Enhancing Gifted Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills (An Example of the Waldorf Approach)

Niymet Demirci; Ebru Ergül

doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1939228

EN TR

Enhancing Gifted Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills (An Example of the Waldorf Approach)

Öz

This study investigates the potential of activities structured around the Waldorf educational approach’s emphasis on play, art, nature, and practical implementation to enhance the mathematical thinking skills of gifted students. It was conducted within a qualitative action research design over a twelve-week period with four gifted fourth-grade students enrolled in a formal educational institution, the Science and Art Center. The process began with initial activities and interviews, followed by the development and implementation of four action plans based on play, art, nature, and practical implementation, designed by the researchers with expert guidance. Data were collected through a mathematical thinking test, semi-structured interviews, and field notes recorded by one of the researchers, and were analyzed through content analysis. The findings revealed significant progress in students’ specializing, generalizing, and conjecturing skills. However, compared with other dimensions of mathematical thinking, improvement in justifying and convincing skills remained relatively limited. The study is significant in addressing the limited body of research on the role of the Waldorf approach in fostering the mathematical thinking of gifted students. The findings indicate that art, nature-, and play-based pedagogy can make a meaningful contribution to the development of several dimensions of mathematical thinking, while also revealing the need for more explicit instructional support in the areas of justification and convincing. In this respect, the study offers both theoretical and practical implications for teachers and researchers concerning the use of alternative pedagogical approaches in mathematics education.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mathematical thinking skills, Gifted students, Waldorf educational approach

Özel Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Matematiksel Düşünme Becerilerinin Geliştirilmesi (Waldorf Yaklaşımı Örneği)

Öz

Bu çalışma, Waldorf eğitim yaklaşımının öğrenme süreçlerinde öne çıkardığı oyun, sanat, doğa ve pratik uygulama temelli etkinliklerin üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin matematiksel düşünme becerilerini geliştirme potansiyelini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, nitel araştırma yaklaşımı çerçevesinde eylem araştırması deseninde yürütülmüştür. Çalışma grubu, dördüncü sınıf düzeyinde öğrenim gören ve aynı zamanda formel bir eğitim kurumu olan Bilim ve Sanat Merkezinde de eğitim gören dört üstün yetenekli öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Araştırma süreci on iki hafta sürmüş; başlangıç etkinlikleri ve görüşmelerin ardından, uzman görüşü doğrultusunda araştırmacılar tarafından oyun, sanat, doğa ve pratik uygulama kavramlarına dayalı dört eylem planı geliştirilmiş ve uygulanmıştır. Veriler, matematiksel düşünme testi, yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ve araştırmacılardan birine ait saha notları aracılığıyla toplanmış; elde edilen veriler içerik analiziyle çözümlenmiştir. Bulgular, öğrencilerin özelleştirme, genelleme yapma ve varsayım oluşturma becerilerinde belirgin bir gelişim gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Buna karşılık, gerekçelendirme ve ikna etme becerilerindeki gelişimin diğer matematiksel düşünme becerilerine kıyasla daha sınırlı kaldığı belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak çalışma, Waldorf yaklaşımına dayalı sanat, doğa, oyun ve deneyim odaklı pedagojik uygulamaların üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin belirli matematiksel düşünme becerilerini desteklemede işlevsel bir potansiyel taşıdığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca bulgular, gerekçelendirme ve ikna etme becerilerinin geliştirilmesi için daha açık yapılandırılmış öğretimsel desteklere ihtiyaç duyulduğunu ortaya koyarak matematik eğitiminde alternatif pedagojik yaklaşımların uygulanabilirliğine ilişkin kuramsal ve pratik çıkarımlar sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Matematiksel düşünme becerileri, Üstün yetenekli öğrenciler, Waldorf eğitim yaklaşımı

