BİR PARADİGMA OLARAK KESİŞİMSELLİK TEORİSİ VE HEMŞİRELİK

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 211 - 234, 31.08.2021

Cansu Karadeniz Benli , Özen Kulakaç

https://doi.org/10.47115/jshs.899007

Öz

Toplumsal cinsiyet, cinsiyet, cinsel kimlik, ırk, sınıf gibi kavramlar toplumda eşitsizliklere konu olan sınıflamalardır. Eşitsizliklerin doğası toplumdan topluma, zamandan zamana değişiklik göstermesine rağmen insanlık tarihi boyunca hep varolmuştur. Siyah kadınların yaşadıkları çoklu dezavantajı, ırk ve cinsiyeti, baskıcı bir deneyim olarak kavramsallaştıran kesişimsellik, siyah eleştirmen, düşünür ve aktivistler tarafından geliştirilmiştir. Kesişimsellik günümüzde yalnız siyah kadınları değil diğer marjinal grupların yaşadıkları eşitsizlikleri de ele almakta ve toplumdaki ırkçılık, cinsiyetçilik, doğurganlık ve homofobi gibi kavramların birbirinden bağımsız olmadığını söylemektedir. Kesişimsellik, sağlık eşitsizlikleri için nispeten yeni olmasının yanında, son 20 yıldır feminist ve sosyal bilim alanında sağlam bir yer edinmiştir. Kesişimşellik yaklaşımının yardımıyla, sağlık alanında ırk, sınıf, cinsiyet ve cinsellik başlığı altında ortaya çıkan eşitsizlik ve güç yapılarının çok sayıdaki karmaşık boyutu açıklanabilmektedir. Kesişimsellik paradigması, hemşireleri uygulamalarında özellikle farklı güçsüzlük veya ötekileştirme biçimleriyle karşılaşabilecek kadınlara bakım sağladıkları zamanlarda, yetkinlikleri üzerine düşünmeye davet etmektedir. Hemşirelik andında, uygulamanın etik boyutunun bir parçası olarak hemşirelerin, cinsiyet, ırk, kültür veya cinsellikten bağımsız olarak herkese eşit davranacağının sözü verilmektedir. Kesişimsellik kuramı, hemşirelerin uygulama, yönetim ve araştırmada bu sözü tutabilmesi için uygun bir kavramsal çatı sunmaktadır. Kesişimselliğin hemşirelik bakımında kullanılması, bakımı alan bireylerin sosyal konumlarının altında yatan ve yaşamlarını nasıl etkilediğinin farkında olunmayan yapıların hemşirelik müdahaleleri ile ortaya çıkarılması mümkün olacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bakım, hemşirelik, paradigma, Kesişimsellik kuramı

The theory of intersection and nursing as a paradigm

Öz

Concepts such as gender, gender, sexual identity, race, and class are classifications that are subject to inequalities in society. Although the nature of inequalities varies from society to society and from time to time, it has always existed throughout human history. Conceptualizing the multiple disadvantages of black women, race and gender, as an oppressive experience, the intersectionality was developed by black critic, thinker, and activists. Intersectionality deals with not only black women but also the inequalities experienced by other marginalized groups today and says that concepts such as racism, sexism, fertility and homophobia in society are not independent from each other. Intersectionality, while relatively new to health inequalities, has established itself firmly in the field of feminist and social science over the past two decades. With the help of the intersectionality approach, the many complex dimensions of inequality and power structures that arise under the heading of race, class, gender and sexuality in health can be explained. The intersectionality paradigm invites nurses to reflect on their competencies in their practice, especially to women who may face different forms of weakness or marginalization. In the nursing oath, it is promised that nurses will treat everyone equally, regardless of gender, race, culture or sexuality, as part of the ethical dimension of the practice. Intersectional theory provides an appropriate conceptual framework for nurses to keep this promise in practice, management, and research. Using intersectionality in nursing care, it will be possible to reveal the structures that underlie the social positions of the individuals who receive care and who are unaware of how they affect their lives with nursing interventions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Care, nursing, paradigm, Intersectionality theory

