Economic Analysis and Marketing Margin of Walnut Market In Turkey

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 4, 3163 - 3171, 15.12.2021

Emine Aşkan

https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.956017

Öz

In the research, grower and consumer prices and the marketing structure of walnut in Turkey it was surveyed. This research focuses on foreign trade, consumption, price fluctuations production and marketing from 2003 to 2017. It has been determined that there is an increase in the number of walnut trees and walnut production over the years and a decrease in walnut yield. In the marketing margin calculations, approximately half of the price paid by the consumer for one kg of walnut is received by the farmer in exchange for the shelled walnut equivalent to the unshelled walnut. This is an important ratio for the farmer and shows that the farmer has a significant profit from this product. Although income was not statistically significant in the forecasted walnut demand model, there was an increase in per capita income in Turkey. Population growth has directly increased walnut consumption. Increases in consumption could not be met with domestic production, so imports increased over the years. With respect to Walnut demand and supply functions, supply elasticity (Se) 0.350 and demand elasticity (De) 0.097 were found. With respect to elasticity coefficients, Walnut growers' sensitivity to changes in prices is higher than consumers'.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Marketing Structure, Price Fluctuation, Walnut

Kaynakça

• Anonymous, 2016. Ünye Commodity Exchange, Walnut Breeding and Problems Report.
• Anonymous, 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization. Crops and data: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. (19 February2019).
• Anonymous, 2019. Trade Statistics For İnternational Business Development https://www.trademap.org/Country_SelProductCountry. (Date of access: 16 June 2019).
• Anonymous, 2019. Turkish Statistical Institute, Plantal Production Statistics, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1046. (Date of access: 06 February 2019)
• Aşkan E, Dağdemir V, 2015. Economic Analysis of Turkey Garlic Market. Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 28(1).
• Bayazit S, Tefek H, Çalışkan O, 2016. Walnut (Juglans regia L.) Researches in Turkey. Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Agriculture Journal 11 (1):169-179, 2016 ISSN 1304-9984.
• Çelik Ş, 2013. Modeling of Production Amount of Hard Fruits by Box-Jenkins Technique. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 23(1): 18–30.
• Dağdemir V, 1998. Economic Analysis of Turkey Onion Market. Journal of Ataturk University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, 12(1/2): 99-114.
• Gülsoy E, Kaya T, Pehluvan M, Şimşek M, 2016. Some Pomological and Chemical Properties of Walnut (Juglans Regia L.) Genotypes Selected from Iğdır Province. Anatolian Agricultural Sciences, Journal / Anatolia J Agr Sci, 31: 309-314.
• Ketenci CK, Bayramoğlu Z, 2018. Competitive Analysis of Walnut Production in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, 5(3): 339–347.
• Koyuncu F, Yıldrım FA, Koyuncu MA, Tosun F, 2005. Investigation of the Phenological Characteristics of Three Different Walnut Populations in Isparta Region. Bahçe, II. National Walnut Symposium Special Issue, Yalova Atatürk Horticultural Center Research Institute Journal, Volume: 34 (1) / 123/132, ISSN 1300-8943.
• Kumbasaroğlu H, Aşkan E, Dağdemir V, 2021. Economic analysis of tomato in Turkey. Mediterranean. Agricultural Sciences, 334(1):47-54.
• Şen SM, 2011. Nutritional Value of Walnut Culture Folklore. ÜÇM Publications / 3, Agricultural Publications //1 2011 (ISBN 978-605-891150-0-8).
• Tan M, Xiang, C, 2019. Rapid develop-ment of ecological rural primary, secondary and tertiary industrial integration based on interactive multi-model algorithm. Fresenious Environmental Bulletin, 28, 7432-7442.
• Topcu Y, 2003. Marketing marjin in Food Products and Algebraic Analysis. Atatürk University Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 34 (2): 199-207.
• Topcu Y, 2004. A Study on the Meat Cost and Marketing Margins of Cattle Fattening Farms in Erzurum Province. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 28(6): 1007-1015.