Kaynakça

Aljabreen, H. (2020). Montessori, Waldorf, and Reggio Emilia: A comparative analysis of alternative models of early childhood education. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-020-00277-1
Amador, J. M. (2022). Mathematics teacher educator noticing: Examining interpretations and evidence of students’ thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(2), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09483-z
Assmus, D. (2018). Characteristics of mathematical giftedness in early primary school age. In F. M. Singer (Ed.), Mathematical creativity and mathematical giftedness: Enhancing creative capacities in mathematically promising students (pp. 145–167). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_6
Assmus, D., & Fritzlar, T. (2022). Mathematical creativity and mathematical giftedness in the primary school age range: An interview study on creating figural patterns. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 54(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01328-8
Attfield, K. (2024). The humane education of Waldorf. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1332597. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1332597
Bak, T. (2023). Stepping into the mainstream: Exploring Steiner streams in publicly funded schools in Australia, 1990–2011. Educational Review, 75(5), 833–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1942792
Ball, D. L., Hoyles, C., Jahnke, H. N., & Movshovitz Hadar, N. (2003). The teaching of proof. In A. Gagatsis & S. Papastavridis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 21–34). Cyprus Mathematical Society. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0305021
Barnes, A. (2021). Enjoyment in learning mathematics: Its role as a potential barrier to children’s perseverance in mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09992-x
Barth, U., & Wiehl, A. (2024). Inclusive Waldorf schools today: What can we build on and what is necessary in the 21st century? Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1345697. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1345697
Berner, E. (2023). Rudolf Steiner’s “Eurythmy”: Between originality and Zeitgeist. Paedagogica Historica, 59(6), 1197–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2021.2001022

Bonotto, C., & Santo, L. D. (2015). On the relationship between problem posing, problem solving, and creativity in the primary school. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 103–123). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_5
Boyd, D. (2018). Early childhood education for sustainability and the legacies of two pioneering giants. Early Years, 38(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2018.1442422
Breen, S., & O'Shea, A. (2011). The use of mathematical tasks to develop mathematical thinking skills in undergraduate calculus courses–A pilot study. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 31(1), 43–48. https://www.bsrlm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/BSRLM-IP-31-1-08.pdf
Brown, J. P., & Stillman, G. A. (2017). Developing the roots of modeling conceptions: “Mathematical modeling is the life of the world.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(3), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1245875
Burton, L. (1984). Mathematical thinking: The struggle for meaning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/748986
Cai, J. (2003). Singaporean students' mathematical thinking in problem solving and problem posing: An exploratory study. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390310001595401
Carlgren, F., & Klingborg, A. (1976). Education towards freedom: Rudolf Steiner education. Lanthorn Press.
Celik, H. C., & Ozdemir, F. (2020). Mathematical thinking as a predictor of critical thinking dispositions of pre-service mathematics teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(4), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.268.6
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/001316446002000104
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Creswell, J.W., & Guetterman, T.C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating qualitative and quantitative research. Pearson.
Daskolia, M., & Koukouzeli, V. (2023). How sustainable is a Waldorf school? Exploring the congruence between Waldorf education and the sustainable school approach in a Greek school case study. Education Sciences, 13(4), 403. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040403
DeDonno, M. A. (2016). The influence of IQ on pure discovery and guided discovery learning of a complex real-world task. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.023
Delima, N., Kusumah, Y. S., & Fatimah, S. (2021). Students’ mathematical thinking and comprehensive mathematics instruction (CMI) model. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 11(2), 161–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v11i2.7807
Dick, L. K., Lovett, J. N., McCulloch, A. W., Cayton, C., Bailey, N., & Yalman Özen, D. (2022). Preservice teacher noticing of students' mathematical thinking in a technology-mediated learning environment. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v29.3.02
Evans, T., Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Inglis, M. (2022). Do mathematicians and undergraduates agree about explanation quality? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111(3), 445–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10164-2
Eysink, T. H., Gersen, L., & Gijlers, H. (2015). Inquiry learning for gifted children. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1038379
Faizah, S., Nusantara, T., Sudirman, S., & Rahardi, R. (2020). Exploring students’ thinking process in mathematical proof of abstract algebra based on Mason’s framework. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 871–884. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.689809
Goldshmidt, G. (2017). On the unique place of art in Waldorf education. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(8), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.818084
Goos, M., & Kaya, S. (2020). Understanding and promoting students’ mathematical thinking: A review of research published in ESM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103, 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09921-7
Gunadi, F., Sudirman, S., Runisah, R., Senjaya, A., & Mustari, S. (2023, February). Impact of STEM learning (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) on students’ mathematics thinking ability: Systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 2nd Multidisciplinary International Conference, MIC 2022, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia.
Hallam, J., Egan, S., & Kirkham, J. (2016). An investigation into the ways in which art is taught in an English Waldorf Steiner school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.07.003
Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023
Huchingson, R. (1990). A comparative study between the behaviors of students in a public school program for the gifted and those in Waldorf schools in terms of Renzulli's “gifted behaviors” [Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Huchingson, R., & Huchingson, J. (1993). Waldorf education as a program for gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(4), 400–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329301600406
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures. Basic Books.
Kaya, D., & Gündüz, M. (2015). The impact of alternative education on social change: The case of “Waldorf schools.” Journal of National Education, 45(205), 5–25.
Kemmis, S. K., & McTaggart, R. M. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Kodsi, S. H. (2022). Constructive play in Waldorf and normative preschools in Israel: Technological thinking and design process during free play. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(2), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09623-9
Komatsu, K., Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2019). Task design for developing students’ recognition of the roles of assumptions in mathematical activity. In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 233–240). Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
Komatsu, K., & Jones, K. (2022). Generating mathematical knowledge in the classroom through proof, refutation, and abductive reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(3), 567–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10086-5
Kroesbergen, E. H., & Schoevers, E. M. (2017). Creativity as predictor of mathematical abilities in fourth graders in addition to number sense and working memory. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3(2), 417–440. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v3i2.63
Kurniawan, S., Rosjanuardi, R., & Aswin, A. (2022). Mathematical justification research in mathematics education across grades: A systematic literature review. Hipotenusa Journal of Mathematical Society, 4(2), 134–147.
Lambert, R., Tan, P., Hunt, J., & Candela, A. G. (2018). Rehumanizing the mathematics education of students with disabilities; Critical perspectives on research and practice. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 10(3), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1463006
Lannin, J. K. (2005). Generalization and justification: The challenge of introducing algebraic reasoning through patterning activities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(3), 231–258. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0703_3
Leikin, R. (2011). The education of mathematically gifted students: Some complexities and questions. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(1), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1211
Lev, M., & Leikin, R. (2017). The interplay between excellence in school mathematics and general giftedness: Focusing on mathematical creativity. In R. Leikin & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness: Interdisciplinary perspectives from mathematics and beyond (pp. 225–238). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_14
Liamputtong, P. (2019). Qualitative inquiry. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_53
Lim, S. A., Jung, J. Y., & Kalyuga, S. (2023). Effectiveness of invention tasks and explicit instruction in preparing intellectually gifted adolescents for learning. Instructional Science, 51(6), 921–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09616-w
Lorenza, N., Sudirman, S., & Susiswo, S. (2024). Students' specializing thinking in solving arithmetic sequence and series problems. PRISMA, 13(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v13i1.3930
