Çevresel Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluğun İnovatif İş Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinde Yeşil Yetenek Yönetiminin Aracılık Rolü

Bu makale geri çekilmiştir. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jss/article/1501734

Geri Çekme Notu

Makale yazarlarının çalışmanın veri setinin geliştirilmesi gerektiği sebebiyle geri çekme talebi neticesinde makale geri çekilmiştir.

Öz

Günümüzün çevreye duyarlı dünyasında, kuruluşlar sürdürülebilirliklerini ve itibarlarını geliştirmek için çevresel kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk uygulamalarını benimsemektedir. Çevresel kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk, çevresel etkiyi azaltmaya ve sürdürülebilir uygulamaları teşvik etmeye yönelik çeşitli girişimleri kapsamaktadır. Çevresel kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun önemli bir yönü de yeşil yetenek yönetimidir. Yeşil yetenek yönetimi, çevresel sürdürülebilirlik hedeflerini desteklemek için gerekli beceri ve bilgilere sahip çalışanları geliştirmeye ve elde tutmaya odaklanmaktadır. İnovatif iş davranışı ise mevcut durumu sorgulayan, yeni fikirler sunan ve yaratıcı problem çözmeyi teşvik eden çalışan davranışlarını ifade etmektedir. Çalışanlar inovatif iş davranışına katıldıklarında, çevresel kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk girişimlerini benimseme ve kuruluş içinde sürdürülebilir uygulamaların geliştirilmesine katkıda bulunma olasılıkları da yükselmektedir. Bu çalışma, banka çalışanlarının çevresel kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğunun inovatif iş davranışı üzerinde yeşil yetenek yönetiminin aracılık etkisini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında; Bandırma ilçesinde ve Balıkesir il merkezinde çalışan 717 banka çalışanına anket çalışması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu bağlamda elde edilen veriler, PLS temelli yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Bulgulara göre, çevresel kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun çalışanların inovatif iş davranışını anlamlı olarak etkilediği, çevresel kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun çalışanların yeşil yetenek yönetimini anlamlı olarak etkilediği, yeşil yetenek yönetiminin çalışanların inovatif iş davranışını anlamlı olarak etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte, çevresel kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun çalışanların inovatif iş davranışı üzerinde yeşil yetenek yönetiminin kısmen aracılık etkisinin bulunduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çevresel kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk
• yeşil yetenek yönetimi
• inovatif iş davranışı

The Mediating Role of Green Talent Management in the Impact of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility on Innovative Business Behavior

Bu makale geri çekilmiştir. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jss/article/1501734

Öz

In today’s environmentally sensitive world, organizations adopt environmental corporate social responsibility practices to improve their sustainability and reputation. Environmental corporate social responsibility encompasses various initiatives to reduce environmental impact and promote sustainable practices. An essential aspect of environmental corporate social responsibility is green talent management. Green talent management focuses on developing and retaining employees with the skills and knowledge required to support environmental sustainability goals. Innovative work behavior refers to employee behaviors that question the status quo, offer new ideas, and encourage creative problem-solving. When employees participate in innovative work behavior, their likelihood of adopting environmental corporate social responsibility initiatives and contributing to developing sustainable practices within the organization also increases. This study examines the mediating effect of green talent management on the innovative work behavior of bank employees’ environmental corporate social responsibility. Within the scope of the study, a survey was conducted on 717 bank employees working in Bandırma district and Balıkesir city center. In this context, the data obtained were tested using PLS-based structural equation modeling. According to the findings, it was determined that environmental corporate social responsibility significantly affects employees’ innovative work behavior, environmental corporate social responsibility significantly affects the green talent management of employees, and green talent management significantly affects employees’ innovative work behavior. However, it is concluded that environmental corporate social responsibility partially mediates green talent management and employees’ innovative work behavior.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Environmental corporate social responsibility
• green talent management
• innovative business behavior

