Araştırma Makalesi

Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Science Curricula about Environmental Topics Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy

Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1 28 Ocak 2025
PDF İndir
EN

Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Science Curricula about Environmental Topics Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy

Öz

Purpose: The aim of this study is to comparatively examine the science curricula of 2018 science course and The Century of Türkiye Education Model’s science course according to Bloom's taxonomy in the context of environmental issues. Design/Methodology/Approach: In the study, the document analysis method, which is one of the qualitative research data collection methods, was used. In the process of selecting the Science curricula published in 2018 and 2024 to be compared in the study, the Science Curricula approved by the Board of Education was taken as the data source. The data were analysed using the content analysis method. Findings: There were a total of 30 learning outcomes in the context of environmental issues in the 2018 science curriculum and a total of 61 learning outcomes in the 2024 science curriculum. In the 2024 science curriculum, it was noteworthy that the number of learning outcomes increased and learning outcomes were also included in the recall and evaluation stages. It is very important that the objectives in the "environment" subjects, especially in the application, analysis and evaluation stages, are more than the 2018 curriculum in order for individuals to transform their knowledge into behavior.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Science education, 2018 Science curriculum, 2024 Science curriculum, Bloom’s taxonomy, Environmental education

Kaynakça

  1. Alım, M. (2006). Avrupa birliği üyelik sürecinde türkiye’de çevre ve ilköğretimde çevre eğitimi. Kastamonu Education Journal, 14(2), 599-616.
  2. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Pearson.
  3. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company.
  4. Bümen, N. (2006). Program geliştirmede bir dönüm noktası: yenilenmiş Bloom taksonomisi. Eğitim Ve Bilim, 31(142).
  5. Cebesoy, Ü. B. & Şahin, M. D. (2010). İlköğretim II. Kademe fen ve teknoloji programının çevre eğitimi açısından karşılaştırmalı incelenmesi. Research Journal of Biology Sciences, 3(2), 159-168.
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
  8. Çepni, S. (2018). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş. Trabzon: Celepler Maatbaacılık.
  9. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  10. Dindar, H., & Taneri, A. (2011). MONE’in 1968, 1992, 2000 ve 2004 yıllarında geliştirdiği fen programlarının amaç, kavram ve etkinlik yönünden karşılaştırılması. Kastamonu Education Journal, 19(2), 363-378.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Benli Özdemir, E., Yilmaz, E., & Selvi, M. (2025). Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Science Curricula about Environmental Topics Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Kastamonu Education Journal, 33(1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1628228
AMA
1.Benli Özdemir E, Yilmaz E, Selvi M. Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Science Curricula about Environmental Topics Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2025;33(1):35-47. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1628228
Chicago
Benli Özdemir, Esra, Ece Yilmaz, ve Mahmut Selvi. 2025. “Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Science Curricula about Environmental Topics Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy”. Kastamonu Education Journal 33 (1): 35-47. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1628228.
EndNote
Benli Özdemir E, Yilmaz E, Selvi M (01 Ocak 2025) Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Science Curricula about Environmental Topics Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Kastamonu Education Journal 33 1 35–47.
IEEE
[1]E. Benli Özdemir, E. Yilmaz, ve M. Selvi, “Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Science Curricula about Environmental Topics Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy”, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, c. 33, sy 1, ss. 35–47, Oca. 2025, doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.1628228.
ISNAD
Benli Özdemir, Esra - Yilmaz, Ece - Selvi, Mahmut. “Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Science Curricula about Environmental Topics Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy”. Kastamonu Education Journal 33/1 (01 Ocak 2025): 35-47. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1628228.
JAMA
1.Benli Özdemir E, Yilmaz E, Selvi M. Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Science Curricula about Environmental Topics Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2025;33:35–47.
MLA
Benli Özdemir, Esra, vd. “Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Science Curricula about Environmental Topics Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy”. Kastamonu Education Journal, c. 33, sy 1, Ocak 2025, ss. 35-47, doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1628228.
Vancouver
1.Esra Benli Özdemir, Ece Yilmaz, Mahmut Selvi. Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Science Curricula about Environmental Topics Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 01 Ocak 2025;33(1):35-47. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1628228