Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’ Views Of Nature Of Science And Their Study Subjects

Suat Çelik; Faik Özgür Karataş

TR EN

Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilimin Doğasına Yönelik Anlayışları İle Öğrenim Gördükleri Alanlar Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı fen ve matematik öğretmen adaylarının bilimin doğasına yönelik anlayışlarını ve bu anlayışlarla öğrenim gördükleri alanlar arasında bir ilişkinin bulunup bulunmadığını irdelemektir. Buna yönelik olarak, “bilimin doğası anlayışları testi” hem fen hem de eğitim fakültelerinin kimya, fizik, biyoloji ve matematik bölümlerinin son sınıflarında öğrenim gören toplam 220 öğretmen adayına uygulanmıştır. Test sonuçları, bilimin doğasının yedi boyutu dikkate alınarak geliştirilen kodlama sistemine göre betimsel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Öğretmen adaylarının anlayışları ile öğrenim gördükleri alanlar arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek için Ki-kare testi kullanılmıştır. Bilimsel bilginin nesnel doğası ve bilimde hayal gücü ve yaratıcılık boyutları hariç, öğretmen adaylarının yalnızca %50’sinden daha azının bilimin doğasının diğer boyutları ile ilgili olarak geçerli anlayışlara sahip oldukları tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, bilimin doğasının yedi boyutunun beşinde öğretmen adaylarının anlayışları ve öğrenim gördükleri alanlar arasında bir ilişki bulunduğu da görülmüştür. Çalışmada, fen eğitimi ve daha sonra yapılacak çalışmalara yönelik çeşitli önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bilimin doğası, fen ve matematik öğretmen adayları

Kaynakça

AAAS, American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Oxford University Press New York NY.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: the impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planning. In- ternational Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 15-42. doi: 10.1080/09500690410001673810
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, Randy L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructi- onal practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417-436.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701.
Abell, S. K., & Smith, D. C. (1994). What Is Science - Preservice Elementary Teachers Conceptions of the Nature of Science. International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 475-487.
Aikenhead, G. S, Fleming, R. W, & Ryan, A. G. (1987). High‐school graduates’ beliefs about science‐ technology‐society. I. methods and issues in monitoring student views. Science Education, 71(2), 145-161.
Ainley, M, & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contri- bution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4-12.
Akerson, V. L., Hanson, D. L., & Cullen, T. A. (2007). The Influence of Guided Inquiry and Explicit Instruction on K-6 Teachers’ Views of Nature of Science. Journal of Science Teacher Educati- on, 18(5), 751-772.
Alters, B. J. (1997). Nature of science: A diversity or uniformity of ideas? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1105-1108.
Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 563-581.

Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers Beliefs About the Nature of Science and Their Relationship to Classroom Practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53-62.
Celik, S. (2009). The influence of project based learning approach on pre-service science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science and technology and scientific process skills. (PhD.), Ataturk University, Erzurum.
Celik, S., & Bayrakceken, S. (2006). The Effect of a “Science, Technology and Society” Course on Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science. Research in Science & Technolo- gical Education, 24(2), 255-273.
Dogan, N., Cakiroglu, J., Cavus, S., Bilican, K., & Arslan, O. (2011). Developing Science Teac- hers’ Nature of Science Views: The Effect of in-Service Teacher Education Program. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi-Hacettepe University Journal of Education(40), 127-139.
Driver, R., Leach, J., & PhilScot, R. M. (1996). Young People’s Images of Science: ERIC.
Erdogan, Rahsan, Cakiroglu, Jale, & Tekkaya, Ceren. (2006). Investigating Turkish Pre-service sci- ence teachers’ views of the nature of science. Research on education in Africa, the Caribbean and the Middle East, 273-285.
Gall, Meredith D, Gall, J, & Borg, W. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). The Use and Impact of Explicit Instruction about the Nature of Science and Science Inquiry in an Elementary Science Methods Course. Science and Education, 11(1), 55-67.
Irez, S. (2009). Nature of Science as Depicted in Turkish Biology Textbooks. Science Education, 93(3), 422-447. doi: 10.1002/sce.20305
İrez, Serhat, Çakir, Mustafa, & Şeker, Hayati. (2011). Exploring Nature of Science Understandings of Turkish Pre-service Science Teachers. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 5(2).
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit in- quiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578. doi: 10.1002/tea.10036
Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. G. (2006). Teaching Nature of Science within a Controversial Topic: Integrated versus Nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395-418.
Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. G. (2007). Relationship between instructional context and vi- ews of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(8), 939-961. doi: 10.1080/09500690601110947
Kilic, Kerem, Sungur, Semra, Cakiroglu, Jale, & Tekkaya, Ceren. (2005). Ninth grade students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Hacettepe University Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 28, 127-133.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students and Teachers Conceptions of the Nature of Science - a Review of the Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
Lederman, N. G., & Omalley, M. (1990). Students Perceptions of Tentativeness in Science - Deve- lopment, Use, and Sources of Change. Science Education, 74(2), 225-239. doi: Doi 10.1002/ Sce.3730740207
Liang, L. L., Chen, S. F., Chen, X., Kaya, O. N., Adams, A. D., Macklin, M., & Ebenezer, J. (2009). Preservıce teachers’ vıews about nature of scıentıfıc knowledge development: an ınternatıonal collaboratıve study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 987- 1012. doi: 10.1007/s10763-008-9140-0
Lin, H. S., & Chen, C. C. (2002). Promoting preservice chemistry teachers’ understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 773-792. doi: 10.1002/tea.10045
Macaroglu, Esra, Taşar, MF, & Cataloglu, Erdat. (1998). Turkish preservice elementary school te- achers’ beliefs about the nature of science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), San Diego, CA.
McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking Historical Examples to Illustrate Key Aspects of the Nature of Science. Science & Education, 17(2-3), 249-263.
McComas, W. F., Almazroa, H., & Clough, M. P. (1998). The Nature of Science in Science Educa- tion: An Introduction. Science and Education, 7(6), 511-532.
McMillan, J. H, & Schumacher, S. (2009). Research in education: Pearson Education.
Mellado, Vicente. (1997). Preservice Teachers’ Classroom Practice and Their Conceptions of the Nature of Science. Science and Education, 6(4), 331-354.
Miles, M. B, & Huberman, A M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source- book: Sage.
Miller, Jon D, Scott, Eugenie C, & Okamoto, Shinji. (2006). Public acceptance of evoluti- on. SCIENCE-NEW YORK THEN WASHINGTON-, 313(5788), 765.
MoNE, Ministry of National Education. (2007). Turkish Ministry of Education: High School Chemistry Curriculum. from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretim-program- lari/icerik/72
MoNE, Ministry of National Education. (2013). Updated high school physics and che- mistry curriculums. Ministry of National Education Retrieved from http://ttkb.meb. gov.tr/www/ogretim-programlari/icerik/72.
Murcia, K., & Schibeci, R. (1999). Primary Student Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1123-1140.
NRC, National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. (0309053269). National Academy Press.
NSF, National Science Foundation. (1983). Educating Americans for the Twenty First Century: Report of the National Science Board Commission on Pre-college Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. Washington, DC.
Palmquist, B. C., & Finley, F. N. (1997). Preservice teachers’ views of the nature of sci- ence during a postbaccalaureate science teaching program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 595-615.
Renninger, K., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issu- es raised by a case study.
Rudge, D. W., & Howe, E. M. (2009). An Explicit and Reflective Approach to the Use of History to Promote Understanding of the Nature of Science. Science & Education, 18(5), 561-580.
Ryder, J., Leach, J., & Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate science students’ images of sci- ence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 201-219.
Samarapungavan, A., Westby, E. L., & Bodner, G. M. (2006). Contextual epistemic deve- lopment in science: A comparison of chemistry students and research chemists. Scien- ce Education, 90(3), 468-495. doi: 10.1002/sce.20111
Sarkar, Md Mahbub Alam, & Gomes, Jui Judith. (2010). Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: The Case of Bangladesh. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Lear- ning and Teaching, 11(1).
Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2008). What Scientists Say: Scientists’ Views of Nature of Science and Relation to Science Context. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 727-771.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). A series of misrepresen- tations: A response to Allchin’s whole approach to assessing nature of science unders- tandings. Science Education, 96(4), 685-692. doi: Doi 10.1002/Sce.21013
Taşar, M. F. (2003). Teaching history and the nature of science in science teacher educati- on programs. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(13), 30-42.
Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2002). Students’ understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 357-368. doi: Doi 10.1080/09500690110066485
Türkmen, L. (2008). Sınıf öğretmenliği programında öğrenim gören birinci sınıf düzeyin- den dördüncü sınıf düzeyine gelen öğretmen adaylarının fen bilimlerine ve öğretimine yönelik tutumları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 16(1), 91-106.
Urhahne, D., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2011). Conceptions of the Nature of Science--Are They General or Context Specific? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 707-730.
Wyss, V. L., Heulskamp, D., & Siebert, C. J. (2008). Increasing middle school student interest in STEM careers with videos of scientists. International Journal of Environ- mental & Science Education, 3(3).
Yildirim, A, & Simsek, H. (2005). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences. An- kara: Seckin Yayınevi.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Suat Çelik Bu kişi benim
ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, KAZIM KARABEKİR EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, MATEMATİK VE FEN BİLİMLERİ EĞİTİMİ BÖLÜMÜ

