Turkish EFL Teachers’ Self-efficacy Levels in the Implementation of Self-Regulated Learning

Öz

Despite the availability of resources and efforts, English as a foreign language (EFL) learners and EFL teachers face challenges in achieving proficiency in the target language in Turkey. Self-regulation, a cognitive and motivational trait, is crucial in foreign language learning. Self-regulated learning (SRL) focuses on learners taking responsibility for their entire learning process, enabling them to engage in metacognitive processes. It has gained significant attention in recent years due to the rise of autonomous learning practices and the importance of management skills in EFL education. Teachers can enhance their awareness and oversight of their students' progress towards their objectives through the use of metacognitive skills. However, there is a lack of focus on teachers' self-efficacy levels in adopting SRL in language education. This research aimed to investigate if Turkish EFL teachers actively encourage SRL in their instruction, focusing on their roles in implementing SRL theory. The causal-comparative model was utilized in the course of this study. A sample of 211 EFL instructors from high schools in an eastern city in Turkey, was investigated. An instrument titled "Teacher Self-Efficacy for Implementing Self-Regulated Learning" was utilized to gather the data. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, and one-way ANOVA analysis were used to analyze the research data. Findings suggested that the average level of self-efficacy among Turkish EFL teachers in utilizing SRL strategies to engage students is moderate. The results of the study are of great implications for the role of educators in promoting students' autonomy and lifelong learning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Self-efficacy
• Self-Regulated
• EFL

Turkish EFL Teachers’ Self Efficacy Levels in the Implementation of Self-Regulated Learning / Türk EFL Öğretmenlerinin Öz-Düzenlemeli Öğrenmenin Uygulanmasında Öz Yeterlik Düzeyleri

Öz

Kaynak ve çabaların mevcudiyetine rağmen, İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenenler ve İngilizce öğretmenleri Türkiye'de hedef dilde yeterlilik kazanmada zorluklarla karşılaşmaktadır. Bilişsel ve motivasyonel bir özellik olan öz düzenleme, yabancı dil öğreniminde çok önemlidir. Öz düzenlemeli öğrenme (SRL), öğrencilerin tüm öğrenme süreçlerinin sorumluluğunu üstlenmelerine odaklanarak, meta-bilişsel süreçlere katılmalarını sağlar. Son yıllarda özerk öğrenme uygulamalarının yükselişi ve EFL eğitiminde yönetim becerilerinin önemi nedeniyle önemli ölçüde ilgi görmüştür. Öğretmenler, meta-bilişsel becerilerin kullanımı yoluyla öğrencilerinin hedeflerine doğru ilerlemeleri konusunda farkındalıklarını ve denetimlerini artırabilirler. SRL, son yıllarda özerk öğrenme uygulamalarının yükselişi ve EFL eğitiminde yönetim becerilerinin önemi nedeniyle önemli ölçüde ilgi görmüştür. Ancak, öğretmenlerin dil eğitiminde SRL'yi benimsemedeki öz yeterlilik düzeylerine odaklanılmamıştır. Bu araştırma, Türk EFL öğretmenlerinin, SRL teorisini uygulamadaki rollerine odaklanarak, öğretimlerinde SRL'yi aktif olarak teşvik edip etmediklerini araştırmayı amaçlamıştır. Çalışmada, Türk EFL öğretmenlerinin EFL'de SRL'yi uygulamada öz yeterlilik düzeylerine ilişkin bulgular sunuldu ve kapsamlı bir tartışma yürütüldü.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• self-efficacy,
• self-regulated learning,
• EFL

Kaynakça

1. Abbasnasab Sardareh, S. Mohd Saad, M. & Boroomand, R. (2012). Self-regulated learning strategies (SRLS) and academic achievement in pre-university EFL learners. California Linguistic Notes, 37, 1-35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261435907
2. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
3. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2
4. Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S., & Larivee, S. (1991). Influence of self-efficacy on self-regulation and performance among junior and senior high-school age students. International Journal of Behavior Development, 14, 153-164. https://doi. org/10.1177/016502549101400203
5. Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (Vol. 4). Longman.
6. Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. Pegem Akademi.
7. Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self‐regulation empowerment program: A school‐based program to enhance self‐regulated and self‐motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41(5), 537-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_11
8. Cohen, B. (2003). Incentives build robustness in bit-torrent" Workshop on economics of peer-to-peer systems, USA.

