Quality Studies in Higher Education from 1980s to Present: Scientometrics Overview on a Global Scale

Yıl 2020, , 482 - 493, 31.01.2020

Güzin Özdağoğlu , Muhammet Damar , Aşkın Özdağoğlu , Hale Turhan Damar , Özlem Bilik

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3684

Cited By: 3

Öz

Higher education institutions contribute positively in the development level of the society by producing values and services in different layers via the activities such as higher education programs and research and development pro-jects. The social beliefs in higher education institutions in leading and shaping the future of society have risen with an increasing trend, therefore, the expectations from the insti-tutions also have increased in the same direction. The ex-pectations have been considered as the sources of inspira-tion for the research on quality in higher education figuring out the developments and the use of various models and standards. In order to reveal the current characteristics of the relevant literature, this research aims at examining the research articles on "quality in higher education" with the help of scientometrics, and thus presenting the related trends are presented on a global scale. In this study, the research articles in Web of Science were considered in the analyses the titles of which include "higher education" and "quality", and related issues that were published between 1980 and 2018. With the support of techniques and tools of scientometrics, the most cited journals, the most cited au-thors and the most publishing countries were summarized in tables; the relations among the authors and among the keywords are presented in a network structure.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Higher Education; Quality, University, Scientometrics

80’lerden Günümüze Yükseköğretimde Kalite Çalışmaları: Küresel Ölçekte Bilimetrik Bakış

Öz

Yükseköğretim kurumları, eğitim-öğretim, araştırma-geliştirme gibi faaliyetleriyle, topluma farklı katmanlarda değer ve hizmet üreterek, toplumun gelişmişlik düzeyine olumlu katkılar sağlamaktadır. Toplumların, geleceklerine, yükseköğretim kurumlarının yön vereceğine olan inançları artarken, bu durum, kurumlardan beklenen eğitim ve hizmet kalitesi düzeyini de aynı doğrultuda artırmaktadır. Dolayı-sıyla, yükseköğretimde kalite konusu, farklı kalite model ve standartların geliştirilmesiyle, araştırma için ilham kaynağı olarak göz önüne alınmıştır. İlgili literatürün mevcut yapısı-nı ortaya koymak amacıyla, bu araştırmada, “yükseköğre-timde kalite” konusundaki araştırma makaleleri bilimetrik yöntemler ile incelenerek, ilgili alandaki eğilimler küresel ölçekte sunulmuştur. Çalışmada; Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında bulunan, 1980-2018 tarih aralığında yayınlan-mış, başlığı yükseköğretimde kalite kavramı ile ilişkilendi-rilmiş araştırma makaleleri analiz edilmiştir. Bilimetrik yöntem ve araçların desteğiyle, kapsama alınan makalelerin en fazla referans verdikleri dergiler, en fazla referans veri-len yazarlar ve en fazla yayın üreten ülkeler, özet tablolar-la; yazarların ve anahtar kelimelerin kendi arasındaki ilişkiler ise kümeler ve ağ yapısı içerisinde sunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yükseköğretim, Kalite, Üniversite, Bilimetri

