Bibliometric Analysis of Concept Mapping Studies in Education

Yıl 2023, Sayı: 12, 1198 - 1215, 26.09.2023

Menşure Alkış Küçükaydın Hakan Ulum Ömer Gökhan Ulum

https://doi.org/10.51531/korkutataturkiyat.1342969

Öz

Concept mapping is a method used in many disciplines and at many levels. It is considered valuable to determine the latest trends in this method. Therefore, in this study, a bibliometric analysis of concept mapping studies published between 1985-2021 on the Web of Science database has been conducted. A total of 519 articles meeting the relevant inclusion criteria were identified. In the related analysis, the top authors, journals, institutions, and articles in the field of concept mapping were revealed. In addition, the co-word network structure in concept mapping studies was examined in terms of collaboration between institutions and authors. In the analyses performed, it was seen that most publications on the subject were from 2013, the top journal was Journal of Research in Science Teaching, and the top institution was the National Taiwan University of Science and Technology. Furthermore, it has been observed that there is not a great deal of co-authorship in the field of concept mapping. However, a binary connection between Kirscher, P., Wang, M., and Stoyanov, S. has been noted. The results have shown that concept mapping has a broad literature base. The study will be of tremendous benefit to the associated field.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bibliometrics, concept mapping, educational research

Eğitimde Kavram Haritalama Çalışmalarının Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Kavram haritalama, birçok disiplinde ve düzeyde kullanılan bir yöntemdir. Bu yöntemdeki son eğilimleri belirlemek için önemli bir yöntem olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu nedenle, bu çalışmada, Web of Science veri tabanında 1985-2021 yılları arasında yayınlanmış kavram haritalama çalışmalarının bibliyometrik bir analizi yapılmıştır. İlgili dâhil etme kriterlerini karşılayan toplam 519 makale belirlenmiştir. İlgili analizde, kavram haritalama alanındaki en önemli yazarlar, dergiler, kurumlar ve makaleler ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Ayrıca, kavram haritalama çalışmalarındaki kurumlar ve yazarlar arasındaki işbirliği açısından kavramsal kelime ağı yapısı incelenmiştir. Yapılan analizlerde, konuyla ilgili yayınların çoğunun 2013 yılında olduğu, en önemli derginin “Journal of Research in Science Teaching” olduğu ve en önemli kurumun “National Taiwan University of Science and Technology” olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca, kavram haritalama alanında çok fazla ortak yazarlık olmadığı gözlemlenmiştir. Ancak, Kirscher, P., Wang, M. ve Stoyanov, S. arasında ikili bir bağlantı olduğu belirtilmiştir. Sonuçlar, kavram haritalamanın geniş bir literatür tabanına sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Çalışma, ilgili alana büyük fayda sağlayacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bibliyometri, kavram haritalama, eğitim araştırması