Faik Özgür Karataş Bu kişi benim
KARADENİZ TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FATİH EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, ORTAÖĞRETİM FEN VE MATEMATİK ALANLAR EĞİTİMİ BÖLÜMÜ

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Mayıs 2015

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Temmuz 2016

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2015 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA88SP54HF

APA

Çelik, S., & Karataş, F. Ö. (2015). Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’ Views Of Nature Of Science And Their Study Subjects. Kastamonu Education Journal, 23(2), 755-772. https://izlik.org/JA88SP54HF

AMA

1.Çelik S, Karataş FÖ. Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’ Views Of Nature Of Science And Their Study Subjects. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2015;23(2):755-772. https://izlik.org/JA88SP54HF

Chicago

Çelik, Suat, ve Faik Özgür Karataş. 2015. “Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’ Views Of Nature Of Science And Their Study Subjects”. Kastamonu Education Journal 23 (2): 755-72. https://izlik.org/JA88SP54HF.

EndNote

Çelik S, Karataş FÖ (01 Mayıs 2015) Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’ Views Of Nature Of Science And Their Study Subjects. Kastamonu Education Journal 23 2 755–772.

IEEE

[1]S. Çelik ve F. Ö. Karataş, “Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’ Views Of Nature Of Science And Their Study Subjects”, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, c. 23, sy 2, ss. 755–772, May. 2015, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA88SP54HF

ISNAD

Çelik, Suat - Karataş, Faik Özgür. “Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’ Views Of Nature Of Science And Their Study Subjects”. Kastamonu Education Journal 23/2 (01 Mayıs 2015): 755-772. https://izlik.org/JA88SP54HF.

JAMA

1.Çelik S, Karataş FÖ. Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’ Views Of Nature Of Science And Their Study Subjects. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2015;23:755–772.

MLA

Çelik, Suat, ve Faik Özgür Karataş. “Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’ Views Of Nature Of Science And Their Study Subjects”. Kastamonu Education Journal, c. 23, sy 2, Mayıs 2015, ss. 755-72, https://izlik.org/JA88SP54HF.

Vancouver

1.Suat Çelik, Faik Özgür Karataş. Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’ Views Of Nature Of Science And Their Study Subjects. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Mayıs 2015;23(2):755-72. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA88SP54HF

Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY) ile lisanslanmıştır.

Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilimin Doğasına Yönelik Anlayışları İle Öğrenim Gördükleri Alanlar Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler