ASEAN VE GÜNEYDOĞU ASYA BÖLGESELCİLİĞİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 20, 1086 - 1116, 31.12.2019

Süleyman Temiz

https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2019.046

Cited By: 1

Öz

 ASEAN, güneydoğu Asya’da, öncüllerine nispeten
devamlılık sağlayabilmiş ve gün geçtikçe daha da ciddi adımlar atarak,
bölgesel, aynı zamanda küresel anlamda büyük ekonomilerin dikkatini çekerek
bölgesel bir kimlik oluşturma konusunda son derece önemli adımlar atabilmiş bir
teşkilattır. ASEAN’ın imzalandığı zaman zarfında bölünme ve çatışma, güneydoğu
Asya bölgesini teşkil eden devletlerde her şekilde ortaya çıkmakta ve bölgesel
devletlerarası ilişkilerde yıkıcı etkiler oluşturmaktaydı. Bölge devletlerinin
birçoğunun bağımsızlıklarını yeni kazanmış olmaları, sömürgeci güçler
tarafından keyfi olarak çizilmiş sınırlardan kalan problemler ve uzlaşmazlıklar,
güneydoğu Asya'nın bölgeselciliği yolundaki en büyük engelleri teşkil
etmekteydi. Bununla birlikte bölge devletlerinin uluslararası politikaları da
istikrar oluşturmaktan uzaktı. Daha geniş çerçevede ise, bölge devletleri
kendilerini büyük güçler tarafından iç işlerine müdahalelerin ve Soğuk Savaş
dönemi çatışmalarının hedefi ve aracı olarak görmekteydiler. ASEAN zaman
içerisinde gücünü siyasi bir güce çevirebilmiş, sağladığı platform sayesinde
bölgesel çatışmalar engellenmiştir. Bu çalışmada, ASEAN’ın güneydoğu Asya
bölgeselciliği üzerindeki etkisi incelenecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ASEAN, Güneydoğu Asya, Bölgeselcilik