Lutzker, P. (2024). Artistic practice in Waldorf teacher education: A sensory-aesthetic concept for a digital age. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1363254. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1363254
Maker, C. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Aspen System Corporation.
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking mathematically. Pearson.
Masters, B. (2009). Distinctive features of Waldorf education and their relevance for or bearing on assessment. El Guiniguada, 18, 81–100.
McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2010). You and your action research project (3rd ed.). Routledge.
MoNE. (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) [Mathematics course curriculum primary and secondary school 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8th grades]. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201813017165445-MATEMATİK%20ÖĞRETİM%20PROGRAMI%202018v.pdf
MoNE. (2024). İlkokul matematik dersi öğretim programı (1, 2, 3 ve 4. Sınıflar) [Mathematics curriculum primary school 1, 2, 3, and 4th grades]. https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/ogretim-programlari/ders/ilkokul-matematik-dersi
MoNE. (2025). 2025-2026 yılı bilim ve sanat merkezleri öğrenci tanılama ve yerleştirme kılavuzu. [2025-2026 science and art centers student identification and placement guide]. https://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2025_11/13094632_2025-2026_Bilim_Sanat_Merkezleri_Ogrenci_Tanilama_ve_Yerlestirme_Klavuzu.pdf
Mora, M., Jaime, A., & Gutiérrez, A. (2022). Descriptors of generalization in primary school mathematically gifted students. In S. A. Chamberlin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th InternationalConference on Mathematical Creativity andGiftedness (MCG 12) (pp. 203–209). WTM-Verlag für wissenschaftliche Texte und Medien Münster.
Neumann, R. (2024). Media education in Waldorf/Steiner schools. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1365149. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1365149
Nicholson, D. W. (2000). Layers of experience: Forms of representation in a Waldorf school classroom. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(4), 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270050033637
Nordlund, C. N. (2013). Waldorf education: Breathing creativity. Art Education, 66(2), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2013.11519211
Oberski, I., Pugh, A., MacLean, A., & Cope, P. (2007). Validating a Steiner–Waldorf teacher education programme. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(1), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510601102388
O'Connor, D., & Angus, J. (2014). Give them time—An analysis of school readiness in Ireland's early education system: A Steiner Waldorf perspective. Education 3–13, 42(5), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.723726
Paschen, H. (2014). Waldorf education and Rudolf Steiner schools as a topic of educational science. Croatian Journal of Education, 16(1), 191–215. https://hrcak.srce.hr/120162
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage.
Pedersen, M. K. (2023). The use of DGE and CAS to support mathematical thinking competency: A literature review. NOMAD: Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 28(3-4), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v28i3-4.149267
Piske, F. H. R., & Stoltz, T. (2021). Creativity in socio-interactional pedagogy and Waldorf Pedagogy: implications for working with the gifted students. Educar em Revista, 37, e81545. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-4060.81545
Pitta-Pantazi, D., Constantinos, C., Kontoyianni, K., & Kattou, M. (2011). A model of mathematical giftedness: Integrating natural, creative, and mathematical abilities. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.548900
Rawson, M. (2024). Translating, transmitting and transforming Waldorf curricula: One hundred years after the first published curriculum in 1925. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1306092. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1306092
Robson, C. (2024). Real world research (5th ed.). Wiley.
Sak, U. (2024). Üstün zekalılar: Özellikleri, tanılamaları, eğitimleri [Gifted children: Their characteristics, identification, and education (7th ed.). Vize Yayıncılık.
Shank, M. (2016). Imagination, Waldorf, and critical literacies: Possibilities for transformative education in mainstream schools. Reading & Writing—Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa, 7(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v7i2.99
Stacey, K. (2006). What is mathematical thinking and why is it important? Proceedings of the APEC- Tsukuba International Conference 2007: Innovative Teaching Mathematics through Lesson Study, Tokyo, Japan. https://www.criced.tsukuba.ac.jp/math/apec/apec2007/kaye_stacey.pdf
Steiner, R. (1996). The education of the child. Steiner Books.
Stylianides, A. J., Komatsu, K., Weber, K., & Stylianides, G. J. (2022). Teaching and learning authentic mathematics: The case of proving. In M. Danesi (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive mathematics (pp,727-761). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03945-4_9
Taplin, J. T. (2024). Waldorf early childhood care and education in the 21st century. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1329773. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1329773
Tran, C., Smith, B., & Buschkuehl, M. (2017). Support of mathematical thinking through embodied cognition: Nondigital and digital approaches. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(16), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0053-8
Uceda, P. Q. (2015). Waldorf teacher education: Historical origins, its current situation as a higher education training course and the case of Spain. Encounters in Theory and History of Education, 16, 129–145. https://doi.org/10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v16i0.5711
Uhrmacher, P. B. (1995) Uncommon schooling: A historical look at rudolf steiner, anthroposophy, and waldorf education, Curriculum Inquiry, 25(4), 381-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1995.11076190
Van der Ven, S. H., Kroesbergen, E. H., Boom, J., & Leseman, P. P. (2012). The development of executive functions and early mathematics: A dynamic relationship. The British journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02035.x
Van Schie, T. J., & Vedder, P. (2023). Different pedagogies, equivalent results: A comparison of language skills and school attitude between Waldorf school students and public school students in the Philippines. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 24 (29), 490-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2023.2248902
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2013). The world of cross-cultural research: Insights for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212471451
Veiga, M. D. (2015). Revisiting humanism as a guiding principle for education: An excursion into Waldorf pedagogy. Educar em Revista, 56, 19–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-4060.41417
Villa-Ochoa, J. A., & Suárez-Téllez, L. (2021). Computer algebra systems and dynamic geometry for mathematical thinking. In M. Danesi (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive mathematics (pp. 1–27). Springer.
Waldorf World List. (2024). Directory of Steiner-Waldorf schools, kindergartens and teacher education centers worldwide. https://www.freunde-waldorf.de/freunde/fileadmin/user_upload/images/Waldorf_World_List/Waldorf_World_List.pdf
Wright, P. (2013). Theory of knowledge or knowledge of the child? Challenging the epistemological assumptions of the curriculum debate on geography from an alternative viewpoint. Oxford Review of Education, 39(2), 193–210. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42001820
Wu, W. R., & Yang, K. L. (2022). The relationships between computational and mathematical thinking: A review study on tasks. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2098929
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences (11th ed.). Seçkin.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Matematik Eğitimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Niymet Demirci
0000-0002-2763-1879
Türkiye