Kaynakça

• Archambault, É., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2009). Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320-1326.
• Archambault, E´., & Larivière, V. (2010). The Limits of Bibliometrics for the Analysis of the Social Sciences and Humanities Literature. World Social Science Report (pp. 251–254). UNESCO Publishing.
• Astriani, D., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., Lukiati, B., & Purnomo, A. (2020). Mind Mapping in Learning Models: A Tool to Improve Student Metacognitive Skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(6), 4-17.
• Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. Grune and Stratton.
• Batdı, V. (2014). The Effect of Using the Concept-mapping Technique and Traditional Methods on the Achievement, Retention and Attitudes of Students: A Meta-analytic Study. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 42, 93-102.
• Beyerbach, B. A. (1988). Developing a Technical Vocabulary on Teacher Planning: Preservice Teachers’ Concept Maps. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(4), 339–347.
• Beyerbach, B. A., & Smith, J. M. (1990). Using a Computerized Concept Mapping Program to Assess Preservice Teachers’ Thinking about Effective Teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 961-971.
• Chang, S. L. & Chang, Y. (2008). Using Online Concept Mapping with Peer Learning to Enhance Concept Application. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(1), 17-27.
• Chen, M. R. A., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Effects of a Concept Mapping‐based Flipped Learning Approach on EFL Students’ English Speaking Performance, Critical Thinking Awareness and Speaking Anxiety. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 817-834.
• Cofie, R., Sarfo, J.O., & & Doe, P.F. (2021). Teaching and Learning of Genetics Using Concept Maps: An Experimental Study among Midwifery Students in Ghana. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(1), 29-34.
• Çelik, M., & Gerçek, C. (2019, June). Evaluation of Researches Concerning Concept Maps in Science Education. In Proceedings of the International Congresses on Education (ERPA 2019) (pp. 184-188).
• Daley, B. J., & Torre, D. M. (2010). Concept Maps in Medical Education: An Analytical Literature Review. Medical Education, 44(5), 440–448.
• De Sousa, L. O., Hay, E. A., & Liebenberg, D. (2019). Teachers’ Understanding of the Interconnectedness of Soil and Climate Change When Developing a Systems Thinking Concept Map for Teaching and Learning. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(4), 324-342.
• Donnelly, J. P. (2017). A Systematic Review of Concept Mapping Dissertations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 60, 186-193.
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
• Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The Eibliometric Analysis of Scholarly Production: How Great is the Impact?. Scientometrics, 105, 1809-1831.
• Garner, J. K., Kaplan, A., Hathcock, S., & Bergey, B. (2020). Concept Mapping as a Mechanism for Assessing Science Teachers’ Cross-disciplinary Field-based Learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(1), 8-33.
• Hartmeyer, R., Stevenson, M.P., & Bentsen, P. (2018). A systematic Review of Concept Mapping-based Formative Assessment Processes in Primary and Secondary Science Education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 598-619.
• Hill, L. H. (2008). Concept Mapping to Encourage Meaningful Student Learning. Adult Learning, 16(3/4), 7-13.
• Horton, P. B., McConney, A. A., Gallo, M., Woods, A. L., Senn, G. J., & Hamelin, D. (1993). An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Concept Mapping as an Instructional Tool. Science Education, 77(1), 95–111.
• Hwang, G. J., Huang, H., Wang, R. X., & Zhu, L. L. (2021). Effects of a Concept Mapping‐Based Problem‐posing Approach on Students’ Learning Achievements and Critical Thinking Tendency: An Application in Classical Chinese Learning Contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 374-493.
• Hwang, G. J., Zou, D., & Lin, J. (2020). Effects of a Multi-level Concept Mapping-based Question-posing Approach on Students’ Ubiquitous Learning Performance and Perceptions. Computers & Education, 149, 103815.
• Islam, I., Munim, K. M., Oishwee, S. J., Islam, A. N., & Islam, M. N. (2020). A Critical Review of Concepts, Benefits, and Pitfalls of Blockchain Technology Using Concept Map. IEEE Access, 8, 68333-68341.
• Jacobs-Lawson, J. M., & Hershey, D. A. (2002). Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool in Psychology Courses. Teaching of Psychology, 29(1), 25-29.
• Jankowska, M. (2010). Concept mapping-a Reflective Tool in Personal Development Planning. Assessment, Teaching & Learning Journal, 10, 14–17.
• Jianhua, L. (2013). The Assessment Agent System: Design, Development, and Evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 197-215.
• Kapuza, A. (2020). How Concept Maps with and without a List of Concepts Differ: The Case of Statistics. Education Sciences, 10(4), 91.
• Kassab, S. E., & Hussain, S. (2010). Concept Mapping Assessment in a Problem-based Medical Curriculum. Medical Teacher, 32(11), 926–931.
