The Evolution Usefulness Scale: Development, Reliability, and Validity

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 3, 778 - 788, 01.09.2021

Muhammed Salman , Turan Güven

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.933194

Cited By: 2

Öz

Purpose: The aim of the current study was to develop a scale to measure the perceived usefulness of the evolutionary theory among biology students who are pre-service teachers.
Design/Methodology/Approach: Firstly, the related literature was analysed to compose a scale, and then the item pool was constructed. The pilot form of the scale was administered to the biology teacher candidates, and the factorial structure and reliability were analysed via explanatory factor analyses and Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient. Then, the final form of the scale was composed based on the results of the pilot testing. The study group of the research included 222 biology teacher candidates. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to obtain proof on construct validity.
Findings: As a result of these analyses, it was decided that the scale has a unidimensional structure with 58.6% explained variance. As for reliability, Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient was estimated, and it was found as .94, which indicates a high level of inter-consistency. At the end of the study, it was concluded that the Evolution Usefulness Scale (EUS), which includes 13 items, can measure the perceived usefulness of the theory of evolution in a valid and reliable manner.
Highlights: It is thought that developing a scale that will determine whether the theory of evolution is useful in understanding other biology topics will fill the gap in the field.

Anahtar Kelimeler

The theory of evolution, Scale development, The usefulness scale, Biology education

Evrim Yararlılık Ölçeği : Geliştirme, Güvenirlilik ve Geçerlilik Çalışmaları

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı: Bu çalışmanın amacı evrim teorisini öğrenmenin biyolojinin diğer konularını öğrenmeye faydasının olup olmadığını belirlemek için evrim yararlılık ölçeği geliştirmektir
Materyal ve Yöntem: Ölçek için ilgili literatür incelenmiş ve madde havuzu oluşturulmuştur. Ölçeğin pilot formu biyoloji öğretmen adaylarına uygulanmış, faktör yapısı ve güvenirliği açıklayıcı faktör analizleri ve Cronbach’s Alpha katsayısı ile incelenmiştir. Daha sonra, pilot test sonuçlarına göre ölçeğin son formu oluşturulmuştur. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu 222 biyoloji öğretmeni adayından oluşmaktadır. Yapı geçerliliğini kanıtlamak için açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri yapılmıştır.
Bulgular: Analizler sonucunda ölçeğin tek boyutlu bir yapıya sahip olduğu ve % 58.6 varyans açıkladığı görülmüştür. Ölçeğin güvenirliliğini incelemek amacıyla Cronbach Alfa iç tutarlılık katsayısı hesaplanmış ve 0,94 olduğu bulunmuştur. Çalışma sonunda 13 maddeden oluşan Evrim Yararlılık Ölçeği'nin (EYÖ) evrim teorisinin algılanan faydasını geçerli ve güvenilir bir şekilde ölçebileceği sonucuna varıldı.
Önemli Vurgular: Evrim teorisinin biyolojinin diğer konularını anlamaya faydasının olup olmadığını belirleyecek bir ölçek geliştirmenin alandaki boşluğu dolduracağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Evrim teorisi, Ölçek geliştirme, Yararlılık ölçeği, Biyoloji eğitimi