Kaynakça

1. Abbas, J., Mahmood, S., Ali, H., Ali Raza, M., Ali, G., Aman, J., Nurunnabi, M. (2019). The effects of corporate social responsibility practices and environmental factors through a moderating role of social media marketing on sustainable performance of business firms. Sustainability, 11(12), 3434.
2. Alhmoudi, R. S., Singh, S. K., Caputo, F., Riso, T., Iandolo, F. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and innovative work behavior: Is it a matter of perceptions?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(6), 2030-2037.
3. Appau, B. K., Marfo-Yiadom, E., Kusi, L. Y. (2021). Performance implication of talent management and innovative work behaviour in colleges of education in Ghana. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 7(1), 1-10.
4. Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., Harrington, E. (2000). Shop floor ınnovation: Facilitating the suggestionand implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupa-Tional And Organizational Psychology, 73, 265-285.
5. Bandura, A. (1969). Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. Handbook of socialization theory and research, 213, 262.
6. Barbarossa, C., Chen, Y., Romani, S., Korschun, D. (2022). Not all CSR initiatives are perceived equal: The influence of CSR domains and focal moralities on consumer responses to the company and the cause. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380,134-149.
7. Bozma, K., Karcıoğlu, F. (2023). The relationships between corporate social responsibility and talent management: An analysis through human resources management. Trends in Business and Economics, 37(2), 81-90.
8. Bui, L. T. T., Chang, Y. (2018). Talent management and turnover intention: focus on Danang city government in Vietnam. International Review of Public Administration, 23(4), 219-236.

