Determination of Major Problems of Raw Hide and Soaking Process in Leather Industry

Öz

Hide quality is adversely affected during salt-curing and soaking processes especially due to bacterial activities of microorganisms. These organisms may cause irreversible grain damage, pinpricks, disruption of collagen fibers, uneven dyeing that cannot be recovered by leather production process. To determine major problems on salted and soaked skins/hides, a questionnaire study was applied to leather technicians in Istanbul Organized Leather Industrial Zone, Turkey in both 2009 and 2018. While most tanneries were processing hides/skins imported from foreign countries in 2009, local cattle hides are processed in 2018. Conventional salt curing method has been applied in warehouses. The most striking point is that the salt was applied randomly during preservation. Although tanneries do not store rawhide more than one month, there is no information about how long they store in warehouses. The tanneries reported red spots, unpleasant odor, hair slip, loss of elasticity, holes in grain surface, bacterial and fungal growth on skin/hides. Leather-making processes are performed at ambient temperature of tanneries. No difference was observed in application of soaking process in both 2009 and 2018 surveys. This questionnaire study showed that most of problems were related with microbial damage and bloodstain, burns due to manure and flaying mistakes at slaughterhouses

Anahtar Kelimeler

• skins
• hides
• leather
• questionnaire

Determination of Major Problems of Raw Hide and Soaking Process in Leather Industry

Öz

Derinin kalitesi, özellikle mikroorganizmaların bakteriyel aktivitelerinden dolayı tuzla kürleme ve ıslatma işlemlerinde olumsuz etkilenmektedir. Bu organizmalar çoğunlukla sonraki deri işlenti safhalarında düzeltilemeyen geri dönüşümsüz sırça hasarına, sırça yüzeyinde küçük deliklere, kollajen liflerinin bozulmasına, düzensiz boyamaya neden olabilmektedir. Tuzlanmış ve ıslatılmış küçükbaş ve büyükbaş derilerindeki önemli problemleri belirlemek için, hem 2009 hem de 2018’de İstanbul Organize Deri Sanayi Bölgesi’ndeki deri teknisyenlerine anket uygulanmıştır. Tabakhanelerin 2009 yılında yabancı ülkelerden ithal edilen derileri/postları işlediği, 2018’de ise yerli sığır derilerinin işlendiği saptanmıştır. Ham deri depolarında geleneksel tuzlama yöntemi uygulandığı belirlenmiştir. En dikkat çeken nokta ise, ham derilerin muhafazası sırasında tuzun rastgele uygulanmasıdır. Tabakhaneler ham deriyi bir aydan fazla depolamamasına rağmen, ham deri depolarında ne kadar süre depolandıkları hakkında bilgi yoktur. Tabakhaneler deride kırmızı leke, kötü koku, kıl gevşemesi, elastikiyet kaybı, sırça yüzeyindeki delik, bakteri ve mantar oluşumu bildirmiştir. Deri işlenti basamakları, tabakhanelerin ortam sıcaklığında gerçekleştirilmektedir. Hem 2009 hem de 2018 yıllarında yapılan anketlerde ıslatma işleminin uygulanmasında bir fark gözlenmemiştir. Bu anket çalışması, dericilikte karşılaşılan problemlerin çoğunun mikrobiyal hasar, kan lekesi, gübre yanığı ve mezbahalarda yapılan hatalar ile ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• küçük baş hayvan derileri
• büyük baş hayvan derileri
• işlenmiş deri
• anket

