Metot, Araç ve Teknoloji Algısının İş Başarısı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Çevre ve Güvenlik Faktörlerinin Aracılık Rolü Üzerine Bir PLS-SEM Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, teknolojik ve yöntemsel uygulamaların bir işletmenin başarısı üzerindeki etkisini incelemek, çevresel ve güvenlik faktörlerinin bu ilişkide oynadığı aracılık rolünü analiz etmektir. Alan yazının büyük çoğunluğu Kanban, Toplam Verimli Bakım (TVB), Kaizen ve yalın üretimin etkinliğini doğrudan modeller aracılığıyla değerlendirirken, çevresel ve örgütsel bağlam değişkenleri yalnızca sınırlı miktarda incelenmiştir. Bu çalışma, nicel yöntemler kullanarak bu değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi sistematik bir çerçeve içinde incelemektedir. Veriler, Kısmi En Küçük Kareler Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (PLS-SEM) kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Yapısal model, SRMR değeri ve doğrudan ve dolaylı etkiler için ön yükleme kullanılarak ölçüm modelinin geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği doğrulandıktan sonra test edilmiştir. Bulgular, Metotlar, Araçlar ve Teknoloji (MAT) algısının İş Başarısı (İB) üzerindeki doğrudan etkisinin anlamlı olmadığını; ancak bu etkinin Çevre ve Güvenlik Faktörleri (ÇGF) algısı aracılığıyla güçlü ve anlamlı bir şekilde aracılık ettiğini göstermektedir. ÇGF'nin İB üzerindeki etkisinin yüksek olduğu bulunmuş olup, bu bulgu tam aracılık yapısını desteklemektedir. Sonuç olarak, teknolojik ve yöntemsel yatırımların iş başarısına dönüşebilmesi için güvenli, sağlıklı ve sürdürülebilir çalışma koşullarıyla bütünleştirilmesi gerektiği ortaya konmuştur. Çalışma, yalın dönüşüm ve dijitalleşme alan yazısına bağlamsal bir katkı sağlamakta ve yöneticilere çevre ve güvenliğin stratejik olarak değerlendirilmesi konusunda önemli çıkarımlar sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yalın üretim
• Dijitalleşme
• Çevre ve Güvenlik
• İş Başarısı
• PLS-SEM

The Effect of Methods, Tools, and Technology Perception on Business Success: A PLS-SEM Analysis of the Mediating Role of Environmental and Safety Factors

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the impact of technological and methodological practices on the success of a business and to analyze the mediating role of environmental and safety factors in this relationship. While the vast majority of the literature evaluates the effectiveness of Kanban, Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), Kaizen, and lean manufacturing directly through models, environmental and organizational context variables have been examined only to a limited extent. This study investigates the relationship between these variables within a systematic framework using quantitative methods. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The structural model was tested after verifying the validity and reliability of the measurement model using SRMR values and bootstrapping for direct and indirect effects. The findings show that the perceived Methods, Tools, and Technology (MTT) does not have a significant direct impact on Business Success (BS). However, this effect is strongly and significantly mediated through the perception of Environmental and Safety Factors (ESF). The effect of ESF on BS was found to be high, supporting the full mediation structure. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that technological and methodological investments must be integrated with safe, healthy, and sustainable working conditions to translate into business success. The study provides a contextual contribution to the literature on lean transformation and digitalization and offers important insights for managers regarding the strategic evaluation of environmental and safety considerations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Lean manufacturing
• Digitalization
• Environment and Safety
• Business Success
• PLS-SEM

Kaynakça

1. Abbasi Kamardi, A., Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., Masoumi, S., & Jafari-Sadeghi, V. (2025). Developing sustainable competitive advantages from the lens of resource-based view: evidence from IT sector of an emerging economy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 33(6), 775-797. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2022.2160485
2. Ahuja, I. P. S., & Khamba, J. S. (2008). Total productive maintenance implementation in a manufacturing organisation. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 3(3), 360. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2008.017504
3. Bazaluk, O., Tsopa, V., Cheberiachko, S., Deryugin, O., Radchuk, D., Borovytskyi, O., & Lozynskyi, V. (2023). Ergonomic risk management process for safety and health at work. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1253141
4. Bititci, U., Cocca, P., & Ates, A. (2016). Impact of visual performance management systems on the performance management practices of organisations. International Journal of Production Research, 54(6), 1571-1593. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1005770
5. Bortolotti, T., Danese, P., & Romano, P. (2013). Assessing the impact of just-in-time on operational performance at varying degrees of repetitiveness. International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 1117-1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.678403
6. Clarke, S. (2006). The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.315
7. Clarke, S. (2013). Safety leadership: A meta‐analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(1), 22-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02064.x
8. Cooper Ph.D., M. D. (2000). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science, 36(2), 111-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00035-7