Kaynakça

• Aguillard, D. 1999. “Evolution education in Louisiana public schools. A decade following Edwards v. Aguillard” American Biology Teacher 61(3): 182-188. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450650
• Alter, B. J., and G. E. Nelson. 2002. “Perspective: Teaching Evolution in Higher Education.” Evolution 56: 1891–1901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00115.x
• Archila, P. A., and Molina, J. 2018. “Evolution and creationism: views of students in a Colombian university—findings from 7 years of data using a three-question survey.” Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9746-3
• Asghar, A., Wiles, J., and Alters, B. 2007. “Canadian Pre-service Elementary Tearchers’ Conceptions of Biological Evolution and Evolution Education.” MCGILL Journal of Education 42(2): 189-208.
• Ayala, F. J. 2013. Biology and religion: the case for evolution. In K. Kampourakis (Ed.), The philosophy of biology: a companion for educators (pp. 161–177). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Banet, E., and G. E. Ayuso. 2003. “Teaching of Biological Inheritance and Evolution of Living Beings in Secondary School.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (3): 373–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145716
• Barnes, M. E., and Brownell, S. E. 2018. “Experiences and practices of evolution instructors at Christian universities that can inform culturally competent evolution education.” Science Education 102(1): 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21317
• Bergman, J. 1979. “Attitude of university students toward the teaching of creation and evolution in the schools.” Origins 6: 64-66.
• Berkman, M.B. and Plutzer, E. 2011. “Defeating Creationism in the Courtroom, But Not in Classroom.” Science Education 331: 404-405. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198902
• Bishop, B. A. and Anderson C. W. 1990. “Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27 (5): 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270503
• Blackwell, W.H., Powell, M.J. and Dukes, G.H. 2003. “The problem of student acceptance of evolution.” Journal of Biological Education 37(2): 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655852
• BouJaoude S., Asghar, A., Wiles, J.R., Jaber, L., Sarieddine, D. and Alters, B. 2010. “Biology professors' and teachers' positions regarding biological evolution and evolution education in a Middle Eastern Society.” International Journal of Science Education First Article: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.489124
• Brem, S.K., Ranney, R. and Schindel, J. 2003. “Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory.” Science Education 87(2): 181-206. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10105
• Bybee, R. W. 1997. Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Bybee, R. (2001). “Teaching about evolution: Old controversy, new challenges.” BioScience 51(4). https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0309:TAEOCN]2.0.CO;2
• Clough, M.P. 1994. “Diminish students‟ resistance to biological evolution.” The American Biology Teacher 56 (7): 409–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449871
• Dagher, Z.R. and BouJaoude, S. 1997. “Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34: 429- 445. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199705)34:5<429::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S
• Dager, Z.R., and Bojujoude, S. 2005. “Students perceptions of the natüre of evolutionary theory.” Science Education 89: 378-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20054
• DeVellis, R. F. 2003. Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.): Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Dobzhansky, T. 1973. “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution.” The American Biology Teachers 35(3): 125-129. https://doi.org/10.2307/4444260
• Evans, E.M. 2001. “Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution.” Cognitive Psychology 42: 217–266. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0749
• Gallup. 2014. In US, 42% believe creationist view of human origins. Available at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/170822/believe-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx
• Grimes, Larry G. 2012. “Teaching evolution: A heuristic study of personal and cultural dissonance.” PhD.diss., University of the Pacific.
• Hill, J. P. 2014. “Rejecting evolution: The role of religion, education, and social networks.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 53: 575-594. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12127
• Ingram, E., and Nelson, C. 2006. “Relationship between achievement and students’ acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-level evolution course.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43: 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20093
• Johnson, R.L. and Peeples, E.E. 1987. “The Role of Scientific Understanding in College. Student Acceptance of Evolution.” American Biology Teacher 49: 93-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/4448445
• Kampourakis, K., and V. Zogza. 2007. “Students’ Preconceptions about Evolution: How Accurate is the Characterization as “Lamarckian” When Considering the History of Evolutionary Thought?” Science & Education 16: 393–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9019-9
• Kim, S. Y., and R. H. Nehm. 2010. “A Cross-cultural Comparison of Korean and American Science Teachers’ Views of Evolution and the Nature of Science.” International Journal of Science Education 10: 1–31.
• Konnemann, C., Asshoff, R., & Hammann, M. 2016. “Insights into the Diversity of Attitudes Concerning Evolution and Creation: A Multidimensional Approach.” Science Education 100(4): 673–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21226
