Konferans Bildirisi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Mediating Role of Emotional Commitment in the Effect of Perceived Organizational Support on Work Engagement

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 30, 224 - 237, 30.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.1422910

Öz

Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to determine the mediating role of affective commitment in the effect of organizational support perceived by academics about the higher education institution they are working in on their job integration.
Design/Methodology: In the study, 218 academics from state and foundation universities were reached through a questionnaire using convenience sampling method. The data obtained were analyzed by structural equation modeling with the help of LISREL program.
Findings: As a result of the analyses, it was determined that the organizational support perceived by academicians has a direct positive effect on their job integration. In addition to this result, it was determined that perceived organizational support has a positive effect on emotional commitment and emotional commitment has a positive effect on job integration. Within the framework of the final result, it has been concluded that emotional commitment plays a partial mediating role in the effect of organizational support perceived by academicians on their job integration.
Limitations: The limitations of the study include the fact that not all universities in Turkey could be reached during the research process and the assumption that the answers given to the statements in the questionnaire form reflect the real feelings and thoughts of the participants.
Originality/Value: The unique value of the research is that it focuses on understanding the perceptions and feelings of academicians, who support the development of countries in the fields of education and science, together with their perceptions and feelings about the organization they work in order to ensure their work engagement so that they can produce more efficient and high performance values.

Kaynakça

  • Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: The moderating influence of socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.288
  • Armstrong-Stassen, M., & Ursel, N. D. (2009). Perceived organizational support, career satisfaction, and the retention of older workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, (82), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X288838
  • Arshadi, N. & G. Hayavi (2013). The effect of perceived organizational support on affective commitment and job performance: mediating role of OBSE. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 739-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.637
  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 389-411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
  • Bal, E. (2008). Self-efficacy, contextual factors and well-being: The impact of work engagement (Yayın No: 221379) [Doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurumu Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  • Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, (10), 1-9. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1156&context=pare
  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler ı̇çin çok değişkenli ı̇statistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi.
  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (and sex and drugs and rock ’n’ roll). Sage.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, (18), 382-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3150980 Gujarati, D. N. (1995). Basic econometrics. McGraw-Hill.
  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Homans, G. C. (1984). Coming to my senses: The autobiography of a social scientist. Transaction Books
  • Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
  • Karagöz, Y. (2017). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı nitel-nicel-karma bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve yayım etiği. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Kim, K. Y., Eisenberger, R. & Baik, K. (2016). Perceived organizational support and affective organizational commitment: Moderating influence of perceived organizational competence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(4), 558-583. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2081
  • Kurtessis J. N., Eisenberger R., Ford M. T., Buffardi L. C., Stewart K. A., & Adis, C. S., (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554
  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job Burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, (52), 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
  • Meyer, J., Allen, N., & Smith, C. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Some methodology consideretions. Journal of Applied Psychology, (78), 538-551. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
  • Meyer, J., & Allen, N. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resources Management Review, (1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
  • Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256. https://doi.org/10.2307/259230
  • Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W., & Steers, R.M. (1982) Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. Academic Press.
  • Panaccio, A., & Vandenberghe, C. (2009). Perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and psychological well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(2), 224-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.002
  • Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825
  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
  • Rich, B.L. Lepine, J.A., & Crawford, E.R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468988
  • Saks, A. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 7(21), 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
  • Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2000). Change in job search behaviors and employment outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(2), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1714
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002a). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
  • Schaufeli, W., Martinez, I., Marques Pinto, A., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. (2002b). Burnout and engagement in university students: Across national study. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, (33), 464-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K. & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of signicance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251060246_Evaluating_the_Fit_of_Structural_Equation_Models_Tests_of_Significance_and_Descriptive_Goodness-of-Fit_Measures
  • Sivalogathasan, V., & Wu, X. (2015), Impact of organization motivation on intellectual capital and innovation capability of the textile and apparel industry in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Innovation Science, 7(2), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1260/1757-2223.7.2.153
  • Sürücü, L., & Maslakçı, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694-2726. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540
  • Sürücü, L., Şeşen, H., & Maslakçı, A. (2023). Regression, mediation/moderation, and structural equation modeling with SPSS, AMOS, and PROCESS Macro. Livre de Lyon.
  • Sürücü, L., Yıkılmaz, İ., & Maslakçı, A. (2022). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) in quantitative researches and practical considerations. Center for Open Science.
  • Turunç, Ö., & Çelik, M. (2010). Algılanan örgütsel desteğin çalışanların i̇ş-aile, aile-i̇ş çatışması, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve i̇şten ayrılma niyetine etkisi: Savunma sektöründe bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 209-232. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/32206
  • Wasti, S. (2000). Meyer ve Allen'in üç boyutlu örgütsel bağlılık ölçeğinin geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik analizi. 8. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, (s. 4012-410) içinde. Nevşehir.
  • Webster, A. (1995). Applied statistics for business and economics. Prentice-Hall.
  • Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 418-428. https://doi.org/10.2307/257334

Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin İşle Bütünleşme Üzerindeki Etkisinde Duygusal Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 30, 224 - 237, 30.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.1422910

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, akademisyenlerin görev yapmakta oldukları yükseköğretim kurumuna ilişkin algıladıkları örgütsel desteğin işle bütünleşmeleri üzerindeki etkisinde duygusal bağlılığın aracı rolünü belirlemektir.
Tasarım/Yöntem: Araştırmada, kolayda örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak devlet ve vakıf üniversitelerindeki 218 akademisyene anket yoluyla ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler, LISREL programı yardımıyla yapısal eşitlik modeliyle analiz edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Analizler sonucunda; akademisyenlerin algıladığı örgütsel desteğin işle bütünleşmeleri üzerinde doğrudan olumlu yönde bir etkiye sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu sonucun yanı sıra algılanan örgütsel desteğin duygusal bağlılık üzerinde ve duygusal bağlılığın işle bütünleşme üzerinde olumlu etkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ulaşılan nihai sonuç çerçevesinde duygusal bağlılığın, akademisyenlerin algıladıkları örgütsel desteğin işle bütünleşmeleri üzerindeki etkisinde kısmi aracı bir rol üstlendiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
Sınırlılıklar: Araştırma sürecinde Türkiye’deki bütün üniversitelere ulaşılamamış olması ve anket formunda yer alan ifadelere verilen yanıtların, katılımcıların gerçek duygu ve düşüncelerini yansıttığının varsayılması, araştırmanın sınırlılıklarını oluşturmaktadır.
Özgünlük/Değer: Eğitim ve bilim alanlarında ülkelerin kalkınmasına destek olan akademisyenlerin daha verimli ve yüksek performanslı değerler üretebilmeleri için işle bütünleşmelerini sağlamak üzere çalıştıkları örgüte ilişkin algılarını ve duygularını birlikte anlamaya odaklanması, araştırmanın özgün değerini oluşturmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: The moderating influence of socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.288
  • Armstrong-Stassen, M., & Ursel, N. D. (2009). Perceived organizational support, career satisfaction, and the retention of older workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, (82), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X288838
  • Arshadi, N. & G. Hayavi (2013). The effect of perceived organizational support on affective commitment and job performance: mediating role of OBSE. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 739-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.637
  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 389-411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
  • Bal, E. (2008). Self-efficacy, contextual factors and well-being: The impact of work engagement (Yayın No: 221379) [Doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurumu Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  • Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, (10), 1-9. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1156&context=pare
  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler ı̇çin çok değişkenli ı̇statistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi.
  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (and sex and drugs and rock ’n’ roll). Sage.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, (18), 382-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3150980 Gujarati, D. N. (1995). Basic econometrics. McGraw-Hill.
  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Homans, G. C. (1984). Coming to my senses: The autobiography of a social scientist. Transaction Books
  • Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
  • Karagöz, Y. (2017). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı nitel-nicel-karma bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve yayım etiği. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Kim, K. Y., Eisenberger, R. & Baik, K. (2016). Perceived organizational support and affective organizational commitment: Moderating influence of perceived organizational competence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(4), 558-583. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2081
  • Kurtessis J. N., Eisenberger R., Ford M. T., Buffardi L. C., Stewart K. A., & Adis, C. S., (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554
  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job Burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, (52), 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
  • Meyer, J., Allen, N., & Smith, C. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Some methodology consideretions. Journal of Applied Psychology, (78), 538-551. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
  • Meyer, J., & Allen, N. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resources Management Review, (1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
  • Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256. https://doi.org/10.2307/259230
  • Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W., & Steers, R.M. (1982) Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. Academic Press.
  • Panaccio, A., & Vandenberghe, C. (2009). Perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and psychological well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(2), 224-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.002
  • Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825
  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
  • Rich, B.L. Lepine, J.A., & Crawford, E.R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468988
  • Saks, A. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 7(21), 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
  • Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2000). Change in job search behaviors and employment outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(2), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1714
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002a). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
  • Schaufeli, W., Martinez, I., Marques Pinto, A., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. (2002b). Burnout and engagement in university students: Across national study. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, (33), 464-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K. & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of signicance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251060246_Evaluating_the_Fit_of_Structural_Equation_Models_Tests_of_Significance_and_Descriptive_Goodness-of-Fit_Measures
  • Sivalogathasan, V., & Wu, X. (2015), Impact of organization motivation on intellectual capital and innovation capability of the textile and apparel industry in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Innovation Science, 7(2), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1260/1757-2223.7.2.153
  • Sürücü, L., & Maslakçı, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694-2726. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540
  • Sürücü, L., Şeşen, H., & Maslakçı, A. (2023). Regression, mediation/moderation, and structural equation modeling with SPSS, AMOS, and PROCESS Macro. Livre de Lyon.
  • Sürücü, L., Yıkılmaz, İ., & Maslakçı, A. (2022). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) in quantitative researches and practical considerations. Center for Open Science.
  • Turunç, Ö., & Çelik, M. (2010). Algılanan örgütsel desteğin çalışanların i̇ş-aile, aile-i̇ş çatışması, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve i̇şten ayrılma niyetine etkisi: Savunma sektöründe bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 209-232. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/32206
  • Wasti, S. (2000). Meyer ve Allen'in üç boyutlu örgütsel bağlılık ölçeğinin geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik analizi. 8. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, (s. 4012-410) içinde. Nevşehir.
  • Webster, A. (1995). Applied statistics for business and economics. Prentice-Hall.
  • Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 418-428. https://doi.org/10.2307/257334
Toplam 41 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Strateji, Yönetim ve Örgütsel Davranış (Diğer)
Bölüm KONFERANS BİLDİRİLERİ
Yazarlar