Ebru Ergül ^* Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Nisan 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

4 Nisan 2025

Kabul Tarihi

10 Şubat 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1939228

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA65CT59EG

APA

Demirci, N., & Ergül, E. (2026). Enhancing Gifted Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills (An Example of the Waldorf Approach). Kastamonu Education Journal, 34(2), 207-237. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1939228

AMA

1.Demirci N, Ergül E. Enhancing Gifted Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills (An Example of the Waldorf Approach). Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2026;34(2):207-237. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1939228

Chicago

Demirci, Niymet, ve Ebru Ergül. 2026. “Enhancing Gifted Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills (An Example of the Waldorf Approach)”. Kastamonu Education Journal 34 (2): 207-37. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1939228.

EndNote

Demirci N, Ergül E (01 Nisan 2026) Enhancing Gifted Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills (An Example of the Waldorf Approach). Kastamonu Education Journal 34 2 207–237.

IEEE

[1]N. Demirci ve E. Ergül, “Enhancing Gifted Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills (An Example of the Waldorf Approach)”, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, c. 34, sy 2, ss. 207–237, Nis. 2026, doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.1939228.

ISNAD

Demirci, Niymet - Ergül, Ebru. “Enhancing Gifted Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills (An Example of the Waldorf Approach)”. Kastamonu Education Journal 34/2 (01 Nisan 2026): 207-237. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1939228.

JAMA

1.Demirci N, Ergül E. Enhancing Gifted Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills (An Example of the Waldorf Approach). Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2026;34:207–237.

MLA

Demirci, Niymet, ve Ebru Ergül. “Enhancing Gifted Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills (An Example of the Waldorf Approach)”. Kastamonu Education Journal, c. 34, sy 2, Nisan 2026, ss. 207-3, doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1939228.

Vancouver

1.Niymet Demirci, Ebru Ergül. Enhancing Gifted Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills (An Example of the Waldorf Approach). Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 01 Nisan 2026;34(2):207-3. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1939228

Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY) ile lisanslanmıştır.

Enhancing Gifted Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills (An Example of the Waldorf Approach)

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Özel Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Matematiksel Düşünme Becerilerinin Geliştirilmesi (Waldorf Yaklaşımı Örneği)

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster