The Power of Expectations in School Management: Pygmalion Effect

Öz

This study aims to discover the pygmalion effect, which suggests to affect a person's expectations from other people on the actions of those people, by taking the opinions of primary school teachers. In order for the study to reach its goal, triangulation technique, which is a mixed method design, has been used. A likert-type five-point scale made up of 18 items and a semi-structured interview form comprising two open-ended questions have been used to acquire data. The scale has applied to take the opinions of teachers working at the schools administered by 25 managers mastering in a postgraduate program without thesis at the Education Management Inspection Planning and Economy Department of Fırat University Institute of Education Sciences. The quantitative and qualitative data acquired have been analyzed by means of statistical softwares. It has been concluded from the findings acquired from teachers’ views reveal the reality and accuracy of pygmalion effect in the field of education, and show that high expectations pave the way for teachers’ motivation, effort, active working, commitment as well as the growth of their enthusiasm.  It is seen that high expectations will generally reveal high performance, while low expectations, due to their negative effects on employees, will cause decrease in motivation as well as unwillingness towards the job being done and therefore, a decline or stability in performance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pygmalion Effect,School,Management,Triangulation

Kaynakça

1. Aydoğan, İ. (2003). Öğretim Ortamında Düşüncenin Gücü. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(1), 200-222
2. Balcı, A. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık
3. Baki, A. and Gökçek, T., (2012). Karma Yöntem Araştırmalarına Genel Bir Bakış. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(42), 001-021
4. Bezuijen, X.M., Ber, P.T., Dam, K. and Thierry, H. (2009). Pygmalion and Employee Learning: The Role of Leader Behaviors. Journal of Management, 35 (5), 1248-1267
5. Berlew, D.E and Hall, D.T. (1966). The Socialization of Managers: Effects of Expectations on Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11(2), 207-223
6. Bridge, B.(2003). Eğitimde Vizyoner Liderlik ve Etkin Yöneticilik. Beyaz Yayınları.İstanbul
7. Chang, J. (2011). A Case Study of the “Pygmalion Effect: Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement”. International Education Studies, 4(1), February
8. Chirayath, S. Lalgem E. M. and George, S.B. (2009). Expectations Come True: A Study of Pygmalion Effect on the Performance of Employees. Management and Labour Studıes. 34 (1), February

