Investigating EFL Teachers’ Attitudes toward Alternative Assessment

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 180 - 203, 29.06.2025

Gülay Er , Fatma Ozcan

https://doi.org/10.51726/jlr.1689906

Öz

Over the last decades, the widespread view that English is now a lingua franca has increased the prominence of English language teaching methodology and has led to the continuous revision and amendment of pedagogical issues such as language teaching and learning along with testing and assessment. To that end, there has been a considerable emphasis on the alignment of assessment practices with language teaching and learning practices. Accordingly, language assessment, more specifically, alternative assessment has been one of the critical issues that have received much attention in the field of language teaching. This current study, which was conducted quantitatively and qualitatively has aimed to explore the attitudes of teachers of English as a foreign language towards AA methods. The participants of the study, 137 EFL teachers who work in the state primary, secondary and high schools in the province of Samsun in Türkiye, responded to the 5-Likert scale with 15 items developed by İzci et al (2014) in the survey part of the study. For the qualitative phase of the study, 16 teachers consented to be interviewed to answer four open-ended questions. The findings of the study revealed that , in general, the EFL teachers held a positive view on alternative assessment methods. Other findings also showed that their attitudes varied significantly in favour of the teachers who received inservice training, and that the participants also had the view that teachers often face the challenges which impede the use of alternative assessment tools and/or that there are factors which prevent them from implementing these methods efficiently.

Anahtar Kelimeler

assessment , language assessment , alternative assessment , teachers'attitudes , EFL context

İngilizce Öğretmenlerinin Alternatif Değerlendirmeye Yönelik Tutumlarının Araştırılması

Öz

Son yıllarda İngilizcenin artık ortak bir dil olduğu görüşünün yaygınlaşması, İngilizce dil öğretim yöntemlerinin önemini artırmış ve dil öğretimi ve öğrenimi ile ölçme ve değerlendirme gibi pedagojik konuların sürekli olarak gözden geçirilmesine ve değiştirilmesine yol açmıştır. Bu amaçla değerlendirme uygulamalarının dil öğretimi ve öğrenim uygulamalarıyla uyumlu hale getirilmesine önemli ölçüde vurgu yapılmaktadır. Bu bağlamda dil değerlendirmesi, daha özel olarak alternatif değerlendirme, dil öğretimi alanında en çok ilgi gören çok önemli konulardan biri olmuştur. Nicel ve nitel olarak yürütülen bu mevcut çalışma, yabancı dil olarak İngilizce öğretmenlerinin alternatif değerlendirme yöntemlerine yönelik tutumlarını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmanın katılımcıları, Türkiye'nin Samsun ilindeki devlet ilkokul, ortaokul ve liselerinde görev yapan 137 İngilizce öğretmenidir. Katılımcılar, çalışmanın anket kısmında İzci ve arkadaşları (2014) tarafından geliştirilen 15 maddelik 5'li Likert ölçeğine yanıt vermişlerdir. Çalışmanın nitel aşaması için 16 öğretmen gönüllü olarak dört açık uçlu soruyu yanıtlamak üzere görüşmeyi kabul etti. Çalışmanın bulguları, genel olarak EFL öğretmenlerinin alternatif değerlendirme yöntemlerine olumlu bir bakış açısına sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Diğer bulgular, hizmet içi eğitim alan öğretmenlerin tutumlarının lehine anlamlı düzeyde farklılaştığını, ayrıca öğretmenlerin alternatif değerlendirme araçlarının kullanımını engelleyen zorluklarla sıklıkla karşılaştıklarını ve/veya bu yöntemleri etkili bir şekilde uygulamalarını engelleyen faktörlerin bulunduğunu düşündüklerini göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

değerlendirme , dil değerlendirmesi , alternatif değerlendirme , öğretmen tutumları