9. Costa, B., Varejão, J., & Gaspar, P. D. (2024). Development of a Value Stream Map to Optimize the Production Process in a Luxury Metal Piece Manufacturing Company. Processes, 12(8), 1612. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12081612
10. Doğan, Ö., & Ertaş, F. C. (2018). Çevreye Duyarlılığın Rekabet Gücüne Etkisi: Yeşil Yıldızlı Oteller Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Maliye Finans Yazıları, 110, 217-233. https://doi.org/10.33203/mfy.448241
11. Ertaş, F. C., & DOĞAN, Ö. (2021). Çevresel Uygulamaların Maliyet ve Rekabet Gücü Açısından İşletmeye Etkisi: Yeşil Yıldızlı Oteller Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 23(3), 467-494. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.820649
12. Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2009). Relation between occupational safety management and firm performance. Safety Science, 47(7), 980-991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.022
13. Ferrazzi, M., Tortorella, G. L., Li, W., Costa, F., & Portioli-Staudacher, A. (2025). From People to Performance: Leveraging Soft Lean Practices for Environmental Sustainability in Large-Scale Production. Sustainability, 17(9), 3955. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093955
14. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
15. Fortuny-Santos, J., Ruiz-de-Arbulo-López, P., Zubeltzu-Jaka, E., & Lujan-Blanco, I. (2025). Lean manufacturing and environmental performance: a meta-analytic approach. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 16(4), 848-889. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-11-2023-0190
16. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd Edition). Sage Publications Inc.
17. He, Y., Wang, Y., & Payne, S. C. (2019). How is safety climate formed? A meta-analysis of the antecedents of safety climate. Organizational Psychology Review, 9(2-3), 124-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386619874870
18. Hernadewita, Hermiyetti, Hendra, Syukriah, Br. Surbakti, R. A., & Marizka, D. A. (2019). Overall Equipment Effectiveness Analyse for Performance of CNC Milling Machine Operation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 505(1), 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/505/1/012052
19. Himme, A. (2012). Critical success factors of strategic cost reduction. Journal of Management Control, 23(3), 183-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-012-0157-8
20. Jahncke, H., Hygge, S., Halin, N., Green, A. M., & Dimberg, K. (2011). Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), 373-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.07.002
21. Juan Santos Mejía Casas. (2025). Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and Industrial Applications: A Review Article. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(31s), 979-981. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i31s.5152
22. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard — Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 71-79.
23. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
24. Leksic, I., Stefanic, N., & Veza, I. (2020). The impact of using different lean manufacturing tools on waste reduction. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 15(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2020.1.351
25. Lucas, M. T., & Noordewier, T. G. (2016). Environmental management practices and firm financial performance: The moderating effect of industry pollution-related factors. International Journal of Production Economics, 175, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.003
26. Mittal, V., Han, K., Frennea, C., Blut, M., Shaik, M., Bosukonda, N., & Sridhar, S. (2023). Customer satisfaction, loyalty behaviors, and firm financial performance: what 40 years of research tells us. Marketing Letters, 34(2), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-023-09671-w
27. Montabon, F., Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2016). Making Sustainability Sustainable. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(2), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12103
28. Nielsen, K., Nielsen, M. B., Ogbonnaya, C., Känsälä, M., Saari, E., & Isaksson, K. (2017). Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work & Stress, 31(2), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2017.1304463
29. Pascu, I., Paraschiv, D., & Didu, A. (2020). Research about using the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis method for improving the quality process performance. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 898(1), 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/898/1/012037
30. Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2006). The relationship between organization strategy, total quality management (TQM), and organization performance––the mediating role of TQM. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.03.033
31. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Içinde Handbook of Market Research (ss. 1-47). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2
32. Senaviratna, N. A. M. R., & A. Cooray, T. M. J. (2019). Diagnosing Multicollinearity of Logistic Regression Model. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2019/v5i230132
33. Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00108-0
34. Sousa, S., Silva, M. M., & Gaspar, P. D. (2025). Implementation of SMED Workshops: A Strategic Approach in the Automotive Sector. Applied Sciences, 15(16), 8943. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15168943
35. Soylu, B., & Ayanoğlu, Y. (2022). Finansal ve Finansal Olmayan Performans ile Kurumsal Yönetim Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Kurumsal Yönetim Endeksindeki İşletmeler Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 24(MODAVICA Özel Sayısı), 202-227. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.1065876
36. Şahan, S. & Altınbay, A. (2023). Yalın Üretim Sistemi ve Bir Uygulama Örneği. Gümrük ve Ticaret Dergisi, 10(34), 21-39.
37. Şahin, B. & Akolaş, D. A. (2020). Yalın Üretim Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi ve Otomotiv Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(4), 37-48.
38. Tazegül, A., Yazarken, H., & Yerdelen Kaygın, C. (2016). İşletmelerin Finansal Başarılı ve Başarısız Olma Durumlarının Veri Madenciliği ve Lojistik Regresyon Analizi ile Tahmin Edilebilirliği. Ege Akademik Bakış (Ege Academic Review), 16(1), 147-147. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2016116590
39. Vilaça, D. M., de Sá, J. C., Antony, J., Sony, M., & McDermott, O. (2025). Lean, Green, and Sustainability 4.0—A Systematic Literature Review. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70215