Kaynakça

• Acharya, A. (2012). The making of Southeast Asia: International relations of a region. Singapore : Institute of Southeast Asian Studies Press.
• Acharya, A. (2013). The Making of Southeast Asia: International Relations of a Region. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
• Anthony, M. C. (2005). Regional Security in Southeast Asia : Beyond the ASEAN Way. Singapore: ISEAS Publications.
• ASEAN. (2012). EAS. Chairman’s Statement of the 7th East Asia Summit (EAS): https://www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/documents/Final_Chairman%20Statement%20of%20the%207th%20EAS%20(Final).pdf adresinden alındı
• ASEAN. (2016, 1 27). Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia Indonesia, 24 February 1976. 1 11, 2019 tarihinde https://asean.org/treaty-amity-cooperation-southeast-asia-indonesia-24-february-1976/ adresinden alındı
• ASEAN. (2018). ARF. ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF): https://asean.org/asean-political-security-community/asean-regional-forum-arf/ adresinden alındı
• ASEAN. (2018). History. 01 28, 2019 tarihinde https://asean.org/asean/about-asean/history/ adresinden alındı
• ASEAN. (2018). Som. The 39th Meeting of the ASEAN Senior Officials: https://asean.org/39th-meeting-asean-senior-officials-drug-matters/ adresinden alındı
• Ayers, D. M. (2000). Anatomy of a crisis : education, development, and the state in Cambodia, 1953 –1998. Hawai, USA: University of Hawai‘i Press.
• Ba, A. D. (2006). Who's socializing whom? Complex engagement in Sino-ASEAN relations. The Pacific Review, 157-179. doi:10.1080/09512740500473163
• BA, A. D. (2009). (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University Press.
• Ball, W. M.-2. (1958, Winter, Vol. 12, No. 1). A Political Re-Examination of Seato. International Organization, 17-25.
• Barnett, M. N. (1998). Dialogues in Arab politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Bentley, G. C. (1986). Indigenous States of Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology Volume: 15 Issues: 1 , 275-305.
• Buszynski, L. (2003, December). ASEAN, the Declaration on Conduct, and the South China Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 25(3), 343-362.
• Butcher, J. G. (2013). The International Court of Justice and the territorial dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia in the Sulawesi Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 35(2), 235-257.
• Calder, K., & Ye, M. (2004). Regionalism and Critical Junctures: Explaining the "Organization Gap" in Northeast Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, 191-226.
• Dosch, J., & Mols, M. (1994). Why ASEAN Co-operation Cannot Work as a Model for Regionalism Elsewhere —A Reply. Economic Bulletin, Vol. 11, No. 2, 212-222.
• Druce, S. C., & Baikoeni, E. Y. (2016). Circumventing Conflict: The Indonesia–Malaysia Ambalat Block Dispute. M. Oishi içinde, In Contemporary Conflicts in Southeast Asia (s. 137-156). Singapore: Springer.
• Elson, R. (2006). Indonesia and the West: an Ambivalent, Misunderstood Engagement. Australian Journal of Politics and History, Volume 52, Number 2, 261-271.
• Emmerson, D. K. (1996). Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore: A regional security core? R. J. Ellings, & S. W. Simon içinde, Southeast Asian Security in the New Millennium. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
• Feeney, W. R.-8. (1984). The United States and the Philippines: The Bases Dilemma. Asian Affairs, 10(4), 63-85.
• Gungwu, W. (2005). Nation-Building: Five Southeast Asian Histories. Singapore: ISEAS Publications.
• Hopf, T. (2002). Social construction of international politics: identities & foreign policies. New York: Cornwell University Press.
• Hund, M. (2003). ASEAN Plus Three: towards a new age of pan-East Asian regionalism? A skeptic’s appraisal. The Pacific Review, 16:3, 383-417. doi:10.1080/0951274032000085644
• Johnston, A. I. (2003). Socialization in international institutions: The ASEAN Way and Internatioal Relation Theory. G. J. Ikenberry, & M. Mastanduno içinde, International relations theory and the Asia-Pacific (s. 107-162). New York, USA: Columbia University Press.
• Jones, D. M., & Smith, M. L. (2002). ASEAN’s imitation community. Orbis, 93-109.
• Kahler, M. (2000). Legalization as Strategy: The Asia-Pacific Case. International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, Legalization and World Politics, 549-571.
• Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). Regionalism in Comparative Perspective. Cooperation and Conflict , 123-159.
• Kaye, D. D. (2001). Beyond the Handshake. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Kelly, G. P. (1986, September). Coping with America: Refugees from Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos in the 1970s and 1980s. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Immigration and American Public Policy, 487, 138-149.
• Khoman, T. (2012, Temmuz 9). ASEAN Conception and Evolution. Aralık 25, 2018 tarihinde ASEAN: https://asean.org/?static_post=asean-conception-and-evolution-by-thanat-khoman adresinden alındı
• Legro, J. W. (2000). The Transformation of Policy Ideas. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44, No. 3, 419-432.
• Leifer, M. (1974). Great power intervention and regional order. M. W. Zacher, & R. S. Milne içinde, Conflict and stability (s. 181-201). Garden City, NJ: Anchor Press.
• Michaud, J. (2006). Historical Dictionary of the Peoples of the Southeast Asian Massif. Oxford, UK: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
• Narine, S. (2002). Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia. London, UK: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
• Paul, E. (2010). Obstacles to Democratization in Southeast Asia A Study of the Nation State, Regional and Global Order. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan Pub.
• Peffer, N. (1954). Regional Security in Southeast Asia. International Organization, Vol. 8, No. 3, 311-315.
• Pollard, V. K. (1970). ASA and ASEAN, 1961-1967: Southeast Asian Regionalism. Asian Survey, 10(3), 244-255.
• Rüland, J. (2000). ASEAN and the Asian crisis: theoretical implications and practical consequences for Southeast Asian regionalism. The Pacific Review, 13:3, 421-451. doi:10.1080/09512740050147942
• Saravanamuttu, J. (1986). Imperialism, dependent development and asean regionalism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 16:2, 204-222. doi:10.1080/00472338685390101
• Seng, T. S., & Cossa, R. A. (2001). Rescuing realism from the realists: A theoretical note on East Asian security. S. Simon içinde, In Many faces of Asian security (s. 15-47). Lanham: MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Severino, R. C. (2008). ASEAN. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies Press.
• Smith, A. L.-7. (2002). TIMOR LESTE, TIMOR TIMUR, EAST TIMOR, TIMOR LOROSA'E: What's in a Name? Southeast Asian Affairs, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS) , 54-77.
• Sussman, G. (1998). Macapagal, the Sabah Claim and Maphilindo:. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 210-228. doi:10.1080/00472338380000141
• Taylor, A. M. (1964). Malaysia, Indonesia - and Maphilindo. International Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2, 155-171.
• Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, 391-¬425. doi:10.1017/S0020818300027764
• Yee, A. (1996). The causal effects of ideas on policies. International Organization, 69-108.