Türkiye'de Patoloji Laboratuvarı Çalışanlarının Yaşadığı İş Kazaları

Öz

Patoloji laboratuvar çalışanları, kimyasal ve fiziksel riskler de dahil olmak üzere çeşitli mesleki tehlikelere sıklıkla maruz kalmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, patoloji laboratuvarlarında mesleki kazaların yaygınlığını ve bu kazaların oluşumunu etkileyen faktörleri belirlemektir. Türkiye genelindeki ikinci ve üçüncü basamak hastanelerde çalışan 486 patoloji laboratuvarı çalışanına yapılandırılmış, öz bildirime dayalı çevrimiçi bir anket uygulandı. Ankette iş kazalarının sıklığı ve özellikleri değerlendirildi. 486 katılımcının 364'ü (%74,9) en az bir iş kazası geçirdiğini bildirdi. Ancak, bu olayların yarısından azı iş kazası olarak tanımlandı (p < 0,001) ve yalnızca %27,5'i resmi olarak bildirildi. Patologların kaza oranı (%78,6), yardımcı sağlık personeline (%69,9) göre anlamlı derecede daha yüksekti (p = 0,029). İş kazası riski, patologlar arasında yardımcı sağlık personeline göre 1,73 kat, üçüncü basamak kurumlarda çalışanlar arasında ise 1,83 kat daha yüksekti. Ayrıca, mesleki deneyim arttıkça iş kazası riski azalıyordu. Tüm laboratuvar çalışanlarının, özellikle de patologların iş kazası riski altında olduğu belirlenmiştir. İş kazalarının net bir şekilde tanımlanması ve önleyici stratejiler konusunda farkındalığın artırılması esastır. Müdahalelerde, laboratuvar çalışanlarının güvenlik protokolleri konusunda eğitimine öncelik verilmeli ve iş sağlığı ve güvenliği birimlerine zamanında bildirim yapılmasının önemi vurgulanmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• laboratuvar
• iş kazası
• iş güvenliği
• patoloji bölümü

Occupational Accidents Experienced by Pathology Laboratory Employees in Türkiye

Öz

Pathology laboratory professionals are frequently exposed to diverse occupational hazards including chemical and physical risks. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of occupational accidents and identify determinants influencing their occurrence in pathology laboratories. A structured, self-reported online survey was administered to 486 laboratory personnel—comprising consultant pathologists, residents, and laboratory technicians—working in secondary and tertiary care centers across Türkiye. Of the 486 participants, 364 (74.9%) reported having experienced at least one occupational incident. However, fewer than half of these incidents were recognized as occupational accidents (p < 0.001) and only 27.5% were officially reported. The pathologists had a significantly higher accident rate (78.6%) than assistant health personnels (69.9%) (p = 0.029). Multivariate analysis revealed that the odds of experiencing an accident were 1.73 times higher among pathologists compared to allied health personnel (p = 0.029). Furthermore, the risk of occupational accidents was inversely correlated with professional tenure. It has been determined that all laboratory workers, especially pathologists, are at risk of occupational accidents. Clear definitions of occupational accidents and increased awareness of preventive strategies are essential. The education of laboratory staff on safety protocols should be prioritized and the importance of timely reporting to occupational health and safety units should be emphasized in interventions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• laboratory
• occupational accident
• occupational safety
• pathology department

Kaynakça

1. P. Carneiro, A. C. Braga, and R. Cabuço, “Professionals working in operating rooms: A characterization of biological and chemical risks,” Work, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 869–876, 2019, doi: 10.3233/WOR-193027.
2. G. D. Nielsen, S. T. Larsen, and P. Wolkoff, “Re-evaluation of the WHO (2010) formaldehyde indoor air quality guideline for cancer risk assessment,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 35–61, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1733-8.
3. Republic of Türkiye Social Security Institution, “About occupational exposure,” Jun. 25, 2021.
4. C.-M. Hsieh, C.-J. Chen, T.-T. Peng, S. Chen, and P.-H. Chen, “The relationship between workplace justice and self-reported occupational accidents in construction employees of Taiwan,” Industrial Health, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 282–286, 2020, doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2019-0131.
5. F. R. Fritzsche et al., “Occupational health risks of pathologists—results from a nationwide online questionnaire in Switzerland,” BMC Public Health, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2012, doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1054.
6. T. N. Hanvold et al., “Occupational safety and health among young workers in the Nordic countries: A systematic literature review,” Safety and Health at Work, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.12.003.
7. A. Turkkan and K. Pala, “Trends in occupational injuries and fatality in Turkey,” International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 457–462, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10803548.2016.1153224.
8. F. Ç. U. Küçük and A. Ilgaz, “Causes of coal mine accidents in the world and Turkey,” Turkish Thoracic Journal, vol. 16, suppl. 1, p. S9, 2015, doi: 10.5152/ttd.2015.003.