Kaynakça

1. [1] Uysal, G. (2002). Türkiye ekonomisinde deri ve deri mamulleri sanayinin yeri ve öneminin araştırılması. Turk J. of Vet and An. Sciences, 26, 671-678.
2. [2] Thanikaivelan, P., Rao, J.R., Nair, B.U. & Ramasami, T. (2005). Recent trends in leather making: processes, problems, and pathways. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 35(1), 37-79.
3. [3] İstanbul Sanayi Odası. (2011). Deri ve deri ürünleri sanayisinin Avrupa Birliği'ne uyum sürecinde sektör rehberleri.
4. [4] Mwinyihija, M. (2014). Emerging world leather trends and continental shifts on leather and leather goods production. Adv. Bus. Management Admin, 1, 1-13.
5. [5] World statistical compendium for raw hides and skins, leather and leather footwear, 1993-2012. (2013). Market and policy analyses of raw materials, horticulture and tropical products team, trade and markets division. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 193.
6. 6. Mwinyihija, M & Quisenberry, W. (2013). Review of the challenges towards value addition of the leather sector in Africa. Global Adv. Res. J. Management Bus., 2 (11), 518-528.
7. [7] Çaglayan P. (2015). Characterization of moderately halophilic bacteria found on the sheep and goat skins . Doctoral thesis, Marmara University,Türkiye, s. 4-5.
8. [8] United Nations industrial development organization, UNIDO, future trends in the World leather and leather products industry and trade, Vienna, 2010.