9. Clemente, F. J. (2008). Effects of Teacher Expectations on the Development of Verbal Creativity in Childhood Education. Revista Electrónica Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 8 (3), 1-14
10. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Demirtaş, H. A., (2004). Sosyal Sınıflandırma, Kişilerarası Beklentiler ve Kendini Doğrulayan Kehanet. İletişim Araştırmaları, 2(2), 33-53.
12. Denzin, N. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill
13. Doğan, S., Uğurlu, C.T., Yıldırım, T. ve Karabulut, E. (2013). Okul Yöneticileri ve Öğretmenler Arasındaki İletişim Sürecinin Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre İncelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Education, 3(1), 34-47
14. Eden, D. (1984). Self-Fulfilling Prophecy as a Management Tool: Harnessing Pygmalion. The Academy of Management Review, 9 (1), 64-73
15. Eden, D., and Ravid, G. (1982). Pygmalion vs. self-expectancy: Effects of instructorand self-expectancy on trainee performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30(3), 351-364.
16. Eden, D., and Shani, A. B. (1982). Pygmalion goes to boot camp: Expectance, leadership, and trainee performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 194-199.
17. Eden, D., Geller, D., Gewirtz, A., Gordon-Terner, R., Inbar, I., Liberman, M., Pass, Y., Salomon-Segev, I. and Shalit, M.,(2000). Implantıng Pygmalıon Leadershıp Style Through Workshop Traınıng: Seven Fıeld Experıments. Leadership Quarterly, 11(2), 171–210.
18. Feldman, R. S., and Prohaska, T. (1979). The student as Pygmalion: Effect of student expectation on the teacher. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(4), 485-493.
19. George, A.S. (1982).Beyond Pygmalion: Developments and Directions in Teacher Expectations. Research South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 10(2), 41-49
20. Howe, M.J.A. (1975). Pygmalion and after New research into teachers' expectations. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 3 (1), 46-49
21. Jenner, H. (1990). The Pygmalion Effect: The Importance of Expectancies. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 7 (2), 127-133
22. Jick, T. D. (1989). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (4), 602-611.
23. Johnson, R. B., and Onwuegbuzıe, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches, 33(7), 14-26.
24. Kashen, D. (2011). Use the Pygmalion Effect to Create a High Performing Team. http://awesomeculture.com/2011/10/03/use-the-pygmalion-effect-to-create-a-high-performing-team/. Downlanded at 02.01.2014
25. King, S. S. (1971). Self-fulfilling prophecies in training the hard-core supervisors' expectations and the underprivileged worker's performance. Social Science Quarterly, 52(2), 369-378.
26. Korman, A. K. (1971). Expectancies as determinants of performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 218-222.
27. Kramer, A.B. (2002). The Pygmalion Effect: A Self-fulfilling Prophecy.” Edit 704, November 10
28. Livingston, S.J. (1969). Pygmalion in Management. Harvard Business Review.
29. Locke, A.E. and White, S. (200). Problems wıth The Pygmalıon Effect And Some Proposed Solutıons. Leadership Quarterly, 11(3), 389–415.
30. Loftus, P. (1995). The Pygmalion effect. Industrial and Commercial Training, 27 (4), 17–20
31. Madran, H.A.D .(2012). Temel Beklenti Etkisi: Kendini Gerçekleştiren Kehanet. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 29-40
32. McNatt, D. B. (2000). Ancient Pygmalion joins contemporary management: A metaanalysis of the result. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 314-322.
33. Merton, R.K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review, 8(2), 193-210.
34. Miles, M.B., and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE. Morahan- Martin
35. Mitchell, E.S. (1986). Multiple triangulation: A methodology for nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 18-26
36. Murphy, A., Campbell, C. and Garavan, T.N. (1999). The Pygmalion effect reconsidered: its implications for education, training and workplace learning. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(4), 238-250
37. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Prasad, D. (2013). The Central Theme of Education in Shaw’s Pygmalion. The Criterion an International Journal in English, ISSN 0976-8165
39. Priyabhashini A, and This V.R. (2005). Transformatıonal Leadershıp and Follower's Career Advancement: Role of Pygmalıon Effect. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 40 (4), 482-499
40. Reynolds, D. (2007) Restraining Golem and Harnessing Pygmalion in the Classroom: A Laboratory Study of Managerial Expectations and Task Design. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6 (4), 475–483
41. Rosenthal R. and Jacobson L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968. Pp. 240 .[Harvard Univ., Boston, MA and South San Francisco Unified Sch. District, SanFrancisco, CA]
42. Rosenthal, R. and SL Jacobson, L. (1966). Teachers' expectancies: Determinates of pupils' IQ gains. Psychological Reports, 19, 115-118.
43. Rubie-Davies, C., Peterson, E.R., Sibley, C.G. and Rosenthal, R.(2014). A teacher expectation intervention: Modelling the practices of high expectation teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 72-85
44. Shaw, B. (2004). Pygmalion. Contaıns Ontarıo Currıculum Support Materıal. Study Guıde. Londra
45. Spitz, H.H. (1999). Beleaguered Pygmalion: A History of the Controversy Over Claims That Teacher Expectancy Raises Intelligence. Intellıgence 27(3), 199-234 Princeton, NJ, USA
46. Stedry, A. C. and Kay, E. (1966). The effects of goal difficulty on performance. Behavioral Science, 11(6), 459-470.
47. Tierney, P. and Farmer, S.M. (2004).The Pygmalion Process and Employee Creativity. Journal of Management, 30(3), 413–432
48. Wang, L.(2000). The Upward Pygmalion Effect in the Organization. Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. Western Kentucky University, Paper 707
49. Whiteley, P., Sy, T. and Johnson, S.K. (2012). Leaders' Conceptions of Followers: Implications for Naturally Occurring Pygmalion Effects. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 822–834
50. Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, (8. Press). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık
51. Zanna, M.P., Sheras, P.L. and Cooper, J. (1975). Pygmalion and galatea: The interactive Effect of Teacher and Student Expectancies, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(3), 279-287