Kaynakça

• Adams, J. (2009). The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in UK higher education institutions. Archivum immunolo-giae et therapiae experimentalis, 57(1), 19.
• Adamu, A. Y., ve Addamu, A. M. (2012). Quality assurance in Ethiopian higher education: Procedures and practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 838 – 846. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.006.
• Adina-Petruta, P., ve Roxana, S. (2014). Integrating six sigma with quality management systems for the development and continu-ous ımprovement of higher education ınstitutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 643-648. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.456.
• Al, U. (2008). Bilimsel yayınların değerlendirilmesi: h-endeksi ve Türkiye’nin performansı. Bilgi Dünyası, 9(2), 263-285.
• Alzafari, K. (2017). Mapping the literature structure of ‘quality in higher education’using co-word analysis. Quality in HigHer education, 23(3), 264-282.
• Barbulescu, A. (2015). Quality culture in the Romanian higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1923-1927. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.445.
• Bass, S. A. (1987). University and community partnerships: Developing linkages for quality gerontological training and institutio-nal expansion. Educational Gerontology: An International Quarterly, 13(4), 307-324.
• Belenli İ., Günay D., Öztemel E., Demir A., Şerifoğlu F.S.., Elmas M., Eryiğit R., Aydın O., ve Kılıç, M. (2011). Türkiye yükse-köğretim kurumları için kalite güvence oluşumu üzerine bir model önerisi. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 1(3), Ara-lık/December: 128-133.
• Bode, P. (1995). Perspective. Quality management and laboratory accreditation at a university: what can be learned from expe-rience? Analyst, 120(5), 1527-1533.
• Bogdan, I., Iuliana, I., Valentin, D., ve Vasile, G. (2009). The quality management of the services of scientometric quantification of the research of the members of the university community deployed within the" e-univroscient" concept. Amfiteatru Econo-mic, 11(26), 429-440.
• Brown, R.D. ve Nunn, E.K.(1981). The Quality of Research in Australian Universities. Search, 12(12), 431-433.
• Burgess, H. A. (1989). Achieving quality education: Use of the external examiner system in African Universities. Journal of Nurse‐Midwifery, 34(3), 144-145.,
• Clarke, M., Butler, C., Schmidt‐Hansen, P. ve Somerville, M. (2004). Quality assurance for distance learning: A case study at Brunel University. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 5-11.
• Clayton, M. (1995). Encouraging the kaizen approach to quality in a university. Total Quality Management, 6(5), 593-602.
• Coate, E. (1993). The introduction of total quality management at Oregon State University. Higher Education, 25(3), 303-320.
• Coleman, P., ve Jarred, A. D. (1994). Regional association criteria and the Standards for College Libraries: the informal role of quantitative input measures for libraries in accreditation. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 20(5-6), 273-284.
• Cowles, D., ve Gilbreath, G. (1993). Total quality management at Virginia Commonwealth University: an urban university strugg-les with the realities of TQM. Higher Education, 25(3), 281-302.
• Çoruh, M. (1996). Implementation of Total Quality Management at Başkent University. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 8(1), 83-84.
• Damush, T. M., Hays, R. D., ve DiMatteo, M. R. (1997). Guality of Life in College Students. Journal of College Student Develop-ment, 38, 2.
• Daskapan, A., Tuzun, E. H., ve Eker, L. (2005). Relationship between physical activity level and health related quality of life among university students. Saudi Medical Journal, 26(6), 1026.
• Doğramacı İ. (2007). Türkiye’de ve dünyada yükseköğretim yönetimi. METEKSAN A.Ş. Ankara. Erişim adresi: http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/hocabey/turkiyede_ve_dunyada_yuksek_ogretim_yonetimi.pdf
• Dragan, M., Ivana, D., ve Arba, R. (2014). Business process modeling in higher education institutions. developing a framework for total quality management at institutional level. Procedia Economics and Finance, 16, 95 - 103. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00779-5.
• Draguta, B. M. (2011). Quality management in higher education services. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3366–3368. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.301.
• Ergul, S. Ardahan, M. Temel, A.B. ve Yıldırım, B.Ö. (2010). Bibliometric review of references of nursing research papers during the decade 1994-2003 in Turkey, International Nursing Review. International Council of Nurses. 49-55.
• Eryılmaz, M. E., Kara, E., Aydoğan, E., Bektaş, O., ve Erdur, D. A. (2016). Quality management in the Turkish higher education institutions: preliminary findings. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.114.
• Farrington, D. J. (2001). Borderless higher education: challenges to regulation, accreditation and intellectual property rights. Minerva, 39(1), 63-84.
• Garfield, E. (2009). From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite softwa-re. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 173-179. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.009.
• Gencel, U. (2001). Yükseköğretim hizmetlerinde toplam kalite yönetimi ve akreditasyon. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(3), 164-218.
• Gorea, B., ve Saharov, N. (2015). Legislative bases for quality assurance in Romanian higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 387 – 391. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.372.
• Günay, D., ve Günay, A. (2017). Historical development and current situation of higher education in Turkey. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 7 (3), 156-178. doi:10.2399/yod.17.024.
• Gür B.S. ve Özer, M. (2012). Türkiye’de yükseköğretimin yeniden yapılandırılması ve kalite güvence sistemi. siyaset ekonomi ve toplum araştırmaları (SETA) çalıştayı. Pelin Ofset, Ankara. Erişim adresi: http://file.setav.org/Files/Pdf/20121217125617_zonguldak-web2.pdf
• Hansen, W. L. (1993). Bringing total quality improvement into the college classroom. Higher Education, 25(3), 259-279.
• Harvey, L. ve Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34.
• Hosseini, M. R., Martek, I., Zavadskas, E. K., Aibinu, A. A., Arashpour, M., ve Chileshe, N. (2018). Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: A Scientometric analysis. Automation in Construction, 87, 235-247. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.002.
• Ifidon, B. I. (1995). Recent Developments in Nigerian Academic Libraries: The Effects of Accreditation on University Lybrary Bookstock. Libri, 45(3-4), 186-198.