9. Cokluk, O., Sekercioglu, G., & Buyukozturk, S. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için çok degiskenli istatistik. Pegem Akademi.
10. De Smul, M., Heirweg, S., Van Keer, H., Devos, G., & Vandevelde, S. (2018). How competent do teachers feel instructing self-regulated learning strategies? Development and validation of the teacher self-efficacy scale to implement self-regulated learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.001
11. Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Elmas, R., Demirdöğen, B., & Geban, Ö. (2011). Preservice chemistry teachers’ images about science teaching in their future classrooms. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40(40), 164-175.
13. Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., & Beechum, N. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners: The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance-A critical literature review. Consortium on Chicago School Research
14. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
15. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906 [10].
16. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
17. Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). Longman.
18. Haukås A (2018) Metacognition in language learning: theoretical perspectives. In: Haukås Å, Bjørke C, Dypedahl M (eds) Metacognition in language learning and teaching. Routledge.
19. Kurman, J. (2001). Self-regulation strategies in achievement settings: Culture and gender differences. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(4), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202210 1032004008
20. Lai, C. (2013). A framework for developing self-directed technology use for language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 17(2), 100–122. https://doi.org/10125/44326
21. Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.568417
22. Lee. (1998). Supporting greater autonomy in language learning. ELT Journal, 52(4), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.4.282.
23. Lombaerts, K., De Backer, F., Engels, N., Van Braak, J., & Athanasou, J. (2009). Development of the self-regulated learning teacher belief scale. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(1), 79-96. https://doi.org/110.3200/JOER.102.3.163-174.
24. Mahmoodi, M. H., Kalantari, B., & Ghaslani, R. (2014). Self-regulated learning (SRL), motivation and language achievement of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1062–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.517
25. Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 106(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546
26. Miller, R. G. (1969). Simultaneous statistical inference. McGraw-Hill.
27. Nejabati, N. (2015). The effects of teaching self-regulated learning strategies on EFL students' reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6) 1343-1348. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0606.23
28. Nota, L., Soresi, S., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation and academic achievement and resilience: A longitudinal study. International journal of educational research, 41(3), 198-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.07.001
29. Nunan, D. (1997). Strategy training in the language classroom: an empirical investigation, RELC Journal, 28(2), 56-81.
30. Ommundsen, Y., Haugen, R., & Lund, T. (2005). Academic self-concept, implicit theories of ability, and self-regulation strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(5), 461-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500267838
31. Oxford, R. (2001). Integrated Skills in the ESL/EFL Classroom. ERIC Digest. ED456670.
32. Öztürk, M and Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2021). Flipped learning design in EFL classrooms: implementing self-regulated learning strategies to develop language skills. Smart Learn. Environ., 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00146-x
33. Pajares, F. (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications (pp. 111-139). New York: Erlbaum.
34. Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. J. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
35. Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational psychologist, 36(2), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
36. Patrick, H., Ryan, A.M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83
37. Perry, N. E., Vande Kamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2010). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational psychologist, 37(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3701_2 Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self‐regulated learning. New directions for teaching and learning, 1995(63), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219956304
38. Pintrich, R. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner (Eds), Handbook of Self- Regulation (pp, 451-501). Academic Press.
39. Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2000). Teacher innovations in self-regulated learning”, In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 651– 686). Academic Press.
40. Saylan-Kırmızıgül A., Kızkapan O., & Tanık-Önal N. (2022). Öz-düzenlemeli öğrenmenin uygulanmasına ilişkin öğretmen öz-yeterlik ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Öğretmen adayları örneklemi. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi/Journal of Higher Education and Science, 12(2), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1068025
41. Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529281
42. Schunk, D.H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359- 382. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002359
43. Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational psychologist, 40(2), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_3
44. Sözbilir, M. (2014). Nedensel karşılaştırma araştırma yöntemi. Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. (Edt., M. Metin). Perem Akademi.
45. Torres, G. (2013). Empowering the language learner: Language learning strategy training and self-regulation in an EFL classroom. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 9(3), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v9i3.7893
46. Wang, M.T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633-662. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209361209
47. Wang, C., Schwab, G., Fenn, P., & Chang, M. (2013). Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies for English language learners: Comparison between Chinese and German college students. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3, 173-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v3n1p173
48. Wang, C., & Bai, B. (2017). Validating the instruments to measure ESL/EFL learners’ self‐efficacy beliefs and self‐regulated learning strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 51(4), 931–947. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44984799
49. Weaver, S. J., & Cohen, A. D. (1994). Making learning strategy instruction a reality in the foreign language curriculum, In C. Klee (Ed.), Faces in a crowd: The individual learner in multi-section courses. (pp.285-323). Heinle and Heinle.
50. Zhang LJ (2001) Awareness in reading: EFL students’ metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Lang Aware 10(4):268–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410108667039
51. Zhang, D., & Goh, C. (2006). Strategy knowledge and perceived strategy use: Singaporean students’ awareness of listening and speaking strategies. Language Awareness, 15(3), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.2167/la342.0
52. Zhang, D., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). Metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL) in second/foreign language teaching. Second handbook of English language teaching, 883-897.
53. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
54. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
55. Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1),166-183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
56. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
57. Zimmerman, B.J. and Schunk, D.H. (2001) Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.