9. Büyükgöze, H., Özdemir, M. (2017). İş doyumu ile öğretmen performansı ilişkisinin duygusal olaylar kuramı çerçevesinde incelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 311-325.
10. Câmara, G., Fonseca, F. (2007). Information policies and open source software in developing countries. Journal of The American Society for Information Science And Technology, 58(1), 121-132.
11. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67.
12. Crant, J.M. (2000) Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435-462.
13. De Roeck, K., Farooq, O. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership: ınvestigating their ınteractive effect on employees’ socially responsible behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 923-939.
14. Ellemers, N., Haslam, S. A. (2012). Social identity theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 2, 379-398.
15. Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
16. Gardas, B. B., Mangla, S. K., Raut, R. D., Narkhede, B., Luthra, S. (2019). Green talent management to unlock sustainability in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 850-862.
17. Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., Parker, S.K. (2007) A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and ınterdependent con-texts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327-347.
18. Groenewald, E., Groenewald, C. A., Kilag, O. K.andrin, G., Pernites, M. J., Macapaz, M. K. (2024). Talent Management in the 21st century: a comprehensive review and prospects for ınnovation. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainabilityand Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(3), 93-99.
19. Guerra, J. M. M., Danvila-del-Valle, I., Méndez-Suárez, M. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on talent management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122291.
20. Hair, J. F., William, B. C., Barry, B. J., Rolph, A. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.
21. Hair, Jr J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
22. Hair, JF., Risher, JJ., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
23. Henriques, T. A. (2019). Gestão de sistemas de ınformação: Pessoas, equipas e mudança organizacional, Descrição Detalhada da Publicação
24. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135.
25. Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255-269.
26. Huk, K., Kurowski, M. (2021). The environmental aspect in the concept of corporate social responsibility in the energy industry and sustainable development of the economy. Energies, 14(18), 59-93.
27. Hurt, H. Joseph, K., Cook, C. (1977). Scale for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65.
28. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairnessand innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302.
29. Katz, D., Kahn, R.L. (1978) The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
30. Kulualp, H. G., Sarı, Ö. (2019). Destekleme davranışı ve sosyal değişim teorisi kapsamında kırsal turizmin etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(1), 643-666.
31. Lacey, M. Y., Groves, K. (2014). Talent management collides with corporate social responsibility: Creation of inadvertent hypocrisy. Journal of Management Development, 33(4), 399-409.
32. Li, Y. B., Zhang, G. Q., Wu, T. J., Peng, C. L. (2020). Employee’s corporate social responsibility perception and sustained innovative behavior: Based on the psychological identity of employees. Sustainability, 12(20), 86-94.
33. Liu, Y., Vrontis, D., Visser, M., Stokes, P., Smith, S., Moore, N., Ashta, A. (2021). Talent management and the HR function in cross-cultural mergers and acquisitions: The role and impact of bi-cultural identity. Human Resource Management Review, 31(3), 100744.
34. Maldonado-Erazo, C. P., Álvarez-García, J., del Río-Rama, M. D. L. C., Correa-Quezada, R. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and performance in SMEs: Scientific coverage. Sustainability, 12(6), 23-32.
35. McLoughlin, I., M. Harris (1997). Innovation, organizational change and technology. London: Thompson.
36. Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2&3), 107-120.
37. Odugbesan, J. A., Aghazadeh, S., Al Qaralleh, R. E., Sogeke, O. S. (2023). Green talent management and employees’ innovative work behavior: the roles of artificial intelligence and transformational leadership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(3), 696-716.
38. Ogbeibu, S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Burgess, J., Gaskin, J., Renwick, D. W. S. (2022). Green talent management and turnover intention: The roles of leader stara competence and digital task interdependence. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23, 27-55.
39. Paruzel, A., Schmidt, L., Maier, G. W. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and employee innovative behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 393, 136-189.
40. Rahmayanti, R., Johan, A. (2024). Does ınnovative work behavior matter for performance? green talent management and green servant leadership in the healthcare industry. JBTI: Jurnal Bisnis: Teori dan Implementasi, 15(1), 85-100.
41. Reuvers, M., van Engen, M.L., Vinkenburg, C. J., Wilson-Evered, E. (2008). Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: exploring the relevance of gender differences. Creativityand Innovation Management, 17, 227-244.
42. Revianto, A. B. (2023). The role of green human capital as a mediation variable based on improved talent management in enhancing green innovation and environmental performance. International Business and Accounting Research Journal, 7(1), 101-109.
43. Rhee, C. S., Woo, S., Yu, S. J., Rhee, H. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and sustainable employability: Empirical evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 13(14), 81-94.
44. Ringle, C., Da Silva, D., Bido, D. (2015). Structural equation modeling with the smartpls. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2), 56-73.
45. Rotter, J. B. (2021). Social learning theory. Expectations and actions. Routledge.
46. Schein, E. H. (1971). Occupational socialization in the professions: The case of the role innovator. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 7, 401-426.
47. Scott, S. G., Bruce, R.A. (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individuals innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
48. Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., Blum, T.C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength,work context and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 489-505.
49. Shanker, S. (2023). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance in malaysian listed firms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(2), 2023, 1078-1096.
50. Sharma, B. (2016). A Focus on reliability in developmental research through cronbach’s alpha among medical, dental and paramedical professionals. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences, 3(4), 271-278.
51. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11-27.
52. Story, J., Castanheira, F., Hartig, S. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and organizational attractiveness: implications for talent management. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(3), 484-505.
53. Tansley, C., Kirk, S., Tietze, S. (2013). The currency of talent management-A reply to talent management and the relevance of context: Towards a pluralistic approach. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 337-340. Tri, H. T., Nga, V. T., Sipko, J. (2019). Predicting overall staffs’ creativity and ınnovative work behavior in banking. Management & Marketing, 14(2), 188-202.
54. Umair, S., Waqas, U., Mrugalska, B., Al Shamsi, I. R. (2023). Environmental corporate social responsibility, green talent management and organization’s sustainable performance in the banking sector of oman: The role of innovative work behavior and green performance. Sustainability, 15(19), 143-154.
55. Valverde, M., Scullion, H., Ryan, G. (2013). Talent management in Spanish medium-sized organisations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(9), 1832-1852.
56. Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590-607.
57. Vives, A. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The role of law and markets and the case of developing countries. Chi.-Kent L. Rev., 83, 199.
58. West, M. A. (1987) Role innovation in the world of work. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 305-315.
59. West, M. A. ve Farr, J. L. (1990) Innovation and crea-tivity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
60. Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 50-84.
61. Yılmaz, Ö. (2014). İlişkisel pazarlama faaliyetlerinin ağızdan ağıza iletişim (WOM) yaratma üzerine etkisi: Bankacılık sektörüne ilişkin bir alan araştırması (Doktora tezi). Erişim adresi: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
62. Żelazna, A., Bojar, M., Bojar, E. (2020). Corporate social responsibility towards the environment in lublin region, Poland: A comparative study of 2009 and 2019. Sustainability, 12(11), 44-63.
63. Zhou, J., C. E. Shalley (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and proposal for future research directions, Martocchio, J.J. ve G.R. Ferris (Ed.). Research in personnel and human resource management, Oxford, England: Elsevier.