• Kotkas, T., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2021). Exploring Students’ Science-related Career Awareness Changes Through Concept Maps. Education Sciences, 11(4), 157.
• Koumaditis, K., & Hussain, T. (2017). Human Computer Interaction Research Through the Lens of a Bibliometric Analysis. In International Conference on Human-computer Interaction (pp. 23–37). Cham: Springer.
• Lehman, J.D., Carter, C., & Kahle, J.B. (1985). Concept Mapping, Vee Mapping, and Achievement - Results of a Field-study with Black High-school Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(7), 663-673.
• Liang, H. Y., Hsu, T. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). Promoting Children’s Inquiry Performances in Alternate Reality Games: A Mobile Concept Mapping‐based Questioning Approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1-20.
• Liu, P. L. (2016). Mobile English Vocabulary Learning Based on Concept-mapping Strategy. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 128-141.
• Liu, P. L., Chen, C. J., & Chang, Y. J. (2010). Effects of a Computer-assisted Concept Mapping Learning Strategy on EFL College Students’ English Reading Comprehension. Computers & Education, 54(2), 436–445.
• Liu, S., Kang, L., Liu, Z., Fang, J., Yang, Z., Sun, J., ... & Hu, M. (2021). Computer-supported Collaborative Concept Mapping: The Impact of Students’ Perceptions of Collaboration on Their Knowledge Understanding and Behavioural Patterns. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-20.
• Llinás, J. G., Macías, F. S., & Márquez, L. M. T. (2020). The Use of Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool in Physics Classes: Can One Use Concept Maps for Quantitative Evaluations?. Research in Science Education, 1789-1804.
• Machado, C.T., & Carvalho, A.A. (2020). Concept Mapping: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 68(1), 38-53.
• Malycha, C. P., & Maier, G. W. (2017). The Random-map Technique: Enhancing Mind-Mapping with a Conceptual Combination Technique to Foster Creative Potential. Creativity Research Journal, 29(2), 114–124.
• Martin, L. G., Martin, F. A., & Southworth, E. (2015). A Critical Review of Concept Mapping Research Literature: Informing Teaching and Learning Practices in GED Preparation Programs. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 27(3), 27–45.
• Mayer, R. E. (2002). Cognitive Theory and the Design of Multimedia Instruction: An Example of the Two-way Street Between Cognition and Instruction. Cambridge University Press.
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8 (5), 336-341.
• Morfidi, E., Mikropoulos, A., & Rogdaki, A. (2018). Using Concept Mapping to Improve Poor Readers’ Understanding of Expository Text. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 271-286.
• Mühling, A. (2016). Aggregating Concept Map Data to Investigate the Knowledge of Beginning CS Students. Computer Science Education, 26(2–3), 176–191.
• Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O.O. (2006). Learning with Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76, 413–448.
• Novak, J. D. (1993). Human Constructivism: A Unification of Psychological and Epistemological Phenomena in Meaning Making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6, 167–193.
• Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press.
• Ospina-Mateus, H., Jiménez, L. A. Q., Lopez-Valdes, F. J., & Salas-Navarro, K. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis in Motorcycle Accident Research: A Global Overview. Scientometrics, 121(2), 793-815.
• Pham, H. H., Vuong, Q. H., Luong, D. H., Nguyen, T. T., Dinh, V. H., & Ho, M. T. (2021). A Bibliometric Review of Research on International Student Mobilities in Asia with Scopus Dataset between 1984 and 2019. Scientometrics, 126, 5201-5224.
• Rosas, S. R., & Kane, M. (2012). Quality and Rigor of the Concept Mapping Methodology: A Pooled Study Analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(2), 236-245.
• Sánchez, A. D., Del Río, M. D. L. C., & García, J. Á. (2017). Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Wine Tourism in the Databases Scopus and WoS. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(1), 8-15.
• Schaal, S., Bogner, F. X., & Girwidz, R. (2010). Concept Mapping Assessment of Media Assisted Learning in Interdisciplinary Science Education. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 339-352.
• Si, J., Kong, H. H., & Lee, S. H. (2019). Developing Clinical Reasoning Skills Through Argumentation with the Concept Map Method in Medical Problem-based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(1), 5.
• Tan, E., de Weerd, J. G., & Stoyanov, S. (2021). Supporting Interdisciplinary Collaborative Concept Mapping with Individual Preparation Phase. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 607-626.
• Yue, M., Zhang, M., Zhang, C., & Jin, C. (2017). The Effectiveness of Concept Mapping on Development of Critical Thinking in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 52, 87-94.
• Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472