Kaynakça

• Abbas, Z. (2012). Difficulties in using methods of alternative assessment In teaching from Iraqi instructors points of view. AL-Fatih Journal, 48, 23-45.
• Ak, B. (2010). Parametrik hipotez testleri. In Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.) SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (pp. 73-83). Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
• Al-Nouh, N.A., Taqi, H.A. & Abdul-Kareem, M. M. (2014). EFL Primary school teachers’ attitudes, knowledge, and skills in alternative assessment. International Educational Studies, 7(5), 68- 84.
• Al-Ruqeishi, M. Ans & Al-Humanidi, S. (2016). Alternative assessment as perceived by EFL teachers. IUP Journal Of English Studies, 11(3), 88-101.
• Andrade, H. & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159-181.
• Arslan, R. Ş. & Üçok-Atasoy, M. (2020). An investigation into EFL teachers’ assessment of young learners of English: Does practice match the policy? International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(2), 468-484. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/818
• Asassfeh, S.M. (2019) EFL Teachers’assessment preferences and prevalent practices: The case of Jordan. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, IJLLT 2(7), 67-74.
• Aschbacher, P. R. (1991). Performance assessment: State activity, interest, and concerns. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 275-288. http://doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0404_2
• Barnhardt, S., Kevorkian, J. & Delett, J. (1998). Portfolio assessment in the foreign language classroom. Washington, DC: National Capital Language Resource Center.
• Baxter, S. J. (2009). Journals in the language classroom, English Teaching Forum, 4, 22-26.
• Brindley, G. (2001a). Assessment. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to speakers of other languages (pp. 137-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Brindley, G. (2001b). Outcomes-based assessment in practice: Some examples and emerging insights. Language Testing, 18(4), 393-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800405
• Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment. Principles and classroom practices. New York: Longman.
• Brown, H. D. & Abeywickrama, P. (2019). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York: Pearson Education.
• Brown, J. D. & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 653-675.
• Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Chan, Y.C. (2008). Elementary school EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of multiple assessments. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 7(1), 37–62.
• Chapella, C. A. & Brindley, G. (2002). Assessment. In N.Schmitt (Ed.) An Introduction to Applied Linguistics (pp. 272-288). London: Arnold.
• Cheng, L., Rogers, T., & Hu, H. (2004). ESL/EFL Instructors’ classroom assessment practices: purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing, 21(3), 360–389. http://doi:10.1191/0265532204lt288oa
• Cheng, L. & Fox, J.(2017). Assessment in the language classroom: Teachers supporting student learning. London: Macmillan Education.
• Cohen, A.D. (1994). Assessing language ability in the classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
• Coombe, C., Folse, K. & Hubley, N. (2007). A practical guide to assessing English language learners. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
• Çakır, N. (2020). Comparative analysis of teachers' beliefs and practices on the assessment of 4th grade-EFL students in Turkey, Italy and Finland [Unpublished MA Thesis]. Bursa Uludağ University.
• Çetin, L. M. B. (2011). An investigation into the implementation of alternative assessment in the young learners’ classroom. [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. Middle East Technical University.
• Danica, K. P. (2020). Alternative Assessment: Efl Teacher's Perspectives [Unpublished MA Thesis]. University of Rijeka.
• Delett, J., Barnhardt, S., & Kevorkian, J. (2001). A framework for portfolio assessment in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 34, (6), 559-568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02103.x
• Demir, H. (2022). Primary school EFL teachers’ perceptions of alternative assessment tools [Unpublished MAThesis]. Gaziantep University.
• Everhard, C.J. (2015). The assessment-autonomy relationship. In C. J.Everhard & L. Murphy (Eds.), Assessment and autonomy in language learning. (pp. 8-34). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Everhard, C.J. (2015). Investigating peer-and self-assessment of oral skills as stepping-stones to autonomy in EFL higher education. In C. J.Everhard & L. Murphy (Eds.), Assessment and autonomy in language learning (pp.114-142). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge.
• Genesee, F., & Upshur, J. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ghaicha, A. & Omarkaly, E. (2018). Alternative Assessment in the Moroccan EFL Classrooms Teachers’ Conceptions and Practice. Higher Education of Social Science, 14(1), 2018, 56- 68. http://doi:10.3968/10161
• Göçtü, R. (2013). Comparison of traditional and alternative assessment in English Language Teaching in high schools: Georgian case [Unpublished MA Thesis]. Karadeniz Technical University.Green, A. (2018). Assessment of learning and assessment for learning. In John I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, (pp.1–6). http://doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0352