Nida Palabıyık 0000-0001-8567-3711

Esra Akay 0000-0001-8343-3490

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Mayıs 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 20 Ocak 2024
Kabul Tarihi 6 Mayıs 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 30

Kaynak Göster

APA Palabıyık, N., & Akay, E. (2024). Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin İşle Bütünleşme Üzerindeki Etkisinde Duygusal Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü. Akademik Araştırmalar Ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), 16(30), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.1422910
AMA Palabıyık N, Akay E. Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin İşle Bütünleşme Üzerindeki Etkisinde Duygusal Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD). Mayıs 2024;16(30):224-237. doi:10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.1422910
Chicago Palabıyık, Nida, ve Esra Akay. “Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin İşle Bütünleşme Üzerindeki Etkisinde Duygusal Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü”. Akademik Araştırmalar Ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD) 16, sy. 30 (Mayıs 2024): 224-37. https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.1422910.
EndNote Palabıyık N, Akay E (01 Mayıs 2024) Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin İşle Bütünleşme Üzerindeki Etkisinde Duygusal Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD) 16 30 224–237.
IEEE N. Palabıyık ve E. Akay, “Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin İşle Bütünleşme Üzerindeki Etkisinde Duygusal Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü”, Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), c. 16, sy. 30, ss. 224–237, 2024, doi: 10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.1422910.
ISNAD Palabıyık, Nida - Akay, Esra. “Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin İşle Bütünleşme Üzerindeki Etkisinde Duygusal Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü”. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD) 16/30 (Mayıs 2024), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.1422910.
JAMA Palabıyık N, Akay E. Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin İşle Bütünleşme Üzerindeki Etkisinde Duygusal Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD). 2024;16:224–237.
MLA Palabıyık, Nida ve Esra Akay. “Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin İşle Bütünleşme Üzerindeki Etkisinde Duygusal Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü”. Akademik Araştırmalar Ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), c. 16, sy. 30, 2024, ss. 224-37, doi:10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.1422910.
Vancouver Palabıyık N, Akay E. Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin İşle Bütünleşme Üzerindeki Etkisinde Duygusal Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD). 2024;16(30):224-37.