Secularization and the State: The “Mardin Thesis”, Literary Fields, and Social Capital
Öz
This article concerns the thesis that state intervention into secularization processes in Turkey vitiates those processes by making them more elitist. By demonstrating that a state action that had nothing to do with secularization pushed the secularization processes of two similar fields of cultural production (poetry and the novel) in opposite directions by changing their composition of human capital in the 1940s, it questions a key assumption of the aforementioned thesis—i.e. that it is possible for the state not to intervene in secularization. It thus calls for a secularization theory in which the state ceases to be the key independent variable—a theory that takes the perspective of civil society and of social capital instead.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Altınkaynak, H. (1977). Edebiyatımızda 1940 kuşağı. İstanbul: Yaylacık Basımevi.
- Baykurt, F. (2002). Dost yüzleri (portreler): Özyaşam. İstanbul: Papirüs Yayınları.
- Berkes, N. (1964). The development of secularism in Turkey. Londra: Psychology Press.
- Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
- Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Brown, W. (2003). Neo-Liberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory & Event, 7(1).
- Burawoy, M. (1989). Two methods in search of science. Theory and Society, 18(6),759–805.
- Büyükokutan, B. (2017). In pursuit of non-western deep secularities: Selfhood and the “Westphalia moment” in Turkish literary milieux.” New Perspectives on Turkey, 56, 3–32.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sosyoloji
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
7 Aralık 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi
4 Mayıs 2018
Kabul Tarihi
26 Mayıs 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2018 Sayı: 58