• Lewontin, R.C. (1981). “Evolution, Creation Debate: A Time for Truth.” Bioscience 31, 559. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioscience/31.8.559
• Lord, T. And Marino, S. 1993. “How university students view the theory of evolution.” Journal of College Science Teaching 22: 353-357.
• Lovely, E.C., & Kondrick, L.C. 2008. “Teaching evolution: Challenging religious preconceptions.” Integrative and Comparative Biology 48(2): 164 –174. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icn026
• Mayr, E. 1970. Populations, species and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Moore, R. 2000. “The revival of creationism in the United States.” Journal of Biological Education, 35(1): 17-21, Winter. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655730
• Nadelson LS, Sinatra GM. 2009. “Educational professionals' knowledge and acceptance of evolution.” Evol Psychol. 7: 490–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490900700401
• National Association of Biology Teachers (NABT). 2004. NABT's Statement on Teaching Evolution.
• Nelson, C. & Skehan, J. 2000. The Creation Controversy and The Science Classroom. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
• Nunez, E. E., R. M. Pringle, and K. T. Showalter. 2012. “Evolution in the Caribbean Classroom: A Critical Analysis of the Role of Biology Teachers and Science Standards in Shaping Evolution Instruction in Belize.” International Journal of Science Education 34: 2421–2453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.700529
• Pazza, R., P. R. Penteado, and K. F. Kavalco. 2010. “Misconceptions about Evolution in Brazilian Freshmen Students.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 3: 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0187-3
• Pennock, R.T. 2010. “Should Students Be Able to Opt Out of Evolution? Some Philosophical Considerations.” Evolution Education Outreach, 3: 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0222-4
• Popper. K. 1957. The poverty of historicism. Boston: The Beacon Press.
• Rice, Justin W., Joanne K. Olson, and James T. Colbert. 2010. “University evolution education: The effect of evolution instruction on biology majors’ content knowledge, attitude toward evolution, and theistic position.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 4(1): 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0289-y
• Rissler, LJ, Duncan, SI, & Caruso, NM. 2014. “The relative importance of religion and education on university students’ views of evolution in the Deep South and state science standards across the United States.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 7(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-014-0024-1
• Rutledge, M. L., and M. A. Warden. 1999. “The development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument.” School Science and Mathematics 99:13–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17441.x
• Rutledge, M.L. and Warden M. A. 2000. “Evolutionary theory, the nature of science and high school biology teachers: Critical relationships.” The American Biology Teacher 62 (1): 23-31. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450822
• Sadler, T.D., Chambers, F.W. and Zeidler, D.L. 2004. “Students conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socio-scientific issue.” International Journal of Science Education 26: 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119456
• Sagan, C. 1980. Cosmos. New York. NY: Random House.
• Scharman, L.C. 2005. “A Proactive Strategy for Teaching Evolution.” The American Biology Teacher 67(1): 12-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/4451775
• Schermelleh-Engel , Karin , Helfried Moosbrugger , and Hans Müller 2003. “Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures.” Methods of Psychological Research Online 8 (2): 23-74.
• Schilders, M., Sloep, P., Peled, E. And Boersma, K. 2009. “Worldviews and Evolution in the Biology Classroom.” Journal of Biology Education 43(3): 115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2009.9656165
• Shankar, G. 1989. “Analysis of Factors İnfluencing the Teaching of Evolution and Creationism in Texas Public High School Biology Classes.” Ph.D. diss., University of the Texas Tech. Skybreak, A. 2009. The science of evolution and the myth of creationism. Chicago: Insight Press.
• Smith M. U., Snyder S. W., Devereaux R. S. 2016. “The GAENE—Generalized acceptance of evolution evaluation: Development of a new measure of evolution acceptance.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53, (9): 1289-1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21328
• Sober, E. 2000. Philosophy of Biology. 2nd Edn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. 2006. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Trani, R. 2004. “I won’t teach evolution; It’s against my religion.” The American Biology Teacher 66(6): 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2004)066[0419:IWTIAM]2.0.CO;2
• Village, A., and S. Baker. 2013. “ Reasons given by UK churchgoers for their stance on evolution” Journal of Beliefs & Values 34 (2): 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2013.801652
• Weld, J. and McNew, J.C. 1999. “Attitudes toward evolution.” The Science Teacher 66(9): 27-31.
• Wiles, J. R., and Asghar, A. 2007. “An effort to encourage dialogue around the teaching and learning of evolution.” McGill Journal of Education 42(2): 167-175.
• Williams, J.D. 2009. “Belief Versus Acceptance: Why do People not Believe in Evolution.” Science & Society 1255-1262. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.200900082