• Hamayan, E. V. (1995). Approaches to alternative assesment. Annual Rewiew of Applied Linguistics, 15, 212-226.
• Hamp-Lyons, L. (2016). Purposes of assessment. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Ed.), Handbook of Second Language Assessment (pp. 13-28). Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
• Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P.R. & Winters, L. (1992) A practical guide to alternative assessment. Washington DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum.
• Huerta-Macias, A. (1995). Alternative assessment: Responses to commonly asked questions. TESOL Journal, 5, 8-11.
• Hughes, A. & Hughes, J. (2020) Testing for language teachers. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Inbar‐Lourie, O., & Donitsa‐Schmidt, S. (2009). Exploring classroom assessment practices: The case of teachers of English as a foreign language. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(2), 185–204. http://doi:10.1080/09695940903075958
• İzci, E., Göktaş, Ö. & Şad, S. N. (2014). Öğretmen Adaylarının Alternatif Ölçme Değerlendirmeye İlişkin Görüşleri ve Yeterlilik Algıları. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 37-57.
• Janisch, C., Liu, X., & Akrofi, A. (2007). Implementing alternative assessment: Opportunities and obstacles. The Educational Forum, 71(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720709335007
• Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-33.
• Kim,Y. & Yazdian, L.S.(2014). Portfolio Assessment and quality teaching. Theory Into Practice, 53, (3), 220-227.
• Küçükhayrat, C. (2024) A descriptive study on the attitudes of EFL instructors working in schools of foreign languages toward alternative assessment [Unpublished MA thesis]. Süleyman Demirel University.
• Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research. Methodology and design. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2018). İlköğretim İngilizce dersi (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim program [English language curriculum (the 2nd-8th grades)]. Retrieved from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=327
• Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2018). Ortaöğretim İngilizce dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) [English language curriculum (the 9th -12th grades)]. Retrieved from https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=342
• Moradian, M. R., Ramezanzadeh, A. & Doust, F. G. (2023). An exploration of EFL teachers’ knowledge of and attitudes towards post-modern approach to language assessment: Qualitative inquiry into Iranian EFL teachers at private language institutes. International Journal of Research in English Education 8(5), 83-94.
• Namayan, R. (2022). A critical review of portfolio assessment as an alternative tool in English language teaching classrooms. English Language and Literature Studies,13(1), 1-8.
• Naraghizadeh, M., Azizmalayeri, F., & Khalaji, H. R. (2023). EFL teachers’ conceptions of alternative assessment strategies. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 11 (44), 43-52. http://doi.org/10.30495/JFL.2023.699904
• Nasri, N., Roslan, S.N., Sekuan, M.I., Bakar, A. & Puteh, S.N. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions on alternative assessment. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences 7(C ), 37-42.
• O’Malley, J.M. & Pierce, L.V. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical appoaches for teachers. New York: Longman.
• Önalan, O. & Karagül, A.E. (2018). A study on Turkish EFL teachers’ beliefs about assessment and its different uses in teaching English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(3), 190- 201.
• Phongsirikul, M. (2018). Traditional and alternative assessments in ELT: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. rEFLections 25(1), 61-84.
• Poehner, M. E.(2016). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Berlin: Springer.
• Poehner, M. E., & Infante, P.(2016). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. In D.Tsagari and J. Banerjee (Eds.) Handbook of second language assessment. (pp.275-290). Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
• Purpura, J. E. (2016). Second and foreign language assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 190–208. http://doi:10.1111/modl.12308
• Rea-Dickins, P. (2000) Classroom assessment. In T.Hedge. Teaching and learning in the language classroom (pp. 375-401). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Richards, J.C. (2005). Key Issues in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Singh, C. K. S., Muhammad, M. M., Mostafa, N. A., Yunus, M. M., Noordin, N. & Darm, R. (2022). Exploring ESL teachers’ alternative assessment strategies and practices in the classroom. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 411-426. http://doi:10.52462/jlls.191
• Tedick, D.J. & Klee, C.A. (1998). Alternative assessment in the language classroom. In G. S. Burkart, (Ed.), One of a series of modules for the professional preparation of teaching assistants in foreign languages (pp.1-43). Washington, DC : Center for Applied Linguistics.
• Troudi, S., Coombe, C. & Al-Hamly, M. (2009). EFL teachers' views of English language assessment in Higher Education in the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 545- 555.
• Turner, C.E. & Purpura, J.E. (2016). Learning-oriented assessment in second and foreign language classrooms. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment. (pp. 255-274). Boston: De Gruyter.