Su, Y. C., & Hung, T. Y., 2002, Toxicity of different industrial effluents in Taiwan: a comparison of the sensitivity of Daphnia similis and Microtox®. Environmental toxicology, 17(2), 93-97.
  9. Loibner A.P., Szolar O.H.J., Braun R. & Hirmann D., 2004, Toxicity testing of 16 priority Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons using Lumistox, Environ Toxicol Chem., 31(3), 557-564.
  10. Ma, X.Y., Wang, X.C., Ngo, H.H., Guo, W., Wu, M.N. & Wang, N., 2014, Bioassay based luminescent bacteria: Interferences, improvements, and applications, Science of the Total Environment, 468, 1-11.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Sönmez, V. Z., & Sivri, N. (2016). Interlaboratory Precision of Acute Toxicity Tests Using Reference Toxicant Formaldehyde. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 1(3), 96-99. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.277868