Yeni Kamu (Yönetimi, İşletmeciliği, Hizmeti)

Öz

Bilimsel ve teknolojik ilerlemeler, ideolojiler, ekonomik, siyasi ve toplumsal dönüşümler, kamu yönetimi biliminin gelişmesi ve kendisini bir başka ‘yeni’nin içerisinde bulması için kaçınılmazdır. Bu çalışma “Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Hareketi”nden “Yeni Kamu Hizmeti”ne kadar geçen süreci “yeni” kavramı etrafında ele almaktadır. 1960’lı yıllarda ABD’de yaşanan toplumsal olaylar ve yönetsel krizlerin sonucunda kamu yönetiminin kimlik krizine çözüm bulma arayışları yeni kamu yönetimi hareketi bağlamında değerlendirilmektedir. 1970’li yıllarda petrol krizlerinin neden olduğu ekonomik bunalımlar devletin rolünün yeniden sorgulanmasına yol açmış ve yeni kamu işletmeciliğinin doğuşuna zemin hazırlamıştır. 1990’lı yıllara gelindiğinde yeni kamu işletmeciliğine yapılan eleştiriler kendisine alternatif yaklaşımların doğuşuna zemin hazırlamıştır. Yeni kamu işletmeciliğinin bazı yönlerinin tartışıldığı ortamda kendisine alternatif yaklaşımlardan birisi olan yeni kamu hizmetinin doğuşu ve ilkeleri ile kamu yönetiminde yaşanan paradigma değişimlerinin nedenlerini irdelemek bu çalışmanın amacını oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma geleneksel yaklaşımdan sonra önüne yeni ekini alan yaklaşımları bütüncül ve karşılaştırmalı ele alarak kavramsal çerçeve sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yeni Kamu Yönetimi
• Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliği
• Yeni Kamu Hizmeti

New Public (Administration, Management, Service)

Öz

Scientific and technological advances, ideologies, economic, political and social transformations are inevitable for the science of public administration to develop and find itself in another 'new'. This study deals with the process from the "New Public Administration Movement" to the "New Public Service" around the concept of "new". As a result of the social events and administrative crises in the USA in the 1960s, the search for a solution to the identity crisis of the public administration is evaluated in the context of the new public administration movement. The economic depressions caused by the oil crises in the 1970s led to the re-questioning of the role of the state and paved the way for the emergence of the new public management. In the 1990s, the criticisms made to the new public administration paved the way for the emergence of alternative approaches. The purpose of this study is to examine the emergence and principles of the new public service, which is one of the alternative approaches, and the reasons for the paradigm shifts in public administration in an environment where some aspects of new public management are discussed. The study presents a conceptual framework by considering the approaches that have new suffixes after the traditional approach in a holistic and comparative manner.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• New Public Administration
• New Public Management
• New Public Service

Kaynakça

1. Aberbach, J. ve Christensen, T. (2005). Citizens And Consumers. Public Management Review, 7(2), 225-246.
2. Ackroyd, S., Kirkpatrick, I. ve Walker, R. (2007). Public Management Reform In The Uk And Its Consequences For Professional Organisation: A Comparative Analysis. Public Administration, 85 (1), 9-26.
3. Ağbal, N. (2000). Public Administration Theory and International Trends. Türk İdare Dergisi, 72(428), 223-225.
4. Almqvist, R. ve Skoog, M. (2006). Management Control Transformations: Change Mechanisms And Their Constant Impact On Management Control Systems. Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, 10(3), 132-154.
5. Aucoin, P. (1990). Administrative Reform In Public Management: Paradigms, Principles And Pendulums. Governance, 3(2), 115-137.
6. Ayhan, E. ve Önder, M. (2017). Yeni Kamu Hizmeti Yaklaşımı: Yönetişime Açılan Bir Kapı. Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 3(2), 19-48.
7. Aykaç, B., Yayman, H. ve Özer A. (2003). Türkiye’de İdari Reform Hareketlerinin Eleştirel Bir Tahlili. Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 5(2), 153-179.
8. Bolton, S. (2002). Consumer As King In The NHS. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(2), 129-139.