Kaynakça

• Akpınar, B. (2019). Farklı Teoriler Çerçevesinde Eş Seçimi Ve Evlilik Uyumu Konularının İncelenmesi. Çizgi Kitabevi, 164-172.
• Aspinall, C., Jacobs, S., & Frey, R. (2019). Intersectionality and Critical Realism: A Philosophical Framework for Advancing Nursing Leadership. Advances in Nursing Science, 42(4), 289-296.
• Atewologun, D. (2018). Intersectionality theory and practice. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management.
• Avci, I. A., Cavusoglu, F., Aydin, M., & Altay, B. (2018). Attitude and practice of family planning methods among Roma women living in northern Turkey. International journal of nursing sciences, 5(1), 33-38.
• Bengiamin, M. I., Capitman, J. A., & Ruwe, M. B. (2010). Disparities in initiation and adherence to prenatal care: impact of insurance, race-ethnicity and nativity. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(4), 618-624.
• Berber, Ş. (2003). Modern Bir Olgu Olarak Sosyal Sınıflar. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (9), 223-232. Bilge, S. (2010). Recent feminist outlooks on intersectionality. Diogenes, 57(1), 58-72.
• Block, D., & Corona, V. (2014). Exploring class-based intersectionality. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(1), 27-42.
• Blom, N., Huijts, T., & Kraaykamp, G. (2016). Ethnic health inequalities in Europe. The moderating and amplifying role of healthcare system characteristics. Social science & medicine, 158, 43-51.
• Brancati, F. L., Kao, W. L., Folsom, A. R., Watson, R. L., & Szklo, M. (2000). Incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in African American and white adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Jama, 283(17), 2253-2259.
• Carbado, D. W., Crenshaw, K. W., Mays, V. M., & Tomlinson, B. (2013). Intersectionality: Mapping the movements of a theory. Du Bois review: social science research on race, 10(2), 303-312.
• Castañeda, H., Holmes, S. M., Madrigal, D. S., Young, M. E. D., Beyeler, N., & Quesada, J. (2015). Immigration as a social determinant of health. Annual review of public health, 36, 375-392.
• Chulach, T., & Gagnon, M. (2013). Rethinking the experience of HIV-positive refugee women in the context of pregnancy: Using an intersectional approach in nursing. Research and theory for nursing practice, 27(4), 240-256.
• Chun, J. J., Lipsitz, G., & Shin, Y. (2013). Intersectionality as a social movement strategy: Asian immigrant women advocates. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 917-940.
• Clarke, A. Y., & McCall, L. (2013). Intersectionality and social explanation in social science research. Du Bois review: social science research on race, 10(2), 349-363.
• Collins, P. H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. routledge.
• Crenshaw, K. (2011). “Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Anti-discrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Anti-racist Politics”, 25-42.
• De Los Reyes, P. (2017). Working life inequalities: do we need intersectionality?. Society, Health & Vulnerability, 8(sup1), 1332858. Donovan, J. Feminist Teori, Bora Aksu (çev.), İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul 2014.
• Dursun, A. (2015). Türkiye Türkçesi Atasözlerinde Sözlü Hukuk. Journal of International Social Research, 8(38).
• Fisher-Borne, M., Cain, J. M., & Martin, S. L. (2015). From mastery to accountability: Cultural humility as an alternative to cultural competence. Social Work Education, 34(2), 165-181.
• Flippen, C. A. (2014). Intersectionality at work: Determinants of labor supply among immigrant Latinas. Gender & Society, 28(3), 404-434.
• Gkiouleka, A., Huijts, T., Beckfield, J., & Bambra, C. (2018). Understanding the micro and macro politics of health: Inequalities, intersectionality & institutions-A research agenda. Social Science & Medicine, 200, 92-98.
• Gustafson, D. L. (2007). White on whiteness: Becoming radicalized about race. Nursing Inquiry, 14(2), 153-161.
• Güneş, F. (2017). Feminist Kuramda Ataerki Tartışmaları Üzerine Eleştirel Bir İnceleme. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences/Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 27(2).
• Hankivsky, O. (2012). Women’s health, men’s health, and gender and health: Implications of intersectionality. Social science & medicine, 74(11), 1712-1720.
• Hankivsky, O., & Christoffersen, A. (2008). Intersectionality and the determinants of health: a Canadian perspective. Critical Public Health, 18(3), 271-283.
