An Investigation into Service Performance Measurement of Non-Governmental Organizations

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3, 1143 - 1159, 02.07.2019

Halil Savaş Zinnet Karakaş

https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.461071

Cited By: 2

Öz

The actions of governments may sometimes be
insufficient to satisfy their citizens in social, economic, cultural, political
areas etc. The gap arising from this insufficiency is filled with the support
of non-governmental organizations. In this study, the data obtained through
implementation of a questionnaire which is generated by considering literature
review and face-to-face interviews conducted with some NGOs with the
participation of 249 individuals were analyzed. These analyses were made
according to the type of NGOs. Following the presentation of the data obtained
according to demographic characteristics, the relationship among five
dimensions of NGOs’ service performance was analyzed.  Consequently, a significant and positive
relationship was found between each pair of these. The hypothesis of this study
was based on the difference between the dimensions of NGOs’ service performance
according to the type of NGOs. The results suggested that these five dimensions
differed, which was mainly originated from foundations and unions. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Non-governmental organizations, NGOs’ service performance measurement, Service performance measurement

Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarında Hizmet Performansının Ölçümü Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz

Hükümetlerin faaliyetleri, vatandaşların sosyal, ekonomik, kültürel,
siyasi ve benzeri alanlarda tatmin edilmesi noktasında yetersiz
kalabilmektedir. Bu yetersiz kalmadan doğan boşluk sivil toplum kuruluşlarının
(STK) desteği ile doldurulmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, literatür taraması ve bazı
STK’lar ile yapılan mülakatlar sonucunda bir anket formu oluşturulmuş daha
sonra anket uygulamasına 249 bireyin katılımı nihayetinde elde edilen veriler
analiz edilmiştir. Bu analizler STK’nın türüne göre yapılmıştır. Demografik
özelliklere göre elde edilen verilerin sunulmasının ardından STK’ların hizmet
performansının beş boyutu arasındaki ilişki analiz edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak bu
boyutların her bir ikilisi arasında anlamlı ve pozitif ilişki bulunmuştur. Bu
çalışmanın hipotezi STK’ların türüne göre STK’ların hizmet performansı
boyutları arasında yer alabilecek farklılığa dayanmaktadır. Sonuçlar
göstermektedir ki bu beş boyut farklılık içermektedir ve bu farklılık büyük
oranda sendika ve vakıflardan kaynaklanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sivil toplum kuruluşları, Hizmet performansının ölçümü, STK’ların hizmet performansının ölçümü