• Johnsrud, L. K. (2002). Measuring the quality of faculty and administrative worklife: Implications for college and university campuses. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 379-395.
• Kanji, G.K., Tambi, A.M.A. (1998). Total quality management and higher education in Malaysia. Total Quality Management, 9:4-5, 130-132, doi: 10.1080/0954412988749.
• Karahan, M., ve Mete, M. (2014). Examination of total quality management practices in higher education in the context of quality sufficiency. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1292 – 1297. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.627.
• Kauppila, O., Mursula, A., Harkonen, J., ve Kujala, J. (2015). Evaluating university–industry collaboration: the European Founda-tion of Quality Management excellence model-based evaluation of university–industry collaboration. Tertiary Education and Management, 21(3), 229-244.
• Keçetep, İ., ve Özkan, İ. (2014). Quality assurance in the European higher education area. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 660 – 664. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.115.
• Mateo, M. A. ve Fernandez, J. (1996). Incidence of class size on the evaluation of university teaching quality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 771-778.
• McCowan, T. (2004). The growth of private higher education in Brazil: implications for equity and quality. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 453-472.
• Moodie, G. C. (1988). The debates about higher education quality in Britain and the USA. Studies in Higher Education, 13(1), 5-13.
• Nielsen, M. L. (1997). Cytopathology laboratory improvement programs of the college of American pathologists. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 121(3), 256.
• Özdemir, A. N. ve Alpaydın, Y. (2018). Yükseköğretim kurumlarında akademik yayıncılık: Üniversite dergilerinin bazı değişken-ler açısından incelenmesi. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 8(1), 9–22. doi:10.2399/yod.17.026
• Pardo, C. Reolid, M. Delicado, M-V. Mallebrera, E. ve Garcia-Meseguer, M-J. (2001). Nursing research in Spain: bibliometrics of references of research papers in the decade 1985–1994. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(6), 933–943.
• Pereira, C. A., Araujo, J. F. F. E., ve Machado-Taylor, M. d. L. (2018). The Brazilian higher education evaluation model: “SI-NAES” sui generis? International Journal of Educational Development, 61, 5-15. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.11.007.
• Popescu-Mitroi, M-M., Todorescu, L-L., ve Greculescu, A. (2015). Quality assurance and classroom management in the study of English in technical higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1917 - 1922. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.724.
• Prisacariu, A. (2015). New perspectives of quality assurance in european higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 119 - 126. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.094.
• Rakhudu, M. A. (2015). Use of Problem Based Scenarios to Prepare Nursing Students to Address Quality Improvement in Health Care Unit: North West University Experience. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(1), 72-80.
• Rezeanu, O. M. (2011). The implementation of quality management in higher education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Scien-ces, 15, 1046–1050. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.237.
• Sarı, A., Fırat, A., ve Karaduman, A. (2016). Quality assurance ıssues in higher education sectors of developing countries; case of Northern Cyprus. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 326 - 334. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.143.
• Sarwerfoner, G. (1981). The Philosophy Of High-Quality Care By University Hospitals-The Role Modeling Of Residents And The Organization Of High-Quality Services For The Delivery Of Psychiatric Health-Care. Psychiatric Journal of The University of Ottawa-Revue De Psychiatrie De L Universite D Ottawa, 6(1), 4-12.
• Schwartzman, S. (2004). Equity, quality and relevance in higher education in Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 76(1), 173-188.
• Shin, J. C. (2017). Quality assurance systems as a higher education policy tool in Korea: International convergence and local contexts. International Journal of Educational Development, doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.10.005. (baskıda makale).
• Tezsürücü, D., ve Bursalıoğlu, S. A. (2013). Yükseköğretimde değişim: kalite arayışları. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10 (2), 97-108.
• Thelwall, M. (2002). The top 100 linked-to pages on UK university web sites: high inlink counts are not usually associated with quality scholarly content. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 483-491.
• Todorescu, L-L., Greculescu, A., ve Lampă, I. (2014). Implementation of quality assurance in Romanian technical higher educa-tion – objective set by the Bologna process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 443 - 447. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1369.
• Todorut, A. V. (2013). The need of total quality management in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 1105 - 1110. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.207.
• Tolor, A. (1983). Perception of quality of life of college students and their faculty. Adolescence, 18(71), 585.
• Tonta, Y. (1999). Bilgi toplumu ve bilgi teknolojisi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 13(4), 363-375.
• Tuijnman, A. (1990). Dilemmas of open admissions policy: quality and efficiency in Swedish higher education. Higher Educa-tion, 20(4), 443-457.
• Van Damme, D. (2001). Quality issues in the internationalisation of higher education. Higher Education, 41(4), 415-441.
• van Eck, N., ve Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric map-ping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
• Vidovich, L. (2002). Quality assurance in Australian higher education: Globalisation andsteering at a distance. Higher Education, 43(3), 391-408.
• Vinkler, P. (2010). The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators. Chandos Publishing. Oxford.
• Yang, S., ve Yuan, Q. (2017). Are Scientometrics, Informetrics, and Bibliometrics different? 16th International Society of Sci-entometrics and Informetrics Conference ISSI 2017.
• Yonezawa, A. (2002). The quality assurance system and market forces in Japanese higher education. Higher Education, 43(1), 127-139.
• YÖDEK (2007). Yükseköğretim kurumlarında akademik değerlendirme ve kalite geliştirme rehberi. Yükseköğretim akademik değerlendirme ve kalite geliştirme komisyonu (YÖDEK). Erişim adresi: http://www.yodek.org.tr/yodek/files/7aa12f8d2582deb44d4249c7aa4a2020.pdf
• YÖK (2007). Türkiye’nin yükseköğretim stratejisi. Meteksan A.Ş. Ankara. 2007. Erişim adresi: tarihinde https://www.kuzka.gov.tr/dosya/yuksekogretim_stratejisi.pdf