• Hankivsky, O., Doyal, L., Einstein, G., Kelly, U., Shim, J., Weber, L., & Repta, R. (2017). The odd couple: using biomedical and intersectional approaches to address health inequities. Global Health Action, 10(sup2), 1326686.
• Hernández, P., & McDowell, T. (2010). Intersectionality, power, and relational safety in context: Key concepts in clinical supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4(1), 29.
• Hooks, B. (2000). Where we stand: Class matters. Psychology Press.
• Huijts, T., & Kraaykamp, G. (2012). Immigrants’ health in Europe: a cross-classified multilevel approach to examine origin country, destination country, and community effects. International Migration Review, 46(1), 101-137.
• Huria, T., Cuddy, J., Lacey, C., & Pitama, S. (2014). Working with racism: a qualitative study of the perspectives of Māori (indigenous peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand) registered nurses on a global phenomenon. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 25(4), 364-372.
• İnce, M. (2017). Toplumsal Tabakalaşma ve Eşitsizlik. Gazi Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 19(1), 294.
• Janevic, T., Jankovic, J., & Bradley, E. (2012). Socioeconomic position, gender, and inequalities in self-rated health between Roma and non-Roma in Serbia. International Journal of Public Health, 57(1), 49-55.
• Kapilashrami, A., Hill, S., & Meer, N. (2015). What can health inequalities researchers learn from an intersectionality perspective? Understanding social dynamics with an inter-categorical approach?. Social Theory & Health, 13(3-4), 288-307.
• Kapilashrami, A., Hill, S., & Meer, N. (2015). What can health inequalities researchers learn from an intersectionality perspective? Understanding social dynamics with an inter-categorical approach?. Social Theory & Health, 13(3-4), 288-307.
• Kartal, F. (2016). Kadınların Yurttaşlığı ve Feminist Kuram. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 49(3).
• Kelly, U. A. (2009). Integrating intersectionality and biomedicine in health disparities research. Advances in Nursing Science, 32(2), 42-56.
• Kılıç, Y. (2014). Türkiye’de eğitimsel eşitsizlik ve toplumsal tabakalaşma ilişkisine dair ampirik bir çalışma. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 243-263.
• Kim, J., Ashing-Giwa, K. T., Kagawa-Singer, & Tejero, J. S. (2006). Breast Cancer Among Asian Americans: Is Acculturation Related to Health-Related Quality of Life? Oncology Nursing Forum, 33(6), 90-99.
• King, K. M., LeBlanc, P., Carr, W., & Quan, H. (2007). Chinese immigrants' management of their cardiovascular disease risk. Western journal of nursing research, 29(7), 804-826.
• Kings, A. E. (2017). Intersectionality and the changing face of ecofeminism. Ethics and the Environment, 22(1), 63-87.
• Kocabaş, A. (2020). COVID-19 Pandemisi ve Sağlığın Sosyal Bileşenleri, Türk Toraks Derneği COVID-19 E-Kitapları Serisi.
• Kohli, A. (2015). Forced and underage marriages in New Zealand: Some reflections on public and private patriarchy and intersectionality.
• Kossman, S. P. (2009). The power of nurse educators: Welcoming and unwelcoming behaviors. Transforming nursing education: The culturally inclusive environment, 27-60.
• Körük, S. (2019). Eşimizi Nasıl Seçeriz? Eş Seçimi Üzerine Bir Derleme. Tam Metin Kitabı Full Text Book.
• Lim, H. J. (2018). Intersectionality and Storytelling in the Context of East Asian Mothers. In East Asian Mothers in Britain (pp. 79-115). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
• Meçik, O., & Aytun, U. (2020). COVID-19 Döneminde Eşitsizlikler: Çalışma İçerikleri ve Ücretler1. Genel-İş Emek Araştırma Dergisi (GEAD), 1.
• Merkin, S. S., Stevenson, L., & Powe, N. (2002). Geographic socioeconomic status, race, and advanced-stage breast cancer in New York City. American journal of public health, 92(1), 64-70.
• Meyer, W., Costenbader, E. C., Zule, W. A., Otiashvili, D., & Kirtadze, I. (2010). ‘We are ordinary men’: MSM identity categories in Tbilisi, Georgia. Culture, health & sexuality, 12(8), 955-971.
• Mill, J., Edwards, N., Jackson, R., Austin, W., MacLean, L., & Reintjes, F. (2009). Accessing health services while living with HIV: Intersections of stigma. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research Archive, 41(3).
• Mink, M. D., Lindley, L. L., & Weinstein, A. A. (2014). Stress, stigma, and sexual minority status: The intersectional ecology model of LGBTQ health. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 26(4), 502-521.
• Nixon, J., & Humphreys, C. (2010). Marshalling the evidence: Using intersectionality in the domestic violence frame. Social politics, 17(2), 137-158.
• Ostlin, P., George, A. and Sen, G. (2001) Gender, health, and equity: The intersections. In: T. Evans, M. Whitehead, F. Diderichsen, A. Bhuiya, M. Wirth and M. Whitehead (eds.) Challenging Inequities in Health: From Ethics to Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch 13, 174–189.
• Overstreet, N. M., Rosenthal, L., & Case, K. A. (2020). Intersectionality as a radical framework for transforming our disciplines, social issues, and the world. Journal of Social Issues.
• Patil, V. (2013). From patriarchy to intersectionality: A transnational feminist assessment of how far we've really come. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 847-867.
• Patrick, A., Laschinger, H. K. S., Wong, C., & Finegan, J. (2011). Developing and testing a new measure of staff nurse clinical leadership: the clinical leadership survey. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(4), 449-460.
• Pauly, B. M., MacKinnon, K., & Varcoe, C. (2009). Revisiting “who gets care?”: Health equity as an arena for nursing action. Advances in Nursing Science, 32(2), 118-127.
• Pharris, M. D., & Bosher, S. D. (Eds.). (2008). Transforming nursing education: The culturally inclusive environment. Springer Publishing Company.
• Quan, H., Fong, A., De Coster, C., Wang, J., Musto, R., Noseworthy, T. W., & Ghali, W. A. (2006). Variation in health services utilization among ethnic populations. Cmaj, 174(6), 787-791.
• Racine, L. (2003). Implementing a postcolonial feminist perspective in nursing research related to non‐Western populations. Nursing Inquiry, 10(2), 91-102.
• Roberts, D., & Jesudason, S. (2013). Movement intersectionality: The case of race, gender, disability, and genetic technologies. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10(2), 313-328.
• Rogers, J., & Kelly, U. A. (2011). Feminist intersectionality: Bringing social justice to health disparities research. Nursing Ethics, 18(3), 397-407.
• Shi, S., Qin, M., Shen, B., Cai, Y., Liu, T., Yang, F., ... & Huang, H. (2020). Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA cardiology.
• Smith, K. E., Bambra, C., & Hill, S. E. (Eds.). (2016). Health inequalities: Critical perspectives. Oxford University Press.96-97. Sunar, L. (2018). Sosyal tabakalaşma.
• Sundean, L. J., & Polifroni, E. C. (2016). A feminist framework for nurses on boards. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32(6), 396-400.
• Sy, K. T. L., Martinez, M. E., Rader, B., & White, L. F. (2020). Socioeconomic disparities in subway use and COVID-19 outcomes in New York City. medRxiv.
• UN Women (2020). Türkiye’de COVID-19 Etkilerinin Toplumsal Cinsiyet Açısından Değerlendirilmesi.
• Van Herk, K. A., Smith, D., & Andrew, C. (2011). Examining our privileges and oppressions: incorporating an intersectionality paradigm into nursing. Nursing inquiry, 18(1), 29-39.
• Varcoe, C., & Dick, S. (2008). The intersecting risks of violence and HIV for rural Aboriginal women in a neo-colonial Canadian context. Journal de la santé autochtone.
• Viruell-Fuentes, E. A., Miranda, P. Y., & Abdulrahim, S. (2012). More than culture: structural racism, intersectionality theory, and immigrant health. Social science & medicine, 75(12), 2099-2106.
• Wagaman, M. A. (2014). Understanding service experiences of LGBTQ young people through an intersectional lens. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 26(1), 111-145.
• Walby, S., Armstrong, J., & Strid, S. (2012). Intersectionality: Multiple inequalities in social theory. Sociology, 46(2), 224-240.
• Weber, L. (2006). Reconstructing the landscape of health disparities research: Promoting dialogue and collaboration between feminist intersectional and biomedical paradigms. Gender, race, class, and health. Intersectional approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 21-59.
• Weber, L., & Fore, M. E. (2007). Race, ethnicity, and health: An intersectional approach. In Handbooks of the sociology of racial and ethnic relations (pp. 191-218). Springer, Boston, MA.
• Yancy, C. W. (2020). COVID-19 and African Americans. Jama.
• Zhong, B. L., Luo, W., Li, H. M., Zhang, Q. Q., Liu, X. G., Li, W. T., & Li, Y. (2020). Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey. International journal of biological sciences, 16(10), 1745.