Kaynakça

• Ateş, N. Y. (2005). Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarında Performans Değerlendirme. İstanbul Technical University Institute of Science (Master Thesis). İstanbul, Turkey.
• Benett, Y., Bittaye, A., & Loum, O. (2012). The Report on NGOs' Performance Standards. Gambia: The Educational Research Network in West and Central Africa.
• Coşkun, A. (2006). STK’ların Stratejik Performans Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklasım: Performans Karnesi. Sivil Toplum , 4 (15), 103-117.
• Cutt, J. (1998). Performance Measurement in Non-Profit Organisations: Integration and Focus within Comprehensiveness. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 20 (1), 3-29.
• Epstein, M. J., & McFarlan, F. W. (2011). Measuring the Efficiency and Effectiveness of a Nonprofit's Performance. Strategic Finance, 27-34.
• Ersungur, Ş. M., Kızıltan, A., & Polat, Ö. (2007). Türkiye'de Bölgelerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmişlik Sıralaması: Temel Bileşenler Analizi. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi , 21 (2), 55-66.
• Espirito Santo, S. (2001). Examining Performance Variables of Non-Governmental Organizations. Florida Atlantic University (Doctoral Thesis) . Boca Raton, Florida, ABD.
• Fine, A. H., Thayer, C. E., & Coghlan, A. T. (2000). Program Evaluation Practice in the Nonprofit Sector. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 10 (3), 331-339.
• Ghimire, S. (2005). Performance Evaluation of Local Non-Governmental Organizations’ Involvement in Community Forestry Development. Pokhara, Nepal: Tribhuvan University Institute of Forestry (Master Thesis).
• Gönel, A. (1998). Araştırma Raporu Önde Gelen STK'lar. İstanbul, Turkey: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı Publishers.
• Green, J. C., Madjidi, F., Dudley, T. J., & Gehlen, F. L. (2001). Local Unit Performance in a National Nonprofit Organization. Nonprofit Management & Leadership , 11 (4), 459-476.
• Kajimbwa, M. (2006). NGOs and Their Role in the Global South. The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 9 (1).
• Kaplan, R. S. (2001). Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11 (3), 353-370.
• Kendall, J., & Knapp, M. (2000). Measuring the Performance of Voluntary Organizations. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 2 (1), 105-132.
• Kurtuluş, K. (2010). Araştırma Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Türkmen Bookstore.
• Latha, K. L., & Prabhakar, K. (2011). Non-Government Organizations: Problems and Remedies in India. Serbian Journal of Management , 6 (1), 109-121.
• Lekorwe, M., & Mpabanga, D. (2007). Managing Non-Governmental Organizations in Botswana. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal , 12 (3), 2-18.
• Lewis, D. (2015). Nongovernmental Organizations, Definition and History. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.546.7849&rep=rep1&type=pdf
• Martens, K. (2002). Mission Impossible? Defining Nongovernmental Organizations. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13 (3), 271-285.
• Olujide, M. G. (2005). Non-Governmental Organisations Self-Evaluation: Issue of Concern in Nigeria. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension , 11 (1-4), 63-72.
• Pan, J.-N., Kuo, T.-C., & Bretholt, A. (2010). Developing a New Key Performance Index for Measuring Service Quality. Industrial Management & Data Systems , 110 (6), 823 - 840.
• Plantz, M. C., Greenway, M. T., & Hendricks, M. (1997). Outcome Measurement: Showing Results in the Nonprofit Sector. New Direction for Evaluation, 75, 15-30.
• Ramadan, M. A., & Borgonovi, E. (2015). Performance Measurement and Management in Non-Governmental Organizations. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 17 (2), 70-76.
• Reibaldi, G., & Grimard, M. (2015). Non-Governmental Organizations Importance and Future Role ın Space Exploration. Acta Astronautica (114), 130-137.
• Seidl, A. F. (1996). Performance Features of a Local Nongovernmental Organization in Natural Resource Management: The Case of the Bay Islands Conservation Association. Florida University (Doctoral Thesis) . Florida, ABD.
• NGO Advisor, (2016). Retrieved from https://www.ngoadvisor.net/
• Shandra, J. M., London, B., Whooley, O. P., & Williamson, J. B. (2004). International Nongovernmental Organizations and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Developing World: A Quantitative, Cross-National Analysis. Sociological Inquiry, 74 (4), 520–545.
• Sharfeddin, H. A. (2008). Examining Performance Variables of Nongovernmental Organizations with Consultative Status with The United Nations. University of Phoneix (Doctoral Thesis). ABD.
• Sharma, P. (2012). Performance Measurement in NGOs. The Management Accountant , 1442-1445.
• Sole, F. (2009). "A Management Model and Factors Driving Performance in Public Organizations", Measuring Business Excellence, 13/4, 3 - 11.
• Speckbacher, G. (2003). The Economics of Performance Management in Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 13 (3), 267-281.
• Tassie, B., Murray, V., & Cutt, J. (1998). Evaluating Social Service Agencies: Fuzzy Pictures of Organizational Effectiveness. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9 (1), 59-79.
• Thayer, C. E., & Fine, A. H. (2001). Evaluation and Outcome Measurement in The Non-Profit Sector: Stakeholder Participation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24, 103-108.
• The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Social Welfare Department. (2012). Service Performance Monitoring System Performance Assessment Manual.
• Turanlı, M., Taşpınar Cengiz, D., & Bozkır, Ö. (2012). Faktör Analizi ile Üniversiteye Giriş Sınavlarındaki Başarı Durumuna göre İllerin Sıralaması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi (17), 45-68.
• Turkish Language Society. (2017). Retrieved from www.tdk.gov.tr
• Tüylüoğlu, Ş., & Önsoy, G. (2012). Sivil Toplum Kalkınma Kuruluşlarının Kalkınmaya Etkisi. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies , 4 (8), 129-150.
• United Nation Rule of Law. (2015). Retrieved from http://www. unrol.org
• Villinger, N. D. (2009). Analyzing Non-Profit Organizations: Managerial Frameworks and Evaluation. The Journal of Global Business Issues, 3 (1), 61-66.
• Yu, S., & McLaughlin, D. A. (2013). Program Evaluation and Impact Assessment in International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs): Exploring Roles, Benefits, and Challenges. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 4 (2), 23–36.