Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of Different Methods in the Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Bay Leaf (Laurus nobilis L.)

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1 30 Haziran 2022
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparison of Different Methods in the Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Bay Leaf (Laurus nobilis L.)

Öz

In this study, the microwave-assisted and enzyme-assisted extraction efficiency were compared to solvent extraction. The extraction efficiencies were evaluated in bay leaf extract in terms of phenolic content and antioxidant capacity. The total phenolic content (mg GAE/g) of the extracts from three different extraction methods as a solvent, enzyme-assisted, and microwave-assisted extraction was found 23.29±0.02, 32.45±0.02, and 30.49±0.02, respectively. The highest value for the total phenolic content was found from the enzyme-assisted extraction. DPPH radical scavenging capacity (%) of the extracts from three different extraction methods was found at 36.91%±0.05, 50.72%±0.27, and 41.51%±0.09, respectively. Like the total phenolic content, the highest value for the DPPH radical scavenging capacity was found from the enzyme-assisted extraction. In addition, total dry matter, total ash, total protein, ascorbic acid, and total chlorophyll content of the bay leaf were analyzed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Enzyme assisted extraction, microwave assisted extraction, bay leaf, phenolic compounds

Kaynakça

  1. AOAC. (1990). Official method of analysis (14th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.
  2. Anticona, M., Blesa, J., Frigola, A., & Esteve, M. J. (2020). High biological value compounds extraction from citrus waste with non-conventional methods. Foods, 9(6), 811.
  3. Bajaj, K.L., & Kaur, G. (1981). Spectrophotometric determination of L-ascorbic acid in vegetables and fruits. Analyst, 106(1258), 117-120.
  4. Bilek, S.E. (2010). The effects of time, temperature, solvent: solid ratio and solvent composition on extraction of total phenolic compound from dried olive (Olea europaea L.) leaves. The Journal of Food, 35, 411-416.
  5. Boulila, A., Hassen, I., Haouari, L., Mejri, F., Amor, I.B., Casabianca, H., & Hosni, K. (2015). Enzyme-assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from bay leaves (Laurus nobilis L.). Industrial Crops and Products, 74(2015), 485-493.
  6. Chakraborty, S., Uppaluri, R., & Das, C. (2020). Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) process for the recovery of bioactive compounds from bitter gourd using response surface methodology (RSM). Food and Bioproducts Processing, 120, 114-122.
  7. Gan, Y., Xu, D., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., Wang, S., Guo, H., Zhang, K., Li, Y., & Wang, Y. (2020). Rana chensinensis ovum oil based on CO2 supercritical fluid extraction: Response surface methodology optimization and unsaturated fatty acid ingredient analysis. Molecules, 25(18), 4170.
  8. Garcia, E. J., Oldoni, T. L. C., Alencar, S. M., Reis, A., Loguercio, A. D., & Grande R. H. M. (2012). Antioxidant activity by DPPH assay of potential solutions to be applied on bleached teeth. Brazilian Dental Journal, 23(1), 22-27.
  9. Li, H. Bin, Wong, C. C., Cheng, K. W., & Chen, F. (2008). Antioxidant properties in vitro and total phenolic contents in methanol extracts from medicinal plants. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 41(3), 385–390.
  10. Mandal, V., Mohan, Y., & Hemalatha, S. (2007). Microwave assisted extraction-an innovative and promising extraction tool for medicinal plant research. Pharmacognosy Reviews, 1(1), 7-18.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Akyüz, A., Tekin, İ., & Ersus, S. (2022). Comparison of Different Methods in the Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Bay Leaf (Laurus nobilis L.). Journal of Apitherapy and Nature, 5(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.35206/jan.1109316
AMA
1.Akyüz A, Tekin İ, Ersus S. Comparison of Different Methods in the Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Bay Leaf (Laurus nobilis L.). Journal of Apitherapy and Nature. 2022;5(1):27-34. doi:10.35206/jan.1109316
Chicago
Akyüz, Ayça, İdil Tekin, ve Seda Ersus. 2022. “Comparison of Different Methods in the Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Bay Leaf (Laurus nobilis L.)”. Journal of Apitherapy and Nature 5 (1): 27-34. https://doi.org/10.35206/jan.1109316.
EndNote
Akyüz A, Tekin İ, Ersus S (01 Haziran 2022) Comparison of Different Methods in the Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Bay Leaf (Laurus nobilis L.). Journal of Apitherapy and Nature 5 1 27–34.
IEEE
[1]A. Akyüz, İ. Tekin, ve S. Ersus, “Comparison of Different Methods in the Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Bay Leaf (Laurus nobilis L.)”, Journal of Apitherapy and Nature, c. 5, sy 1, ss. 27–34, Haz. 2022, doi: 10.35206/jan.1109316.
ISNAD
Akyüz, Ayça - Tekin, İdil - Ersus, Seda. “Comparison of Different Methods in the Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Bay Leaf (Laurus nobilis L.)”. Journal of Apitherapy and Nature 5/1 (01 Haziran 2022): 27-34. https://doi.org/10.35206/jan.1109316.
JAMA
1.Akyüz A, Tekin İ, Ersus S. Comparison of Different Methods in the Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Bay Leaf (Laurus nobilis L.). Journal of Apitherapy and Nature. 2022;5:27–34.
MLA
Akyüz, Ayça, vd. “Comparison of Different Methods in the Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Bay Leaf (Laurus nobilis L.)”. Journal of Apitherapy and Nature, c. 5, sy 1, Haziran 2022, ss. 27-34, doi:10.35206/jan.1109316.
Vancouver
1.Ayça Akyüz, İdil Tekin, Seda Ersus. Comparison of Different Methods in the Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Bay Leaf (Laurus nobilis L.). Journal of Apitherapy and Nature. 01 Haziran 2022;5(1):27-34. doi:10.35206/jan.1109316