9. Borins, S. (2002). New Public Management, North American Style. McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S. and Ferlie, E. (Ed.), The New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects içinde, (ss. 181-194). New York: Routledge.
10. Bourgon, J. (2007). New Directions For Public Administration: Serving Beyond The Predictable. Public Policy and Administration, 24(3), 309–330.
11. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C. ve Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and The New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456.
12. Christensen, T. ve Lægreid, P. (2002). New Public Management: Puzzles of Democracy and The Influence of Citizens. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(3), 267-295.
13. Cleveland, H. (2000). The Future Is Uncentralised. Public Administration Review, 60(4), 293-297.
14. Connell, R., Fawcett, B. ve Meagher, G. (2009). Neoliberalism, New Public Management and The Human Service Professions. Journal of Sociology, 45(4), 331-338.
15. Delican, M. Kamu yönetimi ders notları [PDF Belgesi]. Ders Notları Çevrimiçi Web Sitesi: https://cdn-acikogretim.istanbul.edu.tr/auzefcontent/21_22_Guz/kamu_yonetimi/index.html adresinden 12.05.2022 tarihinde erişildi.
16. Denhardt, R. B., ve Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549-559.
17. Denhardt, R. B., ve Denhardt, J. V. (2001). The New Public Service: Putting Democracy First. National Civic Review, 90(4), 391-401.
18. Denhardt, J. V., ve Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service Revisited. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664-672.
19. Diefenbach, T. (2009). The Ideological Use of New Public Management Concepts During Organisational Change Initiatives. Todnem R. ve Macleod C. (Ed.) Managing Organisational Change in Public Services: International Issues, Challenges and Cases içinde (ss. 58-73). London: Routledge.
20. Durst, S. ve Newell, C. (1999). Better, Faster, Stronger Government Reinvention In The 1990s. American Review of Public Administration, 29(1), 61-75.
21. Edwards, J. (1998). Managerial Influences In Public Administration. International Journal of Organisational Theory and Behaviour, 1(4), 553-583.
22. Eren, V. (2001). Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Anlayışı (Büyükşehir ve İl Belediyeleri üzerinde bir araştırma). (Doktora Tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
23. Eryılmaz, B. (2000). Kamu Yönetimi. İstanbul: Erkam Matbaası.
24. Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L. ve Pettigrew, A. (1996) The New Public Management in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Frederickson, G. (1971). “Toward a New Public Administration”, Frank Marini, (ed.), Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, Chandler Publishing Company, Scranton, 1971, s. 309-331.
26. Frederickson, G. (1989). Minnowbrook II: Changing Epochs of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 49(2), 95-100.
27. Genç, F. N. (2010). Yeni Kamu Hizmeti Yaklaşımı. Türk İdare Dergisi, 466, 145-159.
28. Genç, N. (2015). Yeni Kamu Hizmeti: Vatandaş ve Kamu Yararı Temelinde Kamu Hizmetini Yeniden Düşünmek. Köseoğlu, Ö. Ve Sobacı, M.Z. (Ed.), Kamu Yönetiminde Paradigma Arayışları: Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliği ve Ötesi içinde (ss. 129-149), Bursa: Dora Yayınevi.
29. Haque, M. S. (2004). New Public Management: Origins, Dimensions and Critical Implications. Public Administration and Public Policy, 1(1), 13-27.
30. Hartley, J., Alford, J., Hughes, O., ve Yates, S. (2015). Public Value And Political Astuteness In The Work Of Public Managers: The Art of The Possible. Public Administration, 93, 195–211.
31. Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Harvey, D. (2007). Neoliberalism As Creative Destruction. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610 (21), 21-44.
33. Hergüner, B. (2019). Kamu Yönetiminde Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar: Başlangıçtan Günümüze Kamu Yönetiminin Değişen Yüzü (2.baskı). İstanbul: Seçkin Yayıncılık
34. Hood, C. (1991) A Public Management For All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.
35. Hood, C. (1995). Contemporary Public Management: A New Global Paradigm? Public Policy and Administration, 10(2), 104-117.
36. Jos, P., ve Tompkins, M. (2009). Keeping It Public: Defending Public Service Values In A Customer Service Age. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1077–1086.
37. Kaboolian, L. (1998). The New Public Management: Challenging The Boundaries of the Management vs. Administration Debate. Public Administration Review, 58(3)189- 193.
38. Klein, R. (2010). The New Politics of the NHS: From Creation to Reinvention. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.
39. Lapsley, I. (1994). Market Mechanisms and The Management of Healthcare. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 7(8), 15-25.
40. Lapsley, I. (2009). New Public Management: The Cruellest Invention Of The Human Spirit? Abacus, 45(1), 1-21.
41. Lynn, L. (2006). Public Management: Old and New. New York/London: Routledge.
