Araştırma Makalesi

The Artificial Intelligence Paradox in Mathematics Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Teachers’ Views

Cilt: 34 Sayı: 4 29 Ekim 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

The Artificial Intelligence Paradox in Mathematics Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Teachers’ Views

Öz

In recent decades, the rapid development of educational technologies has made the integration of AI into teaching-learning processes inevitable. This study examines how middle school, high school, and science and art centre mathematics teachers make sense of AI use in mathematics teaching. Using a basic qualitative research design and criterion sampling, data were collected from 27 mathematics teachers via semi-structured interviews and analyzed with inductive content analysis. Findings revealed three main themes: “understanding AI”, “efficiency and pedagogical concerns”, and “measurement and evaluation”. Teachers described AI positively as an assistant, opportunity, time-saver, and efficient measurement expert. However, they also expressed concerns about AI being unfeeling, posing data security risks, and potentially replacing humans—especially teachers. The study concludes that AI may redefine education and mathematics instruction, prompting widespread debate about the future role of teachers. Professional development programs and teacher education curricula need to be reconsidered and enriched accordingly.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mathematics Education, Artificial Intelligence, Digitalisation in Education, Educational Technologies

Kaynakça

  1. Acar, S., & Peker, B. (2025). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının gözünden: ChatGPT’nin eğitimde kullanımı [From the perspective of mathematics teacher candidates: The use of ChatGPT in education]. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Ereğli Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(Special Issue), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.51119/ereegf.2025.136
  2. Albalawi, A. S. (2025). Integrating AI into education: Perspectives from mathematics teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 11(4), 896–921. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1316
  3. Alsharidah, M. A., & Alkramiti, A. M. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions towards using artificial intelligence in mathematics education. Amazonia Investiga, 13(84), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.84.12.3
  4. Asanre, A. A., Taiwo, T. O., & Odupe, T. A. (2024). Teachers’ perception towards the integration of artificial intelligence in the teaching of mathematics in senior secondary school. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 12(2), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v12i2.77349
  5. Baker, T., & Smith, L. (2019). Educ-AI-tion rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. Nesta. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Future_of_AI_and_education_v5_WEB.pdf
  6. Baldemir, B., Tutak, T., & İç, Ü. (2025). Yapay zekâ destekli matematik tarihi ve matematik bilgi yarışmasına yönelik öğrenci ve öğretmen görüşleri [Students’ and teachers’ perspectives on the artificial intelligence-supported mathematics history and mathematics knowledge competition]. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama, 16(32), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.58689/eibd.1776423
  7. Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
  8. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2014). Research methods, design, and analysis. Pearson Education.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education.
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Çalışkan Toraman, Ç., & Özdemir, H. F. (2026). The Artificial Intelligence Paradox in Mathematics Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Teachers’ Views. Kastamonu Education Journal, 34(4), 821-845. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1939772
AMA
1.Çalışkan Toraman Ç, Özdemir HF. The Artificial Intelligence Paradox in Mathematics Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Teachers’ Views. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2026;34(4):821-845. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1939772
Chicago
Çalışkan Toraman, Çiğdem, ve Hasan Fehmi Özdemir. 2026. “The Artificial Intelligence Paradox in Mathematics Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Teachers’ Views”. Kastamonu Education Journal 34 (4): 821-45. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1939772.
EndNote
Çalışkan Toraman Ç, Özdemir HF (01 Ekim 2026) The Artificial Intelligence Paradox in Mathematics Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Teachers’ Views. Kastamonu Education Journal 34 4 821–845.
IEEE
[1]Ç. Çalışkan Toraman ve H. F. Özdemir, “The Artificial Intelligence Paradox in Mathematics Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Teachers’ Views”, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, c. 34, sy 4, ss. 821–845, Eki. 2026, doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.1939772.
ISNAD
Çalışkan Toraman, Çiğdem - Özdemir, Hasan Fehmi. “The Artificial Intelligence Paradox in Mathematics Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Teachers’ Views”. Kastamonu Education Journal 34/4 (01 Ekim 2026): 821-845. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1939772.
JAMA
1.Çalışkan Toraman Ç, Özdemir HF. The Artificial Intelligence Paradox in Mathematics Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Teachers’ Views. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2026;34:821–845.
MLA
Çalışkan Toraman, Çiğdem, ve Hasan Fehmi Özdemir. “The Artificial Intelligence Paradox in Mathematics Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Teachers’ Views”. Kastamonu Education Journal, c. 34, sy 4, Ekim 2026, ss. 821-45, doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1939772.
Vancouver
1.Çiğdem Çalışkan Toraman, Hasan Fehmi Özdemir. The Artificial Intelligence Paradox in Mathematics Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Teachers’ Views. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 01 Ekim 2026;34(4):821-45. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1939772