TEKNOLOJİK PEDAGOJİK İÇERİK BİLGİSİ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇEYE UYARLAMASI

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Schmidt ve diğerleri tarafından geliştirilen “Teknolojik Pedagojik İçerik Bilgisi Ölçeği’nin” Türkçeye uyarlanmasıdır. Uyarlama çalışmaları çerçevesinde öncelikle ölçek maddeleri araştırmacılar tarafından Türkçeye çevrilmiş, on dört uzmandan görüş alınmış ve çeviri, görüşler doğrultusunda değiştirilmiştir. Oluşturulan İngilizce ve Türkçe formlar iki hafta ara ile 32 araştırma ve öğretim görevlisi tarafından doldurulmuştur. İngilizce ve Türkçe formlar arasındaki korelasyon 0.98 bulunduğundan her iki ölçek eş değer kabul edilmiştir. Ölçek geçerlik-güvenilirlik çalışmaları için 291 öğretmene uygulanmıştır. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri sonucunda ölçek 7 faktörden oluşmuştur. Ölçeğin Türkçe formu için Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayısı 0.96 olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuçta ölçeğin Türkçe formunun bu araştırma grubu için geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Teknolojik pedagojik içerik bilgisi ölçeği,teknolojik pedagojik içerik bilgisi,ölçek uyarlama

Adaptation of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Scale to Turkish

Abstract

The aim of the study is adaptation of the technological pedagogical content knowledge scale which was developed by Schmidt at all to Turkish. In order to adapt the scale, firstly scale items were translated to Turkish by the researchers. Then translation form was further modified by consulting fourteen specialists. English and Turkish forms of scale were both filled by 32 research assistants and instructors with two-week intervals respectively. Two forms were accepted as equal since the correlation between them was 0.98. The scale was implemented on 291 teachers for validity and reliability studies. The scale has seven factors, which was found as result of the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. In Turkish version of the scale alpha value was calculated as 0.96. Therefore, it can be concluded that Turkish version of the scale was reliable and valid

Keywords

• Technological pedagogical content knowledge scale,technological pedagogical content knowledge,scale adaptation

Kaynakça

1. Archambault, L. ve Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher
2. Education, 9(1). http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/general/ article2.cfm adresinden 06.12.2010 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
3. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2009). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum (9.baskı). Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.
4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2010).
5. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri: 6. Baskı. Ankara: Pegema yayıncılık. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok
6. Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegema yayıncılık. Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS
7. Basic concepts, applications, and programmings. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocatiates, Publishers. Doukakis, S.; Psaltidou, A.; Stavraki, A.; Adamopoulos, N. ve Tsiotakis, P. (2010).
8. Measuring the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of in- service teachers of computer science who teach algorithms and programming in upper secondary education. Readings in Technology and Education: Proceedings http://sdoukakis.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/icicte_paper_aepp.pdf adresinden 12.2010 tarihinde erişilmiştir. of ICICTE

9. Geisinger, K.F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments.
10. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 304-312. Graham R.C., Burgoyne N., Cantrell P., Smith L., St. Clair L. ve Harris R. (2009)
11. Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends , 70–79. Green, S.B. ve Salkind, N.J. (2005). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and Understanding Data, Fourth Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
12. Hambleton, R.K., Merenda, P.F. ve Spielberger, C.D., (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Harris, J.B., Mishra, P. ve Koehler, M.J. (2007). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Annual
14. Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D. ve Smaldino, S. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning, 7th ed. Columbus: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
15. Horzum, M.B. (Baskıda). Web Pedagojik İçerik Bilgisi Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlaması. İlköğretim Online Dergisi. Jöreskog, K. ve Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS
16. International/Erlbaum. language. Chicago: Scientific Software Koehler, M.J. ve Mishra, P. (2005a). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of
17. Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94–102. Koehler, M.J. ve Mishra, P. (2005b). What Happens when Teachers Design Educational
18. Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152. Koehler, M.J. ve Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 70.
19. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P. ve Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology.
20. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740-762. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012
21. Koh, J.H.L.; Chai, C.S. ve Tsai, C.C. (2010). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey.
22. Mathematics Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/720 adresinden 07.12.2010 tarihinde erişilmiştir. dissertation, University of Tennessee.
23. Lee, M.H. ve Tsai, C.C. (2010). Exploring Teachers' Perceived Self Efficacy and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge with Respect to Educational
24. Use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 38(1), 1-21. Lee, MH., Tsai, CC. ve Chang, CY. (2008). Exploring teachers’ self-efficacy toward the web pedagogical content knowledge in taiwan. Paper presented at the Annual
25. Meeting of the American Educational Research Association New York City, March 24–28, 2008.
26. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2007). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
27. (TPCK): Confronting the Wicked Problems of Teaching with Technology. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2214-2226). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
28. Mishra, P. ve Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–
29. Mishra, P. ve Koehler, M.J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
30. Niess, M. (2005). Preparing Teachers to Teach Science and Mathematics with
31. Technology: Developing a Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 21(5), 509-523. Osborne, J.W. ve Costello, A.B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(11). http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=11, adresinden 18 Ekim 2010 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
32. Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Koehler, M., Punya, M. ve Shin, T. (2009b).
33. Examining Preservice Teachers' Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in an Introductory Instructional Technology Course. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4145-4151). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
34. Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., ve Shin, T. (2009c).
35. Examining preservice teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content knowledge in an introductory instructional technology course. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Society for the Information and Technology & Teacher Education. March 2-6, Charleston, South Carolina. Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., Thompson, A.D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J. ve Shin, T.S. (2009a). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice
36. Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 27. Shin, T., Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., Schmidt, D., Baran, E. ve Thompson, A. (2009).
37. Changing technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through course experiences. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Charleston, South Carolina: SITE, Vol. 1, 4152.
38. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.
39. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.
40. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. Sireci, S.G. ve Berberoglu, G. (2000). Using bilingual respondents to evaluate translated- adapted items. Applied Measurement In Education, 13(3), 229-248.
41. Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk
42. Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74. Şimşek, A. (2000). Eğitim iletişimi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi İletişim Bilimleri
43. Fakültesi (Yayin No:1251/39).
44. Şimşek, Ö.F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş, temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayıncılık.
45. Tabachnick, B.G. ve Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics , 5th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
46. Yalın, H.İ. (2000). Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.