9. K. Celik et al., “Occupational injury patterns of Turkey,” World Journal of Emergency Surgery, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2013, doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-8-57.
10. C. Sagoe-Moses, R. D. Pearson, J. Perry, and J. Jagger, “Risks to health care workers in developing countries,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 345, no. 7, pp. 538–541, 2001, doi: 10.1056/nejm200108163450711.
11. M. Köroğlu et al., “Employee safety and biosafety applications in microbiology laboratories: A multicenter evaluation in Turkey,” Mikrobiyoloji Bulteni, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 347–367, 2020, doi: 10.5578/mb.69634.
12. R. Sun et al., “Analysis on occupational hazard cognition of medical personnel in department of pathology and occupational health management situation of 13 hospitals in a city,” Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 632–635, 2019, doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2019.08.019.
13. U. Ochmann and S. Wicker, “Needlestick injuries of healthcare workers,” Anaesthesist, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 569–580, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-0603-1.
14. A. R. Deipolyi, A. M. Prabhakar, S. Naidu, and R. Oklu, “Needlestick injuries in interventional radiology are common and underreported,” Radiology, vol. 285, no. 3, pp. 870–875, 2017, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170103.
15. F. R. Fritzsche, M. Dietel, W. Weichert, and A. C. Buckendahl, “Cut-resistant protective gloves in pathology—effective and cost-effective,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 452, no. 3, pp. 313–318, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s00428-008-0576-y.
16. M. Jalali et al., “Occupational exposure to formaldehyde, lifetime cancer probability, and hazard quotient in pathology lab employees in Iran: A quantitative risk assessment,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1878–1888, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10627-0.
17. S. Burgaz et al., “Cytogenetic analysis of buccal cells from shoe-workers and pathology and anatomy laboratory workers exposed to n-hexane, toluene, methyl ethyl ketone and formaldehyde,” Biomarkers, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 151–161, 2002, doi: 10.1080/13547500110113242.
18. S. Khan, “The dark side of being a pathologist: Unravelling the health hazards,” Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 46–50, 2024, doi: 10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_1148_21.
19. F. Durur, M. Alper, and I. Aydın, “5S yönteminin bir kamu hastanesi patoloji laboratuvarında uygulanması,” Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Health Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 122–127, 2020, doi: 10.5336/healthsci.2019-70371.
20. Y. M. Al Eryani et al., “Unintentional injuries in the three reference laboratories: Sana'a, Yemen,” International Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 10, p. 174, 2019, doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_160_17.
21. E. M. Mbaisi, Z. Ng’ang’a, P. Wanzala, and J. Omolo, “Prevalence and factors associated with percutaneous injuries and splash exposures among health-care workers in a provincial hospital, Kenya, 2010,” Pan African Medical Journal, vol. 14, p. 10, 2013, doi: 10.11604/pamj.2013.14.10.1373.
22. A. Sarwar, A. Begum, K. Cheema, and M. Rauf, “Occupational health risks among pathologists and pathology trainees: An analysis of prevalence and factors,” Esculapio, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 193–198, 2023, doi: 10.51273/esc2513.
23. M. Kadivar, E. Kabir-Mokamelkhah, and Z. Habibi-Shams, “Work-related hazards among pathologists and residents of pathology: Results of a cross-sectional study in Iran,” Iranian Journal of Pathology, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 274, 2021, doi: 10.30699/IJP.2021.132380.2473.