9. [9] Deri ve deri ürünleri imalatı sanayi, küresel rekabette istanbul sanayi odası meslek komiteleri sektör stratejileri projesi, ISO, Yayın No: 2015/7.
10. [10] Deri ve deri ürünleri sektörü 2018 Ocak ayı ihracat bilgi notu, TDH Ar&Ge ve Mevzuat Şb. İTKİB Genel Sekreterliği, 2018.
11. [11] Kahsay, T., Negash, G., Hagos, Y. & Hadush, B. (2015). Pre-slaughter, slaughter and post-slaughter defects of skins and hides at the Sheba Tannery and leather industry, Tigray region, northern Ethiopia. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 82 (1), 01-07.
12. [12] Bilgi, S.T., Yapici, B.M. & Yapici, A.N. (2009). Determination of bacterial and fungal numbers in floats of pre-tanning operations. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8 (8), 1602-1607.
13. [13] Birbir, M. & Bailey, D.G. (2000). Controlling the growth of extremely halophilic bacteria on brine cured cattle hides. Journal of the Society of Leather Technologists and Chemists, 84 (5), 201-204.
14. [14] Aslan, E., & Birbir, M. (2011). Examination of Gram positive bacteria on salt-pack cured hides. Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 106 (12), 372-380.
15. [15] Yazi, D. (2009). Examination of bacterial population in salt, salted and soaked raw hides. Doctoral thesis, Marmara University,Türkiye, s.1-208.
16. [16] Mwinyijah, M. & Magero, J. (2009). The dilemma in marketing of camel (Camelus dromedarius) hides in Kenya: Paper Presented at the 14th Annual Kenya Camel Forum (KCF) Moyale.
17. [17] Rangarajan, R., Didato, T.D. & Bryant, S. (2003). Measurement of bacterial populations in typical tannery soak solutions by traditional and new approaches. Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 98, 477-485.
18. [18] Kanagaraj, J. & Chandra Babu, N.K. (2002). Alternatives to salt curing techniques: a review. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 61 (5), 339-348.
19. [19] Kanagaraj, J., Sundar, V.J., Muralidharan, C. & Sadulla, S. (2005). Alternatives to sodium chloride in prevention of skin protein degradation-a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 825-831.
20. [20] Kanagaraj, J., Sastry, T.P. & Rose, C. (2005). Effective preservation of raw goat skins for the reduction of total dissolved solids. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 959-964.
21. [21] Kılıçoğlu, S. (1991). Ham deri. Dericilik Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları, Pendik, İstanbul, Türkiye, 6, 65.
22. [22] Birbir, M. (1997). Investigation of salted-cured France and Russian hides for halophilic bacteria. Journal of Turkish Microbiological Society, 27, 68-73.
23. [23] Kannan, K.C., Kumar, P., Rao, J.R. & Nair, B.U. (2010). A novel approach towards preservation of skins. Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 105 (11), 360-368.
24. [24] Bailey, D.G. & Birbir, M. (1993). A study of the extremely halophilic microorganisms found on commercially brine-cured cattle hides. The Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 88, 285-293.
25. [25] Birbir, M. & Ilgaz, A. (1996). Isolation and identification of bacteria adversely affecting hide and leather quality. Journal of the Society of Leather Technologists and Chemists, 80, 147-153.
26. [26] Aslan, E. & Birbir, M. (2012). Examination of Gram-Negative bacteria on salt-pack cured hides. The Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 4 (107), 106-115.
27. [27] Caglayan, P., Birbir, M., Sanchez-Porro, C. & Ventosa, A. (2017). Screening of industrially important enzymes produced by moderately halophilic bacteria isolated from salted sheepskins of diverse origin. Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 112 (6), 207-216.
28. [28] Caglayan, P., Birbir, M., Sánchez-Porro, C., & Ventosa, A. (2018) .Detection of industrially potential enzymes of moderately halophilic bacteria on salted goat skins. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, 43 (3), 312-322.
29. [29] Berber, D. & Birbir, M. (2010). Examination of bacterial populations in salt, salted hides, soaked hides and soak liquors. Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 105 (10), 320-326.
30. [30] Berber, D., Birbir, M., & Mertoglu, B. (2010). Examination of Archaeal and Bacterial populations in salt, salted and soaked hide and soak liquor samples via fluorescent in situ hybridization. Journal of the Society of Leather Technologists and Chemists, 94 (6), 259-261.
31. [31] Berber, D., Birbir, M. & Hacioglu, H. (2010). Efficacy assessment of bactericide containing didecyldimethylammonium chloride on bacteria found in soak liquor at different exposure times. Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 105 (11), 354-359.
32. [32] Bailey, D.G. & Birbir, M. (1996). The Impact of halophilic organisms on the grain quality of brine cured hides, Journal American Leather Chemists Association, 91, 47-51.
33. [33] Bailey, D.G. (2003). The preservation of hides and skins. Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 98, 308-319.
34. [34] Birbir, M., Kallenberger, W., Ilgaz, A. & Bailey, G. (1996). Halophilic bacteria isolated from brine cured cattle hides. Journal of the Society of Leather Technologists and Chemists, 80, 87-90.
35. [35] Akpolat, C., Ventosa, A., Birbir, M., Sánchez-Porro, C. & Caglayan, P. (2015). Molecular identification of moderately halophilic bacteria and extremely halophilic archaea isolated from salted sheepskins containing red and yellow discoloratios, The Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 110, 211-220. [36] Haines, M.B. (1984). Quality rawstock. The Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 4, 164-173.
36. [37] Kallenberger, E.W. (1984). Halophilic bacteria in brine curing. The Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 79, 104-114.
37. [38] Birbir, M., Ogan, A., Calli, B. & Mertoğlu, B. (2004). Enzymatic characteristics of extremely halophilic archaeal community in Tuzkoy Salt Mine, Turkey. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 20, 613-621.
38. [39] Orlita, A. (2004). Microbial biodeterioration of leather and its control: a review. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 53, 157-163.
39. [40] Madigan, M.T., Martinko, J.M., Dunlop, P.V. & Clarck, D.P. (2012). In: Brock Biology of Microorganisms, Thirteenth Edition, Pearson Benjamin Cummings., s.150-151.
40. [41] Richardson, J. H. (1958). A laboratory screening test of bactericides for use in sheep pelt soaking pits. Applied Microbiology, 6 (2) 142-145.
41. [42] Birbir, Y., Uğur, G. & Birbir, M. (2008). Inactivation of bacterial population in hide-soak liquors via direct electric current. Journal of Electrostatics, 66 (7-8), 355-360.
42. [43] Wodroffe, F.W. & Parr, P.R. (1957). Note on bacteriological test on bobby calf skins treated with boric acid. Report on the eight annual conference of freezing works. Leather and Shoe Association, 38-39.
43. [43] http://dericilik.blogcu.com/4144149 (Erişim tarihi: Mayıs 2008).
44. [44] Tancous, J., Kallenberger, W., Buehrig, B. & Hermann, L.S. (1996). Rehydration of brine cured hides. Leather, 21-28.