Turkish Adaptation of the Green Innovative Work Behavior (GIWB) Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

Öz

Purpose: This study aims to adapt the Green Innovative Work Behavior (GIWB) Scale into Turkish to measure employees’ environmentally innovative actions within the context of organizational sustainability. Methodology: Data were collected through a survey from manufacturing employees, and construct validity was tested via exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Findings: The scale explained 52.53% of total variance and showed excellent model fit in CFA (χ²/df = 0.607; CFI = 0.999; RMSEA = 0.001). Conclusion: The Turkish GIWB Scale is a valid and reliable tool to assess employees’ environmentally friendly innovative behaviors. Originality: This study fills a critical gap in Turkish literature and provides practical insights for sustainability-oriented human resource practices. Keywords: Green innovative work behavior, scale adaptation, validity, reliability JEL Classification: M10, M12

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Green innovative work behavior
• scale adaptation
• validity
• reliability

Yeşil Yenilikçi İş Davranışı (Green Innovative Work Behavior) Ölçeği Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, çevresel sürdürülebilirlik bağlamında çalışanların yeşil yenilikçi davranışlarını ölçmeyi amaçlayan Yeşil Yenilikçi İş Davranışı (YYİD) Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanarak geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin test edilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Yöntem: Araştırma, üretim sektöründe çalışanlardan anket yoluyla veri toplanarak yürütülmüş; yapı geçerliliği Açımlayıcı ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizleri ile test edilmiştir. Bulgular: Ölçek tek faktörlü yapısıyla toplam varyansın %52,53’ünü açıklamış ve model DFA'da mükemmel uyum göstermiştir (χ²/df = 0,607; CFI = 0,999; RMSEA = 0,001). Sonuç: YYİD Ölçeği, çalışanların çevre odaklı yenilikçi davranışlarını ölçmede geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olarak doğrulanmıştır. Özgünlük: Çalışma, sürdürülebilirlik temelli örgütsel davranış araştırmaları için Türkçe literatürde ölçme aracı eksikliğini gidermekte ve uygulamacılara yol gösterici veri sunmaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Yeşil yenilikçi iş davranışı, ölçek uyarlama, geçerlik, güvenirlik JEL Sınıflandırması: M10, M12

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yeşil yenilikçi iş davranışı
• ölçek uyarlama
• geçerlik
• güvenirlik

Kaynakça

1. Aboramadan, M. (2022). The effect of green HRM on employee green behaviors in higher education: The mediating mechanism of green work engagement. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2020- 2190
2. Aboramadan, M. ve Karatepe, O. M. (2021). Green human resource management, perceived green organizational support and their effects on hotel employees’ behavioral outcomes. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(10), 3199- 3222. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2020-1440
3. Aboramadan, M., Dahleez, K. ve Hamad, M.H. (2020), Servant leadership and academics outcomes in higher education: the role of job satisfaction. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. , 29(2), 456–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2019-1923
4. Aboramadan, M., Kundi, Y. M. ve Farao, C. (2021). Examining the effects of environmentally- specific servant leadership on green work outcomes among hotel employees: the mediating role of climate for green creativity. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30, 929–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.1912681
5. Aboramadan, M., Crawford, J., Turkmenoglu, M. A. ve Farao, C. (2022). Green inclusive leadership and employee green behaviors in the hotel industry: Does perceived green organizational support matter?. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 107, 103330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103330
6. Afridi, S.A., Afsar, B., Shahjehan, A., Khan, W., Rehman, Z.U. ve Khan, M.A.S. Impact of corporate social responsibility attributions on employee’s extra-role behaviors: Moderating role of ethical corporate identity and interpersonal trust. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/ csr.2403
7. Alnaqbi, E. J. A. A., Mohd-Shamsudin, F. ve Alshurideh, M. (2024). Green HRM practices, green commitment, and green innovative work behavior in UAE higher education institutes. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(2), 723-736. https://doi.org/10.5267/j. uscm.2024.1.013
8. Beaton, D.E., Bombardier, C. ve Guillemin, F. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25, 3186-3191. http://doi. org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

9. Bhutto, T.A., Farooq, R., Talwar, S.,Awan, U. ve Dhir, A. (2021). Green inclusive leadership and green creativity in the tourism and hospitality sector: serial mediation of green psychological climate and work engagement. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(10), 1716-1737. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1867864
10. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
11. Chan, R. Y. (2005). Does the natural‐resource‐based view of the firm apply in an emerging economy? A survey of foreign invested enterprises in China. Journal of management studies, 42(3), 625-672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00511.x
12. Chang, C.H. (2011). The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: The mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics , 104, 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0914-x