Metacognition in a Foreign Language Reading Context

Öz

This study aimed to examine readers’ metacognition and motives for practicing metacognition in a foreign language learning context. Readers’ metacognition was measured by Metacognitive Awareness Inventory and semi-structured questions were developed to study the effects of metacognition training. Findings confirmed that metacognitive individuals pertain reading to comprehension or goal attainment and they know physiological, cognitive, and affective dynamics might impact their performances. Metacognitive readers might hold an understanding of meta-reading; reading skills and dynamics that facilitate and interfere with performances might transfer across languages. Following the training, participants’ self-awareness increased. Their motivation and interest to read in a foreign language was impacted positively. Lastly, although metacognitive readers were aware of that strategic reading may be, initially, cognitively demanding; such readers still continue practicing metacognition for efficiency with time, effectiveness with comprehension and learning, and pleasure of awareness and self-confidence.

Keywords: metacognition; EFL; reading; self-awareness; training.

 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• metacognition,EFL,reading,self-awareness,training

Kaynakça

1. Author, 2017
2. Author,2017a
3. Afflerbach, P., & Meuwissen, K. (2005). Teaching and learning self-assessment strategies in middle school. In S. E. Israel, C. Collins Block, K. L. Bauserman, & K. Kinnucan-Welsch (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction, and professional development (pp. 141–164). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40(6), 1063–1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9202-5
5. Alderson, J. C., & Urquhart, A. H. (1984). Introduction: what is reading? In J. C. Alderson & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a Foreign Language (pp. xv–xxviii). Harlow, England: Longman.
6. Alsheikh, N. O., & Mokhtari, K. (2011). An Examination of the Metacognitive Reading Strategies Used by Native Speakers of Arabic When Reading in English and Arabic. English Language Teaching, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p151
7. Anastasiou, D., & Griva, E. (2009). Awareness of reading strategy use and reading comprehension among poor and good readers. Elementary Education Online, 8(2), 283–297.
8. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984a). Cognitive monitoring in reading. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension (pp. 21–44). Newark: International Reading Association.

9. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984b). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, J. L. Kamil, & P. Rosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 353–394). New York: Longman.
10. Baker, L., & Cerro, L. (2000). Assessing metacognition in children and adults. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 99–145). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
11. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. Bandura, Albert. (1971). Social learning theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.
13. Barnett, M. (1988). Reading through Context: How Real and Perceived Strategy Use Affects L2 Comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 72(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04177.x
14. Boulware-Gooden, R., Carreker, S., Thornhill, A., & Joshi, R. M. (2007). Instruction of metacognitive strategies enhances reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of third-grade students. The Reading Teacher, 61(1), 70–77.
15. Chern, C. L. (1993). Chinese students’ word-solving strategies in reading in English. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & C. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 67–85). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16. Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.131
17. Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Educational Research, 18(1), 1–11.
18. Curwen, M. S., Miller, R. G., White-Smith, K. A., & Calfee, R. C. (2010). Increasing teachers’ metacognition develops students’ higher learning during content area literacy instruction: Findings from the read-write cycle project. Issues in Teacher Education, 19(2), 127–151.
19. Doğanay Bilgi, A., & Özmen, E. R. (2014). The impact of modified multi-component cognitive strategy instruction in the acquisition of metacognitive strategy knowledge in the text comprehension process of students with mental retardation. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(2), 707–714.
20. Duffy, G. G. (1993). Rethinking strategy instruction: Four teachers’ development and low achievers’ understandings. Elementary School Journal, 93(3), 231.
21. Fisher, R. (2002). Shared thinking: metacognitive modelling in the literacy hour. Reading, 36(2), 63–67.
22. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
23. Garner, R., & Alexander, P. a. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and Unanswered Questions. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2402_2
24. Gourgey, A. F. (1998). Metacognition in basic skills instruction. Instructional Science, 26, 81–96.
25. Gourgey, A. F. (2001). Metacognition in basic skills instruction. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 17–32). Boston: Kluwer.
26. Iwai, Y. (2011). The Effects of Metacognitive Reading Strategies: Pedagogical Implications for EFL/ESL Teachers. The Reading Matrix, 11(2), 150–159. Retrieved from http://readingmatrix.com/articles/april_2011/iwai.pdf
27. Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3), 255–278.
28. Karami, S., & Hashemian, M. (2012). The Relationship between (Meta)cognitive Strategies and Reading Comprehension in Iranian Female L2 Learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(4), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n4p58
29. Kerndl & Aberšek, M. K. (2012). Teachers’ competence for developing reader’s reception metacognition. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 46(1979), 52–61.
30. Kurtz, B. E., Schneider, W., Carr, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Rellinger, E. (1990). Strategy instruction and attributional beliefs in West Germany and the United States: Do teachers foster metacognitive development? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15(3), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(90)90024-U
31. Lai, E. R. (2011). Metacognition: A Literature review (Research report). New York, NY:Pearson. Retrieved from http://www.datec.org.uk/CHAT/chatmeta1.htm
32. Muñiz-Swicegood, M. (1994). The effects of metacognitive reading strategy training on the reading performance and student reading analysis strategies of third grade bilingual students. Bilingual Research Journal, 18, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.1994.10162659
33. O’Donnell, A. M., Reeve, J., & Smith, J. K. (2007). Educational psychology: Reflection for action. (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
34. Paris, S. G., & Jacobs, J. E. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children’s reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55(6), 2083–2093.
35. Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20(1), 26–56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt243oa
36. Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning (pp. 43–97). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
37. Pintrich, Paul R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 219–225.
38. Pogrow, S. (2004). The missing element in reducing the learning gap: Eliminating the “blank stare.” Teachers College Record, 106(10), 11381.
39. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. NJ: Routledge.
40. Pressley, Michael, & Gaskins, I. W. (2006). Metacognitively competent reading comprehension is constructively responsive reading: How can such reading be developed in students? Metacognition Learning, 1, 99–113.
41. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1), 113–125.
42. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
43. Takallou, F. (2011). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance and metacognitive awareness. Asian EFL Journal, 13(1), 272–300.Tishman, S., & Perkins, D. (1997). The language of thinking. The Phi Delta Kappan, 78(5), 368–374.
44. Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills. In B. Moschner & C. Artelt (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationenfür Forschung und Praxis (pp. 75–97). Berlin: Waxmann.
45. Veenman, M. V. J. (2016). Metacognition. In P. Afflerbach (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading (pp. 26–40). New York: Routledge.
46. Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
47. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 30–43.
49. Woolfolk, A. (2016). Educational psychology (13th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
50. Zhang, L. J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students’ metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 10(4), 268–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410108667039
51. Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive Strategy Use and Academic Reading Achievement: Insights from a Chinese Context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 54–69.
52. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic.
53. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102