THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC GROWTH, ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND TRADE OPENNESS: THE CASE OF SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANISATION COUNTRIES

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 25, 393 - 416, 29.06.2022

Hamza Çeştepe , Bersu Bahtiyar

https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2022.017

Öz

This paper aims to analyze the relationship between energy consumption, trade openness and economic growth for the countries of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization that have started to follow open foreign trade policies with the transition to market economy since the early 1990s. The study examines validity and aspect of the relationship between variables for the eight countries studied covering the period of 1990-2018 by using panel causality, panel cointegration and panel vector error correction model methods. According to the results of the study, there is a causal relationship among three variables mentioned. While there is a bidirectional causality between economic growth and trade openness and economic growth and energy consumption; there is unilateral causality between energy consumption and trade openness from trade openness to energy consumption. The results support long-term equilibrium among the variables, but the direction and validity of the relationship are different in the short term. Therefore, periodic differences need to be taken into consideration when determining the energy policies that will be implemented in the economic growth process by these countries’ policymakers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Economic growth, energy consumption, Shanghai cooperation organization

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC GROWTH, ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND TRADE OPENNESS: THE CASE OF SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANISATION COUNTRIES

Öz

Bu çalışmada, çoğu 1990’ların başından itibaren piyasa ekonomisine geçişle birlikte dışa açık ticaret politikaları izlemeye başlayan Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü ülkeleri için enerji tüketimi, ticari açıklık ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki dinamik ilişkinin incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. 1990-2018 dönemini kapsayan çalışmada panel nedensellik, panel eşbütünleşme ve panel vektör hata düzeltme modeli yöntemi kullanılarak, çalışmaya konu olan sekiz ülke için değişkenler arasındaki ilişkinin geçerliliği ve yönü incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre, söz konusu üç değişken arasında nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmaktadır. Ekonomik büyüme ve ticari açıklık ile ekonomik büyüme ve enerji tüketimi arasında çift yönlü bir nedensellik varken; enerji tüketimi ve ticari açıklık arasında yalnızca ticari açıklıktan enerji tüketimine doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmaktadır. Sonuçlar, değişkenler arasında uzun dönemde dengenin varlığını desteklemekte, ilişkinin yönü ve geçerliliği ise kısa dönemde farklılaşmaktadır. Bu nedenle, adı geçen ülkelerin ekonomik büyüme sürecinde uygulayacakları enerji politikalarını belirlerken, dönemsel farklılıkları göz önünde bulundurmaları gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ekonomik büyüme, enerji tüketimi, Şanghay işbirliği örgütü

Kaynakça

• Ahmad, M., Zhao, Z. Y., Irfan, M., Mukeshimana & M. C. (2019). Empirics on influencing mechanisms among energy, finance, trade, environment, and economic growth: a heterogeneous dynamic panel data analysis of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(14), 14148-14170.
• Alimov, R. (2018). The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: Its role and place in the development of Eurasia. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(2), 114-124.
• Al-Iriani, M. A. (2006). Energy-GDP relationship revisited: An example from GCC countries using panel causality. Energy Policy, 34(17), 3342-3350.
• Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2000). The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: time series evidence from Asian developing countries. Energy Economics, 22(6), 615-625.
• Austin, G. (Ed.). (2017). Economic development and environmental history in the anthropocene: Perspectives on Asia and Africa. Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data, John Wiley&Sons Ltd. West Sussex, England.
• Barbieri, L. (2009). Panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence: an overview. Journal of Statistics: Advances in Theory and Applications, 1(2), 117-158.
• Burbidge, J. & Harrison, A. (1984). Testing for the effects of oil-price rises using vector autoregressions. International Economic Review, 25, 459-484.
• Carley, S., Lawrence, S., Brown, A., Nourafshan, A. & Benami, E. (2011). Energy-based economic development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 282-295.
• Engle, R. F. & Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 251-276. Erol, U., Yu & E. S. (1987). On the causal relationship between energy and income for industrialized countries. The Journal of Energy and Development, 113-122.
• Ghazouani, T., Boukhatem, J. & Sam, C.Y. (2020). Causal interactions between trade openness, renewable electricity consumption, and economic growth in Asia-Pacific countries: Fresh evidence from a bootstrap ARDL approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 133, 110094.
• Ghosh, S. (2002). Electricity consumption and economic growth in India. Energy Policy, 30 (2), 125-129.
• Gollagari, R. & Rena, R. (2013). An empirical analysis of energy consumption and economic growth in India: are they causally related? Studia Oeconomica, 58 (2), 22-40.
• Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 424-438.
• Granger, C. W. & Newbold, P., (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111-120. Hamilton, J. D. (1983). Oil and the macroeconomy since World War II. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 228-248.
• Hamit-Haggar, M. (2016). Clean energy-growth nexus in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from cross-sectionally dependent heterogeneous panel with structural breaks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 1237-1244.
• Hdom, H.A.D. & Fuinhas, J. A. (2020). Energy production and trade openness: Assessing economic growth, CO2 emissions and the applicability of the cointegration analysis. Energy Strategy Reviews, 30, 1-13.
• Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W. & Rosen, H. S. (1988). Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1371-1395.
• Hossain, M. S. (2011). Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy, 39(11), 6991-6999.
• Huchet‐Bourdon, M., Le Mouël, C. & Vijil, M. (2018). The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue. The World Economy, 41(1), 59-76.
• Hurlin, C. & Mignon, V. (2007). Second generation panel unit root tests. HAL Working Papers, halshs-00159842.
• Ihenacho, E. (2018). The influence of urbanization, population age groups and trade on energy consumption in Nigeria: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment, 3(5), 38-44.
• International Energy Agency (2021). Data. 20 Haziran 2021 tarihinde https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics adresinden erişildi
• Jayanthakumaran, K., Verma, R. & Liu, Y. (2012). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: A comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy, 42, 450-460.
• Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1-44.
• Karakaş, Ü. Ç., Karakaş, A. & Topal, S. (2019). Economic growth affects of economic integration: An economic analysis on Turkish economy in the context of the European Union and Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Alphanumeric Journal, 7(2), 185-204.
• Kasman, A. & Duman, Y. S. (2015). CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Economic Modelling, 44, 97-103.
• Komal, R. & Abbas, F. (2015). Linking financial development, economic growth and energy consumption in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 211-220.
• Kraft, J. & Kraft, A. (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of Energy and Development, 3(2), 401-403.
• Lean, H. H. & Smyth, R. (2010). Multivariate Granger causality between electricity generation, exports, prices and GDP in Malaysia. Energy, 35 (9), 3640-3648.
• Le, H.P. (2020). The energy-growth nexus revisited: the role of financial development, institutions, government expenditure and trade openness. Heliyon, 6, 1-11.
• Lee, C. C. (2005). Energy consumption and GDP in developing countries: a cointegrated panel analysis. Energy economics, 27 (3), 415-427.
• Masih, A. M. & Masih, R. (1996). Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error-correction modelling techniques. Energy economics, 18 (3), 165-183.
• Munir, Q., Lean, H. H. & Smyth, R. (2020). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in the ASEAN-5 countries: A cross-sectional dependence approach. Energy Economics, 85, 104571.
• Narayan, P. K. & Smyth, R. (2009). Multivariate Granger causality between electricity consumption, exports and GDP: evidence from a panel of Middle Eastern countries. Energy Policy, 37 (1), 229-236.
• Nasreen, S. & Anwar, S. (2014). Causal relationship between trade openness, economic growth and energy consumption: A panel data analysis of Asian countries. Energy Policy, 69, 82-91.
• Ozturk, I. (2010). A literature survey on energy–growth nexus. Energy policy, 38(1), 340-349.
• Pao, H. T., Li, Y. Y. & Fu, H. C. (2014). Causality relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in Brazil. Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, 5, 198-205.
• Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 653-670.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
• Pierri, B. (2020). A new balance of power for the twenty-first century: The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, 2001-2007. Eunomia. Rivista semestrale di Storia e Politica Internazionali, (1), 5-50.
• Pirimbaev, J., Ravanoglu, G. A. & Sulaimanova, B (2020). Enerjinin ekonomik büyümeye etkisi: Kırgızistan ekonomisi içın ARDL sınır testi. Reforma, 3(87), 48-63.
• Sadorsky, P. (2011). Trade and energy consumption in the Middle East. Energy Economics, 33 (5), 739-749.
• Satrovic, E. (2019). Energy consumption, trade openness and growth nexus in Turkey: evidence from VECM. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 20 (1), 1-12.
• Shahbaz, M., Tiwari, A. K. & Nasir, M. (2013). The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy, 61, 1452-1459.
• Shahbaz, M., Khraief, N., Uddin, G. S., & Ozturk, I. (2014). Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 325-336.
• Squalli, J. & Wilson, K. (2011). A new measure of trade openness. The World Economy, 34(10), 1745-1770.
• Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2012). Panel veri ekonometrisi. Beta Yayınevi.
• Uysal, D., Yılmaz, K. & Taner, T. A. Ş. (2015). Enerji ithalatı ve cari açık ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3 (1), 63-78.
• Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2005). Energy demand and economic growth: The African experience. Journal of Policy Modeling, 27 (8), 891-903.
• World Bank (2021). World development indicators, 15 Haziran 2021 tarihinde https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators adresinden erişildi
• Zakarya, G. Y., Mostefa, B., Abbes, S. M. & Seghir, G. M. (2015). Factors affecting CO2 emissions in the BRICS countries: A panel data analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 114-125.
• Zeng, S. & Zhou, Y. (2021). Foreign direct investment’s impact on China’s economic growth, technological innovation and pollution. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 2839.