Determining the Seasonal Ornithological Potential of the Dönemeç (Engil) Delta and Generate the Digital Maps Using Geographical Information Systems (GIS)

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 73 - 78, 30.09.2017

Emrah Çelik Atilla Durmuş

Öz

This research was performed in one of the important bird areas in Lake Van Basin, at Dönemeç
(Engil) Delta, (Van - Turkey) from April 2011 to April 2012. A total of, 91 species and 1 subspecies belongs
to 34 families were determined. Out of total, 34.7% (n:32) species were residents, 53.2% (n:49) were summer
visitors, 4.43% (n:4) winter visitors, 6.52% (n:6) non - breeding transit migrants and 1.08% (n:1) random species.
According to International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) criterias, it was observed that one species was
endangered (EN), one species was near threatened (NT), one species was vulnerable (VU) and 89 species were least
concern (LC). The distribution of the species population in the area at six different habitats has been identifed and
habitats of the endangered species, in particular, have been highlighted by creating GIS-based distribution maps.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ArcMap, conservation, ornithofauna, Van lake basin, wetland

Dönemeç (Engil) Deltası’nın Mevsimsel Ornitolojik Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi ve Coğraf Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) Kullanılarak Sayısal Haritaların Oluşturulması

Öz

Bu araştırma Van Gölü Havzası’ndaki önemli kuş alanlarından biri olan Dönemeç (Engil) Deltası’nda
gerçekleştirildi. Nisan 2011 ve Nisan 2012 tarihlerini kapsayan bir yıllık arazi çalışmaları sonucunda 34 familyaya
ait 91 tür ve 1 alttür tespit edildi. Bu türlerin 34.7% (32) Yerli, 53.2% (49) Göçmen, 4.34% (4) Kış ziyaretçisi, 6.52%
(6) Transit Göçer, 1.08% (1) Rastlantısal tür olduğu belirlendi. Alandaki türler Uluslararası IUCN kriterlerine göre
değerlendirildiğinde; 1 türün EN (Endangered), 1 türün VU (Vulnerable-Hassas), 1 türün NT (Near Threatened) ve
89 türün LC (Least Concern) statüsünde olduğu belirlendi. Alandaki türlerin, altı farklı habitatta populasyon dağılımı
belirlenmiş, özellikle nesli tehlike altındaki türlerin yaşam alanları GIS tabanlı dağılım haritaları oluşturularak öne
çıkarılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

ArcMap, koruma, ornitofauna, sulakalan, Van gölü havzası

Kaynakça

• Doygun H, Berberoğlu S, Alphan H, 2003. Determination of land usage changes of Hatay, Burnaz coastal dunes with remote sensing method. Ecology, 12: 4-9.
• Holm ET, Clausen, P, 2006. Effects of water level management on autumn staging waterbird and macrophyte diversity in three Danish coastal lagoons. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15: 4399–4423.
• Mägi E, Kastepõld T, Lotman A, 2004. Ornithological monitoring and wetland management in Matsalu. Bird Census News, 13: 139-144. Mironga JM, 2004. Geographic information systems (GIS) and remote sensing in the management of shallow tropical lakes, South Carolina. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2(1): 83–103.
• Murkin HR, Murkin EJ, Ball JP, 1997. Avian habitat selection and Prairie wetland dynamics: A 10 year experiment. Ecological Applications, 7(4): 1144-1159.
• Nergiz H, Durmuş A, 2017. Effects of habitat change on breeding waterbirds in Arin (Sodalı) Lake, Turkey. Applied Ecology And Environmental Research, 15(3): 1111-1118.
• Stralberg D, Cameron DR, Reynolds MD, Hickey CM, Klausmeyer K, Busby SM, Stenzel LE, Shuford WD, Page GW, 2010. Identifying habitat conservation priorities and gaps for migratory shorebirds and waterfowl in California. Biodiversity Conserv, DOI 10.1007/s10531-010-9943-5.
• Gündoğdu V, Akgün G, Elele M, Piyancı O, 2007. Examination for the change in the quality of GIS-based observations in the years 2001-2006, in Gediz River sub basin. Congress for National Geographic Information Systems, 30 October-2 November, KTÜ, Trabzon.
• Onmuş O, 2006. Use of geographic information systems in order for monitoring and managing of important bird areas, Case study for important bird area of Gediz Delta. 4. Geographic Information Systems Days, 13-16 September, İstanbul.
• Açıkgöz G, 2010. Using remote sensing and geographic information systems to detect changes in the ovaries of coastal wetland system. Çukurova University, Institute of Science and Technology, (Unpublished) Master’s thesis 79 p.
• Adızel Ö, 1998. Researches on Van Lake Basin Ornithofauna. Y Y Ü, Institute of Science and Technology, (Unpublished) Ph.D. thesis Van.
• Artar M, 2008. Development of a method for monitoring protected areas, in the example of Karatepe-Aslantaş National Park. Çukurova University, Institute of Science and Technology, (Unpublished) Ph.D. thesis 276 p.
• Demir A, 2008. Identification of the geographic information system aided distribution by determining salinity and some pollution levels in Akyatan Lagoon. Çukurova University, Institute of Science and Technology, Master’s thesis 206 p.
• Onmuş O, 2008. Observation of nesting areas of breeder species in Gediz Delta and the management of these colonies. Ege University, Institute of Science, Ph.D. thesis 207 p.
• Strauss B, 2008. Nesting mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) habitat selection and management using GIS. Duke University, The Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Master’s thesis 34 p.
• WWF Pakistan, 2007. Pakistan wetland GIS implementation strategy, Draft Discussion Paper, Pakistan Wetland Programme, Islamabad, 80 p
• Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, 1992. Bird Census Techniques. Academic Pres Limited, NW1 7DX, London. 257 p.
• Kiziroğlu İ, 2009. Pocket Book for Turkish Birds. Ankamat Printing, Ankara. 564 p.