42. Matei, L. ve Flogaitis, S. (2011). Public Administration In The Balkans From Weberian Bureaucracy To New Public Management. https://www.academia.edu/45231251/Public_Administration_in_the_Balkans_from_Weberian_Bureaucracy_to_New_Public_Management (29.04.2022)
43. Minoque, M. (2001). Should Flawed Models of Public Management Be Exported: Issues and Practices. Mc Court, W. ve Minoque, M. (Ed.) The Internationalization of Public Management: Reinventing the Third World State içinde (ss. 20-43). Northampton MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
44. Muliawaty, D. L., Si, M., ve Muliawaty, L. (2019). The Role Of New Public Service Model In Developing Tourist Destination In Bandung City: A New Paradigm For Domestic Tourism Industry. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(6), 322-326.
45. Olssen, M. (2009). Liberalism, Neoliberalism, Social Democracy: Thin Communitarian Perspectives On Political Philosophy And Education. New York: Routledge.
46. Ormond, D. ve Loffler, E. (1998). New Public Management. What to Take and What to Leave. III. International Congress of CLAD on State and Public Administration Reform. Madrid, Spain.
47. Osborne, D. ve Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Penguin.
48. Osborne, S. ve McLaughlin, K. (2002). The New Public Management In Context. McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S.P. ve Ferlie, E. (Ed.), New Public Management Current Tends and Future Prospects içinde (ss. 07-14). Routledge: London.
49. Ömürgönülşen, U. ve Zengin. O. (2013). Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde Kamu Yönetimi. Karasu, K. (Ed.), Kamu Yönetimi Ülke İncelemeleri içinde (s. 313-412). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
50. Parker, M. ve Dent, M. (1996). Managers, Doctors And Culture: Changing an English Health District. Administration and Society, 38(3), 335-361.
51. Pollitt, C. ve Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press.
52. Pollitt, C., ve Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform, a comparative analysis. Politiques and Management Public, 18(4), 183-189.
53. Pollitt, C. (2002). Clarifying Convergence Striking Similarities and Durable Differences In Public Management Reform. Public Management Review, 4 (1), 471-492.
54. Pollitt, C. (2003). The Essential Public Manager. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
55. Pollitt, C., Van Thiel, S., ve Homburg, V. (2007). New Public Management in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
56. Radcliffe, J. ve Dent, M. (2005). Introduction: from New Public Management to the new governance? Policy and Politics, 33 (4), 617-622.
57. Runya, X. U., Qigui, S. U. N., ve Wei, S. I. (2015). The Third Wave of Public Administration: The New Public Governance. Canadian Social Science, 11(7), 11-21.
58. Savoie, D. (2006) What Is Wrong With the New Public Management? Canadian Public Administration, 38(1), 112-121.
59. Schimank, U. (2005). New Public Management and The Academic Profession: Reflections on the German Situation. Minerva, 43 (4), 361-376.
60. Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management: A New Narrative For Networked Governance? American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41-57.
61. Thatcher, M. (1993). The Downing Street Years. Harper: Collins.
62. Torres, L. (2004). Accounting and Accountability: Recent Developments In Government Financial İnformation Systems. Public Administration and Development, 24(5), 447–456.
63. Tuncer, A. ve Usta, S. (2013). İki Kriz Arasında Yönetim: Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliği. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (30), 181-195.
64. Turner, R. (2008). Neoliberal Ideology History, Concepts and Policies. Edinburgh: University Press Ltd.
65. Üstüner, Y. (2003). Kamu Yönetiminde Kimlik Sorunsalı, Aykaç, B. Durgun, Ş. Yayman, H. (Ed.), Türkiye’de Kamu Yönetimi içinde (ss. 595-606), Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi.
66. Waldo, D. (1955). The Study of Public Administration, New York: Random House
67. Waldo, D. (1966). But It’s Your Review, Public Administration Review, 26(3), 236-238.
68. Waldo, D. (1968a). Public Administration, David Sills, (Ed.), International Enycylopedia of the Social Sciences VIII içinde (ss. 145-156). New York: Macmillan and Free Press.
69. Waldo, D. (1968b). “Scope of the Theory of Public Administration”, James C. Charlesworth, (ed.), Theory and Practice of Public Administration: Scope, Objectives and Methods, The American Academy of Political and Social Science içinde (ss. 1-26)., Philadelphia, October, s.1-26.
70. Waldo, D. (1969). Public Administration and Change: Terra Paene Incognita. Journal of Comparative Administration, 1(1), 94-113.
71. Waldo, D. (1980). The Enterprise of Public Administration: A Summary View, California: Chandler&Sharp.
72. Wichowsky, A. ve Moynihan, D. P. (2008). Measuring How Administration Shapes Citizenship: A Policy Feedback Perspective On Performance Management. Public Administration Review, 68(5), 908-920.