THE ACTORS AND DYNAMICS OF ADMINISTRATION IN ITALIAN CITY STATES AS ROOT OF MODERN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

Abstract

Following the collapse of the Roman Empire the Italian cities experienced the conditions under which they undertook some administrative responsibilities that generally were implemented by the emperor as a part of Regalian rights. In this period administrative power of the church increased considerably and it became prominent actor of local administration.  On the other hand, in those cities a new manufacture oriented traders and artisans emerged as a class claimed to be the primary actor of local administrative affairs.  The novel economic conditions and rising administrative understanding, based upon the priorities of the cities, facilitated the defeat of the church. Following the elimination of the church, city councils were accepted as institution which protected city dwellers’ benefit.  However, the claim of city councils to be the chief actor of local administration deeply contradicted with the traditional Regalian rights of the kings.  In this article, the struggle between emperor and city states, on the axis of Regalian rights and city-oriented interests, and the framework for power sharing patterns are analyzed as an earlier form of central versus local relations. Such an approach could be meaningful to comprehend the origin and the development of the framework for modern central-local government relations’  patterns.

Keywords

• Italian City States,Regalian Rights,City Councils,Centralization,Central vs. Local Government Relations

YEREL YÖNETİMLERİN KÖKENİ BAĞLAMINDA İTALYAN ŞEHİR DEVLETLERİNDE YÖNETİM VE AKTÖRLER

Öz

Roma İmparatorluğu’nun yıkılmasından sonra imparatorluk boşluğu olarak adlandırılan dönemde İtalyan şehirleri uzunca bir süre şehir ölçekli faaliyetleri kendileri yürütmüşlerdir. İmparatorluk döneminde merkezi yönetim (imparator) tarafından yapılmakta olan bu faaliyetler genellikle yerel bağlamda kilise tarafından yerine getirilmiştir ki bu sürecin sonunda kilise yerel yönetim faaliyetlerinin asli aktörü haline gelmiştir. Ancak 900’lü yılların ortalarından sonra kendilerini toparlayan şehirlerde imalat ekonomisi ve zenaatçılar öncülüğünde yeni ekonomik dinamikler ön plana çıkmaya başlamıştır. Uzun bir süredir kendi ayakları üzerinde duran şehirlerde şehir aidiyeti ekseninde ortaya çıkan yönetim anlayışı şehir ölçekli üretimin de etkisiyle oldukça güçlenmiştir. Gelinen noktada şehir yönetiminin birincil aktörü olma bağlamında kilise ile çatışma kaçınılmaz olmuştur ve bu çatışmanın galibi yeni ekonomik ve sosyal dinamiklerin temsilcisi olan şehir konsülleri olmuştur. Ancak şehir konsüllerinin şehirlerin birincil temsilcisi olma iddiası Regalyan haklar bağlamında şehirler üzerinde idari ve vergi toplama hakları olan imparatorlar tarafından kabul edilmemiştir. Bu makale imparator ile şehirlerin Regalyan haklar-yerel çıkarlar bağlamında ortaya çıkan çatışmalarının sebepleri ve bu çatışmalar sonucunda şekillenen merkez-yerel yönetim yetki paylaşım çerçevesini ve bu çerçevenin bölgesel merkezileşme bağlamında dönüşümünü analiz ederek modern yerel yönetim-merkezi yönetim ilişki modellerinin anlaşılmasına katkı sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İtalyan Şehir Devletleri,Regalyan Haklar,Şehir Konsülleri,Merkezileşme,Merkezi-Yerel Yönetim İlkeleri

Kaynakça

1. Anderson, Perry (1974). Lineages of the Absolutist State. NLB Bloch, Marc (2005). Feudal Society, Volume II. Social Classes and Political Organization. Translated from French by L.A. Manyon. Taylor and Francis e-Library. Blockmans, Wim (1989).Voracious States and Obstructing Cities. An aspect of State Formation in Preindustrial Europe. Theory and Society 18:733-755 Blockmans, Wim (1988). Alternatives to Monarchical Centralisation: The Great Tradition of Revolt in Flanders and Brabant https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/2873/351_069.pdf?sequence=1 Chittolini Giorgio (1989). Cities,”City-states,” and Regional States in North-Central Italy. Theory and Society.18: 689-706 Dente, Bruno (1985). “Center-Local Relations in Italy: The Impact of The Legal and Political Structures”. İçinde Center- Periphery Relations in Western Europe. Edited Yves Meny and Vincent Wright .George Allen, Unwin , London. Epstein, Steven (2000). Freedom and Growth: The Rise of States and Markets in Europe, 1300-1750 . Routledge. Fasano Guarini, Elena (1995). “Center and Periphery”. Edited Julius Kirshner. The Origins of The State in Italy.1300-1600. İçinde Ss.74-96. The University of Chicago Press. Jones, Philip (1997). The Italian City-State.From Commune to Signoria. Oxford University Press. Kirshner, Julius (1996).The Origins of The State in Italy.1300-1600. The University of Chicago Press. Loughlin, John (2001), “Italy: The Crisis of the Second Republic”, Subnational Democracy in the European Union: Challenges and Opportunities . Ed:John Loughlin With the collaboration of Eliseo Aja, Udo Bullmann, Frank Hendriks, Anders Lidström, Daniel Seiler. Oxford University Press ss.211-229 Machiavelli, Niccolo (2008). The Prince. Translated by James Atkinson. Hackett Publishing. Indianapolis/Cambridge Martines, Lauro (1988). Power and Imagination:City-States in Renaissance Italy. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Nicholas, David (1997). The Growth of the Medieval City: From Late Antiquity to the Early Fourteenth Century. Addison Wesley Longman. Nicholas, David (1997b). The Later Medieval City 1300–1500. Taylor &Francis Parker, Geoffrey (2004). The Soverign City: The City-State Through History. Reaktion Books. Pirenne, Henry (2010). Ortaçağ Kentleri: Kökenleri ve Ticaretin Canlanması. Çeviren Şadan Karadeniz. İletişim Yayınları. Poggi, Gianfranco (2009). Çağdaş Devletin Gelişimi. Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul. Reynolds, Susan (1997). Kingdoms and Communities in Western Europe, 900–1300. Second Edition. Oxford. Rose, Richard (1985). “From Government at the Centre to Nationwide Government”,Center- Periphery Relations in Western Europe ,Yves Meny and Vincent Wright .George Allen, Unwin , London. Schiera, Pierangelo (1995). “Legitimacy, Discipline and Institutions: Three Necessary Conditions for The Birth of The Modern State”. İçinde: Julius Kirshner The Origins of The State in Italy.1300-1600. Ss.11-33. The University of Chicago Press. Scott, Tom (2012). The City State in Europe,1000-1600: Hinterland, Territory, Region. Oxford University Press. Tabacco, Giovanni (2008). Northern and Central Italy in The Eleventh Century. The New Cambridge M edieval History, vol:4, pp: 72-93. Edited by David Luscombe & Jonathan Riley-Smith. Cambridge University Press. Tilly, Charles (1989). Cities and States in Europe. Theory and Society 18:563-584.,Theor Weber, Max (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Society. Editted by Gunther Roth and Claus Wittich. University of California Press. Waley, Daniel & Dean Trevor (2010). The Italian City-Republics. 4th edition. Routledge. Wickham, Chris (1981). Early Medieval Italy: Central Power and Local Society 400-1000. The Macmillan Press. Zariski, Raphael (1983). “The Establishment of the Kingdom of Italy as a Unitary State: A Case Study in Regime Formation” Publius, Vol. 13, No. 4 ss. 1-19.